Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding vision-based continuous sign language recognition

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Real-time sign language translation systems, that convert continuous sign sequences to text/speech, will facilitate communication between the deaf-mute community and the normal hearing majority. A translation system could be vision-based or sensor-based, depending on the type of input it receives. To date, most of the commercial systems for this purpose are sensor-based, which are expensive and not user-friendly. Vision-based sign translation systems are the need of the hour but should overcome many challenges to build a full-fledged working system. Preliminary investigations in this work have revealed that the traditional approaches to continuous sign language recognition (CSLR) using HMM, CRF and DTW, tried to solve the problem of Isolated Sign Language Recognition (ISLR) and extended the solution to CSLR, leading to reduced performance. The main challenge of identifying Movement Epenthesis (ME) segments in continuous utterances, were handled explicitly with these traditional methods. With the advent of technologies like Deep Learning, more feasible solutions for vision-based CSLR are emerging, which has led to an increase in the research on vision-based approaches. In this paper, a detailed review of all the works in vision-based CSLR is presented, based on the methods they have followed. The challenges posed in continuous sign recognition are also discussed in detail, followed by a brief on sensor-based systems and benchmark databases. Finally, performance evaluation of all the associated methods are performed, which leads to a short discussion on the overall study and concludes by pointing out future research directions in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed MA, Zaidan BB, Zaidan AA, Salih MM, Lakulu Muhammad Modi bin (2018) A review on systems-based sensory gloves for sign language recognition state of the art between 2007 and 2017. Sensors 18(7):2208

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ananth Rao G, Kishore P V V (2018) Selfie video based continuous indian sign language recognition system. Ain Shams Eng J 9(4):1929–1939

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anil Kumar D, Sastry A S C S, Kishore P V V, Kiran Kumar E (2018) Indian sign language recognition using graph matching on 3d motion captured signs. Multimed Tools Appl 77(24):32063–32091

    Google Scholar 

  4. Azoz Y, Devi L, Yeasin M, Sharma R (2003) Tracking the human arm using constraint fusion and multiple-cue localization. Mach Vis Appl 13(5-6):286–302

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bengio Y, Frasconi P (1995) Diffusion of credit in markovian models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp 553–560

  6. Bhuyan MK, Ghosh D, Bora PK (2006) Continuous hand gesture segmentation and co-articulation detection. In: Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing. Springer, pp 564–575

  7. Billinghurst M (1998) Put that where? voice and gesture at the graphics interface. Acm Siggraph Comput Graph 32(4):60–63

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brand M, Oliver N, Pentland A (1997) Coupled hidden markov models for complex action recognition. In: 1997. proceedings., 1997 ieee computer society conference on Computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE, pp 994–999

  9. Bungeroth J, Stein D, Dreuw P, Ney H, Morrissey S, Way A, van Zijl L (2008) The atis sign language corpus

  10. Calin AD (2016) Gesture recognition on kinect time series data using dynamic time warping and hidden markov models. In: 2016 18th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC). IEEE, pp 264–271

  11. Camgoz NC, Hadfield S, Koller O, Bowden R (2017) Subunets: End-to-end hand shape and continuous sign language recognition. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). IEEE, pp 3075–3084

  12. Camgoz NC, Hadfield S, Koller O, Ney H, Bowden R (2018) Neural sign language translation In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 7784–7793

  13. Choudhury A, Talukdar AK, Bhuyan MK, Sarma KK (2017) Movement epenthesis detection for continuous sign language recognition. J Intell Syst 26(3):471–481

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper H, Ong E-J, Pugeault N, Bowden R (2012) Sign language recognition using sub-units. J Mach Learn Res 13:2205–2231

    Google Scholar 

  15. Crasborn O, Zwitserlood I, Ros J (2008) Corpus ngt. an open access digital corpus of movies with annotations of sign language of the Netherlands. Video corpus of signed language interaction

  16. Cui R, Hu L, Zhang C (2017) Recurrent convolutional neural networks for continuous sign language recognition by staged optimization In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 7361–7369

