Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of occupational risks from human health and environmental perspectives: a new integrated approach and its application using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy MAIRCA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Occupational safety issues encountered in the worksite environment are the issues that companies should consider in improving their operations with a view to human health and environmental awareness. Many methods with different rationales have been existed in the literature to prioritize hazards according to their risk levels and to mitigate their consequences. In this study, a new model is developed for occupational risk assessment by merging two well-known multi-criteria decision-making methods named best and worst method (BWM) and multi attribute ideal real comparative analysis (MAIRCA) under fuzzy environment. The proposed model differentiates from other similar models by three aspects. First, it considers severity of a hazard and its associated risk from the human and environmental riskiness perspectives. Secondly, it applies fuzzy BWM (F-BWM) to calculate the relative importance of three risk factors named as “probability, frequency and severity” of traditional Fine–Kinney method. Thirdly, it applies fuzzy MAIRCA (F-MAIRCA) to rank hazards according to their risk level using importance values obtained by F-BWM. To show applicability of the approach, a case study of risk assessment in a marble factory is fulfilled. Additionally, a number of validation studies including benchmarking analysis with fuzzy VIKOR and fuzzy TOPSIS methods; a sensitivity analysis by varying importance weights of risk factors are carried out to highlight the solidity of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboutorab H, Saberi M, Asadabadi MR, Hussain O, Chang E (2018) ZBWM: The Z-number extension of best worst method and its application for supplier development. Expert Syst Appl 107:115–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Adar T, Delice EK (2019) New integrated approaches based on MC-HFLTS for healthcare waste treatment technology selection. J Enterp Inf Manag 32:688–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Alali AE, Al-Shboul KF, Albdour SA (2018) Radioactivity measurement and radiological hazard assessment of the commonly used granite and marble in Jordan. Radiat Prot Dosim 182:386–393

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badi I, Ballem M (2018) Supplier selection using the rough BWM-MAIRCA model: A case study in pharmaceutical supplying in Libya. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 1(2):16–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtavar E, Yousefi S (2018) Assessment of workplace accident risks in underground collieries by integrating a multi-goal cause-and-effect analysis method with MCDM sensitivity analysis. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32(12):3317–3332

    Google Scholar 

  • Boral S, Howard I, Chaturvedi SK, McKee K, Naikan VNA (2019) An integrated approach for fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy MAIRCA. Eng Fail Anal 108:104195

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpitella S, Certa A, Izquierdo J, La Fata CM (2018) A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: a real-world case. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 169:394–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang TW, Lo HW, Chen KY, Liou JJ (2019) A novel FMEA model based on rough BWM and rough TOPSIS-AL for risk assessment. Mathematics 7(10):874

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee K, Pamucar D, Zavadskas EK (2018) Evaluating the performance of suppliers based on using the R'AMATEL-MAIRCA method for green supply chain implementation in electronics industry. J Clean Prod 184:101–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Delice EK, Adar T, Emeç Ş, Akkaya G (2019) A comprehensive analysis of location selection problem for underground waste containers using integrated MC-HFLTS&MAIRCA and MABAC methods. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.594713

  • Er Kara M, Oktay Fırat S (2018) Supplier risk assessment based on best-worst method and k-means clustering: a case study. Sustainability 10(4):1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Ersoy M (2015) A proposal on occupational accident risk analysis: a case study of a marble factory. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int Jo 21(8):2099–2125

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ersoy M, Eleren A, Kayacan S (2017) An application of failure mode and effect analysis on improving occupational health and safety process of marble factories. Int J Nat Disaster Health Secur 4(1):22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattahi R, Khalilzadeh M (2018) Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment. Saf Sci 102:290–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoushchi SJ, Yousefi S, Khazaeili M (2019) An extended FMEA approach based on the Z-MOORA and fuzzy BWM for prioritization of failures. Appl Soft Comput 81:105505

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigović L, Pamučar D, Bajić Z, Milićević M (2016) The combination of expert judgment and GIS-MAIRCA analysis for the selection of sites for ammunition depots. Sustainability 8(4):372

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul M (2018) A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 24(7):1723–1760

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gul M (2019) A fuzzy-based occupational health and safety risk assessment framework and a case study in an international port authority. J Mar Eng Technol 1–15

