Skip to main content
Log in

Design of Bezier profile horns by using optimization for high amplification

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rotary ultrasonic machine (RUSM) has a lot of applications in industries, with the recent uses of stronger and harder materials. Machining performance of RUSM depends on the design of the horn. A horn also known as a tool holder or concentrator is a waveguide focusing device, which has a decreasing area of the cross section from the upper to lower end. In RUSM, the high amplification factor of the horn is required to increase tooltip vibration for getting a high material removal rate. In this study, the design of the horn using an optimization procedure and finite element analysis (FEA) has been done. FEA-based MATLAB code has been developed for finding all the stress components, axial amplitude, and resonance frequency. Results are validated from the experimental data available in the literature, and it has been found that it is in good agreement with the literature. The amplifications of the horns with cubic and quadratic profiles 23.8% and 19%, respectively, are higher than the traditional horn with the same length and diameters of the ends. Stresses at different locations have been found within the allowable endurance limit. The effect of frequency on the stress distribution has also been studied and found that the variation of stresses over the domain of horn increases with an increase in frequency, but the value of stress is much lower at the resonance frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rozenberg LD, Kazantsev VF, Makarov LO, Yakhimovich DF (1964) Ultrasonic cutting. Consultants Bureau, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ghosh A, Mallik AK (2002) Theory of mechanisms and machines. Manufacturing Science EWP Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kremer D, Saleh SMS, Ghabrial R, Moisan A (1981) The state of the art of ultrasonic machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 30(1):107–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ray A, Jagadish (2018) Design and performance analysis of ultrasonic horn with a longitudinally changing rectangular cross section for USM using finite element analysis. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(7):359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1281-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar V, Singh H (2018) Machining optimization in rotary ultrasonic drilling of BK-7 through response surface methodology using desirability approach. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(2):83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0953-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anand K, Elangovan S (2019) Modelling and multi-objective optimization of ultrasonic inserting parameters through fuzzy logic and genetic algorithm. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 41(4):188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1685-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jain VK (2002) Advanced machining processes. Allied, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  8. Seah KHW, Wong YS, Lee LC (1993) Design of tool holders for ultrasonic machining using FEM. J Mater Process Technol 37(1–4):801–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Amin SG, Ahmed MHM, Youssef HA (1995) Computer-aided design of acoustic horns for ultrasonic machining using finite-element analysis. J Mater Process Technol 55(3–4):254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thoe TB, Aspinwall DK, Wise MLH (1998) Review on ultrasonic machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38(4):239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ya G, Qin HW, Yang SC, Xu YW (2002) Analysis of the rotary ultrasonic machining mechanism. J Mater Process Technol 129(1–3):182–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yadava V, Deoghare A (2008) Design of horn for rotary ultrasonic machining using the finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(1–2):9–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang DA, Chuang WY, Hsu K, Pham HT (2011) Design of a Bézier-profile horn for high displacement amplification. Ultrasonics 51(2):148–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ioan-Calin R, Mihail-Ioan P, Nicolae C (2015) Experimental and numerical study on an ultrasonic horn with shape designed with an optimization algorithm. Appl Acoust 95:60–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roy S, Jagadish (2017) Design of a circular hollow ultrasonic horn for USM using finite element analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8985-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Naseri R, Koohkan K, Ebrahimi M, Djavanroodi F, Ahmadian H (2017) Horn design for ultrasonic vibration-aided equal channel angular pressing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(5–8):1727–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar S, Ding W, Sun Z, Wu CS (2018) Analysis of the dynamic performance of a complex ultrasonic horn for application in friction stir welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(1–4):1269–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Razavi H, Keymanesh M, Golpayegani IF (2019) Analysis of free and forced vibrations of ultrasonic vibrating tools, case study: ultrasonic assisted surface rolling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03718-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang J, Sun Q, Teng J, Jin P, Zhang T, Feng J (2018) Enhanced arc-acoustic interaction by stepped-plate radiator in ultrasonic wave-assisted GTAW. J Mater Process Technol 262:19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zeid I (1998) CAD/CAM theory and practice. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarrivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:182–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms is search, optimization & machine learning. Addison Wesley Publishing Company Inc, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Timoshenko SP, Weaver W, Young DH (1990) Vibration problems in engineering. Wiley, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  24. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN (1970) Theory of elasticity, international edition. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Satyanarayana A, Reddy BK (1984) Design of velocity transformers for ultrasonic machining. Electr India 24(14):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rao SS (2001) The finite element methods in engineering. Butterworth-Heinmann, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reddy JN (2005) An introduction to finite element method. Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kwon YW, Bang H (2000) The finite element method using MATLAB. CRC Press, USA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabindra Kumar Patel.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Paulo de Tarso Rocha de Mendonça, Ph.D.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rai, P.K., Yadava, V. & Patel, R.K. Design of Bezier profile horns by using optimization for high amplification. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 42, 309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02379-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-020-02379-2

Keywords

Navigation