The Importance of Derivatizing Reagent in Chromatography Applications for Biogenic Amine Detection in Food and Beverages

Munir, Muhammad Abdurrahman; Badri, Khairiahi Haji

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5814389

Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 5814389 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5814389

The Importance of Derivatizing Reagent in Chromatography Applications for Biogenic Amine Detection in Food and Beverages

Muhammad Abdurrahman Munir¹and Khairiahi Haji Badri¹

Academic Editor: Krishna K. Verma

Received15 Aug 2019

Revised14 Oct 2019

Accepted21 Oct 2019

Published02 Jan 2020

Abstract

Biogenic amines (BA) are chemical compounds formed in foods that contain protein, allowing the foods to undergo a bacterial degradation process. Biogenic amines are labeled as toxic food because its consumption exceeding the FDA regulation (50 mg/kg) can be harmful to humans. Some countries also have regulations that prohibit the consumption of biogenic amines in high concentrations, especially histamine. The chromatography methods generally applied by researchers are liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC), where the use of a derivatization reagent is necessary to increase their sensitivity. This review is based on past and present studies about biogenic amine detection related to food samples. The rationale of this study is also to provide data on the comparison of the analytical approaches between LC and GC methods. Furthermore, the various approaches of biogenic amine determination and the most applied analytical methods have been reviewed.

1. Introduction

Food analysis has become a challenge in the food industry in ensuring the food distributed is safe for human consumption. There are many factors that require foods to be analyzed, such as contamination of food by bacteria, mishandling of food by humans, and food degradation due to environmental factors such as pH, temperature, and storage. Biogenic amines are compounds that can be easily found in food protein and should be analyzed because they can bring adverse effects. The appearance of biogenic amines in foods is generally influenced by bacteria contamination [1]. The review paper describes the importance of biogenic amine detection and the methods applied by some studies for biogenic amine detection in food and beverage samples.

2. Biogenic Amines

Biogenic amines (BA) are organic compounds with aliphatic, aromatic, and heterocyclic structures and formed by amino acid decarboxylation. The alpha-carboxyl group is removed from the amino acid compound causing the production of the following biogenic amines: histamine from histidine, cadaverine from lysine, tyramine from tyrosine, tryptamine from tryptophan, etc. [2, 3]. Figure 1 shows several biogenic amines that are generally found in food. Of all the biogenic amines, histamine is particularly found in the human body, albeit at a low and harmless concentration owing to the presence of diamine oxidase (DAO) and histamine-N-methyltransferase (HMT) to detoxify histamine. Histamine has the ability to increase blood capillary permeability as a side effect of an inflammatory response, while cadaverine can modify histamine from being nontoxic to toxic [5–7]. Foods contaminated with other compounds are safe for consumption after a heating process. Biogenic amines, on the contrary, can withstand heat and are not destroyed by high heat [8, 9].

(a)

(b)

(c)

However, bluefish, mahi-mahi, herring, and sardine known as nonscombroid fish species can also cause histamine poisoning [10]. Several organizations have different perspectives about histamine consumption. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation for histamine consumption allows histamine to be consumed at 5 mg/100 g of food. Meanwhile, the European Community released a guideline for histamine content in foods and beverages to be lower than 10 mg/100 g of food. However, several studies showed histamine was given to humans orally at 67 and 180 mg per 100 g food without any sign of toxicity [9, 11]. Based on the issues presented above, it is imperative for the players of the food industry to monitor and measure the presence of biogenic amines in food, particularly histamine, to ensure food safety. Food researchers should take on the task of controlling and finding the best method to detect biogenic amines in food and beverages before distribution.

3. Biogenic Amine Detection by Chromatography Methods

Biogenic amine detection in foodstuff is crucial for the following reasons: to modify the current technique or develop new techniques to be applied by researchers or analysts in analyzing biogenic amines in various products from other countries that consume food protein regularly; to study the relationship between biogenic amine accumulation and the growth of bacteria inside foods; and to study their potential toxicity [12]. The analysis of biogenic amines in foods is not a straightforward process as biogenic amines’ structures are very complex, and their presence in foods is sometimes very small (below 1 ppm). The appropriate extraction and purification methods must be selected with care [13]. Furthermore, to ensure the isolation of biogenic amines, the food samples must be treated very carefully. Sample clean-up is important in a biogenic amine extraction before an analysis using chromatography techniques is carried out. Common clean-up techniques applied are presented in Table 1. These include solid-phase microextraction (SPME), hollow fibre liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME), liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), and solid-phase extraction (SPE). Upon completion of a clean-up, the selected instruments can be used to perform an analysis. The use of solvents is important to ensure the successful extraction of biogenic amines. Some studies applied water and methanol to extract biogenic amines, but some studies also considered the use of acidic solvents such as perchloric acid, hydrochloric acid (HCl), or trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for their satisfactory accuracy and recovery.

Several studies reported the use of solvents for biogenic amine extraction, but all of them acquired different results. Biogenic amines are strong organic bases, and thus it is very important to understand their characteristics. 5% TCA and perchloric acid showed satisfactory recovery of biogenic amines and are strongly recommended to extract biogenic amines from fish and meat [16]. Different solvents studied by Richard et al. [17] such as methanol:distilled water (75 : 25, v/v), methanol:0.4 N HCl (75 : 25, v/v), and methanol:HCl:KCl (75 : 24 : 1, v/v/v) were used to extract biogenic amines from fish muscles. The study reported that methanol:0.4 N HCl (75 : 25, v/v) showed good recovery for histamine, putrescine, and cadaverine. Hydrochloric acid 0.1 M is the best choice for amine extraction from cheese but unsuitable for fish and meat because the content of biogenic amines in fish and meat are higher than that in cheese. A study evaluated the application of four acids to extract biogenic amines from cheese, such as chloric acid, perchloric acid, sulfosalicylic acid, and trichloroacetic acid, and reported that perchloric acid has the ability to extract biogenic amines 30% higher than other acid solvents [18]. The use of 0.1 M HCl is preferred to extract biogenic amines from food samples because it is simple and inexpensive. After extraction using HCl, the solution should be alkalinized using sodium or potassium hydroxide (NaOH or KOH) to acquire a good derivatization reaction. A stable pH is necessary for biogenic amine recoveries, where the ideal pH is 11.5. Anything above pH 11.5 reduces the recovery of tyramine. Thus, pH 10 is considered to obtain a good recovery for tyramine. However, it is unstable for histamine, cadaverine, putrescine, spermine, and spermidine [3].

Matrix solid-phase dispersion (MPSD) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) have been applied to extract biogenic amines from various foods [19, 20]. These methods are suitable for fish and meat samples that contain many compounds besides biogenic amines because they can reduce the time of biogenic amine extraction. SPE is used to clean-up fish or meat samples to isolate the specific analyte before the samples are analyzed using chromatographic methods or other instruments, whereas MPSD is used to purify biogenic amines from solid samples such as fish and meat. Furthermore, these techniques require a smaller sample size compared with conventional extraction and use less organic solvents [21]. The liquid chromatography method using C18 column sorbent is used after SPE method is applied to clean-up the analyte. After the samples are derivatized, they are loaded to an activated sorbent, washed, and eluted with acetonitrile for LC analysis [22]. Otherwise, the pH of biogenic amines must be modified to pH 11, and the analytes are eluted and derivatized [19].

Until now, several analytical techniques for biogenic amine detection in food samples have been studied, such as capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE), thin-layer chromatography (TLC), high-performance liquid chromatography (LC), and gas chromatography (GC). The studies showed successes in various samples such as seafood, fish and fish products, juice, milk, dairy products, meat and meat products, and wine [23, 24]. The common chromatography techniques used are high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [24, 25] and gas chromatography (GC) [26, 27].

3.1. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

HPLC is the most common chromatography method applied by several studies mainly due to its simplicity and low cost. C8 or C18 is the best column to analyze biogenic amines in samples with mobile phase applied such as acetonitrile, methanol, or deionized water [28]. Biogenic amine analysis using HPLC needs to be labeled by a derivatizing reagent because biogenic amines have low volatility and lack chromophores. As such, derivatization is important to modify their characteristics. Derivatization is divided into two steps, namely, pre- and postcolumn. The use of various chemical reagents during derivatization relies on the HPLC detector used. O-Phthaldialdehyde (OPA), dansyl-, benzoyl- and dabsyl-chloride, fluorescein, and 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC) [25], and their reactions to biogenic amines are shown in Figure 2. These derivatizing reagents are commonly used by researchers. Some of them are suitable in an ultraviolet (UV) detector, and some are suitable in a fluorescence detector (FD).

The common derivatizing reagents used are OPA, benzoyl chloride, and dansyl chloride. Some researchers use OPA because it is fast and derivatization can be completed below 2 min with a mixture of borate buffer (pH 6–8) and methanol at ambient temperature. It can also react with primary amines easily below 1 min with the addition of a reducing reagent, such as 2-mercaptoethanol or N-acetylcysteine to modify the characteristics of polyamines, such as putrescine, cadaverine, spermidine, and spermine. Nevertheless, some studies reported that OPA has stability issues and a short life [3]. As such, the sensitivity of amine derivatized by OPA during HPLC analysis can decrease. Thus, researchers choose dansyl chloride or benzoyl chloride over OPA as they are more stable. The use of dansyl chloride is suggested for the derivatization step due to its stability for di- and polyamines. Some studies also showed the use of dansyl chloride to detect histamine using the HPLC method with C18 and equipped UV detector with 254 nm providing satisfactory results [29–32]. Nevertheless, dansyl chloride can react with other compounds besides amines such as phenols and alcohols owing to it being a nonspecific reagent. The reaction occurs because food samples contain several hydroxylic substances linked with biogenic amines [33–35]. Thus, several peak interferences will appear besides biogenic amines, and in order to tackle this issue, sorbent particles with a high resolution of 2 μm need to be applied. The separation of 31 compounds of amino acids and biogenic amines using liquid chromatography can be completed within 25 min [36]. On the contrary, the advantage of benzoyl chloride is the long elution time with dansyl derivatives. Procedures using benzoyl chloride were described for several foods such as cheese, fish, and chicken meat by Lázaro et al. [37–39] and Rodrigues et al. [40], respectively, with satisfactory results. Tahmouzi et al. [41] reported the comparison between OPA and benzoyl chloride for histamine determination in tuna fish and found that the derivatization using benzoyl chloride is longer and more complex, but the histamine derivative is more stable than OPA. Nevertheless, the use of derivatization can be avoided using reverse phase columns equipped with an amperometric detector. This technique requires a small sample size and gives better limit detection compared with detectors [42]. The application of benzoyl chloride can also be used to overcome the use of liquid chromatography equipped with double mass spectrometry. As a result of coelution of matrix substances, isotope-labeled internal standard-based methods have been recommended [43].

Almost all isotope-labeled biogenic amines are unavailable as their synthesis is labor intensive. Alternatively, the derivatization of amines with isotope-coded derivatization reagent using 10-methylacridone-2-sulphonyl chloride, and its unlabeled form was recommended [44]. Benzoyl chloride or benzoylation is fast acting and needs to be vortexed at room temperature in alkaline medium for one minute, or inside a borate buffer of pH 10. Nevertheless, the mixture must be kept for 10 to 30 min to allow hydrolysis of the excess reagent. Benzoylation reacts at primary and secondary amine groups, yet tyramine from phenolic groups also reacts with benzoylation [45, 46].

In an alkaline medium for instance, benzoylation can react with ammonium ion, alcohols, polypeptides, and polyphenols. However, benzoylation will adjust the excess of reagent to complete the derivatization step. An experiment has been conducted to find the factors that affect the benzoylation result and optimize the derivatization process, and it was found that the amount of reagent and alkali concentration affects benzoylation yield. Effective mixing of the reaction mixture was necessary to avoid interference or split peaks. Moreover, derivatives in methanol that contain benzoyl chloride must be kept for 3 days at 4°C, to prevent the derivatives from being destroyed [47, 48].

The use of detectors are strongly important after biogenic amines are derivatized with a derivatizing reagent to analyze biogenic amines in food samples. UV and fluorescence detectors (FD) are generally applied, where FD shows better sensitivity than UV. Nevertheless, some studies equipped the HPLC with mass spectrometry (MS) because MS can identify the structure of biogenic amines directly, and derivatization is unnecessary. However, the use of MS to analyze biogenic amines in foods is not favored because UV and FD are less expensive, less time consuming, and are sufficient for biogenic amine detection. Table 2 summarizes the HPLC methods used to determine biogenic amines in food samples in the last decades.

Based on the table, biogenic amines can be found in solid and liquid samples after extracted by different extraction methods, and all of them are extracted using acid solvents such as TCA and HCl. Histamine, putrescine, and cadaverine are amines that generally can be found in food samples according to the studies, where some of them found more than FDA regulations which we as researchers should be alert about this situation owing to the effects that will be given by biogenic amines. Almost all studies used C18 as their column because the column has capability to separate and detect the samples during the process of analysis The choice of derivatizing agent also influenced the choice of detector. The use of OPA should be followed by the fluorescence detector, whereas the use of dansyl, dabsyl, and benzoyl chloride were suitable for UV detectors. Various wavelengths also applied by some studies where the choice of wavelength influenced by the column, derivatization reagent, and detector.

3.2. Gas Chromatography (GC)

Gas chromatography is the general method applied by researchers after HPLC. It has several advantages, such as more accurate, sensitive, and selective, with a higher resolution compared with HPLC. Nevertheless, it is similar to HPLC, where derivatization step is required as biogenic amines have a high polarity and are not easily vaporized, whereas samples need to be vaporized during a GC analysis. Furthermore, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a convenient method to extract biogenic amines from samples to obtain a good recovery during a GC analysis. This technique reduces the use of sample preparation, thus reducing sample contamination. Nevertheless, the amine structure influences the sensitivity of GC where the primary amine is more difficult than the secondary, and the secondary amine is more difficult than the tertiary [61]. Application of GC becomes a choice when biogenic amine compounds convert from polar to nonpolar derivatized compounds. The derivatization technique is used to decrease the polarity of amines and modify their characteristic to be chromatographed on GC columns [62–64]. Derivatizing reagents for gas chromatography are divided into three major reagents, namely, alkylation, acylation, and silylation which are elaborated in Table 3. These derivatizing agents are also considered and are suitable for biogenic amines as they can increase the sensitivity of biogenic amines, so they can be easily detected using GC [67]. However, the use of GC detectors has an important role to enhance the sensitivity of GC to detect biogenic amines in various samples. For example, the use of GC equipped with mass spectrometry (MS) combined with a mass selective detector (MSD) that uses a selected ion monitoring (SIM) method can acquire structure information for the identification of specific amines. These detectors provide an advantage where limits below a microgram can be detected. Furthermore, the flame ionization detector (FID) and flame thermionic detector (FTD) provide satisfactory selectivity and sensitivity in detecting amines. The use of flame photometric detector (FPD) and electron capture detector (ECD) can also be used to detect amines, but the derivatization step is required as described above [68, 69]. Several studies using GC for biogenic amine determination in solid and liquid samples are presented in Table 4.

Silylation has the ability to decrease surface adsorption and increase analyte volatility. A silylation agent is used to react with components containing -OH, -SH, and -NH groups producing silyl derivatives which are less polar, more volatile, and thermally more stable. The choice of a silylation reagent relies on the reactivity of compound where sterically crowded reagents with bulkier R groups are less reactive yet are able to produce stable derivatives after using silylation reagent. Based on Table 3, the silylation reagent TMS (trimethylsilyl) is the best option for GC detection. This is because TMS group influences the volatility of analyte for GC and GC-MS applications and contributes to chemical and thermal stability [66]. The use of silylation requires a heating process to accelerate the reaction with analyte; therefore, the use of glassware during derivatization process is compulsory. The reagent contains moisture; and its reaction with water results in the reagent’s removal from the reaction with analyte. As such, it is suggested that excess derivatization reagent is used to minimize the moisture content of the reagent, avoiding the use of solvents containing active hydrogen atoms [77]. It is important to isolate and determine the content of biogenic amines from food and beverage samples before they undergo a derivatization process and GC analysis. Distilled water can be used to extract biogenic amines from fish samples due to the solubility properties of biogenic amines. Nevertheless, according to some studies, the use of acidic solvents such as hydrochloric acid and trichloroacetic acid provides better results. Some studies preferred the use of a 5-column GC analysis and MS detector to identify the structure of biogenic amines, with only one study using FID as a detector. The application of silylation is recommended for mass spectrometry applications where the silyl group produces more diagnostic fragments or ions of a particular characteristic used for selected ion monitoring (SIM). The application of a double mass spectrometry or MS/MS detector will not require a derivatization process because MS/MS is extremely sensitive and can detect biogenic amines in food samples. The use of other detectors on the contrary requires the derivatization process to alter the properties of analytes, such as decreasing polarities and increasing volatility of biogenic amines, and improve the selectivity, sensitivity, and resolution of GC analysis.

However, the use of MS/MS is very expensive and takes too much time in preparing the sample before analysis [67]. Nevertheless, the use of derivatization agents comes with the following issues: loss of the analytes; occurrence of byproducts; extension of sample preparation time; and potentially longer process [75]. Acylation reagents have become an alternative to silylation reagents for their capability to decrease the polarity of amine, which aids in decreasing nonspecific adsorption effects and modifying GC properties. These reagents also improve stability of compounds by protecting unstable groupings. Furthermore, they confer volatility on substances such as amines which have many polar groups that are nonvolatile and will decompose during heating process, making it possible to detect the amine compounds using gas chromatography. Some studies reported that an acylated compound is more stable than a silylated one, especially for primary amines. Petrarca et al. [70] reported the use of acylation reagent heptafluorobutyric anhydride (HFBA) to detect spermidine and spermine in baby food products using gas chromatography equipped with mass spectrometry. The use of these derivatizing agents provides good accuracy and recovery (above 100%) as the GC with FID and MS detectors is able to detect the derivatized biogenic amines. Successful biogenic amine analysis has also been reported using GC coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) [74, 76]. Besides these derivatizing reagents, Papageorgiou et al. [75] also introduced the use of isobutyl chloroformate (IBCF) to successfully derivatize the structure of amines, as shown in Figure 3.

Shin et al. [78] reported that amines can also be found in human urine besides food and beverages. The amines found in human urine are dopamine, tyramine, and octopamine. The amines in urine samples were extracted using the 0.1 M HCl, derivatized with N-methyl-N-hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS), and modified using N-methyl-bis (heptafluorobutyramide) (MBHFBA). The GC analysis using the MS/MS detector was applied and equipped with DB-5 MS capillary column. Almost all solid and liquid samples contained biogenic amines with half of them containing histamine. Based on the research reported, none of them contained more than 200 ppm of histamine. Although the histamine concentration in the samples was above the FDA regulation (50 ppm), no cases of histamine poisoning were reported in the study.

Based on Table 4, it can be concluded that the addition of derivatizing reagent for GC analysis is imperative to improve the properties of analytes and improve the sensitivity and selectivity of GC. The use of GC (column: ZB-5 MS and column: HP-5 MS) is also suitable to detect biogenic amines in food or beverages. These methods are well approved.

4. Conclusion

The characteristics of biogenic amines such as high polarity, stability of compounds, and matrix complexity are the major concerns in the detection of biogenic amines using liquid and gas chromatography techniques. The availability of several methods to extract biogenic amines from food and beverage samples and the choice of specific column for separations in liquid and gas chromatography are fascinating topics. The use of derivatizing reagents during HPLC and GC applications has been developed well by whole studies linked to biogenic amine detection which shows the importance of a derivatization process before biogenic amines are analyzed using HPLC and GC. However, the determination of biogenic amines poses the following issues: product instability; choice of derivatizing reagent; formation of byproducts; and side effect of excess reagent that causes a decrease in the sensitivity of column.

The derivatizing reagent for HPLC analysis, dansyl chloride, becomes the most well-known reagent used for food analysis despite its disadvantages, such as slow reaction, the recovery of derivative being influenced by pH reagent, and formation of byproducts. o-Phthalaldehyde is a reagent used to derivatize biogenic amines that contain primary amine groups, whereas FMOC-Cl is a reagent that is suitable for derivatizing compounds that contain secondary amine groups and for increasing the sensitivity of liquid chromatography. In a GC analysis, the most popular reagent for food analysis is silylation, despite several inconveniences associated with its use, such as the need for a heating process and its moisture causing reagent to disappear from the reaction.

Some studies also reported that the use of a double MS detector does not require the derivatization step owing to the MS detector being much more sensitive compared with UV and fluorescence detectors. Furthermore, there are some analytical disadvantages to using derivatization agents and conventional methods such as HPLC and GC. They are not only time consuming but also very expensive and need to be analyzed by experts. Improper derivatization step can also cause incomplete derivatization where the analyte cannot react properly with the derivatizing reagent. Some derivatizing reagents must also be prepared one day before analysis as the reagents can be degraded by temperature and the environment. It shows that derivatizing reagent should be prepared by people with analytical chemistry background. Nevertheless, the determination of biogenic amines needs to be done because some biogenic amines such as histamine, cadaverine, putrescine, and tyramine are toxic if consumed by humans. Thus, researchers should study about derivatizing reagents that are stable, easily prepared, and can be applied in different detectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

G. I. Mohammed, A. S. Bashammakh, A. A. Alsibaai, H. Alwael, and M. S. El-Shawai, “A critical overview on the chemistry, clean-up and recent advances in analysis of biogenic amines in foodstuffs,” Trends in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 78, pp. 84–94, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Alizadeh, M. Kamalabadi, and A. Mohammadi, “Determination of histamine and tyramine in canned fish samples by headspace solid-phase microextraction based on a nanostructured polypyrrole fiber followed by ion mobility spectrometry,” Food Analytical Methods, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 3001–3008, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Lazaro and C. A. Conte-Junior, “Chromatographic methods for biogenic amines determination in foods of animal origin,” Brazil Journal of Veterinary Research Animal Science, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 430–446, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Pucciarini, F. Ianni, R. Galarini, R. Sardella, and B. Natalini, “Improtance of quantitative analysis of toxic biogenic amines in food matrices,” International Journal of Clinical Research & Trials, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 123-124, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Feng, S. Teuber, and M. E. Gershwin, “Histamine (Scombroid) fish poisoning: a comprehensive review,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 64–69, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
WHO, Meeting on Public Health Risks of Histamine and other Biogenic Amines from Fish and Fishery Products, Joint FAO/Expert Report, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013.
J. Emborg and P. Dalgaard, “Formation of histamine and biogenic amines in cold-smoked tuna: an investigation of psychrotolerant bacteria from samples implicated in cases of histamine fish poisoning,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 897–906, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Panula, P. L. Chazot, M. Cowart et al., “International union of basic and clinical pharmacology. XCVIII. Histamine receptors,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 601–655, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Naila, S. Flint, G. Fletcher, P. Bremer, and G. Meerdink, “Control of biogenic amines in food-existing and emerging approaches,” Journal of Food Science, vol. 75, no. 7, pp. 139–150, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Smiljkovic, K. Blatt, G. Stefanzl et al., “BTK inhibition is a potent approach to block IgE-mediated histamine release in human basophils,” Allergy, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 1666–1676, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q.-H. Wang, G.-Z. Fang, Y.-Y. Liu, D.-D. Zhang, J.-M. Liu, and S. Wang, “Fluorescent sensing probe for the sensitive detection of histamine based on molecular imprinting ionic liquid-modified quantum dots,” Food Analytical Methods, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 2585–2592, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. Bedia, “Recent analytical approaches to analysis of biogenic amines in food samples,” TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 52, pp. 239–247, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Jain, M. Gupta, and K. K. Verma, “Salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction for the determination of biogenic amines in fruit juices and alcoholic beverages after derivatization with 1-naphthylisothiocyanate and high performance liquid chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1422, pp. 60–72, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. D. Andrzej, W. Dorota, and R. Ewelina, “Matrix solid-phase dispersion with sand in chromatographic analysis of essential oils in herbs,” Phytochemical Analysis, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Barker, “Matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD),” Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Dadáková, M. Křížek, and T. Pelikánová, “Determination of biogenic amines in foods using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC),” Food Chemistry, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 365–370, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Richard, L. Pivarnik, P. C. Ellis, and C. Lee, “Effect of matrix on recovery of biogenic amines in fish,” Journal of AOAC International, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 768–776, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Korös, A. Varga, and I. Molnár-Perl, “Simultaneous analysis of amino acids and amines as theirs o-phthalaldehyde-ethanethoil-9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate derivatives in cheese by high performance liquid chromatography,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1203, no. 2, pp. 146–152, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Restuccia, U. G. Spizzirri, F. Puoci et al., “A new method for the determination of biogenic amines in cheese by LC with evaporative light scattering detector,” Talanta, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 363–369, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. G. Spizziri, D. Restuccia, M. Curcio, O. I. Parisi, F. Iemma, and N. Picci, “Determination of biogenic amines in different cheese samples by LC with evaporative light scattering detector,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Helle, M. Baden, and P. Kaj, “Automated solid phase extraction,” in Mass Spectrometry in Food Safety: Methods and Protocols, J. Zweigenbaum, Ed., pp. 267–307, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Zhu, S. Yang, Y. Zhang, G. Fang, and S. Wang, “Simultaneous detection of fifteen biogenic amines in animal derived products by HPLC-FLD with solid-phase extraction after derivatization with dansyl chloride,” Analytical Methods, vol. 8, no. 18, pp. 3747–3755, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Cohen, D. D. Rudnik, M. Laloush, D. Yakir, and Z. Karpas, “A novel method for determination of histamine in tuna fish by ion mobility spectrometry,” Food Analytical Methods, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 2376–2382, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Sagratini, M. Fernández-Franzón, F. De Berardinis, G. Font, S. Vittori, and J. Mañes, “Simultaneous determination of eight underivatised biogenic amines in fish by solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,” Food Chemistry, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 537–543, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Önal, S. E. K. Tekkeli, and C. Önal, “A review of the liquid chromatographic methods for the determination of biogenic amines in foods,” Food Chemistry, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 509–515, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Munir, Z. B. Assim, and F. B. Ahmad, “Characterization of biogenic amines in fish collected from Sarawak using gas chromatography,” Borneo Journal of Resource Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 21–27, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Almeida, J. O. Fernandes, and S. C. Cunha, “A novel dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method for the determination of eighteen biogenic amines in beer,” Food Control, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 380–388, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lanfranco, S. Moret, and G. Purcaro, “HPLC in food analysis,” in Handbook of HPLC, D. Corradini, Ed., pp. 562–649, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
E. M. A. Ibrahim and A. A. M. Amer, “Comparison of biogenic amines levels in different processed cheese varieties with regulatory specifications,” World Journal of Dairy & Food Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 127–133, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Andic, H. Genccelep, and S. Kose, “Determination of biogenic amines in herby cheese,” International Journal of Food Properties, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1300–1314, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Mazzucco, F. Gosetti, M. Bobba, E. Marengo, E. Robotti, and M. C. Gennaro, “High-performance liquid chromatography–ultraviolet detection method for the simultaneous determination of typical biogenic amines and precursor amino acids. Applications in food chemistry,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 127–134, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Šimat and P. Dalgaard, “Use of small diameter column particles to enhance HPLC determination histamine and other biogenic amines in seafood,” LWT—Food Science & Technology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 399–406, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Vijayabhaskar, P. Srivastava, and S. Rajagopal, “Breaking the sensitivity limitations of cytochrome P450 oxidation product: dansyl chloride derivatisation of 4-OH mephenytoin, a CYP2C19 metabolite and its application to in vitro CYP inhibition assay,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 989, pp. 27–36, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Ding, Y. Huang, S. A. Miller, and M. S. Bolgar, “Trace level liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry quantification of the mutagenic impurity 2-hydroxypyridine N-oxide as its dansyl derivative,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1386, pp. 47–52, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Achaintre, A. Buleté, C. Cren-Olivé, L. Li, S. Rinaldi, and A. Scalbert, “Differential isotope labeling of 38 dietary polyphenols and their quantification in urine by liquid chromatography electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 2637–2644, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jia, Y. P. Kang, J. H. Park, J. Lee, and S. W. Kwon, “Simultaneous determination of 23 amino acids and 7 biogenic amines in fermented food samples by liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1218, no. 51, pp. 9174–9182, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Lázaro, C. A. Conte-Júnior, F. L. Cunha, E. T. Mársico, S. B. Mano, and R. M. Franco, “Validation of an HPLC methodology for the identification and quantification of biogenic amines in chicken meat,” Food Analytical Methods, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1024–1032, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Lazaro, A. C. V. C. S. Canto, B. R. C. Costa-Lima et al., “Evaluacion de aminas biogenicas durante el amacenamiento en refrigeracion de carne de pollo,” Actualidad Avipecuaria, vol. 6, pp. 80–85, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
C. A. Lazaro, C. A. Conte-Junior, A. C. V. C. S. Canto et al., “Biochemical changes in alternative poultry meat during refrigerated storage,” Revista Brasileira de Cienca Veterinaria, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 195–200, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Rodrigues, T. S. Alvares, M. P. Costa et al., “Concentration of biogenic amines in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) preserved in ice and its relationship with physicochemical parameters of quality,” Journal of Aquaculture, Research & Development, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 174, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tahmouzi, R. Khaksar, and M. Ghasemlou, “Development and validation of an HPLC-FLD method for rapid determination of histamine in skipjack tuna fish (Katsuwonus pelamis),” Food Chemistry, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 756–761, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Sun, X. Yang, and E. Wang, “Determination of biogenic amines by capillary electrophoresis with pulsed amperometric detection,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1005, no. 1-2, pp. 189–195, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Mayr and P. Schieberle, “Development of stable isotope dilution assays for the simultaneous quantitation of biogenic amines and polyamines in foods by LC-MS/MS,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 3026–3032, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Cai, Z. Sun, G. Chen, X. Liu, J. You, and C. Zhang, “Rapid analysis of biogenic amines from rice wine with isotope-coded derivatization followed by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,” Food Chemistry, vol. 192, pp. 388–394, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Aflaki, V. Ghoulipour, N. Saemian, and M. Salahinejad, “A simple method for benzoyl chloride derivatization of biogenic amines for high performance liquid chromatography,” Analytical Methods, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1482–1487, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Aflaki, V. Ghoulipour, N. Saemian, and S. Sheibani, “Biogenic amine contents in non-alcoholic beers: screening and optimization of derivatization,” Food Analytical Methods, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 713–720, 2014b.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Özdestan and A. Üren, “A method for benzoyl chloride derivatization of biogenic amines for high performance liquid chromatography,” Talanta, vol. 78, no. 4-5, pp. 1321–1326, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jia, Y. Ryu, S. W. Kwon, and J. Lee, “An in situ benzoylation-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method based on solidification of floating organic droplets for determination of biogenic amines by liquid chromatography-ultraviolet analysis,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1282, pp. 1–10, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Triki, F. Jiménez-Colmenero, A. M. Herrero, and C. Ruiz-Capillas, “Optimisation of a chromatographic procedure for determining biogenic amine concentrations in meat and meat products employing a cation-exchange column with a post-column system,” Food Chemistry, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 1066–1073, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. De Mey, G. Drabik-Markiewicz, H. De Maere et al., “Dabsyl derivatisation as an alternative for dansylation in the detection of biogenic amines in fermented meat products by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography,” Food Chemistry, vol. 130, no. 4, pp. 1017–1023, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bilgin and H. Gençcelep, “Determination of biogenic amines in fish products,” Food Science and Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1907–1913, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wu, G. Li, S. Liu et al., “Simultaneous determination of seven biogenic amines in foodstuff samples using one-step fluorescence labeling and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by HPLC-FLD and method optimization using response surface methodology,” Food Analytical Methods, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 685–695, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yoon, J. H. Park, A. Choi, H.-J. Hwang, and J.-H. Mah, “Validation of an HPLC analytical method for determination of biogenic amines in agricultural products and monitoring of biogenic amines in Korean fermented agricultural products,” Toxicological Research, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 299–305, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Baranowska and J. Płonka, “Simultaneous determination of biogenic amines and methylxanthines in foodstuff-sample preparation with HPLC-DAD-FL analysis,” Food Analytical Methods, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 963–972, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Arulkumar, G. Karthik, S. Paramasivam, and M. A. Rabie, “Histamine levels in Indian fish via enzymatic, TLC and HPLC methods during storage,” Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 281–289, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Dong and K. Xiao, “Modified QuEChERS combined with ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry to determine seven biogenic amines in Chinese traditional condiment soy sauce,” Food Chemistry, vol. 229, no. 15, pp. 502–508, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Costa, C. F. Balthazar, B. L. Rodrigues et al., “Determination of biogenic amines by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-DAD) in probiotic cow’s and goat’s fermented milks and acceptance,” Food Science & Nutrition, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 172–178, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Lázaro, C. A. Conte-Júnior, A. C. Canto et al., “Biogenic amines as bacterial quality indicators in different poultry meat species,” LWT—Food Science and Technology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Franco and A. Wasik, “Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the determination of biogenic amines in wines and beers,” Monatshefte für Chemie—Chemical Monthly, vol. 148, no. 9, pp. 1685–1696, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. A. Gloria, P. R. Saraiva, J. C. S. Rigueira, and S. C. C. Brandão, “Bioactive amines changes in raw and sterilised milk inoculated with Pseudomonas fluorescens stored at different temperatures,” International Journal of Dairy Technology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. D. Wilson, T. D. Adlard, C. F. Poole, and M. Cook, Encyclopedia of Separation Science, Academic Press, London, UK, 2000.
H. Kataoka, “Derivatization reactions for the determination of amines by gas chromatography and their applications in environmental analysis,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 733, no. 1-2, pp. 19–34, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. L. Sassaki, L. M. Souza, R. V. Serrato, T. R. Cipriani, P. A. J. Gorin, and M. Iacomini, “Application of acetate derivatives for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: novel approaches on carbohydrates, lipids and amino acids analysis,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1208, no. 1-2, pp. 215–222, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. I. Ruiz-Matute, O. Hernández-Hernández, S. Rodríguez-Sánchez, M. L. Sanz, and I. Martínez-Castro, “Derivatization of carbohydrates for GC and GC-MS analyses,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 879, no. 17-18, pp. 1226–1240, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kataoka, “Gas chromatography of amines as various derivatives,” Journal of Chromatography Library, vol. 70, pp. 364–404, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Lin, S. M. Wang, C. H. Wu, B. G. Chen, and R. H. Liu, “Chemical derivatization for the analysis of drugs by GC-MS – a conceptual review,” Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Plotka-Wasylka, C. Morrison, M. Biziuk, and J. Namiesnik, “Chemical derivatization processes applied to amine determination in samples of different matrix composition,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 4693–4718, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Halket and V. G. Zaikin, “Derivatization in mass spectrometry-1. Silylation,” European Journal of Mass Spectrometry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. G. Zaikin and J. M. Halket, “Derivatization in mass spectrometry-4. Formation of cyclic derivatives,” European Journal of Mass Spectrometry, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 555–568, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Petrarca, J. O. Fernandes, H. T. Godoy, and S. C. Cunha, “Determination of polyamines in baby food by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: optimization of extraction and microwave-assisted Derivatization using response surface methodology,” Food Analytical Methods, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 3548–3557, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Huang, N. Gan, F. Lv, Y. Cao, C. Ou, and H. Tang, “Environmentally friendly solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry for the determination of biogenic amines in fish samples,” Journal of Separation Science, vol. 39, no. 22, pp. 4384–4390, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Qiu, J.-H. Chen, W. Yu, P. Wang, M. Rong, and H. Deng, “Contamination of Chinese salted fish with volatile N-nitrosamines as determined by QuEChERS and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,” Food Chemistry, vol. 232, pp. 763–769, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mohammadi, M. Kamankesh, Z. Hadian, A. M. Mortazavian, and A. Mohammadi, “Determination of biogenic amines in cheese using simultaneous derivatization and microextraction method followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,” Chromatographia, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 119–126, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Cunha, R. Lopes, and J. O. Fernandes, “Biogenic amines in liqueurs: influence of processing and composition,” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, vol. 56, pp. 147–155, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Papageorgiou, D. Lambropoulou, C. Morrison, J. Namieśnik, and J. Płotka-Wasylka, “Direct solid phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography—mass spectrometry for the determination of biogenic amines in wine,” Talanta, vol. 183, pp. 276–282, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Płotka-Wasylka, V. Simeonov, and J. Namieśnik, “An in situ Derivatization—dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas-chromatography—mass spectrometry for determining biogenic amines in home-made fermented alcoholic drinks,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1453, pp. 10–18, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wojnowski, J. Namieśnik, and J. Płotka-Wasylka, “Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for in situ determination of biogenic amines in meat: estimation of meat’s freshness,” Microchemical Journal, vol. 145, pp. 130–138, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Shin, N. H. Park, W. Lee, M. H. Choi, B. C. Chung, and J. Hong, “Metabolic profiling of tyrosine, tryptophan, and glutamate in human urine using gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry combined with single SPE cleanup,” Journal of Chromatography B, vol. 1051, pp. 97–107, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Muhammad Abdurrahman Munir and Khairiahi Haji Badri. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

8142

Downloads

2011

Citations