Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparative study on the undrained shear strength results of fall cone and vane shear tests in sand–clay mixtures

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an intensive series of laboratory testing results from vane shear and fall cone tests that were conducted on various clay–sand mixtures to understand the link between these methods which are often used for determining the undrained shear strength (su). Three different gradations (2.0–1.0 mm, 1.0–0.6 mm, and 0.6–0.3 mm) of rounded and angular sands were mixed with low-plasticity clay at ratios of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50%. The results of the tests demonstrated that the su values obtained from the vane shear tests were found to be always higher than those obtained from the fall cone tests. It was shown that the sand content used in the mixtures changed the su parameters of the specimens significantly. The results indicated that the su values were significantly influenced by grading characteristics of the sands (d10, d20, d30, d50, d60, cu, cc). The values of su were lower for the samples that had a larger size of sand grains. Finally, shape characteristics of the sand grains were found to be effective on the results. The samples with angular sand grains have higher su values than the samples with rounded sand grains, for all gradations employed in the present study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbireddy COR, Clayton CRI, Huvenne VA (2009) A method of estimating the form of fine particulates. Geotechnique 59(6):503–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D 2573-94 (American Society for Testing and Materials) (2013) Standard test method for laboratory miniature vane shear test for saturated fine-grained clayey soil. United States, West Conshohocken, pp 19428–12959

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabalar AF (2010) Applications of the oedometer, triaxial and resonant column tests to the study of micaceous sands. Eng Geol 112:21–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabalar AF (2018) Influence of grain shape and gradation on the shear behavior of sand mixtures. Sci Iran Trans A Civil Eng 25(6):3101–3109

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabalar AF, Hasan RA (2013) Compressional behaviour of various size/shape sand-clay mixtures with different pore fluids. Eng Geol 164:36–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabalar AF, Mustafa WS (2015) Fall cone tests on clay-sand mixtures. Eng Geol 192:154–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabalar AF, Dulundu K, Tuncay K (2013) Strength of various sands in triaxial and cyclic direct shear tests. Eng Geol 156:92–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cedergen HR (1989) Seepage, drainage, and flownets, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho GC, Dodds JS, Santamarina JC (2006) Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness and strength: natural and crushed sands. J Geotech Geoenviron 132(5):591–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claveau-Mallet D, Duhaime F, Chapuis RP (2012) Practical considerations when using the Swedish fall cone. Geotech Test J 35(4):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton CRI, Abbireddy COR, Schiebel R (2009) A method of estimating the form of coarse particulates. Geotechnique 59(6):493–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng TW (2000) Fall-cone penetration and water content relationship of clays. Geotechnique 50(2):181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaate K (1966) Factors influencing the results of vane tests. Can Geotech J 3:18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboy G (1928) The compressibility of sand-mica mixtures. Proc ASCE 2:555–568

    Google Scholar 

  • Goktepe AB, Sezer A (2010) Effect of particle shape on density and permeability of sands. Proc Instit Civil Eng Geotech Eng 163(6):307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansbo S (1957) A new approach to the determination of the shear strength of clay by the fall-cone test. R Swed Geotech Inst Proc 14:7–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz RD, Kovacks WD (1981) An introduction to geotechnical engineering. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 517

  • Holubec I, D’Appolonia E (1973) Effect of particle shape on the engineering properties of granular soils. Evaluation of relative density and its role in geotechnical projects involving cohesionless soils. ASTM, STP523, West Conshohocken, pp 304–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlsby GT (1982) Theoretical analysis of the fall-cone test. Geotechnique 32(2):111–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny TC (1977) Residual strength of mineral mixture. Proc. 9th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp 155–160

  • Kravitz JH (1970) Repeatability of three instruments used to determine the undrained shear strength of extremely weak, saturated, cohesive sediments. J Sediment Petrol 40(3):1026–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein WC (1941) Measurement and geological significance of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles. J Sediment Petrol 11(2):64–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumbein WC, Sloss LL (1963) Stratigraphy and sedimentation, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, p 660

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson S, Rothhamel M, Jacks G (2009) A laboratory study on strength loss in kaolin surrounding lime-cement columns. Appl Clay Sci 44:116–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HJ (1985) State of the art: laboratory determination of the strength of marine soils. In: Chaney RC, Demars KR (eds) Strength testing of marine sediments: laboratory and in-situ measurements, ASTM special technical publication 883. ASTM, Philadelphia, pp 181–250

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lees G (1964) A new method for determining the angularity of particles. Sedimentology 3(2):21

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroueil S, Le Bihan JP (1996) Liquid limits and fall cones. Can Geotech J 33(5):793–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupini JF, Skinner AE, Vaughan PR (1981) The drained residual strength of cohesive soils. Geotechnique 31(2):181–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeary RK (1961) Mechanical packing of spherical particles. J Am Ceram Soc 44(10):513–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies BK, Merrifield CM (1980) Measurements of shear distribution at the edges of a shear vane blade. Geotechnique 30:314–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK (1976) Fundamental of soil behaviour. John Wiley & Sons, Inc

  • Mohsen S, Ullrich CR (1985) Rate of shear effects on vane shear strength. J Geotech Eng 111(1):135–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monkul MM, Ozden G (2007) Compressional behavior of clayey sand and transition fines content. Eng Geol 89:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraj TS, Murthy BRS, Bindumadhava TS (1987) Liquid limit determination further simplified. Geotech Test J 12(4):302–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni Q, Tan TS, Dasari GR, Hight DW (2004) Contribution of fines to the compressive strength of mixed soils. Geotechnique 54(9):561–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson RE, Mesri G (1970) Mechanisms controlling the compressibility of clay. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 96 (SM6), Proc. Paper 7649, November, 1863–1878.

  • Powers MC (1953) A new roundness scale for sedimentary particles. J Sediment Petrol 23(2):117–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Lo SR (2008) The prediction of equivalent granular steady state line of loose sand with fines. Geomech Geoeng 3(3):179–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seah TH, Sangtian N, Chan IC (2004) Vane shear behavior of soft Bangkok clay. Geotech Test J 27:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone KJ, Kyambadde B (2007) Determination of strength and index properties of fine-grained soils using a soil minipenetrometer. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(6):667–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone KJL, Phan KD (1995) Cone penetration tests near the plastic limit. Geotechnique 45(1):155–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan TS, Goh TC, Karunaratne GP, Lee SL (1994) Shear strength of very soft clay-sand mixtures. Geotech Test J 17(1):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1925) Erdbaumechanik auf bodenphysikalischer grundlage. Deuticke, Leipzig/Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K (1927) Determination of consistency of soils by means of penetration tests. Public Roads 7(12):240–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevanayagam S (1998) Effect of fines and confining stress on undrained shear strength of silty sands. J Geotech Geoenviron 124(6)

  • Thevanayagam S, Mohan S (2000) Intergranular state variables and stress–strain behaviour of silty sands. Geotechnique 50(1):1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thevanayagam S, Martin GR, Shenthan T, Liang J (2001) Post-liquefaction pore pressure dissipation and densification in silty soils. In: Prakash S (ed) Proc., 4th International Conferences on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. San Diego

  • Tiesong L, William RB (1997) Comparison of vane shear and fall cone strengths of soft marine clay. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 15(1):67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troncoso JH, Verdugo R (1985) Silt content and dynamic behavior of tailing sands. Proc. 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering vol 3, pp 1311–1314.

  • Wadell H (1932) Volume, shape, and roundness of rock particles. J Geol 40(5):443–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang DX, Zentar R, Abriak NE, Xu WY (2013) Shear strength behavior of cement/lime-solidified Dunkirk sediments by fall cone tests and vane shear tests. Geotech Test J 36(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerberg B, Muller R, Larsson S (2015) Evaluation of undrained shear strength of Swedish fine-grained sulphide soils. Eng Geol 188:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood DM (1982) Cone penetrometer and liquid limit. Geotechnique 32(2):152–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood DM (1985) Some fall cone tests. Geotechnique 35(1):64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamuro JA, Wood FM (2004) Effect of depositional method on the undrained behavior and microstructure of sand with silt. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 24:751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamuro JA, Bopp PA, Lade PV (1996) One dimensional compression of sands at high pressures. J Geotech Eng 122(2):147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youd TL (1973) Factors controlling maximum and minimum densities of sands, evaluation of relative density and its role in geotechnical projects involving cohesionless soils. ASTM STP 523:98–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Gaziantep, 27310, Gaziantep, Turkey

    Ali Firat Cabalar & Haluk Isik

  2. Dams and Water Resources Engineering, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq

    Muhammed Mukhlif Khalaf

Authors
  1. Ali Firat Cabalar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammed Mukhlif Khalaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haluk Isik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Firat Cabalar.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Erguler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cabalar, A.F., Khalaf, M.M. & Isik, H. A comparative study on the undrained shear strength results of fall cone and vane shear tests in sand–clay mixtures. Arab J Geosci 13, 395 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05351-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05351-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation