Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study of remote sensing classification methods for monitoring and assessing desert vegetation using a UAV-based multispectral sensor

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Restoration programs require long-term monitoring and assessment of vegetation growth and productivity. Remote sensing technology is considered to be one of the most powerful technologies for assessing vegetation. However, several limitations have been observed with regard to the use of satellite imagery, especially in drylands, due to the special structure of desert plants. Therefore, this study was conducted in Kuwait’s Al Abdali protected area, which is dominated by a Rhanterium epapposum community. This work aimed to determine whether Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) multispectral imagery could eliminate the challenges associated with satellite imagery by examining the vegetation indices and classification methods for very high multispectral resolution imagery using UAVs. The results showed that the transformed difference vegetation index (TDVI) performed better with arid shrubs and grasses than did the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). It was found that the NDVI underestimated the vegetation coverage, especially in locations with high vegetation coverage. It was also found that Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) classifiers demonstrated a higher accuracy, with a significant overall accuracy of 93% and a kappa coefficient of 0.89. Therefore, we concluded that SVM and ML are the best classifiers for assessing desert vegetation and the use of UAVs with multispectral sensors can eliminate some of the major limitations associated with satellite imagery, particularly when dealing with tiny plants such as native desert vegetation. We also believe that these methods are suitable for the purpose of assessing vegetation coverage to support revegetation and restoration programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas, A., Minallh, N., Ahmad, N., Abid, S., & Khan, M. (2016). K-means and ISODATA clustering algorithms for landcover classification using remote sensing. Sindh University Research Journal-SURJ, 48(2).

  • Abdullah, M. M., Addae-Wireko, L., & Tena-Gonzalez, G. A. (2017). Assessing native desert vegetation recovery in a war-affected area using multispectral and hyperspectral imagery: a case study of the Sabah Al-Ahmad Nature Reserve, Kuwait. Restoration Ecology, 25(6), 982–993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, F. (2012). Spectral vegetation indices performance evaluated for Cholistan Desert. Journal of Geography regional Planning, 5(8), 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Salameen, F., Al-Amad, S., & Al-Hashash, H. (2014). Determination of genetic variation of Rhanterium epapposum in Kuwait desert using RAPD and SRAP DNA-based markers. Kuwait Journal of Science, 41(3).

  • Al-Sulaimi, J. S., Mollah, M. A., & Matti, M. A. (1990). Geotechnical properties of calcrete soil (Gatch) in Kuwait. Engineering Geology, 28(1–2), 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Wassai, F. A., & Kalyankar, N. (2013). Major limitations of satellite images. Journal of Global Research in Computer Science, 5(4), 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsharrah, S. A., Bruce, D. A., Bouabid, R., Somenahalli, S., & Corcoran, P. A. (2015) High-spatial resolution multispectral and panchromatic satellite imagery for mapping perennial desert plants. In Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications VI, (Vol. 9644, pp. 96440Z): International Society for Optics and Photonics.

  • Aly, A. A., Al-Omran, A. M., Sallam, A. S., Al-Wabel, M. I., & Al-Shayaa, M. S. (2016). Vegetation cover change detection and assessment in arid environment using multi-temporal remote sensing images and ecosystem management approach. Solid Earth, 7(2), 713–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannari, A., Asalhi, H., & Teillet, P. M. (2002) Transformed difference vegetation index (TDVI) for vegetation cover mapping. In IEEE International geoscience and remote sensing symposium, (Vol. 5, pp. 3053–3055): IEEE.

  • Bannari, A., El-Battay, A., Hameid, N., & Tashtoush, F. (2017). Salt-affected soil mapping in an arid environment using semi-empirical model and Landsat-OLI data. Advances in Remote Sensing, 6, 260–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannari, A., Guedon, A., & El-Ghmari, A. (2016). Mapping slight and moderate saline soils in irrigated agricultural land using advanced land imager sensor (EO-1) data and semi-empirical models. Communications in Soil Science Plant Analysis, 47(16), 1883–1906.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bannari, A., Morin, D., & Bonn, F. (1995). A review of vegetation indices. Remote Sensing Reviews., 13, 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzegar, M., Ebadi, H., & Kiani, A. (2015). Comparison of different vegetation indices for very high-resolution images, specific case UltraCam-D imagery. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spatial Information Sciences, 40.

  • Berhane, T., Lane, C., Wu, Q., Anenkhonov, O., Chepinoga, V., Autrey, B., & Liu, H. (2017). Comparing pixel-and object-based approaches in effectively classifying wetland-dominated landscapes. Remote Sensing, 10(1), 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouaziz, M., Eisold, S., & Guermazi, E. (2017). Semiautomatic approach for land cover classification: a remote sensing study for arid climate in southeastern Tunisia. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration, 2(1), 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Al-Mazrooei, S. (2003). Rapid vegetation regeneration in a seriously degraded Rhanterium epapposum community in northern Kuwait after 4 years of protection. Journal of Environmental Management, 68(4), 387–395.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, A., & Sehgal, V. (2010). Assessment of agricultural drought using MODIS derived normalized difference water index. Journal of Agricultural Physics, 10, 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, W., Zhao, J., Cao, C., & Tian, H. (2018). Shrub biomass estimation in semi-arid sandland ecosystem based on remote sensing technology. Global ecology conservation, 16, e00479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, E. E., Chuine, I., Menzel, A., Mooney, H. A., & Schwartz, M. D. (2007). Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends in ecology evolution, 22(7), 357–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, X., Gibbes, C., Southworth, J., & Waylen, P. (2013). Using remote sensing to quantify vegetation change and ecological resilience in a semi-arid system. Land, 2(2), 108–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, S. L., Park, S., Price, K. P., Lee, R.-Y., Wu, J., & Nellis, M. D. (2002). Using conservation reserve program maps derived from satellite imagery to characterize landscape structure. Computers Electronics in Agriculture, 37(1–3), 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Beltagy, A., & Madkour, M. (2012). Impact of climate change on arid lands agriculture. Agriculture Food Security, 1(1), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fathizad, H., Ardakani, M. A. H., Mehrjardi, R. T., & Sodaiezadeh, H. (2018). Evaluating desertification using remote sensing technique and object-oriented classification algorithm in the Iranian central desert. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 145, 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halwagy, R., & Halwagy, M. (1974). Ecological studies on the desert of Kuwait. II. The vegetation. Journal of the University of Kuwait, 1, 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., & Weng, Q. (2018). High spatial resolution remote sensing: data, analysis, and applications: CRC press.

  • Herrick, J. E., Schuman, G. E., & Rango, A. (2006). Monitoring ecological processes for restoration projects. Journal for Nature Conservation, 14(3–4), 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A. (1988). A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). 25(3), 295-309.

  • Huete, A., Didan, K., Miura, T., Rodriguez, E. P., Gao, X., & Ferreira, L. G. (2002). Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1–2), 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, S., & Srivastava, R. (2018). Impact of drought on vegetation carbon storage in arid and semi-arid regions. Remote sensing applications: society environmental analysis ecology studies, 11, 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen, S. R., Høgda, K. A., Wielgolaski, F. E., Tolvanen, A., Tømmervik, H., Poikolainen, J., & Kubin, E. (2009). Growing-season trends in Fennoscandia 1982–2006, determined from satellite and phenology data. Climate Research, 39(3), 275–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawley, V., Lewis, M., Clarke, K., & Ostendorf, B. (2016). Site-based and remote sensing methods for monitoring indicators of vegetation condition: an Australian review. Ecological Indicators, 60, 1273–1283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leemans, R. (1990). Possible changes in natural vegetation patterns due to global warming.

  • Li, Z., Deng, X., Yin, F., & Yang, C. (2015). Analysis of climate and land use changes impacts on land degradation in the North China Plain. Advances in Meteorology, 2015, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A., O'Connor, T., Donaldson, J., Fey, M., Skowno, A., Sigwela, A., et al. (2005). Ecosystem carbon storage under different land uses in three semi-arid shrublands and a mesic grassland in South Africa. South African Journal of Plant Soil, 22(3), 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. L., Rosenqvist, A., & Mora, B. (2017). Current remote sensing approaches to monitoring forest degradation in support of countries measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) systems for REDD+. Carbon balance management, 12(1), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motohka, T., Nasahara, K. N., Oguma, H., & Tsuchida, S. (2010). Applicability of green-red vegetation index for remote sensing of vegetation phenology. Remote Sensing, 2(10), 2369–2387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Movia, A., Beinat, A., & Crosilla, F. (2015). Comparison of unsupervised vegetation classification methods from VHR images after shadows removal by innovative algorithms. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spatial Information Sciences.

  • Mustapha, M., Lim, H., & MatJafri, M. (2012). Analysis of land cover classification in arid environment: a comparison performance of four classifiers. Remote Sensing of Planet Earth, 117.

  • Myneni, R. B., Keeling, C., Tucker, C. J., Asrar, G., & Nemani, R. R. (1997). Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature, 386(6626), 698–702.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagai, S., Nasahara, K. N., Muraoka, H., Akiyama, T., & Tsuchida, S. (2010). Field experiments to test the use of the normalized-difference vegetation index for phenology detection. Agricultural Forest Meteorology, 150(2), 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namita, M. K. (2017). Crop identification using unsuperviesd ISODATA and K-means from multispectral remote sensing imagery. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 7, 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar, S. A., Al-Mutawa, Y. A. A., & Zaman, S. (2000). Vegetation of Kuwait: a comprehensive illustrative guide to the flora and ecology of the desert of Kuwait: Aridland Agriculture Department, food resources division, Kuwait institute … .

  • Omar, S. A., & Bhat, N. (2008). Alteration of the Rhanterium epapposum plant community in Kuwait and restoration measures. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 65(1), 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omar, S. A., & Shahid, S. A. (2013). Reconnaissance soil survey for the state of Kuwait. In Developments in Soil Classification, Land Use Planning and Policy Implications (pp. 85-107): Springer.

  • Qian, J., Zhou, Q., & Hou, Q. (2007) Comparison of pixel-based and object-oriented classification methods for extracting built-up areas in arid zone. In ISPRS workshop on updating Geo-spatial databases with imagery & the 5th ISPRS workshop on DMGISs, (Vol. 36, pp. 163–171, Vol. 4/W54).

  • Richards, J. (2013). Remote sensing digital image analysis (fifth edition ed.): Springer.

  • She, X., Zhang, L., Cen, Y., Wu, T., Huang, C., & Baig, M. (2015). Comparison of the continuity of vegetation indices derived from Landsat 8 OLI and Landsat 7 ETM+ data among different vegetation types. Remote Sensing, 7(10), 13485–13506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, S., Sharma, L. K., & Nathawat, M. S. (2015). Improved land-use/land-cover classification of semi-arid deciduous forest landscape using thermal remote sensing. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing Space Science, 18(2), 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, A. K., & Pettorelli, N. (2015). Agree on biodiversity metrics to track from space: ecologists and space agencies must forge a global monitoring strategy. Nature, 523(7561), 403–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sruthi, S., & Aslam, M. M. (2015). Agricultural drought analysis using the NDVI and land surface temperature data; a case study of Raichur district. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 1258–1264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, B. J. (2017). Optimal remote sensing with small unmanned aircraft systems and risk management. UC Merced,

  • Stöckli, R., & Vidale, P. L. (2004). European plant phenology and climate as seen in a 20-year AVHRR land-surface parameter dataset. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(17), 3303–3330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman, M. K., Bhat, N. R., Abdal, M. S., Zaman, S., Jacob, S., & Thomas, R. R. (2009). Germination studies in Rhanterium epapposum Oliv. World Applied Sciences Journal, 7(4), 468–471.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L., & Shao, G. (2015). Drone remote sensing for forestry research and practices. Journal of Forestry Research, 26(4), 791–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y., Shao, Q., Liu, J., Zhang, H., Yang, F., Cao, W., Wu, D., & Gong, G. (2019). Did ecological restoration hit its mark? Monitoring and assessing ecological changes in the grain for green program region using multi-source satellite images. Remote Sensing, 11(3), 358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth, C., & Jóźków, G. (2016). Remote sensing platforms and sensors: a survey. Journal of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing, 115, 22–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. J., Slayback, D. A., Pinzon, J. E., Los, S. O., Myneni, R. B., & Taylor, M. G. (2001). Higher northern latitude normalized difference vegetation index and growing season trends from 1982 to 1999. International Journal of Biometeorology, 45(4), 184–190.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Maarel, E. (1975). The Braun-Blanquet approach in perspective. Plant Ecology, 30(3), 213–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weih, R. C., & Riggan, N. D. (2010). Object-based classification vs. pixel-based classification: comparative importance of multi-resolution imagery. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing Spatial Information Sciences, 38(4), C7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikum, D. A., & Shanholtzer, G. F. (1978). Application of the Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale for vegetation analysis in land development studies. Environmental Management, 2(4), 323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Y., Sha, Z., & Yu, M. (2008). Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review. Journal of Plant Ecology, 1(1), 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, M., Cao, C., Tong, Q., Li, Z., Zhang, H., He, Q., Gao, M. X., Zhao, J., Zheng, S., Chen, W., & Zheng, L. F. (2010). Remote sensing based shrub above-ground biomass and carbon storage mapping in Mu Us desert, China. Science China Technological Sciences, 53(1), 176–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, T., & Aşık, Ş. (2018). Index-based assessment of agricultural drought using remote sensing in the semi-arid region of Western Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 24(4), 510–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Sun, X., Wu, T., & Zhang, H. (2015). An analysis of shadow effects on spectral vegetation indexes using a ground-based imaging spectrometer. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sensing Letters, 12(11), 2188–2192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS) for supporting the project financially through the NASA’s GLOBE program. Additionally, the authors thank the Natural Environmental Systems and Technologies (NEST) Research Group for supporting the fieldwork.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Z. M. Al-Ali.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Ali, Z.M., Abdullah, M.M., Asadalla, N.B. et al. A comparative study of remote sensing classification methods for monitoring and assessing desert vegetation using a UAV-based multispectral sensor. Environ Monit Assess 192, 389 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08330-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08330-1

Keywords

Navigation