Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Monitoring the spatiotemporal changes in regional ecosystem health: a case study in Izmir, Turkey

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The maintenance of human well-being and development is dependent on ecosystem goods and services. However, natural ecosystems and biodiversity have been disturbed by human activities. Therefore, assessment of ecosystem health has become one of the main topics in landscape management. The aim of this study is to reveal the effects of land use/land cover (LULC) change on regional ecosystem health (REH) in Izmir, Turkey. The study used the vigour, organization and resilience model together with potential ecosystem services to understand the relationships between LULC structure, ecosystems and human activities using the most populous and urbanized parts of Izmir metropolitan city. For this purpose, the CORINE land cover maps and Landsat satellite images for 1990 and 2018 were used. Our results showed that there was an increase in the mean regional ecosystem health value (from 48.06 to 49.32) during 1990–2018, but it changed in an inconsistent way in the different parts of the study area. The urban sprawl type and the presence of vegetation were important factors affecting the overall REH value. The spatiotemporal LULC changes were effective on all the ecosystem health indicators. Among all the ecosystem health indicators, ecosystem vigour and resilience were the most important factors positively affected the REH level in highly urbanized districts. Overall, our study showed that whilst the gains in vegetation between urban and rural areas enhanced the ecosystem vigour and resilience during 1990–2018, they have also improved the regional health of districts located along the coastal parts of the study area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberti, M. (2005). The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. Int Reg Sci Rev, 28(2), 168–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, I. J., Harwood, A. R., Mace, G. M., Watson, R. T., Abson, D. J., Andrews, B., Binner, A., Crowe, A., Day, B. H., Dugdale, S., Fezzi, C., Foden, J., Hadley, D., Haines-Young, R., Hulme, M., Kontoleon, A., Lovett, A. A., Munday, P., Pascual, U., Paterson, J., Perino, G., Sen, A., Siriwardena, G., van Soest, D., & Termansen, M. (2013). Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science, 341(6141), 45–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, A., & Pellerin, S. (2014). Pteridophytes as indicators of urban forest integrity. Ecol Indic, 38, 40–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic, 21, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciftcioglu, G. C., Uzun, O., & Nemutlu, F. E. (2016). Evaluation of biocultural landscapes and associated ecosystem services in the region of Suğla Lake in Turkey. Landsc Res, 41(5), 538–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CLMS. (2019a). Copernicus Land Monitoring Service, CORINE Land Cover. https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc-1990 (Accessed 10 April 2019).

  • CLMS. (2019b). Copernicus Land Monitoring Service, CORINE Land Cover. Available online: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc2018 (Accessed 10 April 2019).

  • Conway, T. M., Almas, A. D., & Coore, D. (2019). Ecosystem services, ecological integrity, and native species planting: how to balance these ideas in urban forest management? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 41, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. (1992). Toward an operational definition of ecosystem health. Ecosystem health: new goals for environmental management, 239-256.

  • Costanza, R. (2012). Ecosystem health and ecological engineering. Ecol Eng, 45, 24–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., & Patten, B. C. (1995). Defining and predicting sustainability. Ecol Econ, 15(3), 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crespin, S. J., & Simonetti, J. A. (2016). Loss of ecosystem services and the decapitalization of nature in El Salvador. Ecosystem Services, 17, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank, M. M., Tomlinson, R. W., & Trew, S. (2000). Application of CORINE land-cover mapping to estimate carbon stored in the vegetation of Ireland. J Environ Manag, 58(4), 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, S., Tilman, D., Fargione, J., Chapin III, F. S., Dirzo, R., & Ktzberber, T. (2005). Biodiversity regulation of ecosystem services. Trends and Conditions, 279–329.

  • Diaz-Pacheco, J., & Gutiérrez, J. (2014). Exploring the limitations of CORINE Land Cover for monitoring urban land-use dynamics in metropolitan areas. J Land Use Sci, 9(3), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EE. (2019). The EarthExplorer data collection. http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ (accessed on 20 April 2019).

  • Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P. J., McDonald, R. I., et al. (2013). Stewardship of the biosphere in the urban era, In Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities (pp. 719-746). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. (2014). Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions (1995) (p. 217). Island Press.

  • Foster, D., Swanson, F., Aber, J., Burke, I., Brokaw, N., Tilman, D., & Knapp, A. (2003). The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience, 53(1), 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman, P. M., Cadenasso, M. L., Cavender-Bares, J., Childers, D. L., Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Hobbie, S. E., Hutyra, L. R., Darrel Jenerette, G., McPhearson, T., Pataki, D. E., Pickett, S. T. A., Pouyat, R. V., Rosi-Marshall, E., & Ruddell, B. L. (2017). Moving towards a new urban systems science. Ecosystems, 20(1), 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guidotti, T. (1995). Perspective on the health of urban ecosystems. Ecosyst Health, 1(3), 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güneralp, B., Tezer, A., & Albayrak, İ. (2013). Local assessment of İstanbul: biodiversity and ecosystem services, In Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities (pp. 291-311). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hails, R. S., & Ormerod, S. J. (2013). Ecological science for ecosystem services and the stewardship of Natural Capital. J Appl Ecol, 50(4), 807–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMM. (2019). Izmir Metropolitan Municipality. The major projects İzmir metropolitan municipality conducts within the scope of “The struggle with climate change.” https://direnclikent2019.izmir.bel.tr/en/immProjects/29/32 (Accessed 3 March 2019).

  • IZSU. (2019). İzmir Su ve Kanalizasyon idaresi (İzmir Water and Sewerage Administration). https://www.izsu.gov.tr/tr/TesisDetay/1/3/2 (Accessed 20 April 2019).

  • Jiang, L. P., Qin, Z. H., Xie, W., Wang, R. J., Xu, B., & Lu, Q. (2007). Estimation of grassland ecosystem services value of China using remote sensing data. Journal of Natural Resources, 22(2), 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, C., Nath, R., Labzovskii, L., & Wang, D. (2018). Integrating ecosystem services into effectiveness assessment of ecological restoration program in northern China’s arid areas: ınsights from the Beijing-Tianjin sandstorm source region. Land Use Policy, 75, 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, P., Chen, W., Hou, Y., & Li, Y. (2018). Linking ecosystem services and ecosystem health to ecological risk assessment: a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Sci Total Environ, 636, 1442–1454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MEA. (2005). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Global assessment report. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R. C. B. G., Faber, M., & Rapport, D. (1992). Ecosystem health: new goals for environmental management. Island Press.

  • O’Brien, A., Townsend, K., Hale, R., Sharley, D., & Pettigrove, V. (2016). How is ecosystem health defined and measured? A critical review of freshwater and estuarine studies. Ecol Indic, 69, 722–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J., Wang, Y., Wu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2007). Evaluation for regional ecosystem health: methodology and research progress. Acta Ecol Sin, 27(11), 4877–4885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J., Wang, Y., Wu, J., Shen, H., & Pan, Y. (2011). Research progress on evaluation frameworks of regional ecological sustainability. Chin Geogr Sci, 21(4), 496–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J., Liu, Y., Wu, J., Lv, H., & Hu, X. (2015). Linking ecosystem services and landscape patterns to assess urban ecosystem health: a case study in Shenzhen City, China. Landsc Urban Plan, 143, 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J., Tian, L., Liu, Y., Zhao, M., & Wu, J. (2017). Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas: thresholds identification. Sci Total Environ, 607, 706–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, D. J. (1989). What constitutes ecosystem health? Perspect Biol Med, 33(1), 120–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, D. J. (1995). Ecosystem health: an emerging integrative science, In Evaluating and monitoring the health of large-scale ecosystems (pp. 5-31). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, D. J. (1999). Epidemiology and ecosystem health: natural bridges. Ecosyst Health, 5(3), 174–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapport, D. J., Costanza, R., & McMichael, A. J. (1998). Assessing ecosystem health. Trends Ecol Evol, 13(10), 397–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosina, K., Batista E Silva, F., Vizcaino, P., Marín Herrera, M., Freire, S., & Schiavina, M. (2018). Increasing the detail of European land use/cover data by combining heterogeneous data sets. International Journal of Digital Earth, 1-25.

  • Running, S. W., Thornton, P. E., Nemani, R., & Glassy, J. M. (2000). Global terrestrial gross and net primary productivity from the earth observing system, In Methods in ecosystem science (pp. 44-57). New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Şahin, S. Z. (2019). The urbanization policy of Turkey: an uneasy symbiosis of unimplemented policy with centralized pragmatic interventions. Turk Stud, 20(4), 599–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEAP. (2016). Izmir Metropolitan Municipality Sustainable Energy Action Plan, pp.89.

  • Stoll, S., Frenzel, M., Burkhard, B., Adamescu, M., Augustaitis, A., Baeßler, C., Bonet, F. J., Carranza, M. L., Cazacu, C., Cosor, G. L., Díaz-Delgado, R., Grandin, U., Haase, P., Hämäläinen, H., Loke, R., Müller, J., Stanisci, A., Staszewski, T., & Müller, F. (2015). Assessment of ecosystem integrity and service gradients across Europe using the LTER Europe network. Ecol Model, 295, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, M., Fath, B. D., & Yang, Z. (2010). Urban ecosystem health assessment: a review. Sci Total Environ, 408(12), 2425–2434.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tezer, A., Turkay, Z., Uzun, O., Terzi, F., Koylu, P., Karacor, E., et al. (2018). Ecosystem services-based multi-criteria assessment for ecologically sensitive watershed management. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-20.

  • Torres, R. T., Santos, J., & Fonseca, C. (2014). Factors influencing red deer occurrence at the southern edge of their range: a Mediterranean ecosystem. Mamm Biol, 79(1), 52–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trammell, T. L., Schneid, B. P., & Carreiro, M. M. (2011). Forest soils adjacent to urban interstates: soil physical and chemical properties, heavy metals, disturbance legacies, and relationships with woody vegetation. Urban Ecosyst, 14(4), 525–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSI. (2019). Turkish Statistical Institute. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ilgosterge/?locale=tr (Accessed 5 July 2019).

  • Wang, Z., Tang, L., Qiu, Q., Chen, H., Wu, T., & Shao, G. (2018). Assessment of regional ecosystem health—a case study of the golden triangle of southern Fujian Province, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 15(4), 802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., Lei, S., He, B. J., Bian, Z., Wang, Y., Lu, Q., Peng, S., & Duo, L. (2019). Assessment of landscape ecological health: a case study of a mining city in a semi-arid steppe. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(5), 752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, C., Deng, X., Xu, S., Wang, Y., & Cui, J. (2016). An integrated approach for assessing the urban ecosystem health of megacities in China. Cities, 53, 110–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zengin, H., Değermenci, A. S., & Bettinger, P. (2018). Analysis of temporal changes in land cover and landscape metrics of a managed forest in the west Black Sea region of northern Turkey: 1970–2010. J For Res, 29(1), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Landscape Architecture, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey

    Birsen Kesgin Atak & Ebru Ersoy Tonyaloğlu

Authors
  1. Birsen Kesgin Atak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ebru Ersoy Tonyaloğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birsen Kesgin Atak.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kesgin Atak, B., Ersoy Tonyaloğlu, E. Monitoring the spatiotemporal changes in regional ecosystem health: a case study in Izmir, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 192, 385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08357-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08357-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation