Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Centrifuge observations on multidirectional loading of a suction caisson in dense sand

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents centrifuge tests undertaken to investigate the combined VH capacities of suction caisson in sand under multidirectional loadings following series of low magnitude horizontal cyclic loading. These loading paths are relevant to foundations of array of floating renewables such as wave energy converters or wind turbines. The centrifuge tests mainly provide information about the VH yield envelopes in different loading directions and the HxHy yield envelopes in the horizontal plane so that the effect of multidirectional loading can be analysed. The evolution of the yield envelope after cyclic loadings is first presented. Yield envelopes for load change angle β of 60°, 90°, 120° from the initial horizontal cyclic loading direction are then presented, and the mechanisms for increased capacity for β > 90° and reduced capacity for β < 90° are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersen KH (2015) Cyclic soil parameters for offshore foundation design. In: Frontiers in offshore geotechnics III, pp 5–82

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen KH, Murff JD, Randolph MF, Clukey EC, Erbrich CT, Jostad HP, Hansen B, Aubeny C, Sharma P, Supachawarote C (2005) Suction anchors for deepwater applications. In: The 1st international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics, ISFOG, Perth, pp 3–30

  3. API 2GEO/ISO, 19901-4 (2011) Geotechnical and foundation design considerations, ANSI/API recommended practice. American Petroleum Institute

  4. API R (2005) Design and analysis of station keeping systems for floating structures. American Petroleum Institute

  5. Aubeny CP, Han SW, Murff JD (2003) Inclined load capacity of suction caissons. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 27(14):1235–1254

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bakmar CL, Ahle K, Nielsen SA, Ibsen LB (2009) The monopod bucket foundation: recent experiences and challenges ahead. In: The European offshore wind conference & exhibition

  7. Butterfield R, Houlsby GT, Gottardi G (1997) Standardized sign conventions and notation for generally loaded foundations. Géotechnique 47(5):1051–1054

    Google Scholar 

  8. Byrne B, Houlsby G, Martin C, Fish P (2002) Suction caisson foundations for offshore wind turbines. Wind Eng 26(3):145–155

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carter JMF (2007) North Hoyle offshore wind farm: design and build. Proc Inst Civ Eng Energy 160(1):21–29

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chow SH, Roy A, Herduin M, Heins E, King L, Bienen B, O’Loughlin CD, Gaudin C, Cassidy MJ (2018) Characterisation of UWA superfine silica sand. Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems, Report GEO 18844

  11. Cuéllar P, Georgi S, Baeßler M, Rücker W (2012) On the quasi-static granular convective flow and sand densification around pile foundations under cyclic lateral loading. Granul Matter 14(1):11–25

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fontana CM, Arwade SR, DeGroot DJ, Myers AT, Landon M, Aubeny C (2016) Efficient multiline anchor systems for floating offshore wind turbines. in: proceedings of the asme 2016 35th international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, V006T09A042. ASME, Busan, South Korea

  13. Gaudin C, O’Loughlin C, Breen J (2018) A new 240 g-tonne geotechnical centrifuge at the University of Western Australia. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference on physical modelling in geotechnics (ICPMG 2018), pp 501–506. CRC Press

  14. Gottardi G, Govoni L, Butterfield R (2005) Yield loci for shallow foundations by “swipe” testing. In: Frontiers in offshore geotechnics, ISFOG 2005—proceedings of the 1st international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics, pp 469–475

  15. Govoni L, Gottardi G, Gourvenec S (2010) Centrifuge modelling of circular shallow foundations on sand. Int J Phys Model Geotech 10(2):35–46

    Google Scholar 

  16. Houlsby GT, Cassidy MJ (2002) A plasticity model for the behaviour of footings on sand under combined loading. Géotechnique 52(2):117–129

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levy NH, Gaudin C, Einav I (2007) The behaviour of piles undergoing a change in lateral loading direction. Int J Phys Model Geotech 7(1):13–23

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu QB, Lehane BM (2012) The influence of particle shape on the (centrifuge) cone penetration test (CPT) end resistance in uniformly graded granular soils. Géotechnique 62(11):973–984

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mayoral JM, Pestana JM, Seed RB (2005) Determination of multidirectional py curves for soft clays. Geotech Test J 28(3):253–263

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murff JD, Hamilton JM (1993) P-ultimate for undrained analysis of laterally loaded piles. J Geotech Eng 119(1):91–107

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nicolai G, Ibsen LB, O’Loughlin CD, White DJ (2017) Quantifying the increase in lateral capacity of monopiles in sand due to cyclic loading. Géotech Lett 7(3):245–252

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ooi L, Carter J (1987) A constant normal stiffness direct shear device for static and cyclic loading. Geotech Test J 10(1):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  23. Su D, Li JH (2013) Three-dimensional finite element study of a single pile response to multidirectional lateral loadings incorporating the simplified state-dependent dilatancy model. Comput Geotech 50:129–142

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tan FS (1990) Centrifuge and theoretical modelling of conical footings on sand. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge

  25. Tran MN, Airey DW, Randolph MF (2005) Study of seepage flow and sand plug loosening in installation of suction caissons in sand. In: The fifteenth international offshore and polar engineering conference, vol 6. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Seoul, Korea

  26. Villalobos FA, Byrne BW, Houlsby GT (2009) An experimental study of the drained capacity of suction caisson foundations under monotonic loading for offshore applications. Soils Found 49(3):477–488

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weller SD, Johanning L (2014) Specific requirements for marine renewable energy foundation analysis. In: Deliverable 4.2 of the DTOcean project

  28. Zhao L, Bransby MF, Gaudin C, Cassidy MJ (2020) Capacity of caissons in dense sand under combined loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 146(4):04020009

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu F, Bienen B, O’Loughlin C, Morgan N, Cassidy MJ (2018) The response of suction caissons to multidirectional lateral cyclic loading in sand over clay. Ocean Eng 170(September):43–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by Australian Research Council Discovery Project programme (Grant No. DP150102449).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Zhao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Bransby, M.F. & Gaudin, C. Centrifuge observations on multidirectional loading of a suction caisson in dense sand. Acta Geotech. 15, 1439–1451 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00970-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-020-00970-4

Keywords

Navigation