Potential of avian and mammalian species A rotaviruses to reassort as explored by plasmid only-based reverse genetics
Introduction
Rotaviruses are enteric viruses that can cause severe gastroenteritis in young children. Despite ongoing vaccination programs it is estimated that rotavirus infections resulted in 128,500 deaths in 2016 worldwide (GBD 2016 Diarrhoeal Disease Collaborators, 2018). Besides human infections, rotaviruses are also highly prevalent in several animal species including birds (Otto et al., 2012, 2015), and outbreaks can lead to significant economic losses in livestock and poultry industry (Castells et al., 2018; Dhama et al., 2015; Vlasova et al., 2017). Avian rotavirus infection has been linked to symptoms of diarrhea and reduced feed intake resulting in growth retardation and increased mortality in chicken and turkey, even though co-infections with other pathogens seem to play a role for disease development (Dhama et al., 2015). In addition, rotavirus was recently demonstrated to be the single causative agent of young pigeon disease syndrome, an illness with high mortality rates (McCowan et al., 2018; Rubbenstroth et al., 2019). So far, no protective vaccines against rotaviruses are commercially available for poultry and domestic birds.
Rotaviruses belong to the genus Rotavirus of the family Reoviridae and comprise the species A-I, as well as the tentative species J-L (Banyai et al., 2017; Johne et al., 2019; Matthijnssens et al., 2012). Rotaviruses of species A (RVA), D, F and G have been detected in several species of birds (Dhama et al., 2015; Otto et al., 2012). RVA are non-enveloped viruses that carry a segmented double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) genome that encodes six structural viral proteins (VPs) and five or six non-structural viral proteins (NSPs). The VPs form the triple-layered icosahedral capsid of rotaviruses. Therein, the inner core is formed by VP2 that encloses the eleven viral dsRNA segments associated with the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase VP1 and the viral capping enzyme VP3. VP3 has guanylyl- and methyltransferase activities (Chen et al., 1999; Pizarro et al., 1991), and also functions as interferon (IFN) antagonist by cleaving 2′-5′-oligoadenylates that act as second messengers in the antiviral IFN response (Zhang et al., 2013). VP6 forms the middle layer and anchors the outer layer consisting of the glycoprotein VP7 and the receptor-binding VP4 that is activated by proteases during the course of infection (Desselberger, 2014). Proteolytic cleavage of trimeric VP4 into VP5* and VP8* occurs before attachment of the virion to the host cell receptor. The NSPs are expressed after infection of the host cell and regulate many aspects of rotavirus infection and replication, as well as suppress the intrinsic host cell immune defenses. In addition, NSP4 can also act as a secreted enterotoxin in the intestinal tract of infected individuals (Desselberger, 2014). For full RVA classification, the segments encoding VP7-VP4-VP6-VP1-VP2-VP3-NSP1-NSP2-NSP3-NSP4-NSP5/6 are assigned to specific genotypes designated as Gx-P[x]-Ix-Rx-Cx-Mx-Ax-Nx-Tx-Ex-Hx, respectively (Matthijnssens et al., 2011, 2008). The high genetic variability of RVA is reflected by a large number of currently known genotypes, e.g. 36 G-Types and 51 P-Types (Rotavirus Classification Working Group, 2020).
Co-infections with different RVA strains can lead to genetic reassortment, which can result in RVA strains with novel antigenic and/or pathogenic features (Doro et al., 2015; Martella et al., 2010). By reassortment, the diversity of RVA strains can increase and the risk of newly emerging human pathogenic RVA strains may arise. Reassortants containing genome segments from human and mammalian animal RVA strains have been frequently described, underlining the zoonotic nature of mammalian animal RVAs (Martella et al., 2010; Doro et al., 2015). In contrast, only little is known about zoonotic transmission and reassortment between avian and mammalian RVA strains. Zoonotic infections of avian RVA in mammalian animals have only been rarely detected (Brussow et al., 1992; Mitake et al., 2015), and reassortment events of avian RVAs have mainly been confined to that with other avian RVA strains (Schumann et al., 2009; Trojnar et al., 2013). Phylogenetically, avian and mammalian RVA cluster separately, indicating a rather long independent evolution (Trojnar et al., 2009). However, the 5′- and 3′-noncoding regions of the genomic segments of both virus groups are highly conserved, suggesting that genetic reassortment might theoretically be possible (Trojnar et al., 2009). One avian RVA strain derived from a pheasant contained a VP4 gene with high sequence identity to mammalian RVA, which might confirm the possibility of reassortment under field conditions (Trojnar et al., 2013).
Under laboratory conditions, only a few viable avian/mammalian reassortant viruses have been created in cell culture. Co-infection of MA-104 cells resulted in a turkey RVA strain carrying the VP4-encoding segment from a simian RVA (Kool et al., 1992). Using a helper virus-dependent reverse genetics system (RGS), the VP4-encoding segment of the simian RVA strain SA11 could also be replaced by its chicken RVA counterpart (Johne et al., 2016). Recently, the development of a helper virus-free RGS for strain SA11 was a major breakthrough for the study of rotavirus biology (Kanai et al., 2017; Komoto et al., 2018). Using this system, we were able to readily reproduce the rescue of the viable SA11/chicken VP4 reassortant (Falkenhagen et al., 2019). However, other genome segments have not been tested and no RGS for avian RVA is available.
Therefore, one aim of this study was to establish a helper virus-free RGS for an avian RVA to enable further investigations on specific characteristics of avian RVAs and their zoonotic potential. In addition, the reassortment capacity of each genome segment of the avian RVA in a mammalian RVA background was assessed using the generated avian RVA plasmids together with the recently established plasmid-based RGS for the simian SA11 strain.
Section snippets
Cell lines and plasmids
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) and Minimal Essential Medium (MEM) were supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mM L-glutamine, 1x non-essential amino acids and 0.1 μg/mL gentamicin (further referred to as complete DMEM or complete MEM; all reagents from Pan-Biotech GmbH, Aidenbach, Germany). Cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. BSR-T7/5 cells (Buchholz et al., 1999) were kindly provided by Dr. Karsten Tischer (Free University of Berlin,
Generation of plasmids for reverse genetics of chicken RVA strain Ch2G3
To set up an RGS for the chicken RVA strain Ch2G3, each genome segment was cloned into a separate expression vector containing a T7 promoter, an HDV ribozyme and a T7 terminator for the correct processing of the 5′- and 3′-termini of the genome segment RNA (Fig. 1a). The plasmid encoding VP4 of Ch2G3 was already available as published (Johne et al., 2016). The remaining plasmids were similarly constructed, starting with RT-PCR amplification of viral RNA from supernatant of Ch2G3-infected MA-104
Discussion
The availability of an RGS enabling site-directed manipulation of RVA genomes represents one of the major recent advances in rotavirus research. Following the rescue of the simian RVA strain SA11 entirely from plasmids (Kanai et al., 2017), the RGS was successfully used to generate reporter rotaviruses, to study the function of individual viral proteins, and was also adapted to rescue two recombinant human RVA strains (Falkenhagen et al., 2020; Kanai et al., 2019; Kawagishi et al., 2019; Komoto
Conclusion
So far, rescue of chicken RVA strain Ch2G3 entirely from cloned plasmids was not successful using the novel RGS. As this could be caused by inefficient virus replication in cell culture, efforts should be made to optimize the RGS in future. Mono-reassortment of Ch2G3 genome segments into the genetic backbone of simian SA11 appears to be mostly impaired. However, chicken VP3 and VP4 genes can functionally replace their SA11 homologs in cell culture, resulting in the generation of
Declaration of competing interest
None.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Corinna Patzina-Mehling: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Alexander Falkenhagen: Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Eva Trojnar: Methodology, Investigation. Ashish K. Gadicherla: Methodology, Investigation. Reimar Johne: Conceptualization, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Silke Apelt, Stefanie Prosetzky, Anja Schlosser and Maria-Margarida Vargas Gonc. de Freitas for their excellent technical assistance. This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Germany (grant numbers JO369/4-3 and JO 369/5-1).
References (50)
- et al.
Candidate new rotavirus species in Schreiber’s bats
Serbia. Infect Genet Evol
(2017) - et al.
Rotavirus open cores catalyze 5’-capping and methylation of exogenous RNA: evidence that VP3 is a methyltransferase
Virology
(1999) Rotaviruses
Virus Res.
(2014)- et al.
Identification of group A rotavirus genes associated with virulence of a porcine rotavirus and host range restriction of a human rotavirus in the gnotobiotic piglet model
Virology
(1995) - et al.
Non-random selection of gene segment 3 and random selection of gene segment 5 observed in reassortants generated in vitro between rotavirus SA11 and RRV
Res. Virol.
(1995) - et al.
Zoonotic aspects of rotaviruses
Vet. Microbiol.
(2010) - et al.
Silencing the alarms: innate immune antagonism by rotavirus NSP1 and VP3
Virology
(2015) - et al.
Detection of avian rotaviruses of groups A, D, F and G in diseased chickens and turkeys from Europe and Bangladesh
Vet. Microbiol.
(2012) - et al.
Detection of rotavirus species A, B and C in domestic mammalian animals with diarrhoea and genotyping of bovine species A rotavirus strains
Vet. Microbiol.
(2015) - et al.
Whole genome sequence analysis of cell culture-adapted rotavirus A strains from chicken
Infect. Genet. Evol.
(2020)
Evidence of interspecies transmission and reassortment among avian group A rotaviruses
Virology
The first complete genome sequence of a chicken group A rotavirus indicates independent evolution of mammalian and avian strains
Virology
Entry and replication of recombinant hepatitis C viruses in cell culture
Methods
Isolation of an avianlike group A rotavirus from a calf with diarrhea
J. Clin. Microbiol.
Generation of bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) from cDNA: BRSV NS2 is not essential for virus replication in tissue culture, and the human RSV leader region acts as a functional BRSV genome promoter
J. Virol.
Prevalence and viability of group A rotavirus in dairy farm water sources
J. Appl. Microbiol.
Avian rotavirus enteritis – an updated review
Vet. Q.
Zoonotic transmission of rotavirus: surveillance and control
Expert Rev. Anti. Ther.
Generation of simian rotavirus reassortants with diverse VP4 genes using reverse genetics
J. Gen. Virol.
Generation of simian rotavirus reassortants with VP4- and VP7-encoding genome segments from human strains circulating in Africa using reverse genetics
Viruses
Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of diarrhoea in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
Lancet Infect. Dis.
Generation of an avian-mammalian rotavirus reassortant by using a helper virus-dependent reverse genetics system
J. Virol.
Distantly related rotaviruses in common shrews, Germany, 2004–2014
Emerg Infect Dis
Entirely plasmid-based reverse genetics system for rotaviruses
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Development of stable rotavirus reporter expression systems
J. Virol.
Cited by (11)
Species A rotavirus reverse genetics: Achievements and prospects
2021, Virus ResearchRotavirus reverse genetics: A tool for understanding virus biology
2021, Virus ResearchCitation Excerpt :Complementarity and interchangeability of gene segment 4, encoding the structural protein VP4, and gs 8 (encoding VP7) from different species, including several human isolates from RV circulating in Africa in the SA11 background was shown. In some cases, reassortants could be rescued, although the generation of reassortants for the VP4-encoding segment of several strains was challenging (Falkenhagen et al., 2021, 2020, 2019; Patzina-Mehling et al., 2020). Other RV segments were also specifically modified and incorporated into infectious particles to shed light on mechanisms associated to virus replication.
Rotavirus research: 2014–2020
2021, Virus ResearchGeneration of recombinant rotaviruses from just 11 cDNAs encoding a viral genome
2020, Virus ResearchCitation Excerpt :Although the efficiencies of these modified procedures and the original 11 plasmid-only system were not compared in their studies, it is reasonable that these modifications could further improve the efficiency of the 11 plasmid-only system. The original 11 plasmid-only system and its derivatives have already been utilized in many RVA laboratories throughout the world, and are contributing to RVA research in various aspects (Falkenhagen et al., 2019, 2020; Fukuda et al., 2020; Komoto et al., 2018, 2019; Papa et al., 2019; Patzina-Mehling et al., 2020; Philip et al., 2019a, 2019b, 2020; Song et al., 2020). Further extensive studies should be performed to obtain valuable results with these techniques.
Strain-Specific Interactions between the Viral Capsid Proteins VP4, VP7 and VP6 Influence Rescue of Rotavirus Reassortants by Reverse Genetics
2023, International Journal of Molecular SciencesDetection, prevalence and molecular characterization of avian rotavirus
2022, Indian Journal of Animal Sciences