Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Qualitative and Quantitative Responses of Early Ripening Table Grape Cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) to Pollination Treatments under Controlled Growing Condition

Qualitative und quantitative Reaktionen von frühreifenden Tafeltraubensorten (Vitis vinifera L.) auf verschiedene Bestäubungsverfahren im geschützten Anbau

  • Original Article / Originalbeitrag
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The production of fruits and seeds of many crops is increased when external pollination occurs. Although self pollination is a widespread biological process in cultivated grapevines, there are still some uncertainties about the consequences of cross fertilization regarding productivity and quality of grapevines. Fertilization biology of grapevines becomes an essential issue when protected cultivation in particular is considered. The present investigations were therefore performed to clarify the possible effects of different pollination treatments on the agronomic features of ‘Perle de Csaba’ and ‘Trakya İlkeren’ table grape cultivars. Before the anthesis, clusters of self-pollination treatment were enclosed within cheesecloth frames to avoid extraneous pollination. For the free pollination group, flowers of twelve similar clusters were allowed to bloom and pollinate spontaneously, while hand pollination was performed by transporting the mixture of external pollens gathered from different cultivars at bloom stage. In ‘Perle de Csaba’ cultivar, hand pollination and free pollination treatments significantly increased the overall agronomic parameters on berry set rate, berry development, cluster size, seed weight and seed size in comparison to self pollination. Treatments had similar effects in ‘Trakya İlkeren’, except for a few parameters such as cluster length, berry diameter and seed thickness. Overall results indicated that cross pollination would considerably increase the quantity and quality of table grapes when cultivated under protected conditions such as glass or greenhouses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ansari M, Davarynejad GH, Tornyai J, Nyeki J, Szabo Z, Soltesz M (2010) Effects of self- and crosspollination on fruit set and fruit quality of sour cherry cultivars. Int J Hortic Sci 16:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cholokashvili S, Chakhnashvili N (1926) Results of a study on Georgian grapevine. Agron Proc Georgian Exp 3:17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergul A, Marasali B (1997) Effects of pollination types on berry and seed set in grape cultivars. Tarım Bilim Derg 3:39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filler DM, Luby JJ, Ascher PD (1994) Incongruity in the interspecific crosses of Vitis reproductive expression in the F1 grogeny. Euphytica 78:155–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotiric M, Mulitinovic M, Nikolic D, Rakonjac V (2003) Pollinizer influence on berry and seed properties in grapevine cultivar ‘Bagrina’ (Vitis vinifera L.). Acta Hortic 603:775–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurasashvili V, Vashakidze L (2004) Type of pollination and frequency of fruit-set of Georgian grapevine variety Gorula. J Probl Agric Sci 26:72–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura PH, Okamoto C, Hirano K (1998) The mode of pollination and stigma receptivity in ‘Vitis coignetiae Pull’. Am J Enol Vitic 49:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Das B (1996) Studies on xenia in almond (Prunus dulcis Miller DA Webb). J Hortic Sci 71:545–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marasali B, Baydar NG (2001) Studies on flower types and pollination properties of some Vitis species and cultivars used as rootstocks. Turk J Agric For 25:393–399

    Google Scholar 

  • McGovern PE, Rudolph HM (1996) The analytical and archaeological challenge of detecting ancient wine: two case studies from the ancient Near East. In: McGovern PE, Fleming SJ, Katz SH (eds) The origins and ancient history of wine. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 57–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins MG, Bouquet A, Williams LE (1992) Biology of the Grapevine. Cambridge University Press, UK, p 239

  • O. I. V. (1983) Le code des caractères descriptifs des variétés et espèces de Vitis. Office International de la Vigne et du Vin, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Okamoto G, Kuwamura T, Hirano K (2004) Effects of water deficit stress on leaf and berry ABA and berry ripening in Chardonnay grapevines. Vitis 43:15–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera D, Miralles B, Obón C, Carreńo E, Palazón JA (2007) Multivariate analysis of Vitis subgenus Vitis seed morphology. Vitis 46:158–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Rombough L (2002) The grape grower. Chelsea Green, White River Junction, VT

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabir A (2008) Ampelographic and molecular characterization of some grape cultivars and rootstocks (Unpublished Ph.D thesis, Univ. of Cukurova, Turkey, 154p)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabir A (2011) Influences of self- and cross-pollinations on berry set, seed characteristics and germination progress of grape (Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Italia’). Int J Agric Biol 13:591–594

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabir A (2013) Improvement of grafting efficiency in hard grafting grape Berlandieri hybrid rootstocks by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Sci Hortic 164:24–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabir A (2015) Xenia and metaxenia in grapes: differences in berry and seed characteristics of maternal grape cv. ‘Narince’ (Vitis vinifera L.) as influenced by different pollen sources. Plant Biol 17:567–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabir A, Sabir FK, Kara Z, Gayretli Y, Mohammed OJM, Jawshly AIM, Kus AD (2019) Berry set and quality response of soilless grown ‘Prima’ grapes to foliar and inflorescence pulverization of various substances under glasshouse condition. Erwerbs-Obstbau 61(Suppl 1):S47–S51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin G (2006) Effects of different pollinizers on berry set with berry and seed features in Alphonse Lavallée (V. vinifera L.) (M.Sci Thesis, Univ. of Selcuk,Turkey, 40p)

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaan LG, Taha MW, Hassan AH, Boraby MSE (1981) Pollination and serological studies on Egyptian grapes. Vitis 20:293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafique M, Khan AS, Malik AU, Shahid M, Rajwana IA, Saleem BA, Amin M, Ahmad I (2011) Influence of pollen source and pollination frequency on fruit drop, yield and quality of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Dhakki. Pak J Bot 43:831–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Staudt G (1999) Opening of flowers and time of anthesis in grapevines Vitis vinifera L. Vitis 38:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Vashakidze L, Gogiava E, Bejuashviliu N (1982) The biological peculiarities of some Georgian grapevine varieties by breeding. In: Conference on ‘Productivity of Subtropical Crops’ Maxaradze-Anaseuli. Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D, Hopf M (2000) Domestication of plants in the Old World, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 151–159

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) as the graduate thesis of Seher Kilinc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Sabir.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

A. Sabir, S. Kilinc and F. Sabir declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabir, A., Kilinc, S. & Sabir, F. Qualitative and Quantitative Responses of Early Ripening Table Grape Cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) to Pollination Treatments under Controlled Growing Condition. Erwerbs-Obstbau 62 (Suppl 1), 75–80 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-020-00499-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-020-00499-6

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation