Skip to main content
Log in

Combined influence of size effect and temperature in microscale deformation of 6063 aluminum gear

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microgears are the crucial parts in the manufacturing of complex microdevices for motion control requiring ultra-light weight, tiny and compact, operational characteristics and dimensional accuracy. During the microforming of gears, the material behavior and grain size effect influence on the formability, yield strength, microhardness and surface roughness of the microgear. In this work, the combined effect of grain size and temperature on flow stress and microstructure of the microgear is investigated during the microplastic deformation of 6063 aluminum alloy. The material with three different grain sizes of aluminum 6063 alloy is considered for its good formability and its strength. The results show the grain size, orientation and boundary have a significant effect on the microplastic deformation process. Microhardness values at the middle and at tooth are controversy and exhibit the inhomogeneous deformation due to the occurrences of the size effect. The grain size dependence on temperature is determined with their difference in microstructure and mechanical properties. This research outcomes thus contribute the basic considerate about the hot microextrusion of aluminum 6063 alloy and enable the development of microgears.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bundesanstat P (2009) New Developments on gear metrology. In: Third tri-national conference of the North American coordinate meterology association. pp 1–49

  2. Davis JR (2001) Alloying: understanding the basis. ASM International, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rivas A, Muñoz P (1999) Effect of the microstructure on the mechanical properties and surface finish on an extruded AA-6063 aluminum alloy. Adv Mater Sci Technol 2:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krishnan N, Cao J, Dohda K (2007) Study of the size effects on friction conditions in microextrusion—part I: microextrusion experiments and analysis. J Manuf Sci Eng 129:669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan WL, Fu MW, Lu J (2011) The size effect on micro deformation behaviour in micro-scale plastic deformation. Mater Des 32:198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fu MW, Chan WL (2011) Geometry and grain size effects on the fracture behavior of sheet metal in micro-scale plastic deformation. Mater Des 32:4738–4746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mao MY, Peng LF, Fu MW, Lai XM (2018) Co-effect of microstructure and surface constraints on plastic deformation in micro- and mesoscaled forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98:1861–1886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Imbaby MF, Jiang K (2010) Stainless steel-titania composite micro gear fabricated by soft moulding and dispersing technique. Microelectron Eng 87:1650–1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2009.10.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tian ZQ, Tang J, Shi K et al (2005) Three-dimensional micro-fabrication on copper and nickel. J Electroanal Chem 581:153–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2004.11.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Loh HT, Thian SCH, Wong YS et al (2007) Micro-mould fabrication for a micro-gear via vacuum casting. J Mater Process Technol 192–193:334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.04.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiguet S, Judelewicz M, Mischler S et al (2006) Effect of filler behavior on nanocomposite SU8 photoresist for moving micro-parts. Microelectron Eng 83:1273–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2006.01.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Riahi M, Ehsanian MH, Asgari A, Djavanroodi F (2017) On a novel severe plastic deformation method: severe forward extrusion (SFE). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:1041–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saotome Y, Iwazaki H (2001) Superplastic backward microextrusion of microparts for micro-electro-mechanical systems. J Mater Process Technol 119:307–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00957-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim WJ, Sa YK (2006) Micro-extrusion of ECAP processed magnesium alloy for production of high strength magnesium micro-gears. Scr Mater 54:1391–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Standard ASTM (1999) Standard practice for microetching metals and alloys. ASTM Int E 407:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gradt T, Schneider T (2016) Tribological performance of MoS2 coatings in various environments. Lubricants 4:32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Standard ASTM (2012) Standard test methods for determining average grain size. ASTM Int E 112–12:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  18. Coppola T, Vici FD, Gotti A et al (2014) Plastic deformation and metallurgical evolution modelling for defects reduction and quality optimization. Procedia Eng 81:1240–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eliash T, Kazakevich M, Semenov VN, Rabkin E (2008) Nanohardness of molybdenum in the vicinity of grain boundaries and triple junctions. Acta Mater 56:5640–5652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Q, Liu Z, Wang B et al (2016) Evolutions of grain size and micro-hardness during chip formation and machined surface generation for Ti-6Al-4V in high-speed machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:1725–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7508-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vander Voort GF, Fowler R (2012) Low-load vickers microindentation hardness testing. Adv Mater Process 170:28–33

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sakai T, Jonas JJ (2001) Plastic deformation: role of recovery and recrystallization. In: Encyclopedia of materials: science and technology. Elsevier, pp 7079–7084

  23. Parasiz SA, Kinsey B, Krishnan N et al (2007) Investigation of deformation size effects during microextrusion. J Manuf Sci Eng 129:690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan WL, Fu MW, Lu J, Liu JG (2010) Modeling of grain size effect on micro deformation behavior in micro-forming of pure copper. Mater Sci Eng A 527:6638–6648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhen WM, Tong GQ, Chen F (2017) Deformation behavior of materials in micro-forming with consideration of intragranular heterogeneities. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 27:616–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng LD, Wang CJ, Guo B, Wang ZL (2013) Size effects on plastic deformation behavior in micro radial compression of pure copper. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23:2686–2691

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received funding support from the Science and Engineering Research Board, Government of India under the project EMR/2015/000370 and PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Srinivasan.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Adriano Fagali de Souza.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srinivasan, N., Rajenthirakumar, D., Sridhar, R. et al. Combined influence of size effect and temperature in microscale deformation of 6063 aluminum gear. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 317 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02414-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02414-2

Keywords

Navigation