  17. Cui R, Hu L, Zhang C (2019) A deep neural framework for continuous sign language recognition by iterative training. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

  18. David Forney G (1973) The viterbi algorithm. Proc IEEE 61(3):268–278

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Dreuw P, Neidle C, Athitsos V, Sclaroff S, Ney H (2008) Benchmark databases for video-based automatic sign language recognition. In: LREC

  20. Dreuw P, Forster J, Ney H (2010) Tracking benchmark databases for video-based sign language recognition. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, pp 286–297

  21. Fang G, Gao W, Zhao D (2007) Large-vocabulary continuous sign language recognition based on transition-movement models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-Part Syst Hum 37(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  22. Forster J, Schmidt C, Hoyoux T, Koller O, Zelle U, Piater JH, Ney H (2012) Rwth-phoenix-weather: A large vocabulary sign language recognition and translation corpus. In: LREC, pp 3785–3789

  23. Forster J, Schmidt C, Koller O, Bellgardt M, Ney H (2014) Extensions of the sign language recognition and translation corpus rwth-phoenix-weather. In: LREC, pp 1911–1916

  24. Fowler CA, Saltzman E (1993) Coordination and coarticulation in speech production. Lang Speech 36(2-3):171–195

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fu K, Zhao Q, Gu IY-H, Yang J (2019) Deepside: A general deep framework for salient object detection. Neurocomputing 356:69–82

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gao W, Ma J, Wu J, Wang C (2000) Sign language recognition based on hmm/ann/dp. Int J Pattern Recogn Artif Intell 14(05):587–602

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gavrila DM (1999) The visual analysis of human movement: a survey. Comput Vis Image Underst 73(1):82–98

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Geetha M, Manjusha C, Unnikrishnan P, Harikrishnan R (2013) A vision based dynamic gesture recognition of indian sign language on kinect based depth images. In: 2013 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Communication, Control, Signal Processing and Computing Applications (c2SPCA). IEEE, pp 1–7

  29. Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1996) Factorial hidden markov models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp 472–478

  30. Gonzalez M, Collet C, Dubot R (2010) Head tracking and hand segmentation during hand over face occlusion in sign language. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, pp 234–243

  31. Graf HP, Cosatto E, Gibbon D, Kocheisen M, Petajan E (1996) Multi-modal system for locating heads and faces. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. IEEE, pp 88–93

  32. Graves A, Fernández S, Gomez F, Schmidhuber J (2006) Connectionist temporal classification: labelling unsegmented sequence data with recurrent neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, pp 369–376

  33. Guo D, Zhou W, Li H, Wang M (2018) Hierarchical lstm for sign language translation. In: Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  34. Hamm J, Lee DD (2008) Grassmann discriminant analysis: a unifying view on subspace-based learning. Inproceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning. ACM, pp 376–383

  35. Han J, Awad G, Sutherland A (2007) Subunit boundary detection for sign language recognition using spatio-temporal modelling. In: The 5th International Conference on Computer Vision Systems

  36. Han J, Awad G, Sutherland A (2009) Modelling and segmenting subunits for sign language recognition based on hand motion analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 30 (6):623–633

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hassan M, Assaleh K, Shanableh T (2019) Multiple proposals for continuous arabic sign language recognition. Sens Imaging 20(1):4

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780

    Google Scholar 

  39. Holden E-J, Lee G, Owens R (2005) Australian sign language recognition. Mach Vis Appl 16(5):312

    Google Scholar 

  40. Huang XD, Ariki Y, Jack MA (1990) Hidden markov models for speech recognition

  41. Huang J, Zhou W, Zhang Q, Li H, Li W (2018) Video-based sign language recognition without temporal segmentation. In: Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

  42. Johnston T, Schembri A (2007) Australian sign language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge University Press

  43. Kendon A (1988) How gesture can become like words. Cross-Cultural Perspective in Nonverbal Communication

  44. Koller O, Forster J, Ney H (2015) Continuous sign language recognition: Towards large vocabulary statistical recognition systems handling multiple signers. Comput Vis Image Underst 141:108–125

    Google Scholar 

  45. Koller O, Ney H, Bowden R (2016) Deep hand; How to train a cnn on 1 million hand images when your data is continuous and weakly labelled In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 3793–3802

  46. Koller O, Zargaran O, Ney H, Bowden R (2016) Deep sign: hybrid cnn-hmm for continuous sign language recognition In: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2016

  47. Koller Oscar, Bowden R, Ney H (2016) Automatic alignment of hamnosys subunits for continuous sign language recognition. LREC 2016 Proceedings, pp 121–128

  48. Koller O, Zargaran S, Ney H (2017) Re-sign: Re-aligned end-to-end sequence modelling with deep recurrent cnn-hmms In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 4297–4305

  49. Koller O, Zargaran S, Ney H, Bowden R (2018) Deep sign: Enabling robust statistical continuous sign language recognition via hybrid cnn-hmms. Int J Comput Vis 126(12):1311–1325

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kong SG, Heo J, Abidi BR, Paik J, Abidi MA (2005) Recent advances in visual and infrared face recognition—a review. Comput Vis Image Underst 97(1):103–135

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kong W W, Ranganath S (2014) Towards subject independent continuous sign language recognition: A segment and merge approach. Pattern Recogn 47(3):1294–1308

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kumar S, Hebert M (2003) Man-made structure detection in natural images using a causal multiscale random field. In: null. IEEE, pp 119

  53. Kwolek B (2019) Gan-based data augmentation for visual finger spelling recognition. In: Eleventh International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2018), vol 11041. International Society for Optics and Photonics, pp 110411U

  54. Lafferty J, McCallum A, Pereira FCN Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data

  55. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lee H-K, Kim J-H (1999) An hmm-based threshold model approach for gesture recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 21(10):961–973

    Google Scholar 

  57. Liang R-H (1997) Continuous gesture recognition system for taiwanese sign language. National Taiwan University

  58. Liang R-H, Ouhyoung M (1998) A real-time continuous gesture recognition system for sign language. In: IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 1998. Proceedings. Third. IEEE, pp 558–567

  59. Liao Y, Xiong P, Min W, Min W, Lu J (2019) Dynamic sign language recognition based on video sequence with blstm-3d residual networks. IEEE Access 7:38044–38054

    Google Scholar 

  60. Lichtenauer JF, Hendriks EA, Reinders MJT (2008) Sign language recognition by combining statistical dtw and independent classification. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence 30(11):2040–2046

  61. Liddell SK, et al. (2003) Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press

  62. Lim KM, Tan AWC, Lee CP, Tan SC (2019) Isolated sign language recognition using convolutional neural network hand modelling and hand energy image. Multimedia Tools and Applications 78:1–28

  63. Lin C-Y (2004) Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Text summarization branches out, pp 74–81

  64. Masood S, Srivastava A, Thuwal HC, Ahmad M (2018) Real-time sign language gesture (word) recognition from video sequences using cnn and rnn. In: Intelligent Engineering Informatics. Springer, pp 623–632

  65. Martínez AM, Wilbur RB, Shay R, Kak AC (2002) Purdue rvl-slll asl database for automatic recognition of american sign language. In: Proceedings. Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. IEEE, pp 167–172

  66. McNeill D (1992) Hand and Mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago press

  67. Molchanov P, Yang X, Gupta S, Kim K, Tyree S, Kautz J (2016) Online detection and classification of dynamic hand gestures with recurrent 3d convolutional neural network In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 4207–4215

  68. Morency L-P, Quattoni A, Darrell T (2007) Latent-dynamic discriminative models for continuous gesture recognition. In: 2007 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. IEEE, pp 1–8

  69. Myers C, Rabiner L (1981) A level building dynamic time warping algorithm for connected word recognition. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process 29(2):284–297

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. Nag R, Wong K, Fallside F (1986) Script recognition using hidden markov models. In: Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE International Conference on ICASSP’86., vol 11. IEEE, pp 2071–2074

  71. Nakjai P, Katanyukul T (2019) Hand sign recognition for thai finger spelling: an application of convolution neural network. J Signal Process Syst 91(2):131–146

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ong SCW, Ranganath S (2005) Automatic sign language analysis: A survey and the future beyond lexical meaning. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence 27(6):873–891

  73. Oreifej O, Liu Z (2013) Hon4d: Histogram of oriented 4d normals for activity recognition from depth sequences In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 716–723

  74. Pantic M, Rothkrantz LJM (2000) Automatic analysis of facial expressions The state of the art. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(12):1424–1445

    Google Scholar 

  75. Papineni K, Roukos S, Ward T, Zhu W-J (2002) Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp 311–318

  76. Pigou L, Van Den Oord A, Dieleman S, Van Herreweghe M, Dambre J (2018) Beyond temporal Recurrence and temporal pooling: convolutions for gesture recognition in video. Int J Comput Vis 126(2-4):430–439

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  77. Pitsikalis V, Theodorakis S, Vogler C, Maragos P (2011) Advances in phonetics-based sub-unit modeling for transcription alignment and sign language recognition. In: CVPR 2011 WORKSHOPS. IEEE, pp 1–6

  78. Rabiner LR (1990) A tutorial on hidden markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. In: Readings in speech recognition. Elsevier, pp 267–296

  79. Sako S, Kitamura T (2013) Subunit modeling for japanese sign language recognition based on phonetically depend multi-stream hidden markov models. In: International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, pp 548–555

  80. Sandler W, Lillo-Martin D (2006) Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge University Press

  81. Shan C, Wei Y, Tan T, Ojardias F (2004) Real time hand tracking by combining particle filtering and mean shift. In: Sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2004. Proceedings. IEEE, pp 669–674

  82. Smith P, da Vitoria Lobo N, Shah M (2007) Resolving hand over face occlusion. Image Vis Comput 25(9):1432–1448

    Google Scholar 

  83. Starner T, Weaver J, Pentland A (1998) Real-time american sign language recognition using desk and wearable computer based video. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20(12):1371–1375

    Google Scholar 

  84. Stenger B, Thayananthan A, Torr PHS, Cipolla R (2003) Filtering using a tree-based estimator. In: null. IEEE, pp 1063

  85. Sutton-Spence R, Woll B (1999) The linguistics of British Sign Language: an introduction. Cambridge University Press

  86. Sy BW, Quattoni A, Morency L-P, Demirdjian D, Darrell T (2006) Hidden conditional random fields for gesture recognition. In: 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’06), vol 2. IEEE, pp 1521–1527

  87. Thapa V, Sunuwar J, Pradhan R (2019) Finger spelling recognition for nepali sign language. In: Recent Developments in Machine Learning and Data Analytics. Springer, pp 219–227

  88. Tolba MF, Samir A, Aboul-Ela M (2013) Arabic sign language continuous sentences recognition using pcnn and graph matching. Neural Comput Appl 23 (3-4):999–1010

    Google Scholar 

  89. Tomkins W (1969) Indian sign language, vol 92. Courier Corporation

  90. Vogler C, Metaxas D (1997) Adapting hidden markov models for asl recognition by using three-dimensional computer vision methods. In: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, vol 1. IEEE, pp 156–161

  91. Vogler C, Metaxas D (1998) Asl recognition based on a coupling between hmms and 3d motion analysis. In: Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No. 98CH36271). IEEE, pp 363–369

  92. Vogler C, Metaxas D (1999) Parallel hidden markov models for american sign language recognition. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 1999. The Proceedings of the Seventh, vol 1. IEEE, pp 116–122

  93. Vogler C, Metaxas D (2001) A framework for recognizing the simultaneous aspects of american sign language. Comput Vis Image Underst 81(3):358–384

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  94. Von Agris U, Kraiss K-F (2007) Towards a video corpus for signer-independent continuous sign language recognition. Gesture in Human-Computer Interaction and Simulation, Lisbon, Portugal

  95. Von Agris U, Blomer C, Kraiss K-F (2008) Rapid signer adaptation for continuous sign language recognition using a combined approach of eigenvoices, mllr, and map. In: 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, pp 1–4

  96. Wallach HM (2004) Conditional random fields: An introduction. Technical Reports (CIS), pp 22

  97. Wang L, Hu W, Tan T (2003) Recent developments in human motion analysis. Pattern Recogn 36(3):585–601

    Google Scholar 

  98. Wang J, Liu Z, Chorowski J, Chen Z, Wu Y (2012) Robust 3d action recognition with random occupancy patterns. In: Computer vision–ECCV 2012. Springer, pp 872–885

  99. Wang H, Chai X, Hong X, Zhao G, Chen X (2016) Isolated sign language recognition with grassmann covariance matrices. ACM Trans Access Comput (TACCESS) 8(4):14

    Google Scholar 

  100. Wang H, Chai X, Chen X (2019) A novel sign language recognition framework using hierarchical grassmann covariance matrix. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

  101. Warchoł D, Kapuściński T, Wysocki M (2019) Recognition of fingerspelling sequences in polish sign language using point clouds obtained from depth images. Sensors 19(5):1078

    Google Scholar 

  102. Wilson AD, Bobick AF (1999) Parametric hidden markov models for gesture recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 21(9):884–900

    Google Scholar 

  103. Wu L, Oviatt SL., Cohen PR. (1999) Multimodal integration-a statistical view. IEEE Trans Multimed 1(4):334–341

    Google Scholar 

  104. Xiao Q, Qin M, Guo P, Zhao Y (2019) Multimodal fusion based on lstm and a couple conditional hidden markov model for chinese sign language recognition. IEEE Access

  105. Xu J, Zhang X (2015) A real-time hand detection system during hand over face occlusion. Int J Multimed Ubiquit Eng 10(8):287–302

    Google Scholar 

  106. Xue Q, Li X, Wang D, Zhang Weigong (2019) Deep forest-based monocular visual sign language recognition. Appl Sci 9(9):1945

    Google Scholar 

  107. Yang R, Sarkar S (2006) Detecting coarticulation in sign language using conditional random fields. In: 2006. ICPR 2006. 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol 2. IEEE, pp 108–112

  108. Yang R, Sarkar S, Loeding B (2007) Enhanced level building algorithm for the movement epenthesis problem in sign language recognition. In: 2007. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR’07. IEEE, pp 1–8

  109. Yang H-D, Sclaroff S, Lee S-W (2009) Sign language spotting with a threshold model based on conditional random fields. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 31 (7):1264–1277

    Google Scholar 

  110. Yang H-D, Lee S-W (2010) Simultaneous spotting of signs and fingerspellings based on hierarchical conditional random fields and boostmap embeddings. Pattern Recogn 43(8):2858–2870

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  111. Yang R, Sarkar S, Loeding BL. (2010) Handling movement epenthesis and hand segmentation ambiguities in continuous sign language recognition using nested dynamic programming. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32:462–477

    Google Scholar 

  112. Yang W, Tao J, Ye Z (2016) Continuous sign language recognition using level building based on fast hidden markov model. Pattern Recogn Lett 78:28–35

    Google Scholar 

  113. Yuan Q, Geo W, Yao H, Wang C (2002) Recognition of strong and weak connection models in continuous sign language. In: 2002. Proceedings. 16th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, volume 1. IEEE, pp 75–78

  114. Zadghorban M, Nahvi M (2018) An algorithm on sign words extraction and recognition of continuous persian sign language based on motion and shape features of hands. Pattern Analysis and Applications 21:1–13

  115. Zhao J-X, Liu J-J, Fan D-P, Cao Y, Yang J, Cheng M-M (2019) Egnet: Edge guidance network for salient object detection In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp 8779–8788

  116. Zheng L, Liang B, Jiang A (2017) Recent advances of deep learning for sign language recognition. In: 2017 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA). IEEE, pp 1–7

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, India

    Neena Aloysius & M. Geetha

Authors
  1. Neena Aloysius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Geetha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neena Aloysius.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aloysius, N., Geetha, M. Understanding vision-based continuous sign language recognition. Multimed Tools Appl 79, 22177–22209 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08961-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-08961-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation