Abstract
This paper aims to offer a new group decision-making (GDM) method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations (IVIFPRs). To furnish this goal, a new additive consistency definition of IVIFPRs is first proposed. Then, a programming model is built to check the additive consistency of IVIFPRs. For incomplete IVIFPRs, two programming models are constructed, which aim at maximizing the consistency and minimizing the uncertainty of missing information. To achieve the minimum total adjustment, a goal programming model is established to repair inconsistent IVIFPRs. Considering the consensus, a programming model for improving the consensus degree is established, which permits different IVIFVs to have different adjustments and makes individual IVIFPRs have the smallest total adjustment to remain more original information. Based on these results, a consistency- and consensus-based GDM method is proposed. At length, a practical example for screening new majors of a private college in China is offered to illustrate the feasibility and efficiency of proposed method.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
References
Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96
Atanassov KT, Gargov G (1989) Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31(3):343–349
Bustince H (1994) Conjuntos Intuicionistas e Intervalo valorados difusos: Propiedades y construcci on. Relaciones Intuicionistas Fuzzy. PhD thesis, Universidad Pública de Navarra
Cabrerizo FJ, Morente-Molinera JA, Pedrycz W, Taghavi A, Herrera-Viedma E (2018) Granulating linguistic information in decision making under consensus and consistency. Expert Syst Appl 99:83–92
Cabrerizo FJ, Al-Hmouz R, Morfeq A, Martínez MA, Pedrycz W, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) Estimating incomplete information in group decision making: a framework of granular computing. Appl Soft Comput 86:105930
Callejas EA, Cerrada JA, Cerrada C, Cabrerizo FJ (2019) Group decision making based on a framework of granular computing for multi-criteria and linguistic contexts. IEEE Access 7:54670–54681
Chiclana F, Mata F, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E, Martinez L (2008) Integration of a consistency control module within a consensus decision making model. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 16(Suppl. 01):35–53
Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Herrera F (2009) Cardinal consistency of reciprocal preference relation: a characterization of multiplicative transitivity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(1):14–23
Gong ZW, Li LS, Zhou FX, Yao TX (2009) Goal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 57(4):1187–1193
He XR (2019) Group decision making based on Dombi operators and its application to personnel evaluation. Int J Intell Syst 34(7):1718–1731
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115(1):67–82
Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 37(1):176–189
Herrera-Viedma E, Cabrerizo FJ, Kacprzyk J, Pedrycz W (2014) A Review of Soft Consensus Models in a Fuzzy Environment. Inf Fusion 17:4–13
Krejčí J (2017) On additive consistency of interval and fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 107:128–140
Li CC, Dong YC, Xu YJ, Chiclana F, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2019) An overview on managing additive consistency of reciprocal preference relations for consistency-driven decision making and Fusion: taxonomy and future directions. Inform Fusion 52:143–156
Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014) Priorities of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation based on multiplicative consistency. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(6):1669–1681
Liao HC, Xu ZS, Xia MM (2014) Multiplicative consistency of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(6):2969–2985
Lodwick WA, Jenkins OA (2013) Constrained intervals and interval spaces. Soft Comput 17(8):1393–1402
Meng FY, An QX, Tan CQ, Chen XH (2017a) An approach for group decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency and consensus analysis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet 47(8):2069–2082
Meng FY, Tang J, Xu ZS (2017b) A 0-1 mixed programming model based method for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 112:289–304
Meng FY, Tang J, Wang P, Chen XH (2018) A programming-based algorithm for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 144:122–143
Meng FY, Tang J, Fujita H (2019) Consistency-based algorithms for decision making with interval fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(10):2052–2066
Meng FY, Tang J, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) A rational and consensual method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative preference relations. Eng Appl Artif Intel 90:103514
Morente-Molinera JA, Kou G, Pang C, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) An automatic procedure to create fuzzy ontologies from users’ opinions using sentiment analysis procedures and multi-granular fuzzy linguistic modelling methods. Inf Sci 476:222–238
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1987) Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 32(1):107–117
Tang J, Meng FY, Zhang YL (2018) Decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency analysis. Inf Sci 467:115–134
Tang J, Meng FY, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2019) A procedure for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 18(4):493–527
Tang J, Meng FY, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2020) Group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Group Decis Negot 29:169–206
Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12(2):117–131
Tapia García JM, Del Moral MJ, Martínez MA, Herrera-Viedma E (2012) A consensus model for group decision making problems with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 39:10022–10030
Ureña R, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2015a) Confidence-consistency driven group decision making approach with incomplete reciprocal intuitionistic preference relations. Knowl-Based Syst 89:86–96
Ureña R, Chiclana F, Morente-Molinera JA, Herrera-Viedma E (2015b) Managing Incomplete Preference Relations in Decision Making: a Review and Future Trends. Inform Sci 302(1):14–32
Wan SP, Wang F, Dong JY (2016a) A novel group decision making method with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations for RFID technology selection. Appl Soft Comput 38:405–422
Wan SP, Xu GL, Dong JY (2016b) A novel method for group decision making with interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 372:53–71
Wan SP, Wang F, Dong JY (2017) Additive consistent interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and likelihood comparison algorithm based group decision making. Eur J Oper Res 263(2):571–582
Wang ZJ (2014) A note on “incomplete interval fuzzy preference relations and their applications”. Comput Industr Eng 77:65–69
Wang ZJ, Wang WZ, Li KW (2009) A goal programming method for generating priority weights based on interval-valued intuitionistic preference relations. in: The 8th International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Baoding, China, pp 1309–1314
Wu J, Chiclana F (2012) Non-dominance and attitudinal prioritisation methods for intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 39(18):13409–13416
Xia MM, Xu ZS (2012) Entropy/cross entropy-based group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Inform Fusion 13(1):31–47
Xian SD, Dong YF, Liu YB, Jing N (2018) A Novel Approach for Linguistic Group Decision Making Based on Generalized Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguistic Induced Hybrid Operator and TOPSIS. Int J Intell Syst 33(2):288–314
Xu ZS (2001) A practical method for priority of interval number complementary judgment matrix. Oper Res Manag Sci 10(1):16–19
Xu ZS (2004) On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference matrices. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 3(3):217–225
Xu ZS (2007a) A survey of preference relations. Int J Gen Syst 36(2):179–203
Xu ZS (2007b) Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making. Control Decis 22(2):215–219
Xu ZS, Cai XQ (2009) Incomplete interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Int J Gen Syst 38(8):871–886
Xu ZS, Chen J (2007) An approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic judgment matrices. Syst Eng Theory Pract 27(4):126–133
Xu ZS, Liao HC (2015) A survey of approaches to decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Knowl-Based Syst 80(C):131–142
Xu ZS, Yager RR (2009) Intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 8(2):123–139
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71571192), the Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University (No. 2019KF-09), and the Major Project for National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71790615).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Leonardo Tomazeli Duarte.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, S., Meng, F. Analysis of the consistency and consensus for group decision-making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Comp. Appl. Math. 39, 147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01177-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-020-01177-9