Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stability in Hybrid Fire Testing Using PI Control

  • S.I. : New Frontiers & Innovative Methods for Hybrid Sim
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Widely used in earthquake engineering, Hybrid testing is promoted in various domains such as wind engineering, coastal structures and fluid-structure interaction. It also begins to be applied to fire engineering (Hybrid Fire Testing or HFT) for coupling fire tests and numerical simulations. However, HFT is still in its infancy. Yet, some tests have been performed and some algorithms have been developed. Recently, Mergny et al. [1] proposed a framework based on linear control system theory for a displacement control procedure. It uses proportional integral (PI) controller and allows performing HFT with non-linear substructures. The method was validated numerically but no analysis was provided about stability. This paper aims to describe the effects on stability of the main sources of errors in the case of HFT using PI control, namely delays, experimental errors and estimation of the stiffness of the physical substructure that is essential for most of the methodologies that have been developed so far. The research shows first through the equations of a single degree of freedom (SDOF) system that the estimation of the stiffness is a potential source of instability and affects directly the design of the PI controller. A simplified model for MDOF system was developed. Then, the research highlights that the effect of the experimental errors can involve a modification of the apparent mechanical response of the specimen and causes instability. However, this effect can be greatly limited. Finally, the delay is not a source of instability. A virtual hybrid test is performed in a steel frame and shows that the simplified model is a satisfying approximation and that described effects of the estimation of the stiffness established for a SDOF system can be observed for a complex system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mergny E, Drion G, Gernay T, Franssen JM (2019) Hybrid fire testing in a non-linear environment using a proportional integral controller. Journal of Structural Fire Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-09-2018-0022

  2. Hakuno M, Shidawara M, Hara T (1969) Dynamic destructive test of a cantilever beam Controlled by an Analog-computer. Trans. Japan Soc. Civ. Eng. 171:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nakashima M, Kato H, Takaoka E (1992) Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1992. 21(1):79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McCrum DP, Williams MS (2016) An overview of seismic hybrid testing of engineering structures. Engineering Structures 118:240–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lennon T (2003) Whole building behaviour – results from a series of large-scale tests, CIB CTBUH International Conference on Tall Buildings, 8–10 May 2003

  6. Korzen M, Magonette G, Buchet P (1999) Mechanical Loading of columns in Fire Tests by Means of the Substructuring Method. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Math. und Mech. 79:S617–S618

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robert F, Rimlinger S, Collignon C (2010) Structure fire resistance: a joint approach between modelling and full-scale testing (substructuring system), 3rd fib International Congress

  8. Mostafaei H (2013) Hybrid fire testing for assessing performance of structures in fire –Application. Fire Safety Journal 56:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Franssen JM, Gernay T (2017) Modeling structures in fire with SAFIR®: Theoretical background and capabilities. Journal of Structural Fire Engineering 8(3):300–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Whyte CA, Mackie KR, Stojadinovici B (2016) Hybrid Simulation of Thermomechanical Structural Response, Journal of Structural Engineering, pp. 142(2)

  11. Wang X, Kim R, Kwon O, Yeo I, Ahn J (2019) Continuous Real-Time Hybrid Simulation Method for Structures Subject to Fire. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 145(12):04019152. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Memari M, Wang X, Mahmoud H, Kwon O (2020) Response of a structure subjected to fire following an earthquake event. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 146(1):04019182. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tondini N, Abbiati G, Possidente L, Stojadinovic B (2016) A Static Partitioned Solver for Hybrid Fire Testing, 9th International Conference on Structures in Fire, DEstech Publications inc.

  14. Sauca A, Gernay T, Robert F, Tondini N, Franssen JM (2018) Hybrid fire testing: Discussion on stability and implementation of a new method in a virtual environment. Journal of Structural Fire Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-01-2017-0017

  15. Shing PB, Mahin SA (1983) Experimental error propagation in pseudodynamictesting, Report UCB/EERC-83/12. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, 1983.

  16. Horiuchi T, Konno T (1996) Development of a real-time hybrid experimental system with actuator delay compensation, 11th World Conference on Earthquake. Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  17. Åström J, Murray R (2008) Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers, Princeton University Press, 2nd edition, November 2008

  18. Schellenberg AH, Mahin SA, Fenves GL (2009) Advanced implementation of Hybrid Simulation, PEER Report 2009/104. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mosqueda G, Stojadinovic B and Mahin SA, Implementation and accuracy of continuous hybrid simulation with geographically distributed substructures, in UCB/EERC 2005–02, Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California, Berkeley

  20. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP and OIML, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, JCGM 100:2008 (GUM 1995 with minor corrections).

  21. Shing PB, Mahin SA (1987) Cumulative experimental errors in pseudodynamic tests. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1987. 15(4):409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadek, F., Main, J. A., Lew, H. S., Robert, S. D., Chiarito, V. P., and El-Tawil, S. (2010), An Experimental and Computational Study of Steel Moment Connection under a Column Removal Scenario, NIST Technical Note 1669.

  23. American Institute of Steel Construction. ANSI/AISC 360-16 Specification for structural steel buildings. AISC, 2016.

  24. EN 1991-1-2:2009 – Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-2: General actions - Actions on structures exposed to fire, 2009.

  25. Sauca, A. (2016). Development and implementation of a methodology for hybrid fire testing applied to concrete structures with elastic boundary conditions, Ph. D. thesis, University of Liege, Liege.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urban and Environmental Engineering (UEE), Liège University, Liège, Belgium

    E. Mergny & J.-M. Franssen

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Liège University, Liège, Belgium

    G. Drion

Authors
  1. E. Mergny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Drion
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J.-M. Franssen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Mergny.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mergny, E., Drion, G. & Franssen, JM. Stability in Hybrid Fire Testing Using PI Control. Exp Tech 44, 687–699 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00375-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00375-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation