Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fedratinib, an oral, selective Janus kinase 2 inhibitor, in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Fedratinib is an oral, selective Janus kinase 2 inhibitor that is approved in the United States for the treatment of patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fedratinib in subjects with renal impairment (RI) and hepatic impairment (HI) were evaluated in two separate studies.

Methods

In the renal study, male and female subjects with stable, chronic mild, moderate, and severe RI, as well as those with end-stage renal disease, were included. The hepatic study included subjects with stable, chronic mild HI. Both were phase 1, multicenter, open-label, single-dose studies, and included matched healthy subjects. Subjects received a single oral dose of fedratinib 300 mg on day 1, were discharged on day 4, returned for clinical visits on days 5–12, and had their end-of-study visit between days 14 and 16.

Results

Thirty-six and 17 subjects were included in the renal and hepatic studies, respectively. In the renal study, fedratinib area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) was 1.9- and 1.5-fold higher in subjects with severe and moderate RI, respectively, than in matched healthy subjects. In the hepatic study, fedratinib AUCinf did not appreciably differ between subjects with mild HI and matched healthy subjects. Overall, most treatment–emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal and mild.

Conclusion

Mild RI and HI do not necessitate fedratinib dosage adjustments. Subjects with moderate RI should be monitored (with dosage adjustments made as necessary), whereas those with severe RI should receive a daily dose of 200 mg, reduced from the indicated dose of 400 mg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Celgene Corporation (2019) Inrebic (fedratinib) [package insert]. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/212327s000lbl.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2020

  2. Pardanani A, Gotlib JR, Jamieson C, Cortes JE, Talpaz M, Stone RM, Silverman MH, Gilliland DG, Shorr J, Tefferi A (2011) Safety and efficacy of TG101348, a selective JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol 29(7):789–796. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.8021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Jamieson C, Gabrail NY, Lebedinsky C, Gao G, Liu F, Xu C, Cao H, Talpaz M (2015) A phase 2 randomized dose-ranging study of the JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib (SAR302503) in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood Cancer J 5:e335. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2015.63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang M, Xu CR, Shamiyeh E, Liu F, Yin JY, von Moltke LL, Smith WB (2014) A randomized, placebo-controlled study of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of the oral JAK2 inhibitor fedratinib (SAR302503) in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 54(4):415–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang M, Xu C, Ma L, Shamiyeh E, Yin J, von Moltke LL, Smith WB (2015) Effect of food on the bioavailability and tolerability of the JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib (SAR302503): results from two phase I studies in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 4(4):315–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Keller F, Maiga M, Neumayer HH, Lode H, Distler A (1984) Pharmacokinetic effects of altered plasma protein binding of drugs in renal disease. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 9(3):275–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03189651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Verbeeck RK, Horsmans Y (1998) Effect of hepatic insufficiency on pharmacokinetics and drug dosing. Pharm World Sci 20(5):183–192. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008656930082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Verbeeck RK (2008) Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 64(12):1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-008-0553-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Verbeeck RK, Musuamba FT (2009) Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with renal dysfunction. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 65(8):757–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-009-0678-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abu-Hilal M, Tawaker J (2009) Portal hypertension secondary to myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a study of 13 cases. World J Gastroenterol 15(25):3128–3133. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.3128

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, Passamonti F, Reilly JT, Morra E, Vannucchi AM, Mesa RA, Demory JL, Barosi G, Rumi E, Tefferi A (2009) New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood 113(13):2895–2901. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-07-170449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Morra E, Rumi E, Pereira A, Guglielmelli P, Pungolino E, Caramella M, Maffioli M, Pascutto C, Lazzarino M, Cazzola M, Tefferi A (2010) A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood 115(9):1703–1708. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-09-245837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tremblay D, Putra J, Vogel A, Winters A, Hoffman R, Schiano TD, Fiel MI, Mascarenhas JO (2019) The implications of liver biopsy results in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms being treated with ruxolitinib. Case Rep Hematol 2019:3294046. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3294046

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Said SM, Leung N, Sethi S, Cornell LD, Fidler ME, Grande JP, Herrmann S, Tefferi A, D'Agati VD, Nasr SH (2011) Myeloproliferative neoplasms cause glomerulopathy. Kidney Int 80(7):753–759. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2011.147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Christensen AS, Moller JB, Hasselbalch HC (2014) Chronic kidney disease in patients with the Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. Leuk Res 38(4):490–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2014.01.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baek SW, Moon JY, Ryu H, Choi YS, Song IC, Lee HJ, Yun HJ, Kim S, Jo DY (2018) Chronic kidney disease in the BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm: a single-center retrospective study. Korean J Intern Med 33(4):790–797. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2016.263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fukuda Y, Araki M, Yamamoto K, Morishita S, Inano T, Misawa K, Ochiai T, Edahiro Y, Imai M, Yasuda H, Gotoh A, Ohsaka A, Komatsu N (2019) Evidence for prevention of renal dysfunction associated with primary myelofibrosis by cytoreductive therapy. Haematologica 104(11):e506–e509. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.208876

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Strati P, Abdelrahim M, Selamet U, Page VD, Pierce SA, Verstovsek S, Abudayyeh A (2019) Ruxolitinib therapy is associated with improved renal function in patients with primary myelofibrosis. Ann Hematol 98(7):1611–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-019-03708-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. US Food and Drug Administration (2003) Guidance for industry: pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired hepatic function: study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/pharmacokinetics-patients-impaired-hepatic-function-study-design-data-analysis-and-impact-dosing-and. Accessed 18 Nov 2019

  20. US Food and Drug Administration (2010) Guidance for industry: pharmacokinetics in patients with impaired renal function—study design, data analysis, and impact on dosing and labeling. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/pharmacokinetics-patients-impaired-renal-function-study-design-data-analysis-and-impact-dosing-and. Accessed 18 Nov 2019

  21. Ogasawara K, Zhou S, Krishna G, Palmisano M, Li Y (2019) Population pharmacokinetics of fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 84(4):891–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-019-03929-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Docci D, Bilancioni R, Pistocchi E, Mosconi G, Turci F, Salvi G, Baldrati L, Orsi C (1985) Serum alpha-1-acid glycoprotein in chronic renal failure. Nephron 39(3):160–163. https://doi.org/10.1159/000183364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koiso K, Akaza H, Kikuchi K, Aoyagi K, Ohba S, Miyazaki M, Ito M, Sueyoshi T, Matsushima H, Kamimura H, Watanabe T, Higuchi S (1996) Pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin hydrochloride in patients with renal impairment: effects of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. J Clin Pharmacol 36(11):1029–1038. https://doi.org/10.1177/009127009603601107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolzt M, Fabrizii V, Dorner GT, Zanaschka G, Leufkens P, Krauwinkel WJ, Eichler HG (1998) Pharmacokinetics of tamsulosin in subjects with normal and varying degrees of impaired renal function: an open-label single-dose and multiple-dose study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 54(4):367–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsushima H, Kamimura H, Soeishi Y, Watanabe T, Higuchi S, Miyazaki M (1999) Plasma protein binding of tamsulosin hydrochloride in renal disease: role of alpha1-acid glycoprotein and possibility of binding interactions. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 55(6):437–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The clinical trial reported in this manuscript was sponsored by Sanofi. Medical writing support was provided by Shawn Vahabzadeh, PharmD, of MediTech Media, Ltd, and funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gopal Krishna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

KO, MP, and GK are employees of and hold equity ownership in Bristol Myers Squibb. WBS declares no conflict of interest. CX are employed by and hold equity ownership in Sanofi and JY is an employee of Sanofi.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All study procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogasawara, K., Smith, W.B., Xu, C. et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of fedratinib, an oral, selective Janus kinase 2 inhibitor, in subjects with renal or hepatic impairment. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 85, 1109–1117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-020-04084-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-020-04084-2

Keywords

Navigation