Abstract
The development of endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms has established new techniques such as balloon and stent-assistance, flow diversion and endosaccular occlusion devices. Antiplatelet treatment is an important aspect to reduce risk of thrombus formation on microcatheters and implanted devices when utilizing these methods. It is particularly relevant for flow diverting stents to prevent early and late stent thrombosis. Consideration of platelet physiology and appropriate selection of antiplatelet medication is important as platelet dysfunction drives many of the pathological processes and complications of neurointerventional procedures. Part one of this review focuses on basic platelet physiology, pharmacology of common antiplatelet medications and future directions and therapies. Part two focuses on clinical applications and evidence-based therapeutic regimens.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360:1267–74.
Stegmayr B, Eriksson M, Asplund K. Declining mortality from subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2004;35:2059–63.
Wareham J, Flood R, Phan K, Crossley R, Mortimer A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational evidence for the use of bailout self-expandable stents following failed anterior circulation stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointervent Surg. 2019;11:675–82.
Yamada NK, Cross DT 3rd, Pilgram TK, Moran CJ, Derdeyn CP, Dacey RG Jr. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on thromboembolic complications of elective coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1778–82.
Ries T, Siemonsen S, Grzyska U, Zeumer H, Fiehler J. Abciximab is a safe rescue therapy in thromboembolic events complicating cerebral aneurysm coil embolization: single center experience in 42 cases and review of the literature. Stroke. 2009;40:1750–7.
Klisch J, Turk A, Turner R, Woo H, Fiorella D. Very late thrombosis of flow-diverting constructs after the treatment of large fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:627–32.
Kulcsár Z, Houdart E, Bonafé A, Parker G, Millar J, Goddard AJ, et al. Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32:20–5.
Nurden AT. Platelets, inflammation and tissue regeneration. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105 Suppl 1:S13–33.
Vinik AI, Erbas T, Park TS, Nolan R, Pittenger GL. Platelet dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1476–85.
Paulus JM. Platelet size in man. Blood. 1975;46:321–36.
Malek AM, Izumo S. Mechanism of endothelial cell shape change and cytoskeletal remodeling in response to fluid shear stress. J Cell Sci. 1996;109:713–26.
Abraham NS, Hlatky MA, Antman EM, Bhatt DL, Bjorkman DJ, Clark CB, et al. ACCF/ACG/AHA 2010 expert consensus document on the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and thienopyridines: a focused update of the ACCF/ACG/AHA 2008 expert consensus document on reducing the gastrointestinal risks of antiplatelet therapy and NSAID use. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:2051–66.
Born G. Fluid-mechanical and biochemical interactions in haemostasis. Br Med Bull. 1977;33:193–8.
Tulamo R, Frösen J, Hernesniemi J, Niemelä M. Inflammatory changes in the aneurysm wall: a review. J Neurointerv Surg. 2010;2:120–3.
Viñuela F, Duckwiler G, Mawad M. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:475–82.
Eskridge JM, Song JK. Endovascular embolization of 150 basilar tip aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: results of the Food and Drug Administration multicenter clinical trial. J Neurosurg. 1998;89:81–6.
Workman MJ, Cloft HJ, Tong FC, Dion JE, Jensen ME, Marx WF, et al. Thrombus formation at the neck of cerebral aneurysms during treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23:1568–76.
Alexander MJ, Duckwiler GR, Gobin YP, Viñuela F. Management of intraprocedural arterial thrombus in cerebral aneurysm embolization with abciximab: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:899–902.
Cronqvist M, Pierot L, Boulin A, Cognard C, Castaings L, Moret J. Local intraarterial fibrinolysis of thromboemboli occurring during endovascular treatment of intracerebral aneurysm: a comparison of anatomic results and clinical outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:157–65.
Ng PP, Phatouros CC, Khangure MS. Use of glycoprotein IIb–IIIa inhibitor for a thromboembolic complication during Guglielmi detachable coil treatment of an acutely ruptured aneurysm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1761–3.
Lempert TE, Malek AM, Halbach VV, Phatouros CC, Dowd CF, Higashida RT. Rescue treatment of acute parent vessel thrombosis with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor during GDC coil embolization. Stroke. 1999;30:693–5.
Roth GJ, Stanford N, Majerus PW. Acetylation of prostaglandin synthase by aspirin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975;72:3073–6.
Patrono C, Ciabattoni G, Patrignani P, Pugliese F, Filabozzi P, Catella F, et al. Clinical pharmacology of platelet cyclooxygenase inhibition. Circulation. 1985;72:1177–84.
Jimenez AH, Stubbs ME, Tofler GH, Winther K, Williams GH, Muller JE. Rapidity and duration of platelet suppression by enteric-coated aspirin in healthy young men. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69:258–62.
Kim KS, Fraser JF, Grupke S, Cook AM. Management of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures. J Neurosurg. 2018;129:890–905.
Graham DY, Smith JL. Aspirin and the stomach. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:390–8.
Li S, Wang D, Tian Y, Wei H, Zhou Z, Liu L, et al. Aspirin inhibits degenerative changes of aneurysmal wall in a rat model. Neurochem Res. 2015;40:1537–45.
Cattaneo M. The platelet P2Y12 receptor for adenosine diphosphate: congenital and drug-induced defects. Blood. 2011;117:2102–12.
Cattaneo M, Gachet C. ADP receptors and clinical bleeding disorders. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999;19:2281–5.
Cattaneo M. Platelet P2 receptors: old and new targets for antithrombotic drugs. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2007;5:45–55.
Helft G, Osende JI, Worthley SG, Zaman AG, Rodriguez OJ, Lev EI, et al. Acute antithrombotic effect of a front-loaded regimen of clopidogrel in patients with atherosclerosis on aspirin. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:2316–21.
Wiviott SD. Clopidogrel response variability, resistance, or both? Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:S18–24.
Savi P, Pereillo JM, Uzabiaga MF, Combalbert J, Picard C, Maffrand JP, et al. Identification and biological activity of the active metabolite of clopidogrel. Thromb Haemost. 2000;84:891–6.
Schrör K. Clinical pharmacology of the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor antagonist, clopidogrel. Vasc Med. 1998;3:247–51.
Hochholzer W, Trenk D, Frundi D, Blanke P, Fischer B, Andris K, et al. Time dependence of platelet inhibition after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel in a large, unselected cohort of candidates for percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2005;111:2560–4.
Pharmaceuticals R. Ticlid (ticlopidine) package insert. 1998.
Saltiel E, Ward A. Ticlopidine. Drugs. 1987;34:222–62.
Paradiso-Hardy FL, Angelo CM, Lanctôt KL, Cohen EA. Hematologic dyscrasia associated with ticlopidine therapy: evidence for causality. CMAJ. 2000;163:1441–8.
Bennett CL, Weinberg PD, Rozenberg-Ben-Dror K, Yarnold PR, Kwaan HC, Green D. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with ticlopidine: a review of 60 cases. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:541–4.
Meyer B, Staudinger T, Lechner K. Clopidogrel and aplastic anaemia. Lancet. 2001;357:1446–7.
Sugidachi A, Asai F, Ogawa T, Inoue T, Koike H. The in vivo pharmacological profile of CS-747, a novel antiplatelet agent with platelet ADP receptor antagonist properties. Br J Pharmacol. 2000;129:1439–46.
Chassot PG, Marcucci C, Delabays A, Spahn DR. Perioperative antiplatelet therapy. Am Fam Physician. 2010;82:1484–9.
Niitsu Y, Jakubowski JA, Sugidachi A, Asai F. Pharmacology of CS-747 (prasugrel, LY640315), a novel, potent antiplatelet agent with in vivo P2Y12 receptor antagonist activity. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2005;31:184–94.
Cagnazzo F, Perrini P, Lefevre PH, Gascou G, Dargazanli C, Riquelme C, et al. Comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel used as antiplatelet medication for endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:681–6.
Van Giezen J, Humphries RG. Preclinical and clinical studies with selective reversible direct P2Y12 antagonists. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2005;31:195–204.
van Giezen JJ, Nilsson L, Berntsson P, Wissing BM, Giordanetto F, Tomlinson W, et al. Ticagrelor binds to human P2Y12 independently from ADP but antagonizes ADP-induced receptor signaling and platelet aggregation. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:1556–65.
Björkman JA, Kirk I, van Giezen JJ. AZD6140 inhibits adenosine uptake into erythrocytes and enhances coronary blood flow after local ischemia or intracoronary adenosine infusion. Circulation. 2007;116:II_28
Teng R, Oliver S, Hayes MA, Butler K. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of ticagrelor in healthy subjects. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38:1514–21.
Teng R. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic profile of the oral antiplatelet agent ticagrelor. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:305–18.
Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–57.
Goto S. Cilostazol: potential mechanism of action for antithrombotic effects accompanied by a low rate of bleeding. Atheroscler Suppl. 2005;6:3–11.
Harker LA, Kadatz RA. Mechanism of action of dipyridamole. Thromb Res. 1983;29:39–46.
Bramer SL, Forbes WP, Mallikaarjun S. Cilostazol pharmacokinetics after single and multiple oral doses in healthy males and patients with intermittent claudication resulting from peripheral arterial disease. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;37:1–11.
Schrör K. The pharmacology of cilostazol. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2002;4:S14–9.
Hwang G, Huh W, Lee JS, Villavicencio JB, Villamor RB Jr, Ahn SY, et al. Standard vs modified antiplatelet preparation for preventing thromboembolic events in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity undergoing coil embolization for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:764–72.
Topol EJ, Byzova TV, Plow EF. Platelet GPIIb–IIIa blockers. Lancet. 1999;353:227–31.
Kintscher U, Kappert K, Schmidt G, Doerr G, Grill M, Wollert-Wulf B, et al. Effects of abciximab and tirofiban on vitronectin receptors in human endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2000;390:75–87.
Speich HE, Earhart AD, Hill SN, Cholera S, Kueter TJ, Smith JN, et al. Variability of platelet aggregate dispersal with glycoprotein IIb–IIIa antagonists eptifibatide and abciximab. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:983–91.
Ibbotson T, McGavin JK, Goa KL. Abciximab. Drugs. 2003;63:1121–63.
Bavry AA. αIIbβ3 (GPIIb–IIIa) antagonists A2. In: Michelson AD, editor. Platelets. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2013. pp. 1139–53. Chapter 55.
Ajani AE, Waksman R, Gruberg L, Sharma AK, Lew R, Pinnow E, et al. Acute procedural complications and in-hospital events after percutaneous coronary interventions: eptifibatide versus abciximab. Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2003;4:12–7.
ESPRIT Investigators. Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy. Novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in planned coronary stent implantation (ESPRIT): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;356:2037–44.
Gretler DD, Guerciolini R, Williams PJ. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of eptifibatide in subjects with normal or impaired renal function. Clin Ther. 2004;26:390–8.
Lefkovits J, Topol E. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:9–18.
Gilchrist IC, O’Shea JC, Kosoglou T, Jennings LK, Lorenz TJ, Kitt MM, et al. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of higher-dose, double-bolus eptifibatide in percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2001;104:406–11.
Kereiakes DJ, Broderick TM, Roth EM, Whang D, Shimshak T, Runyon JP, et al. Time course, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition by abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84:391–5.
Paniccia R, Priora R, Liotta AA, Abbate R. Platelet function tests: a comparative review. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015;11:133.
Nielsen HL, Kristensen SD, Thygesen SS, Mortensen J, Pedersen SB, Grove EL, et al. Aspirin response evaluated by the VerifyNow™ aspirin system and light transmission aggregometry. Thromb Res. 2008;123:267–73.
Price MJ, Angiolillo DJ, Teirstein PS, Lillie E, Manoukian SV, Berger PB, et al. Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a time-dependent analysis of the Gauging Responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) trial. Circulation. 2011;124:1132–7.
Steinhubl SR, Talley JD, Braden GA, Tcheng JE, Casterella PJ, Moliterno DJ, et al. Point-of-care measured platelet inhibition correlates with a reduced risk of an adverse cardiac event after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the GOLD (AU-Assessing Ultegra) multicenter study. Circulation. 2001;103:2572–8.
Kang HS, Kwon B, Kim JE, Han MH. Preinterventional clopidogrel response variability for coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: clinical implications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31:1206–10.
Nishi H, Nakahara I, Matsumoto S, Hashimoto T, Ohta T, Sadamasa N, et al. Platelet reactivity and hemorrhage risk in neurointerventional procedures under dual antiplatelet therapy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8:949–53.
Goh C, Churilov L, Mitchell P, Dowling R, Yan B. Clopidogrel hyper-response and bleeding risk in neurointerventional procedures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:721–6.
Kashiwazaki D, Kuwayama N, Akioka N, Hayakawa Y, Kuroda S. The roles and issues of P2Y12 percent inhibition assessed by VerifyNow assay for patients undergoing neurointervention: a prospective study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:1830–6.
Prabhakaran S, Wells K, Lee V, Flaherty C, Lopes D. Prevalence and risk factors for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in cerebrovascular stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:281–5.
Reavey-Cantwell JF, Fox WC, Reichwage BD, Fautheree GL, Velat GJ, Whiting JH, et al. Factors associated with aspirin resistance in patients premedicated with aspirin and clopidogrel for endovascular neurosurgery. Neurosurgery. 2009;64:890–6.
Peace A, McCall M, Tedesco T, Kenny D, Conroy RM, Foley D, et al. The role of weight and enteric coating on aspirin response in cardiovascular patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2010;8:2323–5.
Weerakkody GJ, Brandt JT, Payne CD, Jakubowski JA, Naganuma H, Winters KJ. Clopidogrel poor responders: an objective definition based on Bayesian classification. Platelets. 2007;18:428–35.
Gilard M, Arnaud B, Cornily JC, Le Gal G, Lacut K, Le Calvez G, et al. Influence of omeprazole on the antiplatelet action of clopidogrel associated with aspirin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:256–60.
Ding L, Gu Z, Wang R, Li Y, Fang Y. Acute stent thrombosis after stent-assisted coiling in an intracranial aneurysm patient carrying two reduced-function CYP2C19 alleles: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e8920.
Bates ER, Lau WC, Angiolillo DJ. Clopidogrel—drug interactions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1251–63.
Park KW, Park JJ, Jeon KH, Kang SH, Oh IY, Yang HM, et al. Enhanced clopidogrel responsiveness in smokers. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011;31:665–71.
Gurbel PA, Nolin TD, Tantry US. Clopidogrel efficacy and cigarette smoking status. JAMA. 2012;307:2495–6.
Goto S, Serebruany V. Vorapaxar. PAR1 receptor antagonist, antiplatelet therapy. Drugs Fut. 2011;36:101–13.
Morrow DA, Alberts MJ, Mohr JP, Ameriso SF, Bonaca MP, Goto S, Hankey GJ, Murphy SA, Scirica BM, Braunwald E; Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events–TIMI 50 Steering Committee and Investigators. Efficacy and safety of vorapaxar in patients with prior ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2013;44:691–8.
Kehinde O, Kunle R. Vorapaxar: a novel agent to be considered in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016;8:98–105.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or non-for-profit sectors
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
S. Pearce, J.T. Maingard, K. Li, H.K. Kok, C.D. Barras, J.H. Russell, J.A. Hirsch, R.V. Chandra, A. Jhamb, V. Thijs, M. Brooks, H. Asadi and declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pearce, S., Maingard, J.T., Li, K. et al. Antiplatelet Drugs for Neurointerventions: Part 1 Clinical Pharmacology. Clin Neuroradiol 30, 425–433 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00910-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00910-5