Skip to main content
Log in

Maximum calcium thickness is a useful predictor for acceptable stent expansion in moderate calcified lesions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contemporary debulking devices such as rotational or orbital atherectomy can modify severe calcified lesions before stent implantation. Actually, we occasionally experience stent underexpansion without debulking devices in not severe but moderate calcified lesions although we expect good stent expansion. We aimed to investigate useful calcium parameters correlated with stent expansion in moderate calcified lesions. We enrolled 50 consecutive moderate calcified lesions in 47 patients who underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2017 and March 2019. The exclusion criteria were the lesions without any calcium and treated with rotational or orbital atherectomy. We compared stent sizing, length, post balloon sizing, post balloon pressure, mean reference area, pre-procedure area stenosis and various calcium parameters including calcium arc, maximum calcium thickness, depth, longitudinal length in pre-PCI OCT with post-PCI stent expansion by simple and multiple regression analysis. Maximum calcium thickness was an independent predictor for stent expansion, while the other calcium parameters were not associated. The optimal thresholds of maximum calcium thickness for predicting acceptable stent expansion defined by 80% was 880 µm (area under curve: 0.73). Maximum calcium thickness < 880 µm is a useful predictor for acceptable stent expansion in moderate calcified lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prati F, Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Limbruno U, Gatto L, La Manna A, Versaci F, Marco V, Di Vito L, Imola F et al (2015) Clinical impact of OCT findings during PCI: the CLI-OPCI II study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 8:1297–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakamura D, Attizzani GF, Toma C, Sheth T, Wang W, Soud M, Aoun R, Tummala R, Leygerman M, Fares A et al (2016) Failure mechanisms and neoatherosclerosis patterns in very late drug-eluting and bare-metal stent thrombosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taniwaki M, Radu MD, Zaugg S, Amabile N, Garcia-Garcia HM, Yamaji K, Jorgensen E, Kelbaek H, Pilgrim T, Caussin C et al (2016) Mechanisms of very late drug-eluting stent thrombosis assessed by optical coherence tomography. Circulation 133:650–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobayashi Y, Okura H, Kume T, Yamada R, Kobayashi Y, Fukuhara K, Koyama T, Nezuo S, Neishi Y, Hayashida A et al (2014) Impact of target lesion coronary calcification on stent expansion. Circ J 78:2209–2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Satler LF, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Leon MB (1998) Treatment of calcified coronary lesions with Palmaz-Schatz stents. An intravascular ultrasound study. Eur Heart J 19:1224–1231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shan P, Mintz GS, Witzenbichler B, Metzger DC, Rinaldi MJ, Duffy PL, Weisz G, Stuckey TD, Brodie BR, Genereux P et al (2017) Does calcium burden impact culprit lesion morphology and clinical results? An ADAPT-DES IVUS substudy. Int J Cardiol 248:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kobayashi N, Ito Y, Yamawaki M, Araki M, Sakai T, Sakamoto Y, Mori S, Tsutsumi M, Nauchi M, Honda Y et al (2018) Optical frequency-domain imaging findings to predict good stent expansion after rotational atherectomy for severely calcified coronary lesions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34:867–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Okamoto N, Ueda H, Bhatheja S, Vengrenyuk Y, Aquino M, Rabiei S, Barman N, Kapur V, Hasan C, Mehran R et al (2019) Procedural and one-year outcomes of patients treated with orbital and rotational atherectomy with mechanistic insights from optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention 14:1760–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamamoto MH, Maehara A, Kim SS, Koyama K, Kim SY, Ishida M, Fujino A, Haag ES, Alexandru D, Jeremias A et al (2019) Effect of orbital atherectomy in calcified coronary artery lesions as assessed by optical coherence tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 93:1211–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yabushita H, Bouma BE, Houser SL, Aretz HT, Jang IK, Schlendorf KH, Kauffman CR, Shishkov M, Kang DH, Halpern EF et al (2002) Characterization of human atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography. Circulation 106:1640–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehanna E, Bezerra HG, Prabhu D, Brandt E, Chamie D, Yamamoto H, Attizzani GF, Tahara S, Van Ditzhuijzen N, Fujino Y et al (2013) Volumetric characterization of human coronary calcification by frequency-domain optical coherence tomography. Circ J 77:2334–2340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kume T, Okura H, Kawamoto T, Yamada R, Miyamoto Y, Hayashida A, Watanabe N, Neishi Y, Sadahira Y, Akasaka T et al (2011) Assessment of the coronary calcification by optical coherence tomography. EuroIntervention 6:768–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang X, Matsumura M, Mintz GS, Lee T, Zhang W, Cao Y, Fujino A, Lin Y, Usui E, Kanaji Y et al (2017) In vivo calcium detection by comparing optical coherence tomography, intravascular ultrasound, and angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:869–879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujino A, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, Lee T, Kim SY, Hoshino M, Usui E, Yonetsu T, Haag ES, Shlofmitz RA et al (2018) A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion. EuroIntervention 13:e2182–e2189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barman N, Okamoto N, Ueda H, Chamaria S, Bhatheja S, Vengrenyuk Y, Gupta E, Sweeny J, Kapur V, Hasan C et al (2019) Predictors of side branch compromise in calcified bifurcation lesions treated with orbital atherectomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 94:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakamura D, Wijns W, Price MJ, Jones MR, Barbato E, Akasaka T, Lee SW, Patel SM, Nishino S, Wang W et al (2018) New volumetric analysis method for stent expansion and its correlation with final fractional flow reserve and clinical outcome: an ILUMIEN I substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 11:1467–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Maria GL, Scarsini R, Banning AP (2019) Management of calcific coronary artery lesions: is it time to change our interventional therapeutic approach? JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12:1465–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mr. John Martin for his linguistic assistance with this manuscript.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masami Nishino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients and the protocol was approved by the local ethics committees.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuhiro, Y., Nakamura, D., Shutta, R. et al. Maximum calcium thickness is a useful predictor for acceptable stent expansion in moderate calcified lesions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 36, 1609–1615 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01874-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01874-w

Keywords

Navigation