Skip to main content
Download PDF

The signal peptide of Cry1Ia can improve the expression of eGFP or mCherry in Escherichia coli and Bacillus thuringiensis and enhance the host’s fluorescent intensity

Microbial Cell Factories volume 19, Article number: 112 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The signal peptides (SPs) of secretory proteins are frequently used or modified to guide recombinant proteins outside the cytoplasm of prokaryotic cells. In the periplasmic space and extracellular environment, recombinant proteins are kept away from the intracellular proteases and often they can fold correctly and efficiently. Consequently, expression levels of the recombinant protein can be enhanced by the presence of a SP. However, little attention has been paid to the use of SPs with low translocation efficiency for recombinant protein production. In this paper, the function of the signal peptide of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry1Ia toxin (Iasp), which is speculated to be a weak translocation signal, on regulation of protein expression was investigated using fluorescent proteins as reporters.

Results

When fused to the N-terminal of eGFP or mCherry, the Iasp can improve the expression of the fluorescent proteins and as a consequence enhance the fluorescent intensity of both Escherichia coli and Bt host cells. Real-time quantitative PCR analysis revealed the higher transcript levels of Iegfp over those of egfp gene in E. coli TG1 cells. By immunoblot analysis and confocal microscope observation, lower translocation efficiency of IeGFP was demonstrated. The novel fluorescent fusion protein IeGFP was then used to compare the relative strengths of cry1Ia (Pi) and cry1Ac (Pac) gene promoters in Bt strain, the latter promoter proving the stronger. The eGFP reporter, by contrast, cannot indicate unambiguously the regulation pattern of Pi at the same level of sensitivity. The fluorescent signals of E. coli and Bt cells expressing the Iasp fused mCherry (ImCherry) were also enhanced. Importantly, the Iasp can also enhanced the expression of two difficult-to-express proteins, matrix metalloprotease-13 (MMP13) and myostatin (growth differentiating factor-8, GDF8) in E. coli BL21-star (DE3) strain.

Conclusions

We identified the positive effects of a weak signal peptide, Iasp, on the expression of fluorescent proteins and other recombinant proteins in bacteria. The produced IeGFP and ImCherry can be used as novel fluorescent protein variants in prokaryotic cells. The results suggested the potential application of Iasp as a novel fusion tag for improving the recombinant protein expression.

Introduction

GFP is the first fluorescent protein (FP) discovered in Aequorea victoria and has been widely used as a molecular reporter (reviewed in [1,2,3]). However, in bacteria expression systems, such as Escherichia coli, GFP cannot fluoresce efficiently due to poor three-dimensional (3D) structure formation [4,5,6]. When fusing with other proteins of interest, GFP may even interfere with the folding of its partner in bacteria [7]. The phenomenon was attributed to the high contact order topology of GFP and the lack of more advanced co-translational folding mechanisms in bacteria [7, 8]. Although the chromophore of GFP contains only three contiguous amino acids (Ser65-Tyr66-Gly67), its formation depends on the native β-barrel structure of the whole molecule [1, 9]. The final β-barrel structure of GFP needs contacts among distant residues in the primary sequence, leading to the low folding rates. Thus, when highly expressed in prokaryotic cells, the GFP peptides aggregate in the crowded cytosol before they can correctly fold.

Strategies have been developed to improve the folding efficiency and fluorescing of GFP in bacteria. Point mutations were showed to improve the fluorescence and/or the folding of GFP. Out of these reported mutants, the enhanced GFP (eGFP) [10] and the superfolder GFP (sfGFP) [11] are widely used. Besides the modification of the GFP molecule per se, general methods to improve the expression of recombinant proteins have also been used [12,13,14,15,16,17]. For instance, the productive folding of N-terminal partner in fusion proteins with GFP could prevent the aggregation of the whole proteins [18]. The popular solubility enhancer partners maltose-binding protein (MBP) and N-utilization substance (NusA) can significantly enhance the solubility of GFP at low temperature [19], but the positive effects disappeared at high temperature [7]. Recently, several novel fusion tags, including Fh8 (an 8-kDa calcium-binding protein extracted from Fasciola hepatica), LEA-like peptide (a hydrophilic late embryogenesis abundant peptide), SKIK (Ser-Lys-Ile-Lys) peptide, OsTDX (Oryza sativa tetratricopeptide domain-containing thioredoxin), S1v1 (a self-assembling amphipathic peptide) and NT11 (the first 11 amino acid residues of a duplicated carbonic anhydrase), were reported can improve the expression of fluorescent proteins in bacteria [17, 20,21,22,23,24]. Chaperones, such as the group containing the DnaK and co-chaperones DnaJ and GrpE (K/J/E), can help the folding of the corresponding aggregation-prone partner and sequentially enhance the fluorescence of GFP in fusion protein [25]. A newly identified molecular chaperone Spheroplast Protein Y (Spy) can be used as a remarkable solubility enhancing fusion tag and its tandem pattern enable it to enhance the soluble expression of large-size proteins [26]. Codon usage and mRNAstructure also affect the fluorescing of GFP [27]. Siller et al. [28] used mutant ribosomes to reduce polypeptide elongation rates, thus facilitated the folding efficiency of recombinant proteins, especially from eukaryotes. This generalized reduction strategy did not adversely impact the folding of the endogenous bacterial proteome.

Generally, the signal peptides (SPs) or their mutants are used to guide the recombinant proteins into periplasmic space or out of the cell for improving the structure formation or the expression level (reviewed in [12,13,14]). But the GFP protein cannot fold into its fluorescent form upon translocation via the SecYEG-translocon due to the post translocation folding mechanism [15, 29, 30]. Unlike the SecYEG-translocon, the twin-arginine translocation system (Tat system) only guides the fully folded and/or co-factor incorporated proteins translocation [31, 32]. As expected, the fluorescent signal of GFP molecules translocated into periplasmic space by the signal peptide of torA (trimethylamine N-oxide reductase) was observed [33]. The signal peptide of torA was also reported to be an inclusion body tag that can aggregate the recombinant proteins in E. coli cytosol [34]. It was not only a novel application of SPs, but also prompted us to pay more attention to the diversity of SPs. In this study, we used a novel fusion tag, the signal peptide of Cry1Ia (Iasp), to improve the expression of GFP in E. coli and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt).

Cry1I toxins of Bt belong to a special branch of the Cry protein family (reviewed in [35, 36]). The cry1I genes generally locate at approximately 500 bp downstream of the cry1A genes. Since there is not a classic promoter structure, the regulation of cry1I genes was a mystery until their transcripts were identified by Tounsi and Jaoua [37,38,39]. Another special characteristic of Cry1I protein is the loss of the classic long C-terminal peptide of Cry1 toxins, which plays an important role in folding the N-terminal three domains into parasporal crystal. The absence of the C-terminal part in Cry1I proteins suggested a different expression pattern. In fact, Kostichka et al. [40] identified Cry1Ia4 protein in supernatant fluids of Bt AB88 cultures and predicted its secretion signal peptide (N-terminal 45 amino acids) which can be removed by unknown peptidase(s) after translocation. Although the Cry1Ia was showed to be a secretory protein, some of the expressed products were observed in the cell pellets of the natural host. The results suggested that the translocation capacity of the signal peptide of Cry1Ia was not high or the corresponding secretory pathway was easily saturated by the overexpressed targets [41, 42]. At present, the related secretory pathway of Cry1Ia is still unclear, but it could be excluded from the Tat system due to lack of the classic conversed sequence (S/T-RRXFLK), especially the double-arginine motif, in signal sequence [43,44,45].

The effects of the Iasp on the eGFP and mCherry proteins in E. coli and Bt cells were evaluated. The results showed that the N-terminal location of Iasp in the fusion fluorescent proteins improved the expression of eGFP and mCherry and consequently enhanced the fluorescent intensity of host cells. The produced IeGFP and ImCherry can be used as ideal reporters in prokaryotic cells. Moreover, the production yields of other difficult-to-express recombinant proteins, such as matrix metalloprotease-13 (MMP13) and myostatin (growth differentiating factor-8, GDF8) in E. coli BL21-star (DE3) strain [19], were dramatically enhanced after fusing with the Iasp. These results indicated that the Iasp can be used as a novel fusion tag for enhancing recombinant protein expression.