  • Gul M, Ak MF (2018) A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment. J Clean Prod 196:653–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul M, Celik E, Akyuz E (2017) A hybrid risk-based approach for maritime applications: the case of ballast tank maintenance. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Inte J 23(6):1389–1403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gul M, Guneri AF, Baskan M (2018a) An occupational risk assessment approach for construction and operation period of wind turbines. Glob J Environ Sci Manag 4(3):281–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul M, Guven B, Guneri AF (2018b) A new Fine–Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. J Loss Prev Process Ind 53:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul M, Ak MF, Guneri AF (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR-based approach for safety risk assessment in mine industry. J Saf Res 69:135–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo S, Zhao H (2017) Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowl Based Syst 121:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafezalkotob A, Hafezalkotob A (2017) A novel approach for combination of individual and group decisions based on fuzzy best-worst method. Appl Soft Comput 59:316–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Health and Safety Authority (HSA) (2006) Guidelines on risk assessments and safety statements, Dublin. https://www.hsa.ie/eng/Publications_and_Forms/Publications/Safety_and_Health_Management/Guidelines_on_Risk_Assessments_and_Safety_Statements.pdf

  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2014) Risk assessment: a brief guide to controlling risks in the workplace, INDG163 (rev4). https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg163.pdf

  • https://enerji.gov.tr/en-US/Pages/Natural-Stones

  • Ilbahar E, Karaşan A, Cebi S, Kahraman C (2018) A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Saf Sci 103:124–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasan A, Ilbahar E, Cebi S, Kahraman C (2018) A new risk assessment approach: safety and critical effect analysis (SCEA) and its extension with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Saf Sci 108:173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketabchi R, Ghaeli M (2019) An application of fuzzy BWM for risk assessment in offshore oil projects. J Proj Manag 4(3):233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokangül A, Polat U, Dağsuyu C (2017) A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine–Kinney methodologies. Saf Sci 91:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutlu AC, Ekmekçioğlu M (2012) Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst Appl 39(1):61–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Wang JQ, Hu JH (2019) Multi-criteria decision-making method based on dominance degree and BWM with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 10(7):1671–1685

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu HC, Liu L, Liu N (2013) Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: a literature review. Expert Syst Appl 40(2):828–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo HW, Liou JJ (2018) A novel multiple-criteria decision-making-based FMEA model for risk assessment. Appl Soft Comput 73:684–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo HW, Liou JJ, Huang CN, Chuang YC (2019) A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis. Reliab Eng Syste Saf 183:173–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahdevari S, Shahriar K, Esfahanipour A (2014) Human health and safety risks management in underground coal mines using fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci Total Environ 488:85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Mete S (2019) Assessing occupational risks in pipeline construction using FMEA-based AHP-MOORA integrated approach under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 25(7):1645–1660

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mi X, Tang M, Liao H, Shen W, Lev B (2019) The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: why, what, what for and what's next? Omega 87:205–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohandes SR, Zhang X (2019) Towards the development of a comprehensive hybrid fuzzy-based occupational risk assessment model for construction workers. Saf Sci 115:294–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Mou Q, Xu Z, Liao H (2016) An intuitionistic fuzzy multiplicative best-worst method for multi-criteria group decision making. Inf Sci 374:224–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Noureddine M, Ristic M (2019) Route planning for hazardous materials transportation: Multicriteria decision making approach. Decis Mak Appl Manag Eng 2(1):66–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Norouzi A, Namin HG (2019) A hybrid fuzzy TOPSIS–best worst method for risk prioritization in megaprojects. Civ Eng J 5(6):1257–1272

    Google Scholar 

  • Oturakci M (2019) A new fuzzy-based approach for environmental risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 25(7):1718–1728

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oz NE, Mete S, Serin F, Gul M (2019) Risk assessment for clearing and grading process of a natural gas pipeline project: an extended TOPSIS model with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for prioritizing hazards. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 25(6):1615–1632

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir Y, Gul M, Celik E (2017) Assessment of occupational hazards and associated risks in fuzzy environment: A case study of a university chemical laboratory. Hum Ecol Risk Assess Int J 23(4):895–924

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Özfirat MK, Özkan E, Kahraman B, Şengün B, Yetkin ME (2017) Integration of risk matrix and event tree analysis: a natural stone plant case. Sādhanā 42(10):1741–1749

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamučar D, Vasin L, Lukovac L (2014) Selection of railway level crossings for investing in security equipment using hybrid DEMATEL-MARICA model. In: XVI international scientific-expert conference on railway, railcon, pp 89–92

  • Pamučar D, Gigović L, Bajić Z, Janošević M (2017a) Location selection for wind farms using GIS multi-criteria hybrid model: an approach based on fuzzy and rough numbers. Sustainability 9(8):1315

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamučar D, Mihajlović M, Obradović R, Atanasković P (2017b) Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers: hybrid DEMATEL-ANP-MAIRCA model. Expert Syst Appl 88:58–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamučar D, Lukovac V, Božanić D, Komazec N (2018a) Multi-criteria FUCOM-MAIRCA model for the evaluation of level crossings: case study in the Republic of Serbia. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications 1(1):108–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamučar DS, Tarle SP, Parezanovic T (2018b) New hybrid multi-criteria decision-making DEMATEL-MAIRCA model: sustainable selection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre. Econ Res Ekonomska istraživanja 31(1):1641–1665

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamučar DS, Ćirović G, Božanić D (2019) Application of interval valued fuzzy-rough numbers in multi-criteria decision making: the IVFRN-MAIRCA model. Yugosl J Oper Res 29:221–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin J, Liu X (2019) Interval type-2 fuzzy group decision making by integrating improved best worst method with COPRAS for emergency material supplier selection. In: Qin J, Liu X (eds) Type-2 fuzzy decision-making theories, methodologies and applications. Springer, Singapore, pp 249–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaee MJ, Yousefi S, Eshkevari M, Valipour M, Saberi M (2020) Risk analysis of health, safety and environment in chemical industry integrating linguistic FMEA, fuzzy inference system and fuzzy DEA. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 34(1):201–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei J (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega 53:49–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostamabadi A, Jahangiri M, Zarei E, Kamalinia M, Banaee S, Samaei MR (2019) Model for a novel fuzzy bayesian network-HFACS (FBN-HFACS) model for analyzing human and organizational factors (HOFs) in process accidents. Process Saf Environ Prot 132:59–72

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rostamabadi A, Jahangiri M, Zarei E, Kamalinia M, Alimohammadlou M (2020) A novel fuzzy bayesian network approach for safety analysis of process systems; an application of HFACS and SHIPP methodology. J Clean Prod 244:118761

    Google Scholar 

  • Ru-xin N, Tian ZP, Wang XK, Wang JQ, Wang TL (2018) Risk evaluation by FMEA of supercritical water gasification system using multi-granular linguistic distribution assessment. Knowl Based Syst 162:185–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq R, Tesfamariam S (2009) Environmental decision-making under uncertainty using intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (IF-AHP). Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23(1):75–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq R, Rodriguez MJ, Imran SA, Najjaran H (2007) Communicating human health risks associated with disinfection by-products in drinking water supplies: a fuzzy-based approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 21(4):341–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemn E, Ntsiful F, Azadah MA, Joe-Asare T (2020) Incident causal factors and the reasons for conducting investigations: a study of five ghanaian large-scale mines. Safety 6(1):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian ZP, Wang JQ, Zhang HY (2018) An integrated approach for failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy best-worst, relative entropy, and VIKOR methods. Appl Soft Comput 72:636–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Topuz E, van Gestel CA (2016) An approach for environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy inference rules. Environ Int 92:334–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Torabi SA, Giahi R, Sahebjamnia N (2016) An enhanced risk assessment framework for business continuity management systems. Saf Sci 89:201–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Liu X, Qin Y (2018) A fuzzy Fine–Kinney-based risk evaluation approach with extended MULTIMOORA method based on Choquet integral. Comput Ind Eng 125:111–123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Zhou L, Chen Y, Chen H (2019) An integrated approach to green supplier selection based on the interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst and extended VIKOR methods. Sci 502:394–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Yucesan M, Gul M (2019) Failure prioritization and control using the neutrosophic best and worst method. Granul Comput 1–15

  • Yucesan M, Mete S, Serin F, Celik E, Gul M (2019) An integrated best-worst and interval type-2 fuzzy topsis methodology for green supplier selection. Mathematics 7(2):182

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Munzur University, Tunceli, Turkey

    Muhammet Gul

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Antalya Bilim University, Antalya, Turkey

    M. Fatih Ak

Authors
  1. Muhammet Gul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Fatih Ak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammet Gul.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 108 kb)

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 22.

Table 22 Detailed information regarding hazards and risks
Full size table

Appendix 2

See Table 23.

Table 23 The all rankings of hazards with respect to three approaches
Full size table

Appendix 3

See Table 24.

Table 24 Rankings according to six different weight vectors
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gul, M., Ak, M.F. Assessment of occupational risks from human health and environmental perspectives: a new integrated approach and its application using fuzzy BWM and fuzzy MAIRCA. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 34, 1231–1262 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01816-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01816-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation