Elsevier

Biosystems Engineering

Volume 195, July 2020, Pages 89-96
Biosystems Engineering

Research Paper
The effect on tether tension when using trees to redirect live machine tethers during forest harvesting on steep slopes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.04.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This study develops a new model that includes friction and cutting forces to estimate cable tension around a rub tree.

  • Data was collected and used to estimate the friction coefficient and cutting deformation coefficient in the new model.

  • The change in tension is independent of the depth the cable cut into the tree.

  • Interaction between the surface toughness of the wood and the frictional surfaces of the cable requires further study.

Ground based forest harvesting machines are being used on steeper slopes with the aid of tethers to help maintain traction and stability. It is common to position a base machine containing the tether winch above the forest harvesting machine. This configuration is termed a live tether. The live tethers may be run around rub trees to reduce the time required to reposition the tether. This study developed a new model that includes both friction and cutting forces to estimate cable tension on either side of the rub tree. A dataset collected in the field was used to estimate the parameters in the model. The model appears to be promising; however, further work is required on the interaction of the cable cutting surfaces and the surface toughness of the wood. In general, it was found that the difference in the tension on either side of the rub tree increased with increasing change in angle, that the cable on average cut 3 mm deeper with each 10 m of the cable travel, and that the difference in tension was not correlated with the depth cut into the wood.

Introduction

Lindroos, La Hera, and Haggstrom (2017) suggest the main drivers of change in mechanized harvesting are the availability of new technology, the demand for new products, and the introduction of new regulations. Changes in regulations and the increased availability of new technology have been driving increased use of ground based mechanized harvesting systems on steep slopes. Harrill, Visser, and Ramond (2019) recount the initiation of the New Zealand Steep Land Harvesting Program that had the objectives of reducing harm, increasing productivity, and reducing costs through a heavy emphasis on mechanization. Tethering machines that are working on steep slopes is now a commonly accepted method to manage machine mobility and safety (Cavalli and Amishev, 2019, Holzfeind et al., 2019). Tether winches can be located on the harvesting machine in which case the tether is static, alternatively, the tether winch may be located on a base machine resulting in a live tether (i.e. the tether moves with respect to the ground).

The tether may be passed around trees or stumps in order to redirect it and to reduce the time required to reposition the base machine. Best practice documents are concerned about the management of tethers passed around trees and stumps (Naillon and Rappin, 2019). Their concerns include failure of the tree or stump, the line sliding off a stump, and for live tethers, inaccurate tension readings when the tension is measured at the base machine. The problem of a cable running around a circular post where the only interaction is Coulomb friction has been solved for many years (Sokolnikoff & Redheffer, 1958). Kimbell (1981) considered the problem of logging cables running around notched stumps as a V-belt running inside a notch, where friction is defined as a linear function of the normal force; however, these tests did not permit significant cutting of the cable into the tree. In addition, Kimbell (1981) used non-swaged cable, while most live tethers being used today are swaged. When using a rub tree to redirect a live tether that is supporting ground based harvesting equipment, the cable will quickly cut into the tree and the V-notch model may not be appropriate.

The objectives of this paper are to 1) to develop a new model for the tension in a cable running around a tree that includes a cutting force in addition to friction, and 2) to measure the percent increase in the tension for a limited sample of trees and to determine whether this is significantly affected by variables such as the depth the cable cuts into the tree and the change in direction of the cable as it passes around the tree.

Section snippets

Theory and calculation

Sokolnikoff and Redheffer (1958) consider a spinning circular wheel rubbing on a stationary belt and Inglis (1963) considers a moving cable bending around a stationary circular post. The force balance as suggested by Sokolnikoff and Redheffer (1958) is presented in Fig. 1. In both of these formulations the change in tension from one side of the post to the other is a function of friction, where the friction force is defined as the normal force multiplied by a constant. When considering the

Data collection

The study site was located in the McDonald Dunn Research Forest, which is located on the east side of the coast range in Oregon, and data were collected in the spring and summer of 2019. The field setup for this study is presented in Fig. 2. A John Deere 648E skidder was used as the braking machine, and a John Deere 648L skidder was used as the pulling machine. The tension in the tether was provided by the service brakes of the braking machine. Thus, steep grades were not required to conduct

Results

As suggested by Eq. (10) increasing θT increases the mean PercentDiff (Fig. 3); however, the effect varies by tree where Tree 2 is the least sensitive and Tree 4 is the most sensitive. The maximum values of PercentDiff do not show a clear trend with respect to increasing θT. For example, the highest maximum value found in this study was for Tree 2 at θT=60o; however, the maximum value for Tree 2 at θT=90owas only the fifth highest overall. For a given tree none of the maximum values for θT=90o

Discussion

Equation (14) can be rewritten to more clearly show the contribution of the cutting deformation and the friction forces.T1=13.4R0.087(e0.087θT1)+To(e0.087θT1)+To

The first term in (15) is the cutting deformation force and the second term is the friction force. Currently there are no published values of k to compare to the estimation presented in this paper. Looking at the swaged cable used in this study (Fig. 5) the surface wires are flattened and oriented to slide along the tree surface,

Conclusions

This study collected the tension from the pulling and braking sides of a cable being pulled around a tree. It was found that increasing the change in direction of the cable increased the difference between the braking and pulling tensions, and on average that the cable cut 3 mm into the wood for each repetition. Unexpectedly, it was found that the difference in tension between the braking and pulling sides did not increase as the cable cut deeper into the wood with increasing number of

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

This research was partially supported by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) under grant number U01 OH010978-02.

References (10)

  • R. Cavalli et al.

    Steep terrain forest operations – challenges, technology development, current implementation, and future opportunities

    International Journal of Forest Engineering

    (2019)
  • P. Durgumahanti et al.

    A new model for grinding force prediction and analysis

    International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    (2010)
  • H. Harrill et al.

    New Zealand cable logging 2008-2018: A period of change

    Current Forestry Reports

    (2019)
  • T. Holzfeind et al.

    Assessing cable tensile forces and machine tilt of winch-assisted forwarders on steep terrain under real working conditions

    Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering

    (2019)
  • C. Inglis

    Applied mechanics for engineers

    (1963)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text