Trends in Biotechnology
Volume 38, Issue 10, October 2020, Pages 1054-1065
Journal home page for Trends in Biotechnology

Opinion
Special Issue: Therapeutic Biomanufacturing
Rethinking Cancer Immunotherapy by Embracing and Engineering Complexity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.05.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Complexity theory provides a conceptual framework in which biological and artificial networks may be designed or manipulated to intensify cell bioprocessing in cancer immunotherapies.

  • Studies on T cell mechanobiology have revealed how physical parameters may be exploited to perturb intracellular networks as an effective way of controlling T cell fates for immunotherapeutic applications.

  • Systems-biology-based computational models open up the potential to predict cues needed to guide T cell differentiation and reprogramming.

  • Advances in immunomodulatory biomaterials, microfabrication, and wearable medical technologies raise the possibility of scaling up point-of-care deployment of immunotherapies.

The meteoric rise of cancer immunotherapy in the past decade has led to promising treatments for a number of hard-to-treat malignancies. In particular, adoptive T cell therapy has recently reached a major milestone with two products approved by the US FDA. However, the inherent complexity of cell-based immunotherapies means that their manufacturing time, cost, and controllability limit their effectiveness and geographic reach. One way to address these issues may lie in complementing the dominant, reductionistic mentality in modern medicine with complex systems thinking. In this opinion article, we identify key concepts from complexity theory to address manufacturing challenges in cell-based immunotherapies and raise the possibility of a unifying framework upon which future bioprocessing strategies may be designed.

Section snippets

Complexity and Its Relevance to Cancer Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy is widely regarded as one of the most important breakthroughs in cancer therapy, demonstrated by encouraging clinical results for checkpoint inhibitors (see Glossary) [1] and T cell-based adoptive cell transfer (ACT) [2]. ACT involves direct use of immune cells to eradicate cancer cells. Three types of ACT are currently being developed for immunotherapy – tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), T cell receptor (TCR)-transduced T cells, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells.

Cell Fate Determination: a Dynamical Systems Perspective

Optimisation of T cell phenotype for ACT requires a holistic approach. Its applicability to biology was proposed by Conrad Waddington >80 years ago: ‘to say that an animal is an organism means in fact two things: firstly, that it is a system made up of separate parts, and secondly, that in order to describe fully how any one part works one has to refer either to the whole system or to the other parts’ [22]. Here, Waddington was describing precisely the irreducible characteristics of complex

Controlling T Cell Fate with Engineered Extracellular Matrix Cues

Although systematic and predictive control over cell type is attractive for ACT, current protocols for reprogramming often rely on gene delivery methods (e.g., viral transduction) and/or cocktails of soluble factors that increase manufacturing cost and time. Elsewhere, physical cues are increasingly exploited to guide, and improve the efficiency of, cell reprogramming of adult stem cells and iPSCs [29]. It might, therefore, be beneficial for ACT to venture beyond the molecule-centric paradigm

Systems Thinking to Address ACT Supply and Manufacturing Challenges

Cell fate control represents only a subset of challenges associated with deploying ACT. Beyond manipulating biological networks, systems thinking can also be applied on a larger scale to improve the vein-to-vein supply network of ACT. The complexity of many artificial systems in today’s hyperconnected world is increasingly approaching that of biological systems [40,41]. This highlights the difficulty in manufacturing and supplying ACT therapies where artificial and biological components

Bridging Natural and Human-Engineered Networks

In contrast to the traditional, linear pharmaceutical manufacturing model, distributed manufacturing (Figure 3) could be adopted to improve the service of ACT in the age of Industry 4.0. Here, we describe how this new manufacturing concept could be technically implemented on various fronts.

Applying systems thinking, the vein-to-vein supply network can be rewired to push both production and customisation capabilities out to the end users (clinicians, in this context). This would reduce costs by

Concluding Remarks

Both the natural and human-engineered worlds tend to form networks. These networks lead to complex systems, which exhibit emergent properties: they contain irreducible levels of organisation, unamenable to reductive analysis. In biology, networks manifest across multiple scales in the form of interacting molecules, cells, tissues, and organs. Similarly, humans have self-assembled into, or created, physical and digital networks, such as social networks, logistic networks, power grids, the World

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) (grant number BB/M009513/1). M.C., M.O.C. and R.D. also gratefully acknowledge support from the EPSRC via 'Frontier Engineering' and 'Frontier Engineering: Progression' awards (grant numbers EP/K038656/1 and EP/S03305X/1).

Glossary

Ancillary material
a material or reagent used in manufacturing that has an effect on the cell therapy product, but not intended to be part of the final product.
Checkpoint inhibitors
antibody-based therapeutics that act by blocking cell surface proteins, known as immune checkpoints (e.g., PD-L1), commonly utilised by tumours to deactivate T cells and achieve immune escape. The blockade of checkpoints provides a means to restore immunogenicity.
Coevolution
two or more agents of a system change/adapt

References (75)

  • R. Zhang

    Biomaterials for vaccine-based cancer immunotherapy

    J. Control. Release

    (2018)
  • J. Li

    3D printing of hydrogels: rational design strategies and emerging biomedical applications

    Mater. Sci. Eng. R. Rep.

