Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A genetic view on the role of prolonged drought stress and mating systems on post-drought recovery, persistence and drought memory of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The consequences of recurrent drought events compared with a single drought and its interaction with deliberate selfing, compared with open-pollination on post-stress recovery, persistence, and drought memory, are not understood in orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). A long term study was started by creating 25 selfed (S1) and 25 open-pollinated progeny of orchardgrass in 2012. Populations were studied in the field, applying a normal and a recurrent drought stress environment for 4 years (2013–2016). In 2016, after the first harvest (June), watering was withheld in both moisture environments for 2 months and then plants were re-watered and evaluated for post-drought recovery and drought memory. On average, open pollination caused higher forage yield in the second and third years; while, in the first and fourth years, there was no significant difference. Obligate selfing reduced persistence of genotypes but did not affect recovery after prolonged drought. The early flowering genotypes had more plant productivity, yield stability, persistence, and drought tolerance, and were also capable of more regrowth and recovery. The results showed that genotypes of orchardgrass constantly performed differently under periodic drought as compared to prolonged drought stress. Moreover, there were significant genetic variations between genotypes in terms of stress memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdollahi M, Saeidnia F, Majidi MM, Mirlohi A (2018) Growth traits associated with drought survival, recovery and persistence of cocksfoot under prolonged drought treatments. Crop Pasture Sci 70:85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Pap 56:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW, Leary RE (1986) Heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations of animals. In: Soule ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez-Venegas R, Abdallat AA, Guo M, Alfano JR, Avramova Z (2014) Epigenetic control of a transcription factor at the cross section of two antagonistic pathways. Epigenetics 2:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annicchiarico P, Pecetti L, Bouzerzour H, Kallida R, Khedim A, Porqueddu C, Simões NM, Volaire F, Lelièvre F (2011) Adaptation of contrasting cocksfoot plant types to agricultural environments across the Mediterranean basin. Environ Exp Bot 74:82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlin GN, Frey KJ (1990) Selection oat for yield in low productivity environments. Crop Sci 30:556–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avramova Z (2015) Transcriptional memory of a stress: transient chromatin and memory (epigenetic) marks at stress response genes. Plant J 83:149–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Kohn JR (1991) Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plants: implications for conservation. In: Falk DA, Holsinger KE (eds) Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl JD, Ray IM (2004) Comparison of S1 with open-pollination progenies in selection for yield in crested wheatgrass. Crop Sci 44:768–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum A (2011) Plant breeding for water-limited environments. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bouslama M, Schapaugh WT (1984) Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Sci 24:933–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breese EL, Hayward MD (1972) The genetic basis of present breeding methods in forage crops. Euphytica 21:324–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce TJA, Matthes MC, Napier JA, Pickett JA (2007) Stressful “memories” of plants: evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Sci 173:603–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chai Q, Jin F, Merewitz E, Hung B (2010) Growth and physiological traits associated with drought survival and post-drought recovery in perennial turfgrass species. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 135:125–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D, Charlesworth B (1987) Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:237–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Ogée J, Allard V et al (2005) Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437:529–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke Topp C, Parkin GW, Ferre TPA (2008) Soil water content. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science, Pinawa, pp 939–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen BR, Chapman DF, Quigley PE (2005) Persistence of Phalaris aquatica in grazed pastures. 1. Plant and tiller population characteristics. Aust J Exp Agric 45:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dencic S, Kastori R, Kobiljski B, Duggan B (2000) Evaluation of grain yield and its components in wheat cultivates and landraces under near optimal and drought conditions. Euphytica 113:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Santis G (2007) Effect of generation of inbreeding on yield and agronomic traits in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea, Schreb.). Breeding and seed production for conventional and organic agriculture. In: Proceedings of the XXVI meeting of the EUCARPIA fodder crops and amenity grasses section, XVI meeting of the EUCARPIA Medicago spp. group, Perugia, Italy, pp 104–107

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Burnt Mill

    Google Scholar 

  • Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev 29:185–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez GCJ (1992) Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. In: Kuo CC (ed) Proceedings of an international symposium on adaptation to food crops to temperature and water stress. AVRDC, Shanhua, Taiwan, pp 257–270

  • Fleta-Soriano E, Munne-Bosch S (2016) Stress memory and the inevitable effects of drought: a physiological perspective. Front Plant Sci 7:143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00143

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hu T, Jin Y, Li H, Amombo E, Fu J (2015a) Stress memory induced transcriptional and metabolic changes of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) in response to salt stress. Physiol Plant 156(1):54–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu T, Liu SQ, Amombo E, Fu JM (2015b) Stress memory induced rearrangements of HSP transcription, photosystem II photochemistry and metabolism of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) in response to high-temperature stress. Front Plant Sci 6:403–425

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Wang Zh (2005) Physiological recovery of Kentucky bluegrass from drought stress. Int Turf Soc Res J 10:867–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Husband BC, Schemske DW (1995) Magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in a diploid population of Epilobium angustifolium (Onagraceae). Heredity 75:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husband BC, Schemske DW (1996) Evolution of the magnitude and timing of inbreeding depression in plants. Evolution 50:54–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. In: Field CB, Stocker TF, Dahe Q (eds) A Special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari A, Naseri H (2007) Genetic variation and correlation among yield and quality traits in cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.). J Agric Sci 145:599–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang LF, Qi X, Zhang XQ, Huang LK, Ma X, Xie WG (2014) Analysis of diversity and relationships among orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerataDactylis glomerata L.) accessions using start codon-targeted markers. Genet Mol Res 13(2):4406–4418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2007) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RN, Jenabzadeh P (1981) Variation in self-fertility, flowering time and inflorescence production in inbred Lolium perenne L. J Agric Sci 96:521–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanapeckas J, Lemeziene N, Stukonis V, Tarakanovas P (2008) Drought tolerance of turfgrass genetic resources. Biologija 54(2):121–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobabe G (1983) Heterosis and hybrid seed production in fodder grass. In: Frankel R (ed) Heterosis: reappraisal of theory and practice. Springer, Berlin, pp 124–137

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA (1984) Inbreeding depression and proximity-dependent crossing success in Phlox drummondii. Evolution 38:116–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Liu F (2016) Drought stress memory and drought stress tolerance in plants: biochemical and molecular basis. In: Hossain M, Wani S, Bhattacharjee S, Burritt D, Tran LS (eds) Drought stress tolerance in plants, vol 1. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu N, Ding Y, Fromm M, Avramova Z (2014) Different gene-specific mechanisms determine the ‘revised-response’ memory transcription patterns of a subset of A. thaliana dehydration stress responding genes. Nucleic Acids Res 42:5556–5566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lloret F, Siscart D, Dalmases C (2004) Canopy recovery after drought dieback in holm-oak Mediterranean forests of Catalonia (NE Spain). Glob Change Biol 10:2092–2099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meunier J, Kolliker M (2013) Inbreeding depression in an insect with maternal care: Influences of family interactions, life stage and offspring sex. J Evol Biol 26:2209–2220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita K, Tanakamaru S, Maitani T, Kimura K (2005) Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. Environ Exp Bot 53:205–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moorad JA, Wade MJ (2005) A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression. Genetics 170:1373–1384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Norton MR, Volaire F, Fukai S, Lelievre F (2008) Measurement of summer dormancy in temperate perennial pasture grasses. Aust J Agric Res 59:498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onokpise OU, Bowley SR, Tomes DT, Twamley BE (1987) Evaluation of self and polycross progeny testing in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.) for forage and seed yield. Plant Breed 98:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintó-Marijuan M, Cotado A, Fleta-Soriano E, Munné-Bosch S (2016) Drought stress memory in the photosynthetic mechanisms of an invasive CAM species, Aptenia cordifolia. Photosynth Res 131:241–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Resco V, Ewers BE, Sun W, Huxman TE, Weltzin JF, Williams DG (2009) Drought-induced hydraulic limitations constrain leaf gas exchange recovery after precipitation pulses in the C3 woody legume, Prosopis velutina. New Phytol 181:672–682

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saeidnia F, Majidi MM, Mirlohi A, Manafi M (2017a) Productivity, persistence and traits related to drought tolerance in smooth bromegrass. Plant Breed 136:270–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saeidnia F, Majidi MM, Mirlohi A, Soltan S (2017b) Physiological and tolerance indices useful for drought tolerance selection in smooth bromegrass. Crop Sci 57:282–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saeidnia F, Majidi MM, Mirlohi A, Ahmadi B (2018) Physiological responses of drought tolerance in orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) in association with persistence and summer dormancy. Crop Pasture Sci 69(5):515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salinger M (2005) Climate variability and change: past, present and future—an overview. Clim Change 70:9–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanada Y, Gras MC, Van Santen E (2010) Cocksfoot. In: Boller BU, Posselt K, Veronesi DF (eds) Fodder crops and amenity grasses, handbook of plant breeding, vol 5. Springer, New York, pp 317–328

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Spanani S, Majidi MM, Hughes N (2018) Genetics of inbreeding effects in smooth bromegrass. Crop Sci 58(5):1899–1906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statgraphics (2016) Statgraphics. Version 17.2.1: Stat Point Inc

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JG (1980) Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart AV, Ellison NW (2011) Dacytlis. In: Kole C (ed) Wild crop relatives: genomic and breeding resources: millets and grasses. Springer, Berlin, pp 73–87

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tester M, Langridge P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327:818–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PK, Ericksen PJ, Herrero M, Challinor AJ (2014) Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: a review. Glob Change Biol 20:3313–3328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torkian M, Sabzalian MR, Ehtemam MH (2019) A simultaneous effect of selfing and Epichloë endophyte on forage, seed yield and turf characteristics of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Grass Forage Sci 00:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Santen E, Casler MD (1987) Effects of inbreeding and genetic variation on forage quality traits and dry matter yield in Dactylis glomerata L. subspecies. Plant Breed 98:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volaire F, Barkaoui K, Norton MR (2014) Designing resilient and sustainable grasslands for a drier future: adaptive strategies, functional traits and biotic interactions. Eur J Agron 52:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter J, Nagy L, Hein R, Rascher U, Beierkuhnlein C, Willner E, Jentsch A (2011) Do plants remember drought? Hints towards a drought-memory in grasses. Environ Exp Bot 71:34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zavalloni C, Gielen B, Lemmens CMHM, de Boeck HJ, Blasi S, van den Bergh S, Nijs I, Ceulemans R (2008) Does a warmer climate with frequent mild water shortages protect grassland communities against a prolonged drought? Plant Soil 308:119–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) and the Isfahan University of Technology (IUT) for the award of a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship to the first author.

Funding

This work was supported by the Iran National Science Foundation, Science deputy of presidency and the Isfahan University of Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Saeidnia.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 207 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saeidnia, F., Majidi, M.M., Mirlohi, A. et al. A genetic view on the role of prolonged drought stress and mating systems on post-drought recovery, persistence and drought memory of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). Euphytica 216, 91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02624-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02624-8

Keywords

Navigation