Elsevier

Matrix Biology

Volumes 91–92, September 2020, Pages 75-91
Matrix Biology

Cardiac fibroblast diversity in health and disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2020.05.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Fibroblasts are transcriptionally, functionally and spatially heterogeneous.

  • Fibroblast diversity is due to anatomical/niche-related and cell autonomous factors.

  • A fibroblast subset termed FAPs possesses progenitor-like properties.

  • Pericytes are likely a distinct stromal cell type and not a fibroblast subtype.

  • FAPs possess organ-specific transcriptional signatures and lineage biases.

Abstract

The cardiac stroma plays essential roles in health and following cardiac damage. The major player of the stroma with respect to extracellular matrix deposition, maintenance and remodeling is the poorly defined fibroblast. It has long been recognized that there is considerable variability to the fibroblast phenotype. With the advent of new, high throughput analytical methods our understanding and appreciation of this heterogeneity has grown dramatically. This review aims to explore the diversity of cardiac fibroblasts and highlights new insights into the diverse nature of these cells and their progenitors as revealed by single cell sequencing and fate mapping studies. We propose that at least in part the observed heterogeneity is related to the existence of a differentiation cascade within stromal cells. Beyond in-organ heterogeneity, we also discuss how the stromal response to damage differs between non-regenerating organs such as the heart and regenerating organs such as skeletal muscle. In exploring possible causes for these differences, we outline that although fibrogenic cells from different organs overlap in many properties, they still possess organ-specific transcriptional signatures and differentiation biases that make them functionally distinct.

Introduction

The cardiac stroma plays key roles in homeostasis and during injury-induced remodeling. In the aftermath of myocardial infarction, a fibrogenic program is activated that eventually leads to the replacement of lost cardiac muscle with a rigid fibrous tissue [1]. Cardiac fibroblasts, loosely defined as plastic adherent stromal cells that secrete type I collagen and maintain the connective tissue, are the major contributors to the fibrogenic response in the heart [2].

Whether cardiac fibroblasts are phenotypically and functionally homogenous or whether they encompass different subsets with unique features and functions has been the subject of much study and controversy in the recent past [3,4]. With the advent of powerful tools enabling single cell biology, the nature and defining characteristics of the cells comprising our tissue is finally being defined not just through a few markers, but by taking a wholistic look at transcriptional programs. Through these approaches, it is apparent that fibroblasts are not only transcriptionally diverse, but also functionally, epigenetically and spatially heterogeneous. The precise extent of such heterogeneity is dependent on the tissue under analysis, with barrier organs such as skin containing multiple subsets of different function and cellular origin, and sterile organs such as muscles limited to cellular intermediates belonging to a single lineage [5,6].

Section snippets

Markers of cardiac fibroblasts: a source of confusion?

As shown in Table 1, many markers have been proposed to specifically label cardiac fibroblasts. However, most of them were shown to either be expressed on other cell types (non-specific) or only identify a subpopulation of fibroblasts. For example, fibroblast specific protein 1 (FSP1, also known as S100A4), is expressed on monocytes and smooth muscle cells; discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) is expressed on smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells; CD90 (gene name is Thy1) is expressed on

Fibroblast heterogeneity

The diversity of cardiac fibroblasts arises from a number of factors. In addition to “cell autonomous” heterogeneity, related to lineage diversity and cellular properties (such as progenitor-like properties), transcriptional profile, and functional state (such as activation versus quiescence), it is likely that a significant amount of differences is due to the diverse microenvironments these cells are exposed to as a result of being in different anatomical locations within the heart [10]. In

Stromal response to damage in regenerative vs non-regenerative tissues

Despite their close phenotypic similarity across tissues, the response of resident FAPs to injury in regenerative organs such as skeletal muscles is significantly different from that observed in non-regenerative organs such as the heart. In skeletal muscles, following acute injury, FAPs markedly proliferate and secrete trophic factors that promote the expansion and myogenic differentiation of satellite cells (skeletal muscle stem cells) into mature myocytes [34]. Upon successful regeneration,

Concluding remarks and future directions

In conclusion, the diversity of fibroblasts has been described since long ago [104]. It was believed that different anatomical locations imparted some specific characteristics on the fibroblasts that reside in them [105]. As science progressed, it became apparent that fibroblasts are heterogeneous not only between different organs, but also within the same organ. Different anatomical locations harbor fibroblasts with distinct functions and transcriptional profiles. The emergence of single cell

Declaration of Competing Interest

Authors have no competing interests to declare.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Rossi lab members for their help in proofreading the article.

Funding

This work was supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant FDN-159908) and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (grant G-19-0026541) to F.M.V.R.

References (147)

  • P. Hematti

    Mesenchymal stromal cells and fibroblasts: a case of mistaken identity?

    Cytotherapy

    (2012)
  • I.C.L. Pillai et al.

    Cardiac fibroblasts adopt osteogenic fates and can be targeted to attenuate pathological heart calcification

    Cell Stem Cell

    (2017)
  • D.A. Skelly et al.

    Single-cell transcriptional profiling reveals cellular diversity and intercommunication in the mouse heart

    Cell Rep.

    (2018)
  • V. Krizhanovsky et al.

    Senescence of activated stellate cells limits liver fibrosis

    Cell

    (2008)
  • C.K. Nagaraju et al.

    Myofibroblast phenotype and reversibility of fibrosis in patients with end-stage heart failure

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2019)
  • R.D. Goldman et al.

    The distribution of actin in non-muscle cells. The use of actin antibody in the localization of actin within the microfilament bundles of mouse 3T3 cells

    Exp. Cell Res.

    (1975)
  • B. Hinz

    Formation and function of the myofibroblast during tissue repair

    J. Investig. Dermatol.

    (2007)
  • Y. Kimura et al.

    Cadherin-11 expressed in association with mesenchymal morphogenesis in the head, somite, and limb bud of early mouse embryos

    Dev. Biol.

    (1995)
  • K.A. Cieslik et al.

    Defective myofibroblast formation from mesenchymal stem cells in the aging murine heart: rescue by activation of the AMPK pathway

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (2011)
  • L. Lukjanenko et al.

    Aging disrupts muscle stem cell function by impairing matricellular WISP1 secretion from fibro-adipogenic progenitors

    Cell Stem Cell

    (2019)
  • M. Bujak et al.

    Aging-related defects are associated with adverse cardiac remodeling in a mouse model of reperfused myocardial infarction

    J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.

    (2008)
  • S.L. Lin et al.

    Pericytes and perivascular fibroblasts are the primary source of collagen-producing cells in obstructive fibrosis of the kidney

    Am. J. Pathol.

    (2008)
  • Y. Jiang et al.

    Independent stem cell lineages regulate adipose organogenesis and adipose homeostasis

    Cell Rep.

    (2014)
  • M. Crisan et al.

    A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs

    Cell Stem Cell

    (2008)
  • D.T. Covas et al.

    Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells obtained from diverse human tissues share functional properties and gene-expression profile with CD146+ perivascular cells and fibroblasts

    Exp. Hematol.

    (2008)
  • N. Guimarães-Camboa et al.

    Pericytes of multiple organs do not behave as mesenchymal stem cells in vivo

    Cell Stem Cell

    (2017)
  • R. Vivar et al.

    TGF-β1 prevents simulated ischemia/reperfusion-induced cardiac fibroblast apoptosis by activation of both canonical and non-canonical signaling pathways

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta – Mol. Basis Dis.

    (2013)
  • B. Sacchetti et al.

    No identical “mesenchymal stem cells” at different times and sites: human committed progenitors of distinct origin and differentiation potential are incorporated as adventitial cells in microvessels

    Stem Cell Rep.

    (2016)
  • E.P. Kirk et al.

    Mutations in crdiac T-box factor gene TBX20 are associated with diverse cardiac pathologies, including defects of septation and valvulogenesis and cardiomyopathy

    Am. J. Hum. Genet.

    (2007)
  • M.K. Singh et al.

    The T-box transcription factor Tbx15 is required for skeletal development

    Mech. Dev.

    (2005)
  • Y. Lan et al.

    Osr2, a new mouse gene related to Drosophila odd-skipped, exhibits dynamic expression patterns during craniofacial, limb, and kidney development

    Mech. Dev.

    (2001)
  • A.G. Ridgeway et al.

    Pax3 is essential for skeletal myogenesis and the expression of Six1 and Eya2

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2001)
  • N.G. Frangogiannis

    Matricellular proteins in cardiac adaptation and disease

    Physiol. Rev.

    (2012)
  • M.D. Tallquist et al.

    Redefining the identity of cardiac fibroblasts

    Nat. Rev. Cardiol.

    (2017)
  • C. McLeod et al.

    On the origin and impact of mesenchymal stem cell heterogeneity: new insights and emerging tools for single cell analysis

    Eur. Cells Mater.

    (2017)
  • D. Jiang et al.

    Defining skin fibroblastic cell types beyond CD90

    Front. Cell Dev. Biol.

    (2018)
  • B.A. Shook et al.

    Myofibroblast proliferation and heterogeneity are supported by macrophages during skin repair

    Science (80-.).

    (2018)
  • M.J. Ivey et al.

    Defining the cardiac fibroblast

    Circ. J.

    (2016)
  • O. Kanisicak et al.

    Genetic lineage tracing defines myofibroblast origin and function in the injured heart

    Nat. Commun.

    (2016)
  • B. Burstein et al.

    Differential behaviors of atrial versus ventricular fibroblasts: a potential role for platelet-derived growth factor in atrial-ventricular remodeling differences

    Circulation

    (2008)
  • A. Rutkovskiy et al.

    Valve interstitial cells: the key to understanding the pathophysiology of heart valve calcification

    J. Am. Heart Assoc.

    (2017)
  • J.T. Kuwabara et al.

    Tracking adventitial fibroblast contribution to disease: a review of current methods to identify resident fibroblasts

    Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.

    (2017)
  • S. Dulauroy et al.

    Lineage tracing and genetic ablation of ADAM12 + perivascular cells identify a major source of profibrotic cells during acute tissue injury

    Nat. Med.

    (2012)
  • S.J. Morrison et al.

    Identification of a lineage of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors

    Development

    (1997)
  • L.E. Neidig et al.

    Evidence for minimal cardiogenic potential of stem cell antigen 1-positive cells in the adult mouse heart

    Circulation

    (2018)
  • M. Noseda et al.

    PDGFRα demarcates the cardiogenic clonogenic Sca1+ stem/progenitor cell in adult murine myocardium

    Nat. Commun.

    (2015)
  • R.J. Vagnozzi et al.

    Genetic lineage tracing of Sca-1+ cells reveals endothelial but not myogenic contribution to the murine heart

    Circulation

    (2018)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    Cardiac Sca-1 + cells are not intrinsic stem cells for myocardial development, renewal, and repair

    Circulation

    (2018)
  • U.J. Tissue, S. Eng, Mesenchymal stromal cells and fibroblasts, (2012)....
  • M. Soundararajan et al.

    Fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells: two sides of the same coin?

    J. Cell. Physiol.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Potential Mechanisms Between HF and COPD: New Insights From Bioinformatics

      2023, Current Problems in Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, in HF induced by myocardial infarction (MI), the death of many cardiac cells leads to repair fibrosis.32 Pathophysiological stimuli such as pressure overload, volume overload, metabolic dysfunction, and aging may cause interstitial and perivascular fibrosis in the absence of infarction.33 Activated myofibroblasts are the primary effector cells of cardiac fibrosis.34

    • Hif-1a suppresses ROS-induced proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts following myocardial infarction

      2022, Cell Stem Cell
      Citation Excerpt :

      We compared the qualities of CFs from atria and ventricles. Cardiac chambers have different biomechanical properties, and their fibroblasts show distinct growth, signaling, and fibrogenic behaviors in vitro (Burstein et al., 2008; Soliman and Rossi, 2020). We found a higher density of S+P+ CFs and a lower density of CD31+ ECs (relative to TIP) in atria compared to ventricles (Figure S1O).

    • Emerging skeletal muscle stromal cell diversity: Functional divergence in fibro/adipogenic progenitor and mural cell populations

      2022, Experimental Cell Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Yet, the true lineage bifurcation between VSMCs and pericytes, if it even happens in an irreversible way, is yet to be fully characterised. In most transcriptome data, mural cells form a separate cluster from FAPs, with specific identifiers, but boundaries between VSMCs and pericytes are harder to identify even while Rgs5, Abcc9 and Kcnj8 seem to be gradually accepted as pericyte markers and Myl9, Myh11, Tagln more highly expressed in VSMCs [7,12,17,51]. However, when characterising any cell type with distinct markers, it is important to distinguish transcript expression from protein translation, the damaging effect tissue digestion has on more fragile populations and their cell surface markers.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text