Results

Fluorescent intensity detection of IeGFP in E. coli

The expression cassettes and the corresponding plasmids and strains used in this study were showed in Fig. 1 and Table 1. As a constitutive promoter in E. coli, the promoter of cry1Ac gene (Pac) can regulate the expression of its downstream gene uninterruptedly after inoculation [46]. As expected, the expression of both IeGFP and eGFP was detected at 4 h after inoculation by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 2a). The expression products cannot be identified easily by Coomassie bright blue staining SDS-PAGE analysis (data not shown). The migration of intact IeGFP proteins was consistent with the calculated molecular weight (33.1 kDa). Interestingly, only a small quantity of IeGFP proteins were cleaved to give the same molecular weight product (27.9 kDa) as eGFP. The more intense color of cell pellets of strain TAc-IeGFP clearly distinguished them from pellets of strain TAc-eGFP (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The expression cassettes of the fusion fluorescent proteins. The Pac-pelBegfp-Tac and Pac-torAegfp-Tac expression cassettes are similar to the Pac-Iegfp-Tac except the leader sequence at the 5′ flanking of egfp gene. The expression cassettes PT7-NusA-egfp-TT7, PT7-MBP-egfp-TT7, PT7-I-mmp13-TT7, PT7-Trx-mmp13-TT7, PT7-I-gdf8-TT7 and PT7-Trx-gdf8-TT7 share same structures with PT7-Trx-egfp-TT7

Full size image
Table 1 Plasmids and strains used and constructed in this work
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Expression analysis of eGFP and IeGFP regulated by Pac promoter in E.coli TG1 strain. a Lane “-” is the negative control which prepared from T304 cells sampled at 12 h after inoculation. TAc-IeGFP and TAc-eGFP cells were separately taken at 4, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h after inoculation. Lane “M” is the molecular weight standards. b Comparison of the collected cells when they were incubated for 24 h. c The fluorescent intensities and their fold changes for TAc-IeGFP over TAc-eGFP strains at corresponding sampling time. The slit widths of EX/EM were 3 nm and 5 nm respectively and the detections were conducted in low sensitivity. The fluorescent signals of T304 cells cannot be detected. The error bars indicate standard error of mean. The significant differences of the fluorescent intensities between TAc-IeGFP and TAc-eGFP cells at corresponding time were indicated by single asterisk (p < 0.05) or double asterisks (p < 0.01)

Full size image

The fluorescent signals of TAc-IeGFP and TAc-eGFP strains were also monitored. An increasing trend of the fluorescent intensities for both TAc-IeGFP and TAc-eGFP was observed over time (Fig. 2c and Additional file 1: Table S1). Importantly, the fluorescent intensities of TAc-IeGFP strain were approximately 1.5, 2.4, 2.1 or 2.0-fold higher than TAc-eGFP strain at 8, 10, 12 or 24 h after inoculation, respectively.

Fluorescent intensity detection of IeGFP in Bt strain

The expression and resulting fluorescent signals of IeGFP and eGFP in Bt were investigated. In Bt cells, the expression of IeGFP controlled by Pac were detected at 9 h after inoculation in the collected cells (Fig. 3a and b). During 12 to 36 h, the degradation of IeGFP protein was observed. The main degradation product was an approximately 26 kDa peptide (Fig. 3a, b and Additional file 1: Figure S1A). From 48 to 72 h, the intact band of IeGFP protein accumulated continuously and almost half of them were cleaved into the 26 kDa band. The eGFP protein shown a similar expression pattern with IeGFP (Fig. 3b). The truncated peptide of eGFP was also about 26 kDa, the same as the degradation product of IeGFP in vivo. IeGFP protein could not be detected in the supernatant of cell culture of BAc-IeGFP strain until 60 h after inoculation. Surprisingly, eGFP protein also appeared in the supernatant of the BAc-eGFP strain at the same time. The main immune signal in the supernatant samples were also about 26 kDa which was very similar to the truncated IeGFP and eGFP inside the cell.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression analysis of eGFP and IeGFP regulated by the Pac promoter in Bt strain. a, b The expression of IeGFP (panel a) and eGFP (panel b) in Bt at different times (9, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h after inoculation) were analyzed respectively by western blot. “S” represents the supernatant of cell culture and “P” represents the resuspended cells by PBS buffer. Lane “M” is the molecular weight standards. c, d The fluorescent intensities of the harvested cells (panel c) or the supernatants of cell cultures (panel d) and their fold changes for BAc-IeGFP over BAc-eGFP strain at corresponding culture time. The slit widths of EX/EM were both 3 nm and the detections were conducted in low sensitivity for the resuspended cells and in high sensitivity for the supernatant. The fluorescent signals of B304 cells cannot be detected and the fluorescent intensity of the 72 h supernatant of BAc-IeGFP strain cell culture was beyond the limit (1000 A.U.). The error bars indicate standard error of mean. The significant differences of the fluorescent intensities between BAc-IeGFP and BAc-eGFP strains at corresponding time were indicated by single asterisk (p < 0.05) or double asterisks (p < 0.01). e Comparison of the collected cells before (up) and after excitement (down) when they were incubated for 24 h and 48 h. The cells were excited by blue light using Luyor 3415RG hand held lamp

Full size image

With increasing incubation time, the fluorescent intensity of the BAc-IeGFP and BAc-eGFP cell increased during the first 48 h, consistent with the immunoblot analysis (Fig. 3a–c and Additional file 1: Table S2). Thereafter, whilst the protein continued to accumulate, it was accompanied by a decline in fluorescent intensity. It was notable that the fluorescent intensities of BAc-IeGFP kept more than three times higher than that of BAc-eGFP throughout the detection period (Fig. 3c and Additional file 1: Table S2). Interestingly, the fluorescent signals of IeGFP or eGFP in the supernatant were detected at same time after 48 h of inoculation at high sensitivity (Fig. 3d and Additional file 1: Table S3). Similarly, the enhanced fluorescent intensity of the BAc-IeGFP strain was readily observable in the altered pigmentation of cell pellets (Fig. 3e).

The expression pattern of IeGFP and eGFP in E. coli TG1 and BL21-star (DE3) strain, and Bt BMB171 strain were compared by western blot analysis (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). The result revealed the stability of eGFP expressed either in E. coli TG1 or in BL21-star (DE3) strains. The pelB signal peptide can guide almost all of eGFP (pelB-eGFP) to the periplasmic space of E. coli and then the leader peptide was removed. However, most of IeGFP proteins remained intact and only a fraction of them were processed, especially when its expression was regulated by the T7 promoter. In Bt strain, both eGFP and IeGFP protein were cut to a slightly lower molecular weight band (26 kDa) in cells or in supernatant of cell culture.

Iasp enhanced the expression level of recombinant proteins

To confirm the effect of Iasp on improving the expression of recombinant proteins, the eGFP and IeGFP was expressed in E. coli BL21-star (DE3) strain, respectively. As a result, the T7 promoter regulated the expression of IeGFP at higher level than eGFP at different temperatures, especially at 16 °C (Fig. 4). The expression level of eGFP was very low after 4 h induction at 16 °C, but the product can keep soluble (Additional file 1: Figure S2A). At the same condition, about half of the IeGFP products kept soluble. Nevertheless, the amount of this soluble fraction was higher than the total production of eGFP. It was notable that the expression level of IeGFP was similar to the NusA and MBP guided eGFP (N-eGFP and M-eGFP) and slightly higher than the Trx (thioredoxin) guided eGFP (T-eGFP). All of the fusion tags tested can produce considerable fraction of soluble fluorescent proteins in this study. For GDF8 and MMP13 proteins, their expressions were hard to identified by Coomassie brilliant blue stained SDS-PAGE analysis. However, with the assistance of Iasp or Trx, the expression levels were dramatically enhanced (I-MMP13, T-MMP13, I-GDF8 and T-GDF8) in E. coli BL21-star (DE3) strain (Fig. 4b and c). The difference was that almost all of I-MMP13, T-MMP13, I-GDF8 and T-GDF8 proteins were expressed as the inclusion bodies at the same induction condition (Additional file 1: Figure S2B and C).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The expression analysis of IeGFP in E. coli BL21-star (DE3). IeGFP (lane “I”) and eGFP (lane “e”) expressed in E. coli BL21-star (DE3) at the different induction temperatures were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Lane “-” is the negative controls sampled from the BL28aD cell culture and lane “M” is the molecular weight standards. The arrow indicates the IeGFP expressed at 16 °C

Full size image

The effect of the Iasp on its original protein Cry1Ia was also investigated. In Bt cells, the accumulation of the Cry1Ia (81.2 kDa) regulated by the Pac promoter at 72 h after inoculation can be detected by SDS-PAGE (Additional file 1: Figure S3A). When removed the Iasp from the Cry1Ia, more accumulation of the truncated protein (Cry1IaD44, 76.2 kDa) was observed in Bt cells. Interestingly, Cry1IaD44 showed different degradation pattern compared to the intact Cry1Ia. The main degradation products of Cry1IaD44 (14 kDa) were soluble in the alkali buffer (50 mM Na2CO3, 10 mM dithiothreitol, pH 10.5) (Additional file 1: Figure S3B). Similar degraded fragment was observed in the expression product of a further truncated variant Cry1IaD73 (73.3 kDa), losing the N-terminal 73 amino acids of Cry1Ia. The result suggested the Iasp or its associated chaperone can prevent the attacking of specific protease(s). Interestingly, the different processing pattern observed in Bt cells was not detected in E. coli strain (Additional file 1: Figure S3C).

Effect of Iasp encoding sequence on the transcript level of Iegfp gene

To identify the effect of IeGFP encoding sequence on the fusion gene, the transcription levels of the Iegfp and egfp genes in E. coli TAc-IeGFP and TAc-eGFP strains were compared using real-time quantitative PCR. As shown in Table 2, the transcription level of Iegfp gene in TAc-IeGFP strain was approximately 7 or 13 times higher than egfp gene in TAc-eGFP at 8 h or 12 h after inoculation. But interestingly, the wide difference in mRNA level between the Iegfp and egfp genes only resulted in the double protein level indicated by fluorescent intensity in Fig. 1. In addition, the structure of the 5′ leader sequence of the target mRNA plays an important role in affecting the translational efficiency, especially the nucleotides near the start codon (-4 to +37) [27]. We predicted the secondary structures of Iegfp and egfp genes by RNAstructure software [47]. The result showed that the calculated folding energy of the nucleotides near the start codon (− 4 to +37) of Iegfp was about − 0.6 kcal/mol, which implied less thermodynamic stability in this section than that of egfp gene (− 5 kcal/mol, Fig. 5).

Table 2 Comparison of Iegfp and egfp gene in mRNA level
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Prediction of the secondary structure of sequences near the initial codon. The secondary structure of sequences near the initial codon (−4 ~ + 37) of egfp (left) and Iegfp (right) gene were predicted by RNAstructure software. The initial codon is indicated in red. The folding energies (dG) are also indicated respectively

Full size image

Comparison the Iasp with the pelB and torA signal peptide

The expression of IeGFP in E. coli was compared with the signal peptide of pelB (pectate lyase B) or torA guided eGFP (pelB-eGFP and torA-eGFP). The signal peptides of pelB or torA can guide the target protein into periplasm of E. coli by two representative inner membrane spanning transporters (SecYEG translocon or the twin-arginine translocation system) respectively [31]. Another fusion protein eGFP-I was also constructed to identify the function of Iasp when located at the C-terminal of eGFP. The expression of these proteins was monitored at five time points (4, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h after inoculation). The western blot analysis showed that all of these proteins can expressed under regulation of the constitutive promoter Pac (Fig. 6a). The expression level of IeGFP after 10 h of incubation was higher than pelB-eGFP and torA-eGFP. But when the Iasp was located at C-terminal of eGFP (eGFP-I), the expression level decreased. Interestingly, the observed band of eGFP-I was larger than the expected molecular weight (33.1 kDa). Both of the signal peptides pelB and torA did not improve the expression level of eGFP but might translocate eGFP efficiently because the observed bands of pelB-eGFP and torA-eGFP were equal to the eGFP in molecular weight. The result indicated that both signal peptides were cleaved by corresponding peptidase after translocation. The growth and the fluorescent intensities of these strains were also monitored and the results were consistent with the immunoblot analysis except the strains expressing pelB-eGFP and torA-eGFP respectively (Fig. 6b, c and Additional file 1: Table S4). The expression of the pelB-eGFP negatively affected the growth of the E. coli cells and the expression products did not fluoresce normally. The expression level of torA-eGFP was lower than pelB-eGFP observed by western blot analysis, but its fluorescent signal was detected after 12 h of incubation.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Expression analysis of the different fluorescent proteins in E. coli strain. a The expression of eGFP (lane “e”), IeGFP (lane “Ie”), eGFP-I (lane “eI”), pelB-eGFP (lane “pe”) and torA-eGFP (lane “te”) at different times (4, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h after inoculation) were analyzed by western blot. Lane “-” is the negative control which prepared from T304 cells sampled at the corresponding times respectively. Lane “M” is the molecular weight standards. The arrows indicate the expressed IeGFP at different times. b The optical densities at 600 nm (OD600) of the E. coli strains expressing the different fluorescent proteins were monitored during the first 6 h after inoculation. The error bars indicate standard deviation of mean. c The fluorescent intensities of the samples obtained at corresponding times in panel a (slit widths of EX/EM = 3/5 nm in low sensitivity). The fluorescent signals of T304 cells cannot be detected. The error bars indicate standard error of mean

Full size image

Subcellular location of IeGFP in E. coli

According to the confocal images, the fluorescent signals were observed evenly in the cytoplasm for cells expressing eGFP, IeGFP and eGFP-I (Fig. 7). The fluorescent signal of pelB-eGFP, by contrast, was not detected in the host cells. For cells expressing torA-eGFP, the polar localization was observed.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Confocal images analysis of E. coli cells expressing different fluorescent proteins. The E. coli cells expressing eGFP (d–f), IeGFP (g–i), eGFP-I (j–l), torA-eGFP (m–o) or pelB-eGFP (p–r) were observed by inverted confocal microscope (Leica SP8). The cells of T304 strain (a–c) were used as the negative control. The bright-field images and the fluorescent images were arranged in the first and second row, respectively, and then were merged (the third row). The scale bars represent 5 μm

Full size image

Verification of the cry1Ia gene promoter regulation using IeGFP

To confirm the better performance of IeGFP, the Iegfp and gfp genes were placed under control of the cry1Ia promoter (Pi) and expressed in the Bt strain. The expression patterns of both proteins were identified and compared by the detection of fluorescent intensity. The result showed that the Pi promoter regulated the Iegfp gene expression in a similar way to that of Pac over time (Fig. 8 and Additional file 1: Tables S5 and S6). But the expression level of Pi regulated genes was lower because the fluorescent signal of IeGFP and eGFP in BI-IeGFP and BI-eGFP cells was only detected on the 3/3 nm (the slit widths of EX/EM) in high sensitivity. According to the specification, the sensitivity of the spectrofluorophotometer (RF 5301PC) at high mode is about 50 times in comparison to that at low mode. In fact, the color of the cell pellets of BI-IeGFP and BI-eGFP were difficult to distinguish from the negative control cells by visible observation (B304 strain, data not shown).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Fluorescent intensities analysis of the Pi promoter regulated eGFP and IeGFP in Bt strain. The fluorescent intensities of the resuspended cells by PBS buffer (a) and the supernatants of cell cultures (b) were detected respectively. The samples were obtained at different times (9, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h after inoculation). The slit widths of EX/EM were 3/3 nm and the detections were conducted in high sensitivity. The fluorescent signals of B304 cells cannot be detected and the fluorescent intensity of the 36 h cells of BI-IeGFP strain was beyond the limit (1000 A.U.). The significant difference of the fluorescent intensities between BI-IeGFP and BI-eGFP strains at corresponding time were indicated by single asterisk (p < 0.05). The error bars indicate standard error of mean

Full size image

Verification of the function of Iasp on mCherry protein

To identify the effect on other FPs in vivo, the Iasp was used to guide the expression of mCherry. The new fusion protein ImCherry was also expressed in E. coli TG1 strain (TAc-ImCherry) and the Bt BMB171 strain (BAc-ImCherry), respectively, under control of Pac promoter. Similar results to those with IeGFP were observed. The fluorescent signals of the TAc-ImCherry strain were more intensive than the corresponding control strain TAc-mCherry (Fig. 9a and Additional file 1: Table S7). The 24 h-after-inoculation cells of TAc-ImCherry strain were distinguished easily with the TAc-mCherry strain (Fig. 9b). Most of ImCherry proteins were expressed in the intact molecules (33.0 kDa) and only a fraction of them were digested into a 28 kDa band which was equal to the individually expressed mCherry protein (27.8 kDa, Fig. 9c).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Expression analysis of mCherry and ImCherry in E. coli TG1 and Bt BMB171 strain. a The fluorescent intensities of the harvested TG1 cells expressing mCherry or ImCherry were monitored at different times (4, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h after inoculation). The slit widths of EX/EM were 1.5 nm and 3 nm, and the detections were conducted in high sensitivity. The fluorescent signals of B304 cells cannot be detected. The error bars indicate standard error of mean. The significant differences of the fluorescent intensities between TAc-ImCherry and TAc-mCherry cells at corresponding time were indicated by single asterisk (p < 0.05) or double asterisks (p < 0.01). b Comparison of the collected E. coli TG1 cells when they were incubated for 24 h. c Western blot analysis of the expression of mCherry and ImCherry in E. coli TG1 strain. “-” lane is negative control which prepared from T304 cells sampled at 12 h after inoculation. TAcImCherry and TAcmCherry cells were separately taken at 4, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h after inoculation. “M” represents the molecular weight standards. d, e The fluorescent intensities of the supernatants of cell cultures (panel D, slit widths of EX/EM = 3/5 nm in high sensitivity) or the harvested Bt cells (e slit widths of EX/EM = 3/3 nm in high sensitivity) at corresponding culture time. The fluorescent signals of B304 cells cannot be detected. The error bars indicate standard error of mean. The significant differences of the fluorescent intensities between BAc-ImCherry and BAc-mCherry cells at corresponding time were indicated by double asterisks (p < 0.01). f Western blot analysis of the expression of ImCherry in Bt BMB171 strain. “S” represents the supernatant of cell culture and the “P” means the resuspended cells by PBS buffer. “M” represents the molecular weight standards

Full size image

In Bt cells, the fluorescent signal of mCherry cannot be detected during the cultivation period tested whereas the ImCherry performed well (Fig. 9c and e, and Additional file 1: Tables S8 and S9). The significant accumulation of ImCherry protein was also observed after 60 h of incubation, consistent with the fluorescent signal variation (Fig. 9f). The expression of the individual mCherry cannot be detected by western blot analysis even in 72 h-after-inoculation cells (data not shown). These results implied lower expression levels of the mCherry and ImCherry than the eGFP and IeGFP which might be attributed to the non-optimal codon used in the mCherry gene. Due to lower expression level in Bt strain, only weak violet color was observed for the BAc-ImCherry strain after 60 h inoculation (data not shown).

Interestingly, the immune signals of ImCherry were also detected in the supernatant of cell culture after 60 h of incubation and the corresponding bands were lower than the degraded products inside the cells (Fig. 9f and Additional file 1: Figure S1B). The band detected in the supernatant of cell culture of BAc-ImCherry strain was equal to the mCherry expressed in E. coli TG1 strain (Additional file 1: Figure S1B).

Discussion

In this study, the predicted secretion signal peptide of Cry1Ia (Iasp) was fused to the N-terminal of eGFP and mCherry to produce novel fluorescent proteins, IeGFP and ImCherry. These fusion fluorescent proteins were not constructed for translocation across the membrane after expression, but to identify the positive effect of the Iasp on protein expression in the cytoplasm of prokaryotic cells.

Iasp can improve the expression level of eGFP and sequentially enhance the fluorescent signal of the tested prokaryotic cells. Under regulation of Pac promoter, the fluorescent intensity of TAc-IeGFP strain was significantly higher than that of TAc-eGFP strain and so did the corresponding Bt strains. In E. coli cells tested, the expression of fluorescent proteins regulated by Pac cannot be identified easily by SDS-PAGE analysis that suggested a weaker activity of Pac than the T7 promoter. But it was sufficient to alter the pigmentation of the host cells. Similarly, Iasp could also enhance the expression level of mCherry in the tested bacteria and the fluorescent intensity of the host cells. These results indicated that Iasp can improve the expression level of fluorescent proteins. The fusion fluorescent proteins, such as IeGFP and ImCherry constructed in this study, can accumulate inside host cells and therefore be used as novel fluorescent protein variants.

Iasp encoding sequence can affect the stability of mRNA and/or improve the translation efficiency. The observed high levels of transcripts of Iegfp gene were probably responsible for the enhanced expression level of IeGFP. In addition, Kudla et al. [27] reported that the structure of the 5′ leader sequence of the target mRNA played an important role in influencing the translational efficiency, especially the nucleotides near the initial codon (− 4 to + 37). The authors fused a 28-codon leader sequence with low secondary structure into the 5′ of different GFP encoding sequences. These fusion genes produced uniformly high expression levels. The strong correlation between mRNA folding energy and expression level suggests that the tightly folded messages obstruct translation initiation and thereby reduce protein synthesis [27, 48]. According to the prediction results of RNAstructure software [47], the participation of Iasp encoding sequence decreased the thermodynamic stability of the secondary structure near the initial codon (− 4 to + 37). Interestingly, in Kudla’s report, the gfp gene variants resulting high fluorescent intensities showed the similar folding energy level with the egfp construct used in this study (about − 5.0 kcal/mol). This implicated that Iasp encoding sequence could optimize the secondary structure of this region further and sequentially improve the translational efficiency. The result was also consistent with the report of Boël G et al. [49]. By high-throughput protein-expression analysis, the authors found that several factors, including the folding of mRNA head and the codon usage near this region, affected the translation efficiency in E. coli. The codon usage of 5′ coding sequence (CDS) does not only regulate the secondary structure of mRNA, but also influences the efficient ribosome docking. Therefore, Iasp can also be used as a fusion tag to improve the expression level of other recombinant proteins, such as two difficult-to-express proteins MMP13 and GDF8 tested in this study.

The interactions between the nascent peptide and the chaperones would alleviate the aggregation tendency of the highly expressed peptides and provide them more opportunities or directly assist them in folding into the correct 3D structure. For instance, co-expression of some chaperones and co-chaperones can prevent misfolding of eukaryotic proteins in prokaryotic system [50, 51]. Zhang et al. [25] reported that the combination of DnaK, DnaJ and GrpE (K/J/E) helped the folding of N-terminal nascent peptide and improved the solubility of the GFP partner in fusion protein. Consequently, the fluorescence of the fusion protein was enhanced in E. coli. Another chaperones, such as the novel Spy [26], or chaperone-interacted partner proteins, such as the classic MBP and NusA [17], can be used in the fusion proteins to enhance their solubility. For secretory proteins, the signal peptides also interact with corresponding chaperones which not only transfer the nascent peptides to the translocation machinery but also prevent aggregation. It was proven that alternating signal peptides or proper modification improved the expression-secretion efficiency of recombinant proteins simultaneously [52, 53]. However, some the signal peptides utilizing the SecYEG translocon, which only translocate the unfolded peptides, were reported to negatively affect the stability and folding of target proteins. For instance, the signal peptide of MBP (malE) and pelB led the thermodynamic destabilization of the C-terminal mature MBP or thioredoxin (Trx) due to the hydrophobic interactions between the signal peptides and the unfolded peptides. The interactions were thought necessary to hold the unfolded state before translocation [54,55,56,57]. Although the related secretory pathway of the Cry1Ia is unclear and the components participated in the machinery still keep uncovered, Iasp would interact with the corresponding chaperone(s) in its secretory pathway. In this study, soluble expression of IeGFP regulated by T7 promoter was observed and the production yield of soluble fraction was higher than that of eGFP. The solubility enhancing effect of Iasp on eGFP was similar to the well-known fusion tags NusA, MBP and Trx. However, both Iasp or Trx fused MMP13 (I-MMP13 or T-MMP13) and GDF8 (I-GDF8 or T-GDF8) were expressed in insoluble form. The expression result of T-MMP13 and T-GDF8 was consistent with the previous report [19]. Therefore, the fitness of solubility enhancing effect of Iasp on diverse recombinant proteins need to be investigated further. Several hypotheses have been suggested to explain the mechanisms of solubility enhancement by fusion tags, including formation of micelle-like structures, attracting chaperons, exerting an intrinsic chaperon-like activity or net charged (reviewed in [17]). As a signal peptide, the interaction of Iasp with the corresponding chaperon(s) would be supposed and the deletion mutation on its original protein Cry1Ia might provide a clue. After removal of the Iasp, the truncated Cry1Ia proteins (Cry1IaD44) accumulated inside the Bt cells and showed different degradation profile compared to the intact Cry1Ia. Interestingly, in E. coli BL21-star (DE3) strain, no visible difference between them were observed by SDS-PAGE analysis besides the expected bands of Cry1Ia, Cry1Ia44 and Cry1Ia73. The result might be attribute to the different protease constitution between E. coli and Bt cells, and the phenomenon implied the effect of Iasp on preventing the Cry1Ia protein from attacking by some proteases directly or indirectly.

Iasp cannot translocate the eGFP efficiently in E. coli. By confocal microscopy, most of IeGFP proteins accumulated in the cytosol of E. coli cells that was consistent with the western blot analysis. According to the previous reports, the saturation of corresponding secretory pathway led to accumulation of recombinant proteins in cytosol [41, 42]. Although a fraction of IeGFP molecules were detected as a smaller band that probably represented the molecules translocated into periplasm, no fluorescent signal in this location were captured by confocal microscopy. Similarly, the expression of pelB-eGFP was detected by western blot analysis but no fluorescent signal was observed either in the cytoplasm or periplasmic space. Western blot analysis showed that almost all of expressed pelB-eGFP proteins were digested into a 27 kDa band that was equal to the individually expressed eGFP. Therefore, we concluded the efficiently translocation of eGFP guided by pelB signal peptide regulated by Pac. However, the high translocation efficiency of pelB-eGFP would overload the SecYEG-translocon and result in the growth retardation of TAc-pelBeGFP strain. Out of the known GFP variants, the sfGFP is the only one that can fold into its fluorescent form upon translocation via the SecYEG-translocon [15, 29, 30]. The post translocation folding mechanism was probably responsible for the observation for E. coli cells expressing pelB-eGFP. The Iasp would guide some eGFP peptide into periplasm via an analogous pathway besides that most of IeGFP peptides could not be captured by the corresponding chaperone(s) in their secretory pathway for unknown reasons, and then folded into the fluorescent form in the cytoplasm. The fluorescent signal of torA-eGFP can be detected albeit weak. The signal peptide of torA can translocate the target proteins into periplasm by Tat system. Unlike the SecYEG-translocon, the Tat system only guides the fully folded and/or co-factor incorporated proteins translocation [31, 32]. This different translocation mechanism explained the completely opposite fluorescing ability of pelB-eGFP and torA-eGFP in vivo. The polarization of fluorescence of torA-eGFP observed by confocal microscopy indicated the periplasm localization and the phenomenon resulted from the plasmolysis of E. coli cells in response to the osmotic up-shock when resuspended in PBS buffer [33]. In addition, when the Iasp was located at the C-terminal of eGFP (eGFP-I), its translocation function and effects on enhancing fluorescent signal were both lost.

In Bt cells, the IeGFP could not be translocated out of cells or in low efficiency because its immunoblot or fluorescent signal emerged at the same time point as the eGFP. The result indicated that the target proteins would not only be released by corresponding secretory pathway but also by the lysis of mother cells. Kostichka et al. [40] reported the Cry1Ia protein in natural host AB88 was not detected in pure crystal samples isolated from a 52 h culture but was detected in 26 h pellets of cells. Therefore, we speculated that some soluble Cry1Ia proteins stayed in the mother cells of Bt strain may release directly into supernatant during the spore maturation. The release of the soluble components would also be one of factors leading to the decline of fluorescent intensity of the resuspended precipitates of the BAc-eGFP and BAc-IeGFP cell cultures during last 12 h, especially at the 72 h after inoculation. The dramatically increased fluorescent intensity of 72 h supernatant of both BAc-eGFP and BAc-IeGFP could also support the speculation. Moreover, during the sporulation period, the Pac promoter can accelerate the synthesis of the recombinant proteins that would prompt the formation of insoluble inclusion bodies. In this study, the rapid accumulations of eGFP and IeGFP after 48 h incubation were indicated by the immunoblot analysis. Therefore, the formation of inclusion bodies would be the second factor leading to the inconsistence between the significant decreasing of fluorescent intensity and the rapid accumulation of the protein products. The third factor would be the pH fluctuation in Bt cells at the latter sporulation stage. In Bacillus subtilis, the fluorescent intensity of a fusion proteins β-GFP, including the β subunit of prokaryotic RNA polymerase located at the N-terminal of GFP, was dramatically weaken during the sporulation stage V-VI by the decreased pH inside mother cells [58]. The period represented the last time before the mature spore release. The mCherry is more tolerant to a drop in pH [58]. Nevertheless, the fluorescent intensity of the resuspended BAc-IeGFP cells kept 3.5- to 4.1-fold times to that of BAc-eGFP during the whole culture period except the first 9 h, which were higher than the differences between the TAc-IeGFP and TAc-IeGFP (1.5- to 2.4-fold).

We also noticed the degradation of eGFP and IeGFP proteins in the Bt strains. In the cells at 9 or 12 h after incubation, the intact IeGFP or eGFP proteins were observed. But during the 12 to 36 h after inoculation, part of them were digested by unknown protease(s). After 48 h, the recombinant proteins accumulated rapidly and approximately half of them were processed by these protease(s). The genus Bacillus can produce diverse proteases and Bt is also an excellent source of proteases [59]. Generally, the overall protease activity of Bt strains follows a slow increase in the initial 12 h and then gradually increased to the peak at around 30 h after inoculation [59]. The protease activity variation would be partly responsible for the degradation process of the eGFP and IeGFP retained in Bt cells.

In supernatant of cell culture of corresponding Bt strains, the 26 kDa fragment, slightly smaller than the intact eGFP (27.9 kDa), was the main product. The N-terminal analysis revealed that the 26 kDa fragment started with GKGEELFT amino acids and therefore another cleavage site(s) would locate at the C-terminal of eGFP protein. The deficiency of the C-terminal of eGFP proteins would partially account for the weaker fluorescent intensity of eGFP and IeGFP in supernatant compared to the collected cells. Fox example, with loss of the C-terminal 11 amino acids, the expressed superfolder GFP 1-10 was insoluble and cannot fluoresce [60]. In addition, the immune signals of the ImCherry protein in the supernatant of cell culture and inside Bt cells were different in molecular weight. The result proved that there were different proteases responding to the degradation of ImCherry and IeGFP inside and outside the Bt cell. The intact ImCherry proteins expressed by the prokaryotic cells tested was slightly larger than its calculated molecular weight (33.0 kDa). This may be attributed to the unknown post-translational modification(s).

At present, little attention has been paid to the use of SPs with low translocation efficiency for recombinant protein production. The torA signal sequence was proven to direct expression of recombinant proteins in inclusion bodies even if the target was a well-soluble protein in E. coli [34]. This small inclusion body tag can help to express the toxic or unstable recombinant proteins. But the signal peptide of torA and Iasp would belong to different secretory pathways because the signal sequences of Tat system share the classic conversed sequence (S/T-RRXFLK), especially the double-arginine motif, which is not existed in Iasp [43,44,45]. More importantly, Iasp can guide the expression of eGFP at higher level than torA signal peptide under control of Pac promoter in this study.

In conclusion, we identified the capacity of the SP of Cry1Ia protein (Iasp) in improving the expression of eGFP and mCherry proteins in E. coli and Bt cells. The insertion of encoding sequence of Iasp optimized the secondary structure near the initial codon and then facilitated the docking of ribosome. The more efficient recruitment of ribosome would account for the stability of mRNA and the rapid synthesis of the fusion fluorescent proteins. Meanwhile, Iasp can keep a considerable fraction of the fusion fluorescent proteins soluble inside the cells that guarantee the correct folding of fluorescent proteins. Therefore, the higher production of the soluble IeGFP and ImCherry generated the more intense fluorescent signal inside bacterial cells and these fusion proteins could be used as ideal candidates of fluorescent protein variants. Moreover, the function of Iasp on improving the expression of the recombinant proteins should also be highlighted and worthy of further investigation. This study also hinted the versatility of some signal peptides.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

All plasmids and strains used in this work are detailed in Table 1. Unless otherwise noted, E. coli cells were incubated in Luria–Bertani medium (LB medium) with 50 μg/mL ampicillin for pMD19 and pHT304 derived vectors, or 50 μg/mL kanamycin for pET28a derived vectors at 37 °C with 200 rpm shaking. Bt strains grew in LB medium (containing 25 μg/mL erythromycin if harboring the pHT304 plasmid or its derivatives) at 28.5 °C with 200 rpm shaking.

Construction of expression vectors

pET expression constructions The egfp gene was amplified with primers EGFP-F and I/EGFP-R (Table 3) by PCR method and was TA-cloned into pMD19 vector (Takara, Tokyo, Japan). After sequence analysis, the BamHI/XhoI fragment of egfp gene was prepared and inserted into the corresponding site of the pET28aDel plasmid [61]. This vector is designated as p28aD-eGFP. The Iegfp gene was constructed by fusing Iasp encoding sequence (primers IEGFP-F and IEGFP-fuR) with egfp gene (primers IEGFP-fuF and I/EGFP-R) by overlapping PCR using primers IEGFP-F and I/EGFP-R (Table 3). The PCR product of Iegfp gene was cloned into pMD19 vector. After sequencing, the BamHI/XhoI restriction fragment of Iegfp gene was inserted into the corresponding site of the pET28aDel plasmid to form p28aD-IeGFP plasmid. The p22b-eGFP expression vector was constructed by ligating NcoI/SacI fragment of pET22b with same restriction fragment of egfp from the pAc-eGFP plasmid described below. The encoding sequences of matrix metalloprotease-13 (MMP13, genbank accession number AAP78940.1) and myostatin (growth differentiating factor-8, GDF8, genbank accession number 5F3B_C) genes and their fusion version I-MMP13, T-MMP13 (Trx-MMP13), T-GDF8 and I-GDF8 with Iasp (I) or Txr (T) were synthesized after codon optimization and then separately cloned into the BamHI/SacI site of the pET28aDel2 plasmid. The NcoI recognition site was added at the initial codon of the mmp13 and gdf8 genes. The pET28aDel2 was obtained by replacing the sequences between XbaI and BamHI of pET28a with 5′-AATAATTTTGTTTAACTTTAAGAAGGAGATATA. The T-eGFP encoding sequence was synthesized and inserted into the BamHI/SacI site the pET28aDel2 plasmid. The resulted plasmid was designated as p28aD2-T-eGFP. The p28aD2-M-eGFP and p28aD2-N-eGFP plasmids were constructed by replacing the trx sequence located between BamHI/NcoI site with the MBP and NusA encoding sequences, respectively. All of these expression vectors were separately transformed into BL21-star (DE3) strain by calcium chloride (CaCl2) transformation. Both the eGFP and IeGFP expressed by pET vectors described above were tagged by the His-tag at the C terminal.

Table 3 Primers used in this work
Full size table

pHT304 expression constructions The pHT304 plasmid was linearized by SacI and blunted by T4 DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher scientific, Grand Island, NY), and then recyclized by ligase to produce p304ΔSacI plasmid. Both the egfp (primers GFP-F and 304I/EGFP-R) and Iegfp (primers IEGFP-F and 304I/EGFP-R) gene were re-amplified by PCR method from the p28aD-eGFP and p28aD-IeGFP plasmids, respectively. Each PCR product contained the intact coding sequences (CDS) of the corresponding gene. The promoter (Pac, primers Pac-F and Pac-R) and terminator (Tac, primers Tac-F and Tac-R) of the cry1Ac gene were obtained by PCR method. The whole DNA extracted from a Bt strain preserved in the lab was used as the template. After sequencing, all of the Pac fragment (HindIII/BamHI), the Tac fragment (BamHI/KpnI) and the egfp gene or Iegfp gene (BamHI/SacI) were inserted one by one into the corresponding restriction sites of the p304ΔSacI plasmid. The plasmids were named pAc-eGFP or pAc-IeGFP. The cry1Ia gene (primers cry1Ia-F and cry1Ia-R) and its truncated variants cry1IaD44 (primers cry1IaD44-F and cry1Ia-R) and cry1IaD73 (primers cry1IaD73-F and cry1Ia-R) were amplified by PCR method using the Bt strain harboring a cry1Ia gene. These amplicons were cloned into the BamHI/SacI site of the pAc-eGFP, respectively, to obtain the pAc-Cry1Ia, pAc-Cry1IaD44 and pAc-Cry1IaD73 plasmids. The cry1Ia, cry1Ia44 and cry1Ia73 were also cloned into the BamHI/SacI site of pET28aDel plasmid for expression in the E. coli BL21-star (DE3) strain. The promoter of cry1Ia gene (Pi) was obtained by PCR method using primers Pi-F and Pi-R and then was used to replace the Pac sequence of pAc-eGFP or pAc-IeGFP with HindIII and BamHI. The resulting plasmids were designated as pI-eGFP and pI-IeGFP respectively.

The pAc-torAeGFP plasmid were constructed by inserting the torA fragment (the torA signal peptide encoding sequence) to the BamHI site of pAc-eGFP vector by ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). The torA fragment was obtained by PCR method using torAlaz-F and torAlaz-R primers with the genomic DNA of E. coli TG1 strain as the template. The pAc-pelBeGFP plasmid was constructed by the same method except that the pelB fragment (the pelB signal peptide encoding sequence) was amplified by pelBlaz-F and pelBlaz-R primer with the pET22b plasmid as the template. Similarly, the amplicon of Iasp encoding sequence amplified by egfp-F and egfp-R primers was recombined into the XhoI site of pAc-eGFP vector to produce the pAc-eGFPI plasmid.

The plasmid pAc-mCherry was constructed by replacing the egfp gene in pAc-eGFP plasmid with mcherry fragment amplified using mCherry-F and 304I/mC-R primers. The template for the PCR reaction was pCMV-N-mCherry plasmid (Beyotime biotechnology, Beijing, China) which is used for protein expression in mammalian cells. The ImCherry gene was constructed by fusing Iasp encoding sequence (primers IEGFP-F and ImC-fuR) with mCherry gene (primers ImC-fuF and 304I/mC-R) by overlapping PCR using primers IEGFP-F and 304I/mC-R and then was inserted into the BamHI/SacI sites of the pAc-eGFP plasmid. The resulting plasmid was designated as pAc-ImCherry.

All of the pHT304, pAc-eGFP, pAc-IeGFP, pAc-Cry1Ia, pAc-Cry1IaD44 and pAc-Cry1IaD73, pI-eGFP, pI-IeGFP, pAc-pelBeGFP, pAc-torAeGFP, pAc-eGFPI, pAc-mCherry and pAc-ImCherry plasmids were transformed separately into calcium chloride (CaCl2) treated competent cells of E. coli TG1 strain and then into Bt BMB 171 strain by Bio-rad (Hercules, CA) MicroPulser™ Electroporator. The electroporation was performed using the 0.2 cm cuvette with 2.5 kilovolt pulse according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Proteins expression and samples preparation

E. coli TG1 strain The single colony of each E. coli TG1 strain harboring p304ΔSacI or its derived vectors described above was inoculated into 3 mL LB medium respectively and incubated overnight. The optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of cell cultures for all strains were adjusted to be equal and then 6 μL cell culture of each strain was collected and inoculated into 6 mL fresh LB medium. Unless otherwise noted, five repeats were inoculated for each strain. At 4, 8, 10, 12 or 24 h after inoculation, 1 mL of cell cultures from each repeat for each strain were taken and mixed. Out of the 5 mL mixture for each sample, 2 mL were separated and used to analyze the protein expression by western blot and the remaining 3 mL mixture were used for optical density and/or fluorescence detection. The analysis was replicated 3 times.

Bt BMB 171 strain The samples were prepared as same as the E. coli TG1 strains described above with the exception that each strains was sampled at 9, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 or 72 h after inoculation. The cells and supernatant of the 5 mL mixture were separated by centrifugation. Then they were used for proteins expression analysis and fluorescence investigation. To express Cry1Ia and its truncated variants in Bt cells, the BAc-Cry1Ia, BAc-Cry1IaD44 and BAc-Cry1IaD73 strains were cultivated for 72 h and the total proteins in cells was analyzed by SDS-PAGE. In addition, the precipitates of BAc-Cry1Ia, BAc-Cry1IaD44 and BAc-Cry1IaD73 were resuspended by alkali buffer (50 mM Na2CO3, 10 mM dithiothreitol, pH 10.5). After 1 h incubation at 37 °C, the soluble and insoluble components were separated by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

E. coli BL21-star (DE3) strain The single colony of each BL21-star (DE3) strain was inoculated into 3 mL LB medium respectively and incubated at 37 °C with 250 rpm shaking overnight. Then 50 μL cell culture for each strain was pipetted into 50 mL fresh LB medium and continuously cultivated in the same condition. When the OD600 of the cell culture reached 0.8, the recombinant protein expression was induced by 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside) with 250 rpm shaking for 4 h. After induction, cells for each strain were harvested respectively by centrifuging at 10,000 rpm for 10 min and were washed by deionized water for three times. The cells were resuspended in 20 mL ice-cold LE buffer (50 mmol/L Na2HPO4, 0.3 mol/L NaCl, pH 8.0). Two milliliters of the cell suspension for each strain was pipetted into a new tube for protein analysis. The remaining cells were ultrasonic-treated in ice-cold condition. The lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min and then the supernatant and the resuspended precipitate by same volume of LE buffer as the supernatant of each strain was prepared for SDS-PAGE analysis.

Fluorescence detection

The fluorescent signals were detected by Shimadzu RF530PC Spectrofluorophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). The excitation wavelength (EX) was 488 nm and the fluorescent intensities were recorded at 511 nm (emission wavelength, EM) for eGFP and IeGFP proteins. The EX/EM for detecting the mCherry were 565 nm and 603 nm, respectively. The fluorescent intensity is an arbitrary unit (A.U.). Before recording, the emission spectrum of each strain was scanned from 450 nm to 650 nm to confirm the emission peak was at or very close to the EM. The slit widths of EX and EM and the sensitivity of detection were indicated independently. The sensitivity at high mode is about 50 times higher than that at low mode according to the specification of RF 5301PC. For Bt strains, both the supernatant of the cell culture after centrifugation and the cells resuspended by fresh LB medium were monitored. For each E. coli strain, the whole cell culture was the loading sample. Each treatment for either E. coli or Bt strains was replicated three times. Unless otherwise noted, in each replication every record represented the value of mixture from 5 parallel tubes.

Proteins analysis by SDS-PAGE and western blot

Unless otherwise noted, the collected cells of each sample from 2 mL culture were resuspended by 100 μL PBS buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 2 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) and the corresponding supernatant of Bt strains was concentrated to 200 μL by ultrafiltration using Amicon Ultra-0.5 Centrifugal Filters (3 kDa, Millipore, MA, USA). All of the protein samples were mixed with one-fourth volume of 5 × SDS gel-loading buffer respectively, and boiled for 5 min. After centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min, they were loaded onto gels for separation by SDS-PAGE and analyzed after Coomassie bright blue staining.

For western blot analysis, the separated proteins were transformed onto the nitrocellulose membrane without staining and incubated with rabbit antiserum against IeGFP protein and the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG (H + L) antibody (MultiSciences, HangZhou, China) successively. For detecting mCherry and ImCherry proteins, the primary antibody was the mCherry-tag monoclonal antibody (MultiSciences, HangZhou, China) and the secondary antibody was the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) antibody (MultiSciences, HangZhou, China). The target bands were visualized using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma, St. Louis, MO).

mRNA analysis of Iegfp and egfp gene

The transcription levels of Iegfp and egfp gene were compared by real-time quantitative PCR method. First, the total RNAs of TAc-eGFP and TAc-IeGFP cells collected at different times were extracted using RNAiso Plus (Takara Biomedical Technology, Beijing, China). Second, the obtained RNA samples were reverse-transcribed to cDNA by PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Biomedical Technology, Beijing, China). Finaly, the cDNAs were used for real-time PCR (Takara Premix Ex Taq for Probe qPCR) to quantify the transcription level of egfp and Iegfp genes. The Hcat gene of E. coli was used as the reference gene [62]. The primers used for real-time PCR were listed in Table 2. The differential expression analysis of egfp and Iegfp genes were evaluated by 2−ΔCt method [63].

The secondary structures of nucleotides near the initial codon (−4 ~ + 37 nt) for both Iegfp and egfp genes were predicted by RNAstructure software [47]. The structure with lowest folding energy for each sequence were chosen for comparison.

Fluorescence localization

The cells were prepared by Schlegel’s method with modification [15]. Briefly, cells corresponding to 1 A600 unit were harvested (4000×g, 2 min) and washed by 1 mL PBS buffer twice. Subsequently, 600 μL fixing solution (2% Paraformaldehyde, 2.5% Glutaraldehyde in PBS) was added and cells were incubated for 45 min at room temperature (RT). Subsequently, cells were washed three times with PBS and resuspended in 100 μL PBS. Three microliters of the cell suspension was mounted on a glass slide. Fluorescence images of cells were obtained using inverted confocal microscope (Leica SP8) with a 60 × times oil immersion objective (Leica). The resulting images were recorded with the LAS-AF-Lite software (Leica).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Zimmer M. Green fluorescent protein (GFP): applications, structure, and related photophysical behavior. Chem Rev. 2002;102:759–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shaner NC, Steinbach PA, Tsien RY. A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods. 2005;2:905–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Snapp EL. Fluorescent proteins: a cell biologist’s user guide. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19:649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Crameri A, Whitehorn EA, Tate E, Stemmer WPC. Improved green fluorescent protein by molecular evolution using DNA shuffling. Nat Biotechnol. 1996;14:315–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fukuda H, Arai M, Kuwajima K. Folding of green fluorescent protein and the cycle3 mutant. Biochemistry. 2000;39:12025–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang JD, Herman C, Tipton KA, Gross CA, Weissman JS. Directed evolution of substrate-optimized GroEL/S chaperonins. Cell. 2002;111:1027–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang H-C, Kaiser CM, Hartl FU, Barral JM. De novo folding of GFP fusion proteins: high efficiency in eukaryotes but not in bacteria. J Mol Biol. 2005;353:397–409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Plaxco KW, Simons KT, Baker D. Contact order, transition state placement and the refolding rates of single domain proteins. J Mol Biol. 1998;277:985–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsien RY. The green fluorescent protein. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:509–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang G, Gurtu V, Kain SR. An enhanced green fluorescent protein allows sensitive detection of gene transfer in mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;227:707–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pedelacq JD, Cabantous S, Tran T, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS. Engineering and characterization of a superfolder green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:79–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta SK, Shukla P. Advanced technologies for improved expression of recombinant proteins in bacteria: perspectives and applications. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36:1089–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Overton TW. Recombinant protein production in bacterial hosts. Drug Discov Today. 2014;19:590–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosano GL, Ceccarelli EA. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schlegel S, Rujas E, Ytterberg AJ, Zubarev RA, Luirink J, de Gier J-W. Optimizing heterologous protein production in the periplasm of E. coli by regulating gene expression levels. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:24–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sørensen HP, Mortensen KK. Soluble expression of recombinant proteins in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 2005;4:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Costa S, Almeida A, Castro A, Domingues L. Fusion tags for protein solubility, purification and immunogenicity in Escherichia coli: the novel Fh8 system. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Waldo GS, Standish BM, Berendzen J, Terwilliger TC. Rapid protein-folding assay using green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:691–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marblestone JG, Edavettal SC, Lim Y, Lim P, Zuo X, Butt TR. Comparison of SUMO fusion technology with traditional gene fusion systems: enhanced expression and solubility with SUMO. Protein Sci. 2006;15:182–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ikeno S, Haruyama T. Boost protein expression through co-expression of LEA-like peptide in Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082824.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen TKM, Ki MR, Son RG, Pack SP. The NT11, a novel fusion tag for enhancing protein expression in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:2205–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ojima-Kato T, Nagai S, Nakano H. N-terminal SKIK peptide tag markedly improves expression of difficult-to-express proteins in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2017;123:540–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiao W, Jiang L, Wang W, Wang R, Fan J. Evaluation of rice tetraticopeptide domain-containing thioredoxin as a novel solubility-enhancing fusion tag in Escherichia coli. J Biosci Bioeng. 2018;125:160–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao W, Liu L, Du G, Liu S. A multifunctional tag with the ability to benefit the expression, purification, thermostability and activity of recombinant proteins. J Biotechnol. 2018;283:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang A, Cantor EJ, Barshevsky T, Chong S. Productive interaction of chaperones with substrate protein domains allows correct folding of the downstream GFP domain. Gene. 2005;350:25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ruan A, Ren C, Quan S. Conversion of the molecular chaperone spy into a novel fusion tag to enhance recombinant protein expression. J Biotechnol. 2019;307:131–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kudla G, Murray AW, Tollervey D, Plotkin JB. Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science. 2009;324:255–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Siller E, DeZwaan DC, Anderson JF, Freeman BC, Barral JM. Slowing bacterial translation speed enhances eukaryotic protein folding efficiency. J Mol Biol. 2010;396:1310–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dinh T, Bernhardt TG. Using superfolder green fluorescent protein for periplasmic protein localization studies. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:4984–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Aronson DE, Costantini LM, Snapp EL. Superfolder GFP is fluorescent in oxidizing environments when targeted via the Sec translocon. Traffic. 2011;12:543–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Costa TRD, Felisberto-Rodrigues C, Meir A, Prevost MS, Redzej A, Trokter M, Waksman G. Secretion systems in Gram-negative bacteria: structural and mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:343.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Berks BC. The twin-arginine protein translocation pathway. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:843–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Santini C-L, Bernadac A, Zhang M, Chanal A, Ize B, Blanco C, Wu L-F. Translocation of Jellyfish green fluorescent protein via the Tat system of Escherichia coli and change of its periplasmic localization in response to osmotic up-shock. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:8159–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jong WSP, Vikström D, Houben D, van den Berg van Saparoea HB, de Gier J-W, Luirink J. Application of an E. coli signal sequence as a versatile inclusion body tag. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16:50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Adalat R, Saleem F, Crickmore N, Naz S, Shakoori A. In vivo crystallization of three-tomain cry toxins. Toxins. 2017;9:80–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schnepf E, Crickmore N, Van Rie J, Lereclus D, Baum J, Feitelson J, Zeigler DR, Dean DH. Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62:775–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Gleave AP, Williams R, Hedges RJ. Screening by polymerase chain reaction of Bacillus thuringiensis serotypes for the presence of cryV-like insecticidal protein genes and characterization of a cryV gene cloned from B. thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:1683–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Shin BS, Park SH, Choi SK, Koo BT, Lee ST, Kim JI. Distribution of cryV-type insecticidal protein genes in Bacillus thuringiensis and cloning of cryV-type genes from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. entomocidus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:2402–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Tounsi S, Jaoua S. Identification of a promoter for the crystal protein-encoding gene cry1Ia from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;208:215–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kostichka K, Warren GW, Mullins M, Mullins AD, Palekar NV, Craig JA, Koziel MG, Estruch JJ. Cloning of a cryV-type insecticidal protein gene from Bacillus thuringiensis: the cryV-encoded protein is expressed early in stationary phase. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:2141–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. DeLisa MP, Lee P, Palmer T, Georgiou G. Phage shock protein PspA of Escherichia coli relieves saturation of protein export via the Tat pathway. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:366–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Rothman JE, Orci L. Molecular dissection of the secretory pathway. Nature. 1992;355:409–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Wilson JW. Bacterial Protein Secretion Mechanisms. In: Nickerson CA, Schurr MJ, editors. Molecular paradigms of infectious disease: a bacterial perspective[M]. Boston: Springer; 2006. p. 274–320.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Freudl R. Leaving home ain’t easy: protein export systems in Gram-positive bacteria. Res Microbiol. 2013;164:664–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Goosens VJ, Monteferrante CG, van Dijl JM. The Tat system of Gram-positive bacteria. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) Molecular Cell Research. 2014;1843:1698–706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Schnepf HE, Wong HC, Whiteley HR. Expression of a cloned Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein gene in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:4110–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Reuter JS, Mathews DH. RNAstructure: software for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Kozak M. Regulation of translation via mRNA structure in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Gene. 2005;361:13–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Boël G, Letso R, Neely H, Price WN, Wong K-H, Su M, Luff JD, Valecha M, Everett JK, Acton TB, Xiao R, Montelione GT, Aalberts DP, Hunt JF. Codon influence on protein expression in E. coli correlates with mRNA levels. Nature. 2016;529:358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Georgiou G, Valax P. Expression of correctly folded proteins in Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1996;7:190–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Baneyx F. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1999;10:411–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Borrero J, Jiménez JJ, Gútiez L, Herranz C, Cintas LM, Hernández PE. Protein expression vector and secretion signal peptide optimization to drive the production, secretion, and functional expression of the bacteriocin enterocin A in lactic acid bacteria. J Biotechnol. 2011;156:76–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Klatt S, Konthur Z. Secretory signal peptide modification for optimized antibody-fragment expression-secretion in Leishmania tarentolae. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Beena K, Udgaonkar JB, Varadarajan R. Effect of signal peptide on the stability and folding kinetics of maltose binding protein. Biochemistry. 2004;43:3608–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Krishnan B, Kulothungan SR, Patra AK, Udgaonkar JB, Varadarajan R. SecB-mediated protein export need not occur via kinetic partitioning. J Mol Biol. 2009;385:1243–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kulothungan SR, Das M, Johnson M, Ganesh C, Varadarajan R. Effect of crowding agents, signal peptide, and chaperone SecB on the folding and aggregation of E. coli maltose binding protein. Langmuir. 2009;25:6637–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Singh P, Sharma L, Kulothungan SR, Adkar BV, Prajapati RS, Ali PSS, Krishnan B, Varadarajan R. Effect of signal peptide on stability and folding of Escherichia coli Thioredoxin. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e63442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Doherty GP, Bailey K, Lewis PJ. Stage-specific fluorescence intensity of GFP and mCherry during sporulation in Bacillus Subtilis. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:303–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Brar SK, Verma M, Tyagi RD, Surampalli RY, Barnabé S, Valéro JR. Bacillus thuringiensis proteases: production and role in growth, sporulation and synergism. Process Biochem. 2007;42:773–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Cabantous S, Terwilliger TC, Waldo GS. Protein tagging and detection with engineered self-assembling fragments of green fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:102–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Gao J, Zhang Y, Zhao Q, Lin C, Xu X, Shen Z. Transgenic rice expressing a fusion protein of Cry1Ab and Cry9Aa confers resistance to a broad spectrum of lepidopteran pests. Crop Sci. 2011;51:2535–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhou K, Zhou L, Lim Q, Zou R, Stephanopoulos G, Too HP. Novel reference genes for quantifying transcriptional responses of Escherichia coli to protein overexpression by quantitative PCR. BMC Mol Biol. 2011;12:18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Arantes O, Lereclus D. Construction of cloning vectors for Bacillus thuringiensis. Gene. 1991;108:115–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Gibson TJ. Studies on the Epstein-Barr virus genome. Cambridge: University of Cambridge; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Li L, Yang C, Liu Z, Li F, Yu Z. Screening of acrystalliferous mutants from Bacillus thuringiensis and their transformation properties. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao Acta Microbiologica Sinica. 2000;40:85–90 (In Chinese).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. Jianhua Lv of college of life sciences in Shanxi Agricultural University for her kindly gift of the egfp gene, and we also appreciate Dr. Rupert Fray of the University of Nottingham for revising this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Project 31601690 supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Life Sciences, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, 030801, China

    Jianhua Gao, Hongmei Qian, Xiaoqin Guo, Yi Mi, Junpei Guo, Juanli Zhao, Zhongwei Tang & Xingchun Wang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Institute of Insect Sciences, College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310058, China

    Chao Xu, Ting Zheng, Chaoyang Lin & Zhicheng Shen

  3. Experimental Teaching Center, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, 030801, China

    Ming Duan

  4. Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    Yiwei Jiang

Authors
  1. Jianhua Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongmei Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoqin Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Mi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Junpei Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Juanli Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chao Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ting Zheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ming Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhongwei Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Chaoyang Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zhicheng Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yiwei Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Xingchun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J Gao and XW conceived of the presented idea and planned the experiments. J Gao, HQ, XG, YM, JGuo, XW, CL and ZS analyzed the data. JGao wrote the manuscript with support from XW, CL, ZS, YJ. HQ, XG, YM, J Guo and JZ constructed the vectors and analyzed the protein expression. J Gao, HQ, XG, YM and J Guo investigated of fluorescent intensity with support from MD and ZT. J Gao, HQ, XG and MD took photographs with confocal microscope. CX and TZ prepared the polyclonal antibodies of IeGFP. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianhua Gao or Xingchun Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The fluorescent intensity data of TAc-eGFP and TAc-IeGFP cell cultures. Table S2. The fluorescent intensity data of the resuspended BAc-eGFP and BAc-IeGFP cells. Table S3. The fluorescent intensity data of the supernatant of BAc-eGFP and BAc-IeGFP cell cultures. Table S4. The fluorescent intensity data of five E. coli strains expressing eGFP and its variants. Table S5. The fluorescent intensity data of BI-eGFP and BI-IeGFP cells. Table S6. The fluorescent intensity data of the supernatants of BI-eGFP and BI-IeGFP cell cultures. Table S7. The fluorescent intensity data of TAc-mCherry and TAc-ImCherry cell cultures. Table S8. The fluorescent intensity data of supernatants of BAc-mCherry and BAc-ImCherry cell cultures. Table S9. The fluorescent intensity data of BAc-ImCherry cells. Figure S1. Comparison of fluorescent proteins expressed in different strains. Figure S2. Solubility analysis of three recombinant proteins. Figure S3. SDS-PAGE analysis of Cry1Ia and its truncated variants.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, J., Qian, H., Guo, X. et al. The signal peptide of Cry1Ia can improve the expression of eGFP or mCherry in Escherichia coli and Bacillus thuringiensis and enhance the host’s fluorescent intensity. Microb Cell Fact 19, 112 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01371-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01371-8

Keywords

Microbial Cell Factories

ISSN: 1475-2859

Contact us