Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of fuel composition uncertainty on grate firing biomass combustor performance: a Bayesian model averaging approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biomass has great potential to meet greenhouse gas reduction and fuel supply security in the future. Although the grate biomass combustors are increasingly deployed worldwide to generate energy from solid biomass, challenges in understanding the system operation to some extent have remained. This paper analyzes the effects of fuel composition uncertainty on the biomass grate combustor’s performance, which have not been solved so far. A 1D transient numerical model of the biomass fuel bed combustion is developed. A set of thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) experiments on randomly selected biomass particles from the same fuel supplier are conducted to achieve the proximate analysis of the particles. The Bayesian model averaging (BMA) method was exercised to deliver the fuel uncertainty into the CFD model of the fuel bed. Results revealed that the fuel composition variability can significantly affect the solid fuel conversion so that ignoring them can result in incomplete combustion. In three various scenarios proposed, combustor is analyzed: (I) using primary fuel composition given by the producer, (II) mean value of fuel composition obtained from the BMA model, and lastly (III) fuel composition under fully uncertainty conditions. Results revealed that overlooking the fuel uncertainty results in overestimating system energy output by 8.3% and also can waste 1611-kg feed annually which is roughly 5% of whole consumed fuel. Meanwhile, owing to uncertainty associated with fuel composition, flame temperature can fluctuate up to 15 °C. According to the uncertainty analysis, char content of wood pellets has dominating role in fuel quality. Finally, a life cycle analysis (LCA) is conducted for the first, second, and coal-fueled system scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bridgwater T (2006) Biomass for energy. J Sci Food Agric 86:1755–1768. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bryden KM, Ragland KW (1996) Numerical modeling of a deep, fixed bed combustor. Energy and Fuels 10:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef950193p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Demirbas A (2005) Potential applications of renewable energy sources, biomass combustion problems in boiler power systems and combustion related environmental issues. Prog Energy Combust Sci 31:171–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PECS.2005.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heidari M, Dutta A, Acharya B, Mahmud S (2018) A review of the current knowledge and challenges of hydrothermal carbonization for biomass conversion. J Energy Inst 92:1779–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOEI.2018.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yung MM, Jablonski WS, Magrini-Bair KA (2009) Review of catalytic conditioning of biomass-derived syngas. Energy Fuel 23:1874–1887. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800830n

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang J, Wu R, Zhang G, Yu J, Yao C, Wang Y, Gao S, Xu G (2013) Technical review on thermochemical conversion based on decoupling for solid carbonaceous fuels. Energy Fuel 27:1951–1966. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400118b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goyal HB, Seal D, Saxena RC (2008) Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12:504–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2006.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Heidari M, Salaudeen S, Dutta A, Acharya B (2018) Effects of process water recycling and particle sizes on hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. Energy and Fuels 32:11576–11586. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mason PE, Darvell LI, Jones JM, Pourkashanian M, Williams A (2015) Single particle flame-combustion studies on solid biomass fuels. Fuel 151:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2014.11.088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Biswas AK, Umeki K (2015) Simplification of devolatilization models for thermally-thick particles: differences between wood logs and pellets. Chem Eng J 274:181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.03.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farokhi M, Birouk M, Tabet F (2017) A computational study of a small-scale biomass burner: the influence of chemistry , turbulence and combustion sub-models. Energy Convers Manag 143:203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klason T (2006) Modelling of biomass combustion in furnaces. Lund university

  13. Bhuiyan AA, Karim MR, Naser J (2015) Modeling of solid and bio-fuel combustion technologies. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802397-6.00016-6

  14. Dernbecher A, Dieguez-Alonso A, Ortwein A, Tabet F (2019) Review on modelling approaches based on computational fluid dynamics for biomass combustion systems. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00370-z

  15. Khodaei H, Al-Abdeli YM, Guzzomi F, Yeoh GH (2015) An overview of processes and considerations in the modelling of fixed-bed biomass combustion. Energy 88:946–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yin C, Rosendahl LA, Kær SK (2008) Grate-firing of biomass for heat and power production. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34:725–754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haberle I, Skreiberg Ø, Łazar J, Haugen NEL (2017) Numerical models for thermochemical degradation of thermally thick woody biomass, and their application in domestic wood heating appliances and grate furnaces. Prog Energy Combust Sci 63:204–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hosseini Rahdar M, Nasiri F, Lee B (2019) A review of numerical modeling and experimental analysis of combustion in moving grate biomass combustors. Energy Fuel 33:9367–9402. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gómez MA, Porteiro J, Chapela S, Míguez JL (2018) An Eulerian model for the simulation of the thermal conversion of a single large biomass particle. Fuel 220:671–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2018.02.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gómez MA, Martín R, Chapela S, Porteiro J (2019) Steady CFD combustion modeling for biomass boilers: an application to the study of the exhaust gas recirculation performance. Energy Convers Manag 179:91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2018.10.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen R, Yue HH, Yue R, Ai Y, Zheng JX (2020) Numerical simulation of combustion in a biomass briquette chain boiler. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00569-0

  22. Khodaei H, Yeoh GH, Guzzomi F, Porteiro J (2018) A CFD-based comparative analysis of drying in various single biomass particles. Appl Therm Eng 128:1062–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2017.09.070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. K.U.C. Perera, M Narayana. Modelling of particle size effect on equivalence ratio requirement for wood combustion in fixed beds. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2018:183–199

  24. Karim MR, Naser J (2018) CFD modelling of combustion and associated emission of wet woody biomass in a 4 MW moving grate boiler. Fuel 222:656–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2018.02.195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou A, Xu H, Yang W, Tu Y, Xu M, Yu W, Boon SK, Subbaiah P (2018) Numerical study of biomass grate boiler with coupled time-dependent fuel bed model and computational fluid dynamics based freeboard model. Energy Fuel 32:9493–9505. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mätzing H, Gehrmann H-J, Seifert H, Stapf D (2018) Modelling grate combustion of biomass and low rank fuels with CFD application. Waste Manag 78:686–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WASMAN.2018.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Karim MR, Naser J (2018) Numerical study of the ignition front propagation of different pelletised biomass in a packed bed furnace. Appl Therm Eng 128:772–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2017.09.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cereijo GN, Curto-risso P, Antonio W (2017) Simplified model and simulation of biomass particle suspension combustion in one-dimensional flow applied to bagasse boilers. Biomass Bioenergy 99:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang K, Jiang X (2018) An investigation of fuel variability effect on bio-syngas combustion using uncertainty quantification. Fuel 220:283–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2018.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bouloré A (2019) Importance of uncertainty quantification in nuclear fuel behaviour modelling and simulation. Nucl Eng Des 355:110311. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NUCENGDES.2019.110311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang K, Jiang X (2018) An assessment of fuel variability effect on biogas-hydrogen combustion using uncertainty quantification. Int J Hydrog Energy 43:12499–12515. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2018.04.196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang K, Jiang X (2019) Uncertainty quantification of fuel variability effects on high hydrogen content syngas combustion. Fuel 257:116111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2019.116111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu Y, Zhai M, Jin S, Zou X, Liu S, Dong P (2019) Numerical simulation of high-temperature fusion combustion characteristics for a single biomass particle. Fuel Process Technol 183:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUPROC.2018.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. González WA, Pérez JF, Chapela S, Porteiro J (2018) Numerical analysis of wood biomass packing factor in a fixed-bed gasification process. Renew Energy 121:579–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2018.01.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Skreiberg O, Glarborgb P, Jensenb A, Dam-johansenb K. Kinetic NO modeling and experimental results from single wood particle combustion. Fuel 1997;76:671–682

  36. Yang YB, Sharifi VN, Swithenbank J, Ma L, I L, Jones JM et al (2008) Combustion of a single particle of biomass combustion of a single particle of biomass. Energy 22:306–316. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef700305r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li J, Paul MC, Younger PL, Watson I, Hossain M, Welch S (2016) Prediction of high-temperature rapid combustion behaviour of woody biomass particles. Fuel 165:205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gómez MA, Porteiro J, Patiño D, Míguez JL (2015) Eulerian CFD modelling for biomass combustion. Transient simulation of an underfeed pellet boiler. Energy Convers Manag 101:666–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ström H, Thunman H (2013) CFD simulations of biofuel bed conversion: a submodel for the drying and devolatilization of thermally thick wood particles. Combust Flame 160:417–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMBUSTFLAME.2012.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Duffy NTM, Eaton JA (2013) Investigation of factors affecting channelling in fixed-bed solid fuel combustion using CFD. Combust Flame 160:2204–2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.04.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Uusitalo L, Lehikoinen A, Helle I, Myrberg K (2015) An overview of methods to evaluate uncertainty of deterministic models in decision support. Environ Model Softw 63:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2014.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. ASTM D7582–10-standard test methods for proximate analysis of coal and coke by macro thermogravimetric analysis 2012

  43. Höfer I, Kaltschmitt M (2019) Assessment of additives avoiding the release of problematic species into the gas phase during biomass combustion—development of a fast screening method based on TGA. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 9:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-016-0229-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Heidari M, Norouzi O, Salaudeen S, Acharya B, Dutta A (2019) Prediction of hydrothermal carbonization with respect to the biomass components and severity factor. Energy Fuel 33:9916–9924. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Collazo J, Porteiro J, Patiño D, Granada E (2012) Numerical modeling of the combustion of densified wood under fixed-bed conditions. Fuel 93:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2011.09.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mahmoudi AH. Prediction of heat-up, drying and gasification of fixed and moving beds by the discrete particle method (Dpm). 2015

    Google Scholar 

  47. Fatehi H, Bai XS, Fatehi H, Bai XS (2014) A comprehensive mathematical model for biomass combustion. Combust Sci Technol 186:574–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2014.883255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Acharya B, Sule I, Dutta A (2012) A review on advances of torrefaction technologies for biomass processing. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2:349–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-012-0058-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Pattanayak S, Hauchhum L, Loha C, Sailo L (2019) Selection criteria of appropriate bamboo based biomass for thermochemical conversion process. Biomass Convers Biorefinery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00421-5

  50. Hosseini Rahdar M, Nasiri F, Lee B (n.d.) Availability-based predictive maintenance scheduling for vibrating-grate biomass boilers. Saf Reliab. https://doi.org/10.1080/09617353.2020.1759261

  51. Benetto E, Popovici EC, Rousseaux P, Blondin J (2004) Life cycle assessment of fossil CO2 emissions reduction scenarios in coal-biomass based electricity production. Energy Convers Manag 45:3053–3074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fereshteh Mafakheri, Fuzhan Nasiri, (2014) Modeling of biomass-to-energy supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research directions. Energy Policy 67:116-126

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Building, Civil & Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, H3G 1M8, Canada

    Mohammad Hosseini Rahdar, Fuzhan Nasiri & Bruno Lee

Authors
  1. Mohammad Hosseini Rahdar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fuzhan Nasiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bruno Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Hosseini Rahdar.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini Rahdar, M., Nasiri, F. & Lee, B. Effect of fuel composition uncertainty on grate firing biomass combustor performance: a Bayesian model averaging approach. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 12, 2781–2797 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00774-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00774-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation