Abstract
Clostridium acetobutylicum is a well-known strain for biofuel production. In previous work, it was found that this strain formed biofilm readily during fermentation processes. Biofilm formation could protect cells and enhance productivities under environmental stresses in our previous work. To explore the molecular mechanism of biofilm formation, Spo0A of C. acetobutylicum was selected to investigate its influences on biofilm formation and other physiological performances. When spo0A gene was disrupted, the spo0A mutant could hardly form biofilm. The aggregation and adhesion abilities of the spo0A mutant as well as its swarming motility were dramatically reduced compared to those of wild type strain. Sporulation was also negatively influenced by spo0A disruption, and solvent production was almost undetectable in the spo0A mutant fermentation. Furthermore, proteomic differences between wild type strain and the spo0A mutant were consistent with physiological performances. This is the first study confirming a genetic clue to C. acetobutylicum biofilm and will be valuable for biofilm optimization through genetic engineering in the future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alsaker KV, Spitzer TR, Papoutsakis ET (2004) Transcriptional analysis of spo0A overexpression in Clostridium acetobutylicum and its effect on the cell's response to butanol stress. J Bacteriol 186(7):1959–1971
Baer SH, Blaschek HP, Smith TL (1987) Effect of butanol challenge and temperature on lipid composition and membrane fluidity of butanol-tolerant Clostridium acetobutylicum. Appl Environ Microbiol 53(12):2854–2861
Branda SS, Chu F, Kearns DB et al (2006) A major protein component of the Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix. Mol Microbiol 59(4):1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05020.x
Cairns LS, Hobley L, Stanley-Wall NR (2014) Biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis: new insights into regulatory strategies and assembly mechanisms. Mol Microbiol 93(4):587–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12697
Chen Y, Zhou T, Liu D et al (2013) Production of butanol from glucose and xylose with immobilized cells of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 18(2):234–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-012-0573-5
Costerton JW (1999) Introduction to biofilm. Int J Antimicrob Agents 11(3–4):217–221
Dawson LF, Valiente E, Faulds-Pain A et al (2012) Characterisation of Clostridium difficile biofilm formation, a role for Spo0A. PLoS ONE 7(12):e50527. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050527
Esaka K, Aburaya S, Morisaka H et al (2015) Exoproteome analysis of Clostridium cellulovorans in natural soft-biomass degradation. AMB Express 5(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-014-0089-9
Flemming HC, Wingender J (2010) The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol 8(9):623
Fünfhaus A, Göbel J, Ebeling J et al (2018) Swarming motility and biofilm formation of Paenibacillus larvae, the etiological agent of American Foulbrood of honey bees (Apis mellifera). Sci Rep 8(1):8840. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27193-8
Hamon MA, Lazazzera BA (2001) The sporulation transcription factor Spo0A is required for biofilm development in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 42(5):1199–1209. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02709.x
Harris LM, Welker NE, Papoutsakis ET (2002) Northern, morphological, and fermentation analysis of spo0A inactivation and overexpression in Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. J Bacteriol 184(13):3586–3597
Heap JT, Pennington OJ, Cartman ST et al (2007) The ClsoTron: a universal gene knock-out system for the genus Clostridium. J Microbiol Methods 70(3):452–464
Heap JT, Kuehne SA, Ehsaan M et al (2010) The ClosTron: mutagenesis in Clostridium refined and streamlined. J Microbiol Methods 80(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2009.10.018
Irar S, Oliveira E, Pagès M et al (2006) Towards the identification of late-embryogenic-abundant phosphoproteome in Arabidopsis by 2-DE and MS. Proteomics 6(S1):S175–S185. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200500387
Jain S, Chen J (2006) Antibiotic resistance profiles and cell surface components of salmonellae. J Food Prot 69(5):1017–1023. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-69.5.1017
Kirk DG, Zhang Z, Korkeala H et al (2014) Alternative sigma factors SigF, SigE, and SigG are essential for sporulation in Clostridium botulinum ATCC 3502. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(16):5141–5150
Lee J, Jang YS, Choi SJ et al (2012) Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 for isopropanol-butanol-ethanol fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(5):1416–1423
Liu D, Chen Y, Ding FY et al (2014) Biobutanol production in a Clostridium acetobutylicum biofilm reactor integrated with simultaneous product recovery by adsorption. Biotechnol Biofuels 7(1):5
Liu D, Chen Y, Ding F et al (2015) Simultaneous production of butanol and acetoin by metabolically engineered Clostridium acetobutylicum. Metab Eng 27:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2014.11.002
Liu D, Xu J, Wang Y et al (2016) Comparative transcriptomic analysis of Clostridium acetobutylicum biofilm and planktonic cells. J Biotechnol 218:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.11.017
Liu D, Yang Z, Chen Y et al (2018a) Clostridium acetobutylicum grows vegetatively in a biofilm rich in heteropolysaccharides and cytoplasmic proteins. Biotechnol Biofuels 11(1):315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-018-1316-4
Liu D, Yang Z, Wang P et al (2018b) Towards acetone-uncoupled biofuels production in solventogenic Clostridium through reducing power conservation. Metab Eng 47:102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2018.03.012
O’Toole GA, Kolter R (1998) Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Mol Microbiol 30(2):295–304. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01062.x
Pratt LA, Kolter R (1998) Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili. Mol Microbiol 30(2):285–293. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.01061.x
Pyne ME, Bruder M, Moo-Young M et al (2014) Technical guide for genetic advancement of underdeveloped and intractable Clostridium. Biotechnol Adv 32(3):623–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.04.003
Ravagnani A, Jennert KCB, Steiner E et al (2000) Spo0A directly controls the switch from acid to solvent production in solvent-forming clostridia. Mol Microbiol 37(5):1172–1185. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02071.x
Schauer O, Mostaghaci B, Colin R et al (2018) Motility and chemotaxis of bacteria-driven microswimmers fabricated using antigen 43-mediated biotin display. Sci Rep 8(1):9801. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28102-9
Shanks RMQ, Sargent JL, Martinez RM et al (2006) Catheter lock solutions influence staphylococcal biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces. Nephrol Dial Transpl 21(8):2247–2255. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfl170
Sharma D, Khan AU (2018) Role of cell division protein divIVA in Enterococcus faecalis pathogenesis, biofilm and drug resistance: a future perspective by in silico approaches. Microb Pathog 125:361–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.10.001
Shen S, Zhang T, Yuan Y et al (2015) Effects of cinnamaldehyde on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus membrane. Food Control 47:196–202
Shen X, Liu D, Liu J et al (2016) Enhanced production of butanol and acetoin by heterologous expression of an acetolactate decarboxylase in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Bioresour Technol 216:601–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.05.121
Strehmel J, Neidig A, Nusser M et al (2015) Sensor kinase PA4398 modulates swarming motility and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. Appl Environ Microbiol 81(4):1274–1285
Sullivan L, Bennett GN (2006) Proteome analysis and comparison of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824 and Spo0A strain variants. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 33(4):298–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-005-0050-7
Watnick P, Kolter R (2000) Biofilm, city of microbes. J Bacteriol 182(10):2675–2679
Whiteley M, Bangera MG, Bumgarner RE et al (2001) Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature 413(6858):860. https://doi.org/10.1038/35101627
Xue C, Zhao J, Chen L et al (2017) Recent advances and state-of-the-art strategies in strain and process engineering for biobutanol production by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Biotechnol Adv 35(2):310–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.01.007
Yakhnin H, Pandit P, Petty TJ et al (2007) CsrA of Bacillus subtilis regulates translation initiation of the gene encoding the flagellin protein (hag) by blocking ribosome binding. Mol Microbiol 64(6):1605–1620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05765.x
Zhu B, Ge X, Stone V et al (2017) ciaR impacts biofilm formation by regulating an arginine biosynthesis pathway in Streptococcus sanguinis SK36. Sci Rep 7(1):17183. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17383-1
Zmantar T, Kouidhi B, Miladi H et al (2010) A microtiter plate assay for Staphylococcus aureus biofilm quantification at various pH levels and hydrogen peroxide supplementation. New Microbiol 33(2):137–145
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21706123), the key program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21636003), the Outstanding Youth Foundation of Jiangsu (Grant No. SBK2017010373), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2018YFA0902200, 2018YFB1501705), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX18_1111), the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_14R28); the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), and the Jiangsu Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Bio-Manufacture.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Z., Wang, Z., Lei, M. et al. Effects of Spo0A on Clostridium acetobutylicum with an emphasis on biofilm formation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 36, 80 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02859-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02859-6