Elsevier

Nuclear Physics A

Volume 1001, September 2020, 121923
Nuclear Physics A

Measurement of cross sections for charge pickup reaction by 56Fe on Al, C and CH2 targets at 500 MeV/n

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.121923Get rights and content

Abstract

The nuclear charge pickup cross sections of 56Fe on polyethylene (CH2), carbon and aluminum targets at an energy of 497 MeV/n were investigated using CR-39 nuclear track detector. The dependence of charge pickup cross section on target mass was studied.

Introduction

Nuclear charge pickup reactions, being presumably very peripheral interactions by their nature, have drawn much attention in heavy-ion induced interactions at various energies. With a magnetic spectrometer at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Bevalac energy, Olson et al. [1] measured very small cross sections (<0.1mb) for 1.05 and 2.10 GeV/n 12C going to 12N, i.e. (12C, 12N) reaction, for H, Be, C, Al and Ag targets, and Olson et al. [2] measured larger (0.5 to 1.0 mb) cross sections for 1.7 GeV/n 18O going to 18F, i.e. (18O, 18F) reaction, for Be and Th targets. Using a magnetic spectrometer and a time-of-flight (TOF) system at Saturne, Bachelier et al. [3] measured the energy transfer in the charge transfer reaction of 0.95 GeV/n 20Ne going to 20Na, i.e. (20Ne, 20Na) reaction, for C, Y, and Pb targets. Two peaks, one at a low excitation energy due to nppn and one at 300MeV due to excitation of a target nucleon to a delta resonance, were detected. Roy-Stephan [4], [5] reported the charge pickup cross sections for 900 MeV/n 20Ne in H, C, and Pb targets and for 900 and 1100 MeV/n 12C in H, C, and Pb targets. Gerbier et al. [6] measured the charge pickup cross sections for 0.6 to 0.8 GeV/n 197Au going to any isotope of Hg, i.e. (197Au, Hg) reaction, a large cross section, 35mb, and accompanied by a surprisingly large momentum downshift was reported. Ren Guoxiao et al. [7] measured the charge pickup cross sections for 1.7 GeV/n 56Fe, 1.46 GeV/n 84Kr, 1.28 GeV/n 139La, and 0.8 GeV/n 197Au on a CR-39 target, combining their results with data on charge pickup by 12C, 18O, and 20Ne projectiles, they found that the cross section for charge pickup reactions by ∼ GeV/n projectiles was generally given to within a factor of 2 by the expression σΔZ=+1=1.7×104γPTAP2 (in mb), where γPT=AP1/3+AT1/31.0 implied peripheral collisions. This steeper projectile mass dependence was not well understood physically for a nuclear process. Since these charge pickup interactions were presumably very peripheral collisions by their nature, the cross sections may be expected to depend on the impact parameter γPT=AP1/3+AT1/31.0, and being presumably a surface interaction, may also be expected to depend on the cross sectional or surface area, proportional to AP2/3. Then nuclear charge pickup reactions of heavy ions on various targets were investigated at BNL [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], SPS [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], GSI [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], and LBL [31], [32] energies. The dependence of nuclear charge pickup cross section on the beam energy, target size, and projectile size were studied based on available data, but conclusions were not consistent to each other. Generally, the nuclear charge pickup cross section decreases with the increase of the beam energy, and increases with projectile size and target size.

At low and intermediate energies, but below the Fermi energy, the mechanism responsible for charge pickup was transfer reaction where the final states were populated by sequential proton-pickup neutron-stripping processes (or vice versa). At these energies, the projectile velocity was smaller than the Fermi velocity of nucleons inside the nucleus, and because of the overlapping of Fermi spheres at the moment of contact, the nucleons move from one Fermi sea into another. At relativistic energies, however, the Fermi spheres of projectile and target were totally non-overlapping, preventing any transfer of, e.g., a target proton to the projectile. Instead, we can assume Δ-resonance formation and decay in nucleon-nucleon (NN) collisions to be the most likely elementary processes in which a projectile neutron can be converted into a proton, e.g., by nΔp+π with subsequent absorption of the proton in the projectile and emission of the π [27] and, possibly, neutrons. At intermediate and high energies, two mechanism, e.g., proton transfer through the nuclear overlap zone and Δ-resonance formation and decay in nucleon-nucleon (NN) collisions, may make a contribution simultaneously.

In this paper, the nuclear charge pickup cross sections of 56Fe on Al, C and CH2 targets at an energy of 497 MeV/n were investigated using CR-39 nuclear track detector.

Section snippets

Experimental details

Stacks of Al, C and CH2 targets sandwiched with CR-39 nuclear track detectors (HARZLAS TD-1, Fukuvi, Japan) were perpendicularly exposed to a 56Fe beam of initial energy of 500 MeV/n in the biology port of the HIMAC (the Heavy Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba) facility at the Japanese National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS). The beam fluence was about 2000ions/cm2. The configuration of sandwiched target is shown in Fig. 1. CR-39 sheets, with dimensions of 5cm×5cm and thickness of 0.8

Results and discussion

For measuring the charge pickup cross sections the main experimental requirement was to achieve a charge resolution sufficient to distinguish the relatively rare fragments emerging from the target with an increased charge from the much more abundant projectile nuclei that pass through the target without changing charge. To do this, the reconstructed events matching the possibilities (1) and (4) discussed in above section were selected for final analysis.

Fig. 5 shows the etched track area

Conclusions

The nuclear charge pickup cross sections of 56Fe on polyethylene, carbon and aluminum targets at an energy of 497 MeV/n were investigated using CR-39 nuclear track detector. The dependence of the charge pickup cross section on target mass with the relation of σΔZ=+1=aATb was obtained, and the fitting parameter b1.40. This strong dependence on target mass confirmed that the nuclear charge pickup reaction was a peripheral and surface interaction by its nature, but can not be completely explained

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This work has been supported by the Chinese National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. 11075100 and 11565001, the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province under Grant 2011011001-2, the Shanxi Provincial Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, China (Grant No. 2011-058). We are grateful to Dr. S. Kodaira in NIRS and staff of the HIMIC for helping to expose the stacks.

References (35)

  • D. Bachelier et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (1986)
  • Y.D. He et al.

    Phys. Lett. B

    (1993)
  • H. Dekhissi et al.

    Nucl. Phys. A

    (2000)
  • F. Rejmund et al.

    Nucl. Phys. A

    (2001)
  • L. Audouin et al.

    Nucl. Phys. A

    (2006)
  • S. Ota et al.

    Radiat. Meas.

    (2008)
  • D.L. Olson et al.

    Phys. Rev. C

    (1983)
  • D.L. Olsen et al.

    Phys. Rev. C

    (1981)
  • M. Roy-Stephan

    Nucl. Phys. A

    (1988)
  • M. Roy-Stephan

    Nucl. Phys. A

    (1988)
  • G. Gerbier et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1988)
  • Ren Guoxiao et al.

    Phys. Rev. C

    (1989)
  • B.S. Nilsen et al.

    Phys. Rev. C

    (1994)
  • C.J. Waddington et al.

    Nucl. Phys. A

    (1994)
  • P.B. Price et al.

    Phys. Rev. C

    (1991)
  • S.E. Hirzabruch et al.

    Phys. Rev. C

    (1995)
  • L.Y. Geer et al.

    Phys. Rev. C

    (1995)
  • Cited by (4)

    View full text