Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid simulation of bridges constructed with concrete-filled steel tube columns subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents the application of multi-axis hybrid simulation for evaluating the seismic response of a rigid-frame bridge structure constructed with concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns subjected to combined horizontal and vertical ground motions. These types of bridges are believed to have superior seismic performance and better ability to withstand collapse when subjected to extreme multi-directional seismic loads. The case-study hybrid model was a 1:3 scaled bridge structure with three spans and double-column bents. The experimental element consisted of one CFST column while the rest of the bridge elements were modelled numerically in the computer. Two popular cross-section shapes of circular and square CFST columns were tested and compared. The structure was subjected to the horizontal (longitudinal) and vertical components of the Northridge ground motion with five increasing intensity levels to cover all scenarios ranging from frequent to very rare events during the lifecycle of the structure. A state-of-the-art hybrid testing facility, referred to as the multi axis substructure testing system, was used to simulate complex boundary effects on the physical specimen using mixed load/deformation modes. The bridge columns showed great levels of ductility and no sign of severe damage or loss of stability, while they were subjected to large axial force variations and lateral deformation demands during hybrid simulations. The superior seismic performance of CFST elements highlights their benefit in construction of more resilient bridges, particularly those with the vital roles in post-disaster operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelnaby AE, Frankie TM, Elnashai AS et al (2014) Numerical and hybrid analysis of a curved bridge and methods of numerical model calibration. Eng Struct 70:234–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrahamson N, Litehiser J (1989) Attenuation of vertical peak acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79(3):549–580

    Google Scholar 

  • ACI Committee 318 (2014) Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318–14) [and] commentary on building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318R-14)

  • AISC (2016) Specification for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 360–16). American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys Nu, Simpson K (1996) Prediction of vertical response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(4):401–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousias S, Sextos A, Kwon O-S et al (2019) Intercontinental hybrid simulation for the assessment of a three-span R/C highway overpass. J Earthq Eng 23(7):1194–1215

    Google Scholar 

  • Broderick B, Elnashai A (1995) Analysis of the failure of interstate 10 freeway ramp during the Northridge earthquake of 17 January 1994. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 24(2):189–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Button MR, Cronin CJ, Mayes RL (2002) Effect of vertical motions on seismic response of highway bridges. J Struct Eng 128(12):1551–1564

    Google Scholar 

  • Chae Y, Park M, Kim C-Y et al (2017) Experimental study on the rate-dependency of reinforced concrete structures using slow and real-time hybrid simulations. Eng Struct 132:648–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouw N, Hao H (2012) Pounding damage to buildings and bridges in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Int J Prot Struct 3(2):123–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung J, Hulbert G (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-α method. J Appl Mech 60(2):371–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier C, Elnashai A (2001) A procedure for combining vertical and horizontal seismic action effects. J Earthq Eng 5(04):521–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Carpio Carpio M, Mosqueda G, Hashemi MJ (2015) Large-scale hybrid simulation of a steel moment frame building structure through collapse. J Struct Eng 142(1):04015086

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal A, He L (2004) Vertical earthquake ground motion records: an overview. J Earthq Eng 8(05):663–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Elnashai A, Papazoglou A (1997) Procedure and spectra for analysis of RC structures subjected to strong vertical earthquake loads. J Earthq Eng 1(01):121–155

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA P (2007) 461. Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components, report no. FEMA-461. Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, DC

  • Gourley BC, Tort C, Denavit MD et al (2008) A synopsis of studies of the monotonic and cyclic behavior of concrete-filled steel tube members, connections, and frames. Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana

  • Han L-H, Li W, Bjorhovde R (2014) Developments and advanced applications of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) structures: members. J Constr Steel Res 100:211–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi MJ, Al-Mahaidi R, Kalfat R et al (2015) Development and validation of multi-axis substructure testing system for full-scale experiments. Aust J Struct Eng 16(4):302–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi MJ, Mosqueda G, Lignos DG et al (2016) Assessment of numerical and experimental errors in hybrid simulation of framed structural systems through collapse. J Earthq Eng 20(6):885–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi M, Tsang H, Al-Ogaidi Y et al (2017a) Collapse assessment of reinforced concrete building columns through multi-axis hybrid simulation. ACI Struct J 114(2):437–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi MJ, Al-Ogaidi Y, Al-Mahaidi R et al (2017b) Application of hybrid simulation for collapse assessment of post-earthquake CFRP-repaired RC columns. J Struct Eng 143(1):04016149

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra LF, Medina RA, Krawinkler H (2005) Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34(12):1489–1511

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaslan EC (2001) 1994 Northridge earthquake bridge damage assessment efforts. In: Health monitoring and management of civil infrastructure systems. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 268–271

  • Kim SJ, Holub CJ, Elnashai AS (2010) Analytical assessment of the effect of vertical earthquake motion on RC bridge piers. J Struct Eng 137(2):252–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SJ, Holub CJ, Elnashai AS (2011) Experimental investigation of the behavior of RC bridge piers subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake motion. Eng Struct 33(7):2221–2235

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunnath SK, Erduran E, Chai Y et al (2008) Effect of near-fault vertical ground motions on seismic response of highway overcrossings. J Bridge Eng 13(3):282–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman D, Roeder C, Heid A et al (2018) Shear response of concrete filled tubes part 1: experiments. J Constr Steel Res 150:528–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman D, Roeder C, Heid A et al (2019) Shear response of concrete filled tubes part II: analytical study. J Constr Steel Res 153:169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg JE, Galambos TV (1996) Load and resistance factor design of composite columns. Struct Saf 18(2–3):169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Maikol Del Carpio R, Hashemi MJ, Mosqueda G (2017) Evaluation of integration methods for hybrid simulation of complex structural systems through collapse. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 16(4):745–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Mast R, Marsh L, Spry C et al (1996) Seismic design of bridges. Design example no. 4: three-span continuous CIP concrete bridge. Federal Highway Administration

  • Mathworks I (2014) MATLAB: R2014a. Mathworks Inc, Natick

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna F (2011) OpenSees: a framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Comput Sci Eng 13(4):58–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosqueda G, Stojadinovic B, Hanley J et al (2008) Hybrid seismic response simulation on a geographically distributed bridge model. J Struct Eng 134(4):535–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima M, Kaminoso T, Ishida M et al (1990) Integration techniques for substructure online test. In: 4th U.S. national conference of earthquake engineering. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Palm Springs, CA

  • Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div 85(3):67–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama I (2002) Summary of research on concrete-filled structural steel tube column system carried out under the US-Japan cooperative research program on composite and hybrid structures. Building Research Inst, Roorkee

    Google Scholar 

  • Papazoglou A, Elnashai A (1996) Analytical and field evidence of the damaging effect of vertical earthquake ground motion. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(10):1109–1138

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto A, Pegon P, Magonette G et al (2004) Pseudo-dynamic testing of bridges using non-linear substructuring. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(11):1125–1146

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian J, Cui Y, Fang X (2007) Shear strength tests of concrete filled steel tube columns. Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao (China Civ Eng J) 40(5):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Saadeghvariri MA, Foutch D (1991) Dynamic behaviour of R/C highway bridges under the combined effect of vertical and horizontal earthquake motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 20(6):535–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg A, Yang TY, Mahin S et al (2008) Hybrid simulation of structural collapse. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering

  • Schellenberg A, Kim HK, Takahashi Y et al (2009a) OpenFRESCO command language manual. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg AH, Mahin SA, Fenves GL (2009b) Advanced implementation of hybrid simulation. Report no. PEER 2009/104. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA

  • Stathas N, Skafida S, Bousias S et al (2017) Hybrid simulation of bridge pier uplifting. Bull Earthq Eng 15(8):3385–3398

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens MT, Lehman DE, Roeder CW (2016) Design of CFST column-to-foundation/cap beam connections for moderate and high seismic regions. Eng Struct 122:323–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens MT, Lehman DE, Roeder CW (2018) Seismic performance modeling of concrete-filled steel tube bridges: Tools and case study. Eng Struct 165:88–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Systran C (2014) The SCRAMNet+ network (shared common RAM network). Systran Corporation, Dayton

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi Y, Iemura H, Mahin S et al (2008) International distributed hybrid simulation of 2-span continuous bridge. In: 14th world conference on earthquake engineering

  • Terzic V, Stojadinovic B (2013) Hybrid simulation of bridge response to three-dimensional earthquake excitation followed by truck load. J Struct Eng 140(8):A4014010

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, McCormick J, Yoshitake N et al (2008) Collapse simulation of a four-story steel moment frame by a distributed online hybrid test. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(6):955–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei B, Zuo C, He X et al (2018) Effects of vertical ground motions on seismic vulnerabilities of a continuous track-bridge system of high-speed railway. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 115:281–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson T, Chen S, Mahmoud H (2015) Analytical case study on the seismic performance of a curved and skewed reinforced concrete bridge under vertical ground motion. Eng Struct 100:128–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y-S, Tsai K-C, Elnashai AS et al (2012) An online optimization method for bridge dynamic hybrid simulations. Simul Model Pract Theory 28:42–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazdi HA (2020) Collapse assessment of concrete-filled steel tube columns through multi-axis hybrid simulation. Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology

  • Yuan H, Dang J, Aoki T (2014) Behavior of partially concrete-filled steel tube bridge piers under bi-directional seismic excitations. J Constr Steel Res 93:44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Wang J (2018) Concrete-filled steel tube arch bridges in China. Engineering 4(1):143–155

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Stipend (RTPS) Scholarship. The Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) is also acknowledged for providing the ground motion records through the PEER database. The authors would like to acknowledge the efforts of Ph.D. student Hamidreza Askarieh Yazdi and the personnel of the Smart Structures Laboratory at Swinburne University of Technology.

Funding

This research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Stipend (RTPS) Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Javad Hashemi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interest.

Availability of data and code availability

The data generated during and/or analyzed during this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Attraqchi, A.Y., Hashemi, M.J. & Al-Mahaidi, R. Hybrid simulation of bridges constructed with concrete-filled steel tube columns subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 4453–4480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00871-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00871-7

Keywords

Navigation