    (2020)
  • H. Htay

    Evaluation of safety of automated wearable artificial kidney (AWAK) device in peritoneal dialysis patients

    Kidney Int. Rep.

    (2019)
  • E. Rollo

    Label-free identification of activated T lymphocytes through tridimensional microsensors on chip

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2017)
  • S. Kauffman

    A proposal for using the ensemble approach to understand genetic regulatory networks

    J. Theor. Biol.

    (2004)
  • S. Huang

    Cancer attractors: A systems view of tumors from a gene network dynamics and developmental perspective

    Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.

    (2009)
  • M.-O. Coppens

    A nature-inspired approach to reactor and catalysis engineering

    Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng.

    (2012)
  • S. Huang

    Tumor progression: chance and necessity in Darwinian and Lamarckian somatic (mutationless) evolution

    Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.

    (2012)
  • A. Ribas et al.

    Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade

    Science

    (2018)
  • S. Guedan

    Emerging cellular therapies for cancer

    Annu. Rev. Immunol.

    (2019)
  • S.L. Maude

    Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2018)
  • N. Goldenfeld et al.

    Simple lessons from complexity

    Science

    (1999)
  • P. Mac Carron et al.

    Universal properties of mythological networks

    EPL

    (2012)
  • S. Battiston

    Complexity theory and financial regulation

    Science

    (2016)
  • S.A. Kauffman

    The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution

    (1993)
  • M.M. Waldrop

    Complexity : The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos

    (1992)
  • A.C. Ahn

    The limits of reductionism in medicine: could systems biology offer an alternative?

    PLoS Med.

    (2006)
  • M.H.V. Van Regenmortel et al.

    The rational design of biological complexity: a deceptive metaphor

  • S. Huang et al.

    Complex gene regulatory networks – from structure to biological observables: cell fate determination gene regulation, cell fate determination

  • S. Huang

    Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2005)
  • H. Maeda et al.

    Analyses of repeated failures in cancer therapy for solid tumors: poor tumor-selective drug delivery, low therapeutic efficacy and unsustainable costs

    Clin. Transl. Med.

    (2018)
  • A. Brock et al.

    Precision oncology: between vaguely right and precisely wrong

    Cancer Res.

    (2017)
  • B. Besse

    Hyperprogressive disease in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors or with single-agent chemotherapy

    JAMA Oncol.

    (2018)
  • A.D. McLellan et al.

    Chimeric antigen receptor T cell persistence and memory cell formation

    Immunol. Cell Biol.

    (2019)
  • F. Blaeschke

    Induction of a central memory and stem cell memory phenotype in functionally active CD4+ and CD8+ CAR T cells produced in an automated good manufacturing practice system for the treatment of CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Cancer Immunol. Immunother.

    (2018)
  • Z.L. Chang

    Identification and selective expansion of functionally superior T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors

    J. Transl. Med.

    (2015)
  • A.K. Chakraborty et al.

    Pairing computation with experimentation: a powerful coupling for understanding T cell signalling

    Nat. Rev. Immunol.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Embracing complexity in biomaterials design

      2022, Biomaterials and Biosystems
      Citation Excerpt :

      This approach does not have to replace minimalistic strategies but rather offers opportunities to complement and enhance them. The need for embracing and engineering complexity is increasingly being recognized in fields expanding from precision medicine [7] to biofabrication [8]. In this perspective, we argue that new ways of thinking about materials design could offer solutions to major unmet needs.

    • Accelerating vein-to-vein cell therapy workflows with new bioanalytical strategies

      2021, Current Opinion in Biotechnology
      Citation Excerpt :

      While these direct patient interfaces are key to personalized cancer treatment, the strategy also presents several practical challenges, including harvest and cell expansion failures, product variability, and the need to outpace disease progression [5,6]. To overcome these obstacles to effective production of cell therapies, advanced bioanalytical tools are necessary to increase bioprocessing efficiencies, which will not only allow for timely therapeutic implementation, but also contribute to safe and effective outcomes [7]. Although the clinical success of cell therapies has improved substantially in recent years, many biomanufacturing bottlenecks remain.

    • Engineered hydrogels for mechanobiology

      2022, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
    • Nature-Inspired Chemical Engineering for Process Intensification

      2021, Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    @

    Twitter: @MatthewHWChin (M.H.W. Chin), @GentlemanLab (E. Gentleman), and @UCLCNIE (M.-O. Coppens).

    5

    http://cnie.org.uk

    6

    http://ucl.ac.uk/day-lab

    View full text