Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluating the performance of calculated elemental measures in sediment archives

  • Note
  • Published:
Journal of Paleolimnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mass accumulation rates, tracer element ratios, enrichment factors, excess measures, and centred log-ratios are elemental measures used in paleolimnological studies when more than one source (e.g. pollution and/or erosion) contributes an element of interest to the sediment archive, or when the closure constraint results in spurious correlations between element concentrations. To determine which measures perform best, we created a model to simulate sediment archives with known inputs from multiple sources. We then calculated each measure and evaluated performance based on whether or not the measure preserved the timing and/or magnitude of mass input from a single source (e.g. pollution). We found that mass accumulation rates performed well when there was a low concentration of the target element in the erosional source, tracer element ratios performed well when erosion was constant, and excess measures performed well when erosion was variable. Enrichment factors did not preserve the magnitude of mass input between simulations with different erosional compositions, and tracer element ratios performed poorly when erosion was not constant. We confirmed these results using real elemental geochemistry from two lakes near Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, the data from which suggested that the composition of the erosional source is likely to change over time. Collectively, our data suggest that although elemental measures are useful interpretive tools, each method has specific numerical and geochemical assumptions that must be evaluated prior to its use. Assumptions of each measure used in a study should be made clear, and concentration profiles should always be made available to the reader.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) postgraduate scholarship program (DW Dunnington), the NSERC ENGAGE/ENGAGE Plus program (IS Spooner and Halifax Water), and the NSERC Halifax Water Industrial Research Chair program (GA Gagnon, NSERC Grant Nos. IRCPJ: 349838-16, 130040). We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their thorough reviews of the manuscript, and Mark Brenner for editorial handling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dewey W. Dunnington.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dunnington, D.W., Gregory, B.R.B., Spooner, I.S. et al. Evaluating the performance of calculated elemental measures in sediment archives. J Paleolimnol 64, 155–166 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-020-00123-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-020-00123-3

Keywords

Navigation