Skip to main content
Log in

Model of Effective Width and Fracture Conductivity for Hydraulic Fractures in Tight Reservoirs

  • Research Article-Petroleum Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing technology is widely used in the development of tight reservoirs. Hydraulic fracture closure highly impacts oil and gas production in tight reservoirs, and a quantitative description of the effective width and fracture conductivity has a guiding significance for fracturing design and productivity prediction. In this paper, based on the mechanical characteristics of proppants in hydraulic fracturing, a fracture width model is first established for sandstone and shale reservoirs, and the effect of the closing pressure on the rock mechanics parameters of proppants is considered. Then, by the changes in fracture width and proppant permeability, a fracture conductivity model is built. Finally, the models are verified with existing experimental data, and are applied to analyze the influence of relevant parameters on the effective width and fracture conductivity of hydraulic fractures. Fracture closure is primarily affected by proppant deformation and embedment. An increase in the proppant elastic modulus can reduce proppant deformation and avoid fracture closure. A fracture containing large proppant more readily closes during the production process, and the closing pressure has a considerable effect on the proppant rock mechanical parameters, which can prevent the fracture from closing to maintain its conductivity. In this study, fracture closure and its conductivity are predicted, which is conducive to the production of tight reservoirs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

Coefficient

b :

Coefficient

\(\overline{c}_{\text{p}}\) :

Compression coefficient (1/MPa)

C :

Physical quantity (unitless)

E :

Elasticity modulus (MPa)

F :

Conductivity coefficient (μm2 cm)

h :

Depth (mm)

k :

Permeability (mD)

K :

Coefficient (unitless)

p :

Pressure (MPa)

P :

Force (N)

w :

Fracture width (cm)

R :

Radius (mm)

α′:

Variable (mm)

ν :

Poisson’s ratio (unitless)

β :

Deformation value (mm)

ξ :

Coefficient (unitless)

χ :

Coefficient (unitless)

γ :

Coefficient (unitless)

λ :

Coefficient (unitless)

0:

Initial state

1:

Sphere 1

2:

Sphere 2

f:

Fracture

References

  1. Nülle, G.M.: Prospects for shale development outside the USA: evaluating nations’ regulatory and fiscal regimes for unconventional hydrocarbons. J. World Energy Law Bus. 8(3), 232–268 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dong, D.Z.; Zou, C.N.; Dai, J.X.: Suggestions on the development strategy of shale gas in China. Nat. Gas Geosci. 27(3), 397–406 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mayerhofer, M.J.; Lolon, E.P.; Youngblood, J.E.; Heinze, J.R.: Integration of microseismic-fracture-mapping results with numerical fracture network production modeling in the Barnett Shale. In: SPE 102103 was Presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition in San Antonio, Texas, USA (2006)

  4. Van der Vlis, A.C.; Haafkens, R.; Schipper, B.A.; Visser, W.: Criteria for proppant placement and fracture conductivity. In: SPE 5637 was Presented at the 50th Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineering of AIME in Dallas, Texas, USA (1975)

  5. Chen, P.; Jiang, S.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, K.: Pressure response and production performance of a volumetric fracturing horizontal well in a shale gas reservoir based on the boundary element method. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 87(2), 66–77 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Baihly, J.D.; Malpani, R.; Altman, R.; Lindsay, G.; Clayton, R.: Shale gas production decline trend comparison over time and basins-revisited. In: SPE 178674 was Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference in San Antonio, Texas, USA (2015)

  7. Wang, H.Y.: What factors control shale gas production decline trend: a comprehensive analysis and investigation. In: SPE 179967 was Presented at the SPE/IAEE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium in Houston, Texas, USA (2016)

  8. Lacy, L.L.; Rickards, A.R.; Bilden, D.M.: Fracture width and embedment testing in soft reservoir sandstone. SPE Drill. Complet. 13(1), 25–29 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurz, B.A.; Schmidt, D.D.; Cortese, P.E.: Investigation of improved conductivity and proppant applications in the Bakken Formation. In: SPE 163849 was Presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference in Woodlands, Texas, USA (2013)

  10. Jiang, J.; Yang, J.: Coupled fluid flow and geomechanics modeling of stress-sensitive production behavior in fractured shale gas reservoirs. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 101, 1–12 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reinicke, A.; Rybacki, E.; Stanchits, S.; Dresen, G.: Hydraulic fracturing stimulation techniquesand formation damage mechanisms—implications from laboratory testing of tight sandstone–proppant systems. Geochemistry 70(3), 107–117 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, D.; Ye, Z.; Pan, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, J.: A permeability model for the hydraulic fracture filled with proppant packs under combined effect of compaction and embedment. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 149, 428–435 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, K.; Gao, Y.; Lyu, Y.; Wang, M.: New mathematical models for calculating proppant embedment and fracture conductivity. SPE J. 20(3), 496–507 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fan, M.; Han, Y.; McClure, J.; Chen, C.: Hydraulic fracture conductivity as a function of proppant concentration under various effective stresses: from partial monolayer to multilayer proppants. In: This Paper was Presented at the Unconventional Resources Technology Conference in Austin, Texas, USA (2017)

  15. Deng, S.; Li, H.; Ma, G.; Huang, H.; Li, X.: Simulation of shale–proppant interaction in hydraulic fracturing by the discrete element method. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 70, 219–228 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tang, Y.; Ranjith, P.G.; Wu, B.: Experimental study of effects of shearing on proppant embedment behaviour of tight gas sandstone reservoirs. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 172, 228–246 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang, Y.; Ranjith, P.G.; Perera, M.S.A.; Rathnaweera, T.D.: Influence of proppant concentration and fracturing fluids on proppant-embedment behavior for inhomogeneous rock medium: an experimental and numerical study. SPE Prod. Oper. 33(4), 666–678 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Araújo, R.G.S.; Sousa, J.L.A.O.; Bloch, M.: Experimental investigation on the influence of temperature on the mechanical properties of reservoir rocks. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34(3–4), 298.e1-e16 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Senseny, P.E.: Laboratory measurements of mechanical properties of sandstones and shales. In: SPE 11762 was Presented at the 1983 SPE/DOE Symposium on Low Permeability in Denver, Colorado, USA (1983)

  20. Miyazaki, K.; Yamaguchi, T.; Sakamoto, Y.; Tenma, N.; Ogata, Y.; Kazuo, A.: Effect of confining pressure on mechanical properties of artificial methane hydrate bearing sediments. In: This Paper was Presented at the Twentieth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China (2010)

  21. Deng, H.; Zhang, M.; Deng, T.; Zhang, Q.: A triaxial compression test of tight quartz sandstone under high temperature and high confining presssure. Oil Gas Geol. 38(6), 1172–1179 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Peng, J.; Zeng, F.; Li, C.; Miao, S.: Experimental study of anisotropy and mechanical property of quartz sandstone. Rock Soil Mech. 38(S1), 103–112 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, J.; Wang, M.; Wang, W.: Elastic Mechanics Introduction, Recension of, 1st edn. Peking University Press, Beijing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barree, R.D.; Miskimins, J.L.; Conway, M.W.; Duenckel, R.: Generic correlations for proppant-pack conductivity. SPE Prod. Oper. 33(3), 509–521 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, F.; Zhu, H.; Guo, J.; Huang, B.: Discrete-element-method/computational-fluid-dynamics coupling simulation of proppant embedment and fracture conductivity after hydraulic fracturing. SPE J. 22(2), 632–644 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang, J.; Safari, R.; Perez, O.; Fragachan, F.E: Reservoir depletion-induced proppant embedment and dynamic fracture closure. In: SPE 195135 was Presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference in Manama, Bahrain (2019)

  27. Yun, M.; Yi, W.; Zhuang, H.: Empirical relationship among elastic modulus, porosity, clay content, effective pressure and temperature in dry core sample of sandstone. Oil Geophys. Prospect. 36(3), 308–314 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gao, Y.; Chen, M.; Lin, B.; Jin, Y.; Chen, S.; Yu, H.: Thermal influences on mechanical properties of oil sands. Chin. J. Rock Mechan. Eng. 37(11), 2520–2535 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Niandou, H.; Shao, J.; Henry, J.P.; Fourmaintraux, D.: Laboratory investigation of the mechanical behaviour of Tournemire shale. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34(1), 3–16 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Asef, M.R.; Reddish, D.J.: The impact of confining stress on the rock mass deformation modulus. Geotchnique 53(4), 235–241 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zeng, F.; Shao, L.; Guo, X.: Effect of confining pressure on the transversely isotropic elastic parameters for sandstone. Chin. J. Undergr. Spa. Eng. 15(2), 443–451 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, D.; Pan, Z.; Ye, Z.; Hou, B.; Wang, D.; Yuan, L.: A unified permeability and effective stress relationship for porous and fractured reservoir rocks. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 29, 401–412 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, S.; Mou, S.; Zhang, J.; Wang, L.: Experimental evaluation of long-term conductivity of fracturing in coal beds. Acta Geol. Sin. 82(10), 1444–1449 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development (GSYKY-B09-33), Open Foundation of Top Disciplines in Yangtze University, Science and Technology Research Project of Hubei Provincial Department of Education (Q20161311, Q20171301).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peng Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, S., Chen, P., Yan, M. et al. Model of Effective Width and Fracture Conductivity for Hydraulic Fractures in Tight Reservoirs. Arab J Sci Eng 45, 7821–7834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04614-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04614-3

Keywords

Navigation