Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-world assessment of afatinib for patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Introduction Afatinib is used to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring common EGFR mutations; however, the clinicopathological factors that predict this drug’s effectiveness in real-world settings remain unclear. We therefore evaluated the effectiveness of afatinib in such patients and assessed potential prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively investigated patients with NSCLC who received first-line afatinib between July 2014 and August 2018. Variables (including sex, age, performance status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, EGFR genotype, smoking status, clinical stage prior to treatment [stage IV vs.. postoperative recurrence], presence or absence of brain metastases, body surface area, any afatinib dose reductions, and afatinib starting dose [40 vs.. 20 or 30 mg]) were subjected to a Cox proportional hazards regression model to estimate progression-free survival (PFS). Results Forty-eight patients with a median age of 67 years were included; the objective response rate was 62.5% (30 patients). The median PFS was 14.1 months; the PFS periods were 11.8 and 15.9 months for patients receiving 40 mg versus 20–30 mg of afatinib (P = 0.41), respectively, and were 14.5 and 13.8 months for patients who required afatinib dose reduction and those who did not, respectively (P = 0.80). The PFS tended to be longer in patients without brain metastases (albeit not significantly). Ultimately, no significant predictive values for PFS were identified. Conclusions Afatinib is effective for patients with NSCLC harboring common EGFR mutations irrespective of their clinicopathological backgrounds. A direct comparison of afatinib and osimertinib in treatment-naïve patients is warranted to determine the optimal standard of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration, Fitzmaurice C, Allen C et al (2017) Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol 3:524–548. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K et al (2012) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62:220–241. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bria E, Milella M, Cuppone F et al (2011) Outcome of advanced NSCLC patients harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations randomized to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors or chemotherapy as first-line treatment: a meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 22:2277–2285. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Petrelli F, Borgonovo K, Cabiddu M, Barni S (2012) Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR-mutated non–small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials. Clin Lung Cancer 13:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2011.08.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC et al (2004) EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304:1497–1500. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1099314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miyawaki M, Naoki K, Yoda S et al (2017) Erlotinib as second- or third-line treatment in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Keio Lung Oncology Group Study 001 (KLOG001). Mol Clin Oncol 6:409–414. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2017.1154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramalingam AA, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D et al (2020) Overall survival with osimertinib in untreated, EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med 382:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1913662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Wang B, Chu H, Yao Y (2016) Intrinsic resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with activating EGFR mutations. Onco Targets Ther 9:3711–3726. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S106399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Igawa S, Sasaki J, Otani S, Ishihara M, Takakura A, Katagiri M, Masuda N (2015) Impact of smoking history on the efficacy of gefitinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Oncology 89:275–280. https://doi.org/10.1159/000438703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishinarita N, Igawa S, Kasajima M et al (2018) Smoking history as a predictor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations. Oncology 95:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1159/000488594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ono T, Igawa S, Kurahayashi S et al (2020) Impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Invest New Drugs. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-020-00919-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Igawa S, Kasajima M, Ishihara M et al (2014) Evaluation of gefitinib efficacy according to body surface area in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring an EGFR mutation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 74:939–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-014-2570-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ono T, Igawa S, Ozawa T et al (2019) Evaluation of osimertinib efficacy according to body surface area and body mass index in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring an EGFR mutation: A prospective observational study. Thorac Cancer 10:880–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Du Bois D, Du Bois EF (1916) Clinical calorimetrytenth paper a formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med 17:863–871. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1916.00080130010002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu YL, Sequist LV, Tan EH et al (2018) Afatinib as first-line treatment of older patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: Subgroup analyses of the LUX-Lung 3, LUX-Lung 6, and LUX-Lung 7 trials. Clin Lung Cancer 19:e465–e479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2018.03.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho GF, Chai CS, Alip A et al (2019) Real-world experience of first-line afatinib in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC: a multicenter observational study. BMC Cancer 19:896. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6107-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Brueckl WM, Laack E, Reck M et al (2018) Efficacy of afatinib in the clinical practice: First results of the GIDEON trial: A prospective non-interventional study (NIS) in EGFR mutated NSCLC in Germany. Ann Oncol 28(8Suppl):viii393–viii547. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kato T, Yoshioka H, Okamoto I, Yokoyama A, Hida T, Seto T, Kiura K, Massey D, Seki Y, Yamamoto N (2015) Afatinib versus cisplatin plus pemetrexed in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring activating EGFR mutations: Subgroup analysis of LUX-Lung 3. Cancer Sci 106:1202–1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang SK, Hsieh MS, Lee MR, Keng LT, Ko JC, Shih JY (2017) Real-world experience of afatinib as a first-line therapy for advanced EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 8:90430–90443. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19563

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Halmos B, Tan EH, Soo RA et al (2019) Impact of afatinib dose modification on safety and effectiveness in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC: Results from a global real-world study (RealGiDo). Lung Cancer 127:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.10.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang JC, Sequist LV, Zhou C et al (2016) Effect of dose adjustment on the safety and efficacy of afatinib for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma: post hoc analyses of the randomized LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials. Ann Oncol 27:2103–2110. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yokoyama T, Yoshioka H, Fujimoto D et al (2019) A phase II study of low starting dose of afatinib as first-line treatment in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (KTORG1402). Lung Cancer 135:175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.03.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chae YK, Davis AA, Raparia K et al (2019) Association of Tumor Mutational Burden With DNA Repair Mutations and Response to Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 20:88–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagahashi M, Sato S, Yuza K et al (2018) Common driver mutations and smoking history affect tumor mutation burden in lung adenocarcinoma. J Surg Res 230:181–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Offin M, Rizvi H, Tenet M et al (2019) Tumor Mutation Burden and Efficacy of EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients with EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers. Clin Cancer Res 25:1063–1069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Paz-Ares L, Tan EH, O’Byrne K et al (2017) Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial. Ann Oncol 28:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Soria JC, Felip E, Cobo M et al (2015) Afatinib versus erlotinib as second-line treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUX-Lung 8): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:897–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00006-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Srivastava RM, Trivedi S, Concha-Benavente F, Hyun-bae J, Wang L, Seethala RR, Branstetter BF 4th, Ferrone S, Ferris RL (2015) STAT1-induced HLA class i upregulation enhances immunogenicity and clinical response to anti-EGFR mAb cetuximab therapy in HNC patients. Cancer Immunol Res 3:936–945. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Pollack BP, Sapkota B, Cartee TV (2011) Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition augments the expression of MHC class I and II genes. Clin Cancer Res 17:4400–4413. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lizotte PH, Hong RL, Luster TA et al (2018) A high-throughput immune-oncology screen identifies EGFR inhibitors as potent enhancers of antigen-specific cytotoxic t-lymphocyte tumor cell killing. Cancer Immunol Res 6:1511–1523. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Schuler M, Wu YL, Hirsh V et al (2016) First-line afatinib versus chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and common epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations and brain metastases. J Thorac Oncol 11:380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2015.11.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M et al (2015) Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): Analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol 16:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71173-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff members of the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine for their assistance in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoshi Igawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Igawa, S., Ono, T., Kasajima, M. et al. Real-world assessment of afatinib for patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Invest New Drugs 38, 1906–1914 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-020-00948-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-020-00948-9

Keywords

Navigation