Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is there still a need for the antimony electrode 100 years after its introduction as a pH sensor?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the glass electrode, first mentioned in the literature over 100 years ago, is still the preferred analytical tool for determining hydrogen ion activity in aqueous media, there are a number of applications for other sensors that also measure pH. Even if they do not correspond to the measuring performance of the glass electrode in terms of, e.g., accuracy, reproducibility, and long-term stability, they open up the feasibility of using electrochemical sensors even where the operation with glass electrodes is not possible. This applies in particular to scenarios in which extreme and harsh environmental conditions prevail. Currently relevant here are, for example, measurements in geothermal plants or directly on arable land in agricultural production. In the present article, new electrochemical devices based on antimony electrodes are presented especially for these purposes; in addition, the use of the antimony electrode as a basic electrode for the CO2 determination according to the Severinghaus principle is reported on.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. Cremer M (1906) Über die Ursache der elektromotorischen Eigenschaften der Gewebe, zugleich ein Beitrag zur Lehre von den polyphasischen Elektrolytketten. Z Biol 29(47):562–608

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scholz F (2011) From the Leiden jar to the discovery of the glass electrode by Max Cremer. J Solid State Electrochem 15(1):5–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scholz F (2011) Nikolsky’s ion exchange theory versus Baucke’s dissociation mechanism of the glass electrode. J Solid State Electrochem 15(1):67–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Belyustin AA (2011) The centenary of glass electrode: from Max Cremer to F. G. K. Baucke. J Solid State Electrochem 15(1):47–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vonau W, Gerlach F, Ahlborn K (2013) Glass-based redox sensor. J Solid State Electrochem 17(4):969–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Galster H (1990) pH-Messung. Weinheim, VCH, pp 156–176

    Google Scholar 

  7. Uhl A, Kestranek W (1923) Die elektrometrische Titration von Säuren und Basen mit der Antimon-Indikatorelektrode. Monatsh Chem 44(1-2):29–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stock JT, Purdy WC, Garcia LM (1958) The antimony-antimony oxide electrode. Chem Rev 58(4):611–626

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ball TR (1937) The antimony electrode in pH measurements. Trans Electrochem Soc 72(1):139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perley GA (1939) Characteristics of the antimony electrode. Ind Eng Anal Int Ed 11(6):319–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Metha DN, Kulkarni Jatkar SK (1935) Hydrogen ion concentration of lead solutions. J Indian Inst Sci A 18:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  12. Galster H (1990a) pH-Messung. Weinheim, VCH, p 162

  13. Company catalogue (1978) Elektroden und Messzubehör für die Potentiometrie, Forschungsinstitut Meinsberg, pp 10-11

  14. Milazzo G (1952) Elektrochemie: Theoretische Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Springer, Wien, p 177

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Guth U, Gerlach F, Decker M, Oelßner W, Vonau W (2009) Solid-state reference electrodes for potentiometric sensors. J Solid State Electrochem 13(1):27–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Severinghaus JW, Bradley AF (1958) Electrodes for blood pO2 and pCO2 determination. J Appl Physiol 13(3):515–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Markdahl-Bjarme M, Edwell G (1981) Modified conventional type of p-CO2-electrode with monocrystalline antimony as the pH-sensing element. Med Biol Eng Comput 19(4):447–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Edwall G (1978) Improved antimony-antimony oxide (III) pH electrodes. Med Biol Eng Comput 16(6):661–669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Edwall G (1979) Influence of crystallographic properties on antimony electrode potential--I. Polycrystalline Material Electrochim Acta 24(6):595–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Edwall G (1979) Influence of crystallographic properties on antimony electrode potential--lI. Monocrystalline material. Electrochim Acta 24(6):605–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Edwall G (1979) Influence of crystallographic properties on antimony electrode potential--]II. Oriented monocrystalline material. Electrochim Acta 24: 613-621, 6

  22. Mascini M, Cremisini C (1977) A new pH electrode for gas-sensing probes. Anal Chim Acta 92(2):277–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. DIN ISO 10390: Soil quality – determination of pH (ISO 10390:2005), DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. Beuth-Verlag, Berlin

  24. Schaller G, Fischer WR (1981) Die Verwendung von Antimon-Elektroden zur pH-Messung in Böden. Z Pflanzenernaehr Bodenk 144(2):197–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Galster H (1990b) pH-Messung. Weinheim, VCH, p 161

  26. Adamchuk VI, Morgan MT, Ess DR (1999) An automated sampling system for measuring soil pH. Trans ASAE 42(4):885–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Decker M, Bause S, Teichmann P, Schneider M, Vonau W (2017) Development of an automatic system for the on-site pH measurement of soil samples. Tech Mess 84:659–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Das Kurt-Schwabe-Institut für Mess- und Sensortechnik Meinsberg e.V. wird mitfinanziert durch Steuermittel auf der Grundlage des vom Sächsischen Landtag beschlossenen Haushaltes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kurt-Schwabe-Institut für Mess- und Sensortechnik e.V. Meinsberg, Kurt-Schwabe-Straße 4, D- 04736, Waldheim, Germany

    Winfried Vonau, Manfred Decker, Ute Enseleit & Frank Gerlach

Authors
  1. Winfried Vonau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manfred Decker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ute Enseleit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frank Gerlach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winfried Vonau.

Additional information

The article is dedicated to Professor Fritz Scholz on the occasion of his 65th birthday

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vonau, W., Decker, M., Enseleit, U. et al. Is there still a need for the antimony electrode 100 years after its introduction as a pH sensor?. J Solid State Electrochem 24, 3269–3277 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-020-04647-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-020-04647-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation