Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Experimental investigation of impact loading effects on rectangular flat panels of fiber self-compacting cementations composite with expanded steel sheet

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Impact loadings essentially differ from static loadings due to a huge amount of the force applied to milliseconds under these loadings. Energy absorption of composites is proper criteria to examine the function against impact loading. Energy absorbers are widely used in the industry. At the same time, due to their unique properties, the use of strong self-compacting composites has been considered by the researchers. High tensile, compressive, and flexural strengths have made these concrete composites more eminent. In a comprehensive experimental work, using four basic mix designs, 64 rectangular composite panels were made with 100 mm2 of area and 30, 45, 60, and 75 mm thickness and tested by impact loading. Compressive, tensile, and flexural strength tests were performed on all the four max designs. Steel fibers with percentages of 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 with 25 m of length were used to make the concrete composites. A hammer with 180 kg weight and 7500 J power was used as the impact loading with drop hammer test machine (DH-TM). The specimens were dynamically loaded by drop test from a 60 cm height. The use of steel fibers and expanded sheets in combination with each other significantly increases the energy absorption. Moreover, the initial peak force increases, while crushing length and deformation of the specimens reduce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig. 42

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eibl J (1988) Concrete structures under impact and impulsive loading (CEB-Bulletin information, No. 187). Comité Euro-International du Beton, Dubrovnik

  2. Banthia N, Sappakittipakom M (2007) Toughness enhancement in steel fiber reinforced concrete through fiber hybridization. Cem Concr Res 39:1366–1372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wild S, Sabir BB, Khatib JM (1995) Factors influencing strength development of concrete containing silica fume. Cem Concr Res 25:1567–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozawa K, Maekawa K, Okamura H (1996) Self-compacting high performance concrete. Coll Pap 34:135–149

    Google Scholar 

  5. Okamura H (1997) Self-compacting high-performance concrete. Concr Int 31:50–54

    Google Scholar 

  6. Okamura H, Ozawa K (1994) Self-compactable high performance concrete in Japan. Int Workshop High Perform Concr 21:31–44

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bartos PJM, Gibbs JC, Zhu (2001) Uniformity of in situ properties of self-compacting concrete in full scale structural elements. Cem Concr Compos 28:489–501

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mastali M, Dalvand A, Sattarifard A (2017) The impact resistance and mechanical properties of the reinforced self-compacting concrete incorporating recycle CFRP fiber with different and dosages. Compos B 112:74–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Romualdi JP, Mandel JA (1964) Tensile strength of concrete affected by uniformly distributed and closely spaced short lengths of wire reinforcement. J ACI 61(6):657–670

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vandewalle L (2000) RILEM TC 162-TDF: test and design methods for steel fiber reinforced concrete. Mater Struct 33(225):3–6

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Li VC (1993) From micromechanics to structural engineering—the design of cementitious composites for civil engineering applications. JSCE J Struct Mech Earthq Eng 10(2):37–48

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer G, Wang S, Li VC (2003) Design of engineered cementitious composites for processing and workability requirements. In: Seventh international symposium on brittle matrix composites, Warsaw, Poland, pp 29–36

  13. Kong HJ, Bike S, Li VC (2003) Development of a self-compacting engineered cementitious composite employing electrosteric dispersion/stabilization. J Cem Concr Compos 25(3):301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang S, Li VC (2006) High early strength engineered cementitious composites. ACI Mater J 103(2):97–105

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karihaloo BL, Wang J (1997) Micromechanical modeling and strain hardening and tensile softening in cementitious composites. J Comput Mech 19:453–462

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lepech MD, Li VC, Robertson RE, Keoleian GA (2007) Design of ductile engineered cementitious composites for improved sustainability. ACI Mater J 105(4):350–366

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li VC, Yang EH (2007) Self-healing in concrete materials. In: van der Zwaag S (ed) Self healing materials: an alternative approach to 20 centuries of materials science. Springer, pp 161–193

  18. Ghamarian HR, Zarei M, Abadi T (2011) Experimental and numerical crashworthiness investigation of empty and foam-filled end-capped conical tubes. Thin Walled Struct 49(10):1312–1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones N (2010) Energy-absorbing effectiveness factor. Int J Impact Eng 37:754–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meidell A (2009) Computer aided materials election for circular tubes designed to resist axial crushing. Thin Walled Struct 47(8):962–969

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Yuen SC, Nurick GN (2008) energy absorbing characteristics of tubular structures with geometric and material modifications. Apply Mech Rev 61(2):802–815

    Google Scholar 

  22. Olabi AG, Morris E, Hashmi MSJ (2007) Metallic tube type energy absorbers a synopsis. Thin Walled Struct 45(7):706–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alghamdi A (2001) Collapsible impact energy absorbers. Thin Walled Struct 39:189–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song J, Chen Y, Gu L (2013) Light-weight thin-walled structures whit patterned windows under axial crushing. Int J Mech Sci 66:239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Graciano C, Martinez G, Smith D (2009) Experimental investigation on the axial collapse of expanded metal tubes. Thin Walled Struct 47:953–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Garciano C, Martinez G, Gutirrez A (2012) Failure mechanism of expanded metal tubes under axial crushing. Thin Walled Struct 51:20–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Graciano C, Martínez G, Gutierrez A (2013) Energy absorption of axially crushed expanded metal tubes. Thin Walled Struct 71:134–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith D, Graciano C, Martínez G (2014) Quasi-static axial compression of concentric expanded metal tubes. Thin Walled Struct 84:170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith D, Graciano C, Martínez G, Teixeira P (2014) Axial crushing of flattened expanded metal tubes. Thin Walled Struct 85:42–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hatami H, Shokri RadM, Ghodsbin JahromiA (2017) A theoretical analysis of the energy absorption response of expanded metal tubes under impact loads. Int J Impact Eng 109:224–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nouri MD, Hatami H, Jahromi AG (2015) Experimental and numerical investigation of expanded metal tube absorber under axial impact loading. Struct Eng Mech 54(6):1245–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hatami H, Nouri MD (2015) Experimental and numerical investigation of lattice-walled cylindrical shell under low axial impact velocities. Latin Am J Solids Struct 12(10):1950–1971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hatami H, Ghodsbin JahromiA (2017) Energy absorption performance on multilayer expanded metal tubes under axial impact. Thin Walled Struct 116:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharbatdar MK, Parsa H (2017) The evaluation of strengthening effect reinforced concrete structures with FRP on seismic dynamic performance of the structures. J Struct Constr Eng 6(2):225–244

    Google Scholar 

  35. Iranpour A, Ebrahimpour H, Rahgozar R, (2017) Evaluation of bond-slip behavior in precast reinforced concrete beam-to-column connection using finite element modeling. J Struct Constr Eng (online published)

  36. Farokhzad R, Divandari H (2017) The effect of nano-CaCo3 and nano-SiO2 on properties of self-compacting concrete. J Struct Constr Eng (online published)

  37. Sanginabadi Kh, Rostami R, Habibi N, Mostofinejad D, Zarrebini M (2018) Fracture mechanics of fiber reinforced concrete: experimental study of composition, geometry and hybridization of fibers. J Struct Constr Eng 5(2):82–94

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gholhaki M, Kheyroddin A, Hajforoosh M (2018) The effect of magnetic water and different pozzolanic materials on the fresh and hardened properties of self-compacted concrete. J Struct Constr Eng 5(1):5–19

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ruiz G, de la Rosa A, Almeida LC, Poveda E, Zhang XX, Tarifa M, Wu ZM, Yu RC (2019) Dynamic mixed-mode fracture in SCC reinforced with steel fibers: an experimental study. Int J Impact Eng 129:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aoude Hassan, Dagenais FredericP, Burrell RussellP, Saatcioglu Murat (2015) Behavior of ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete columns under blast loading. Int J Impact Eng 80:185–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. ASTM International (2010) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens 1 this standard is for educational use only. Annu Book ASTM Stand i(C):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0039

  42. ASTM C 496 (2004) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimen. Annu Book ASTM Stand 4(2):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  43. Test CC, Drilled T, Concrete C (2010) Standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam with third-point loading) 1. The Hand C78-02(C):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0078

  44. ACI Committee 318 (2014) Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, p 107

    Google Scholar 

  45. CEB-FIB Model Code for Concrete Structures (1991) Evaluation of the time dependent behaviour of concrete. Bulletin d’Information No. 199, Comite European du e´ton/Fe´de´ration Internationale de la Precontrainte, Lausanne, p 201

  46. Carino NJ, Lew HS (1982) Re-examination of the relation between splitting tensile and compressive strength of normal weight concrete. ACI Mater J 79(3):214–219

    Google Scholar 

  47. Oluokun FA, Burdette EG, Deatherage JH (1991) Splitting tensile strength and compressive strength relationships at early ages. ACI Mater J 88(2):115–121

    Google Scholar 

  48. Arioglu N, Girgin ZC, Arioglu E (2006) Evaluation of ratio between splitting tensile strength and compressive strength for concretes up to 120 MPa and its application in strength criterion. ACI Mater J 103(1):18–24

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lavanya G, Jegan J (2015) Evaluation of relationship between split tensile strength and compressive strength for geopolymer concrete of varying grades and molarity. Int J Appl Eng Res 10(15):35523–35527

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gardner NJ (1990) Effect of temperature on the early age properties of type I, type III, and type I/Fly ash concretes. ACI Mater J 87(1):68–78

    Google Scholar 

  51. ACI Committee 318 (2002) Building code requirements for reinforced concrete and commentary. ACI, MI

    Google Scholar 

  52. ACI Committee 318 (2005) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and Commentary (318R-05). ACI, Farmington Hills, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  53. ACI Committee 363 (1992) Report on high-strength concrete (ACI 363R-92). American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, p 56

    Google Scholar 

  54. European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (2002) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures—part 1: general rules and rules for buildings. Brussels, pp 26–35 & 132

  55. Indian Standards (IS) (2000) IS: 456-2000, code of practice for reinforced concrete. BIS, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

    H. Hatami

  2. Civil Engineering Department, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

    A. Dalvand & A. Seyedi Chegeni

Authors
  1. H. Hatami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Dalvand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Seyedi Chegeni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Dalvand.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Paulo de Tarso Rocha de Mendonça, Ph.D.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hatami, H., Dalvand, A. & Chegeni, A.S. Experimental investigation of impact loading effects on rectangular flat panels of fiber self-compacting cementations composite with expanded steel sheet. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 318 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02395-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02395-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation