Abstract
In recent years, a new branch of plant physiology, plant phenomics, which focuses on identifying patterns of organization and changes in plant Phenomes, i.e., physical and biochemical characteristics, considered as a set of phenotypes of a plant organism, has emerged. Phenomics is a postgenomic discipline that actively uses the achievements of the genomic era and bioinformatics. It supplements them with standardized and statistically significant factual material on phenotypes with a high degree of detail. The technique of obtaining and analyzing information about phenotypes in phenomics is called phenotyping. High-performance phenotyping, providing digital automated analysis of large data samples, has become widespread. Recent progress in high-performance phenotyping has been associated with the development of image registration systems in various spectral regions, approaches to cultivating plant objects under standardized conditions, sensory technologies, robotics, and methods for data processing and analysis, such as computer vision and machine learning (artificial neural network). Phenomics technologies have a high information content analysis, surpassing human capabilities, performing measurements in the hyperspectral range using X-ray tomography and ultra-precise “thermal” images, and have a number of other low-invasive and precision approaches. Arrays of data obtained using phenomics technologies are recorded and processed automatically and are free from the problems of subjective assessment and inadequate statistical processing. It is assumed that phenotyping will allow for the creation of digital models of the vital activity processes and the “formation” of plant productivity at the organism level in connection with the dynamics of transcriptomes, proteomes, and metabolomes. Phenomics helps researchers transform a large amount of information received from modern sensors into new knowledge using computer data processing and modeling, reducing the distance from basic science to the practical application of results in crop production and breeding. Phenotyping is actively developing both in laboratory and in greenhouse conditions as well as on open agricultural sites, forests, and in real natural phytocenoses. The review analyzes the current state of plant phenomics with a focus on technical aspects, in particular, the design of hardware-software phenotyping complexes, i.e., phenomics platforms, as well as the use of neural networks in phenotyping of plant organisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Furbank, R.T. and Tester, M., Phenomics—technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck, Trends Plant Sci., 2011, vol. 16, p. 635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.09.005
Bolger, M., Schwacke, R., Gundlach, H., Schmutzer, T., Chen, J., Arend, D., Oppermann, M., Weise, S., Lange, M., Fiorani, F., Spannagl, M., Scholz, U., Mayer, K., and Usadel, B., From plant genomes to phenotypes, J. Biotechnol., 2017, vol. 261, p. 46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.06.003
Lee, S. and Persson, P., Financing from family and friends, Rev. Financ. Stud., 2016, vol. 29, p. 2341. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw031
White, J.W., Andrade-Sanchez, P., Gore, M.A., Bronson, K.F., Coffelt, T.A., Conley, M.M., Feldmann, K.A., French, A.N., Heun, J.T., Hunsaker, D.J., Jenks, M.A., Kimball, B.A., Roth, R.L., Strand, R.J., Thorp, K.R., et al., Field-based phenomics for plant genetics research, Field Crop. Res., 2012, vol. 133, p. 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.04.003
Araus, J.L. and Cairns, J.E., Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier, Trends Plant Sci., 2014, vol. 19, p. 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008
Afonnikov, D.A., Genaev, M.A., Doroshkov, A.V., Komyshev, E.G., and Pshenichnikova, T.A., Methods of high-throughput plant phenotyping for large-scale breeding and genetic experiments, Russ. J. Genet., 2016, vol. 52, p. 688. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795416070024
Colaço, A.F., Molin, J.P., Rosell-Polo, J.R., and Escolà, A., Application of light detection and ranging and ultrasonic sensors to high-throughput phenotyping and precision horticulture: current status and challenges, Hortic. Res., 2018, vol. 5, p. 35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0043-0
König, I.R., Auerbach, J., Gola, D., Held, E., Holzinger, E.R., Legault, M.-A., Sun, R., Tintle, N., and Yang, H.C., Machine learning and data mining in complex genomic data—a review on the lessons learned in genetic analysis workshop 19, BMC Genet., 2016, vol. 17, p. S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0315-8
Cheng, L., Zhang, B., He, L., Ma, F.F., Wang, X.C., Li, H.Y., and Han, Y.H., Constitutive down-regulation of SiSGR gene is related to green millet in Setaria italica,Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2017, vol. 64, p. 608. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443717040045
Uzal, L.C., Grinblat, G.L., Namías, R., Larese, M.G., Bianchi, J.S., Morandi, E.N., and Granitto, P.M., Seed-per-pod estimation for plant breeding using deep learning, Comput. Electron. Agr., 2018, vol. 150, p. 196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.04.024
Skelly, D.A., Merrihew, G.E., Riffle, M., Connelly, C.F., Kerr, E.O., Johansson, M., Jaschob, D., Graczyk, B., Shulman, N.J., Wakefield, J., Cooper, S.J., Fields, S., Noble, W.S., Muller, E.G.D., Davis, T.N., et al., Integrative phenomics reveals insight into the structure of phenotypic diversity in budding yeast, Genome Res., 2013, vol. 23, p. 1496. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.155762.113
Orgogozo, V., Morizot, B., and Martin, A., The differential view of genotype–phenotype relationships, Front. Genet., 2015, vol. 6: 179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00179
Lobos, G.A., Camargo, A.V., del Pozo, A., Araus, J.L., Ortiz, R., and Doonan, J.H., Editorial: plant phenotyping and phenomics for plant breeding, Front. Plant Sci., 2017, vol. 8, p. 2181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02181
Gerlai, R., Phenomics: fiction or the future? Trends Neurosci., 2002, vol. 25, p. 506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02250-6
Deans, A.R., Lewis, S.E., Huala, E., Anzaldo, S.S., Ashburner, M., Balhoff, J.P., Blackburn, D.C., Blake, J.A., Burleigh, J.G., Chanet, B., Cooper, L.D., Courtot, M., Csösz, S., Cui, H., Dahdul, W., et al., Finding our way through phenotypes, PLoS Biol., 2015, vol. 13: e1002033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002033
Kochinke, K., Zweier, C., Nijhof, B., Fenckova, M., Cizek, P., Honti, F., Keerthikumar, S., Oortveld, M.A.W., Kleefstra, T., Kramer, J.M., Webber, C., Huynen, M.A., and Schenck, A., Systematic phenomics analysis deconvolutes genes mutated in intellectual disability into biologically coherent modules, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2016, vol. 98, p. 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.11.024
Awada, L., Phillips, P.W.B., and Smyth, S.J., The adoption of automated phenotyping by plant breeders, Euphytica, 2018, vol. 214: 148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2226-z
Hay, F.R., Timple, S., and van Duijn, B., Can chlorophyll fluorescence be used to determine the optimal time to harvest rice seeds for long-term genebank storage? Seed Sci. Res., 2015, vol. 25, p. 321.
Schnable, J.C. and Freeling, M., Genes identified by visible mutant phenotypes show increased bias toward one of two subgenomes of maize, PLoS One, 2011, vol. 6: e17855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017855
Burleigh, J.G., Alphonse, K., Alverson, A.J., Bik, H.M., Blank, C., Cirranello, A.L., Cui, Y., Daly, M., Dietterich, T.G., Gasparich, G., Irvine, J., Julius, M., Kaufman, S., Law, E., Liu, J., et al., Next-generation phenomics for the tree of life, PLoS Curr., 2013, vol. 5. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.tol.085c713acafc8711b2ff7010a4b03733
Flood, P.J., Kruijer, W., Schnabel, S.K., van der Schoor, R., Jalink, H., Snel, J.F.H., Harbinson, J., and Aarts, M.G.M., Phenomics for photosynthesis, growth and reflectance in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals circadian and long-term fluctuations in heritability, Plant Methods, 2016, vol. 12: 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-016-0113-y
Henebry, G.M., Making sense of remotely sensing vegetation, BioScience, 2011, vol. 61, p. 568. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.7.13
Thorp, K.R., Gore, M.A., Andrade-Sanchez, P., Carmo-Silva, A.E., Welch, S.M., White, J.W., and French, A.N., Proximal hyperspectral sensing and data analysis approaches for field-based plant phenomics, Comput. Electron. Agr., 2015, vol. 118, p. 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.09.005
Hughes, N., Askew, K., Scotson, C.P., Williams, K., Sauze, C., Corke, F., Doonan, J.H., and Nibau, C., Non-destructive, high-content analysis of wheat grain traits using X-ray micro computed tomography, Plant Methods, 2017, vol. 13: 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0229-8
Jones, H.G., Serraj, R., Loveys, B.R., Xiong, L., Wheaton, A., and Price, A.H., Thermal infrared imaging of crop canopies for the remote diagnosis and quantification of plant responses to water stress in the field, Funct. Plant Biol., 2009, vol. 36, p. 978. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09123
Warner, J.L., Denny, J.C., Kreda, D.A., and Alterovitz, G., Seeing the forest through the trees: uncovering phenomic complexity through interactive network visualization, J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 2015, vol. 22, p. 324. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002965
Gago, J., Douthe, C., Coopman, R.E., Gallego, P.P., Ribas-Carbo, M., Flexas, J., Escalona, J., and Medrano, H., UAVs challenge to assess water stress for sustainable agriculture, Agric. Water Manag., 2015, vol. 153, p. 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.020
Ludovisi, R., Tauro, F., Salvati, R., Khoury, S., Mugnozza Scarascia, G., and Harfouche, A., UAV-based thermal imaging for high-throughput field phenotyping of black poplar response to drought, Front. Plant Sci., 2017, vol. 8: 1681. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01681
Pereyra-Irujo, G.A., Gasco, E.D., Peirone, L.S., and Aguirrezábal, L.A.N., GlyPh: a low-cost platform for phenotyping plant growth and water use, Funct. Plant Biol., 2012, vol. 39, p. 905. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP12052
Yang, W., Duan, L., Chen, G., Xiong, L., and Liu, Q., Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2013, vol. 16, p. 180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2013.03.005
Paproki, A., Sirault, X., Berry, S., Furbank, R., and Fripp, J., A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis, BMC Plant Biol., 2012, vol. 12: 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-63
Gandomi, A. and Haider, M., Beyond the hype: big data concepts, methods, and analytics, Int. J. Inf. Manage., 2015, vol. 35, p. 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007
Chen, M., Du, X., Zhu, Y., Wang, Z., Hua, S., Li, Z., Guo, W., Zhang, G., Peng, J., and Jiang, L., Seed Fatty Acid Reducer acts downstream of gibberellin signalling pathway to lower seed fatty acid storage in Arabidopsis,Plant Cell Environ., 2012, vol. 35, p. 2155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02546.x
Granier, C. and Vile, D., Phenotyping and beyond: modelling the relationships between traits, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2014, vol. 18, p. 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.02.009
Fahlgren, N., Gehan, M.A., and Baxter, I., Lights, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2015, vol. 24, p. 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2015.02.006
Dutta, S., Cruz, J.A., Jiao, Y., Chen, J., Kramer, D.M., and Osteryoung, K.W., Non-invasive, whole-plant imaging of chloroplast movement and chlorophyll fluorescence reveals photosynthetic phenotypes independent of chloroplast photorelocation defects in chloroplast division mutants, Plant J., 2015, vol. 84, p. 428. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13009
Li, L., Zhang, Q., and Huang, D., A review of imaging techniques for plant phenotyping, Sensors (Basel), 2014, vol. 14, p. 20078. https://doi.org/10.3390/s141120078
Vanhaeren, H., Gonzalez, N., and Inzé, D., A journey through a leaf: phenomics analysis of leaf growth in Arabidopsis thaliana,Arabidopsis Book, 2015, vol. 13: e0181. https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0181
Gregory, P.J., Bengough, A.G., Grinev, D., Schmidt, S., Thomas, W.B.T.B., Wojciechowski, T., and Young, I.M., Root phenomics of crops: opportunities and challenges, Funct. Plant Biol., 2009, vol. 36, p. 922. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP09150
Plazas, M., Andújar, I., Vilanova, S., Gramazio, P., Herraiz, F.J., and Prohens, J., Conventional and phenomics characterization provides insight into the diversity and relationships of hypervariable scarlet (So-lanum aethiopicum L.) and gboma (S. macrocarpon L.) eggplant complexes, Front. Plant Sci., 2014, vol. 5: 318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00318
Pound, M.P., French, A.P., Atkinson, J.A., Wells, D.M., Bennett, M.J., and Pridmore, T., RootNav: navigating images of complex root architectures, Plant Physiol., 2013, vol. 162, p. 1802. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.221531
Galkovskyi, T., Mileyko, Y., Bucksch, A., Moore, B., Symonova, O., Price, C.A., Topp, C.N., Iyer-Pascu-zzi, A.S., Zurek, P.R., Fang, S., Harer, J., Benfey, P.N., and Weitz, J.S., GiA Roots: software for the high throughput analysis of plant root system architecture, BMC Plant Biol., 2012, vol. 12: 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-12-116
Guan, Q., Wu, J., Yue, X., Zhang, Y., and Zhu, J., A nuclear calcium-sensing pathway is critical for gene regulation and salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis,PLoS Genet., 2013, vol. 9: e1003755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003755
Smolikova, G., Kreslavski, V., Shiroglazova, O., Bilova, T., Sharova, E., Frolov, A., and Medvedev, S., Photochemical activity changes accompanying the embryogenesis of pea (Pisum sativum) with yellow and green cotyledons, Funct. Plant Biol., 2018, vol. 45, p. 228. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP16379
Rolfe, S.A. and Scholes, J.D., Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of plant–pathogen interactions, Protoplasm-a, 2010, vol. 247, p. 163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-010-0203-z
Arvidsson, S., Pérez-Rodríguez, P., and Mueller-Roeber, B., A growth phenotyping pipeline for Arabidopsis thaliana integrating image analysis and rosette area modeling for robust quantification of genotype effects, New Phytol., 2011, vol. 191, p. 895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03756.x
Clark, R.T., MacCurdy, R.B., Jung, J.K., Shaff, J.E., McCouch, S.R., Aneshansley, D.J., and Kochian, L.V., Three-dimensional root phenotyping with a novel imaging and software platform, Plant Physiol., 2011, vol. 156, p. 455. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.169102
Das, A., Schneider, H., Burridge, J., Ascanio, A.K.M., Wojciechowski, T., Topp, C.N., Lynch, J.P., Weitz, J.S., and Bucksch, A., Digital imaging of root traits (DIRT): a high-throughput computing and collaboration platform for field-based root phenomics, Plant Methods, 2015, vol. 11: 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0093-3
Joosen, R.V.L., Arends, D., Willems, L.A.J., Ligterink, W., Jansen, R.C., and Hilhorst, H.W.M., Visualizing the genetic landscape of Arabidopsis seed performance, Plant Physiol., 2012, vol. 158, p. 570. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.186676
Tanabata, T., Shibaya, T., Hori, K., Ebana, K., and Yano, M., SmartGrain: high-throughput phenotyping software for measuring seed shape through image analysis, Plant Physiol., 2012, vol. 160, p. 1871. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.205120
Schöler, F. and Steinhage, V., Automated 3D reconstruction of grape cluster architecture from sensor data for efficient phenotyping, Comput. Electron. Agric., 2015, vol. 114, p. 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.04.001
Perez-Sanz, F., Navarro, P.J., and Egea-Cortines, M., Plant phenomics: an overview of image acquisition technologies and image data analysis algorithms, Gig-ascience, 2017, vol. 6, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/gix092
Zhang, J., Naik, H.S., Assefa, T., Sarkar, S., Reddy, R.V.C., Singh, A., Ganapathysubramanian, B., and Singh, A.K., Computer vision and machine learning for robust phenotyping in genome-wide studies, Sci. Rep., 2017, vol. 7: 44048. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44048
Czedik-Eysenberg, A., Seitner, S., Güldener, U., Koemeda, S., Jez, J., Colombini, M., and Djamei, A., The 'PhenoBox', a flexible, automated, open-source plant phenotyping solution, New Phytol., 2018, vol. 219, p. 808. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15129
Sandhu, D., Coleman, Z., Atkinson, T., Rai, K.M., and Mendu, V., Genetics and physiology of the nuclearly inherited yellow foliar mutants in soybean, Front. Plant Sci., 2018, vol. 9: 471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00471
Coneva, V., Frank, M., de Luis Balaguer, M.A., Li, M., Sozzani, R., and Chitwood, D.H., Genetic architecture and molecular networks underlying leaf thickness in desert-adapted tomato, Plant Physiol., 2017, vol. 175, p. 376. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00790
Weber, J.F., Kunz, C., Peteinatos, G.G., Santel, H.-J., and Gerhards, R., Utilization of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging technology to detect plant injury by herbicides in sugar beet and soybean, Weed Technol., 2017, vol. 31, p. 523. https://doi.org/10.1017/wet.2017.22
Van de Velde, K., Chandler, P.M., van der Straeten, D., and Rohde, A., Differential coupling of gibberellin responses by Rht-B1c suppressor alleles and Rht-B1b in wheat highlights a unique role for the DELLA N-terminus in dormancy, J. Exp. Bot., 2017, vol. 68, p. 443. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw471
Cabrera-Bosquet, L., Fournier, C., Brichet, N., Welcker, C., Suard, B., and Tardieu, F., High-throughput estimation of incident light, light interception and radiation-use efficiency of thousands of plants in a phenotyping platform, New Phytol., 2016, vol. 212, p. 269. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14027
Cendrero-Mateo, M.P., Muller, O., Albrecht, H., Burkart, A., Gatzke, S., Janssen, B., Keller, B., Körber, N., Kraska, T., Matsubara, S., Li, J., Müller-Linow, M., Pieruschka, R., Pinto, F., Rischbeck, P., et al., Field phenotyping: challenges and opportunities, in Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Infrastructures, Chabbi, A. and Loescher, H.W., Eds., Boca Raton: CRC, 2017, p. 53.
Puglielli, G., Redondo-Gómez, S., Gratani, L., and Mateos-Naranjo, E., Highlighting the differential role of leaf paraheliotropism in two Mediterranean Cistus species under drought stress and well-watered conditions, J. Plant Physiol., 2017, vol. 213, p. 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2017.02.015
Mishra, A., Heyer, A.G., and Mishra, K.B., Chlorophyll fluorescence emission can screen cold tolerance of cold acclimated Arabidopsis thaliana accessions, Plant Methods, 2014, vol. 10: 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-10-38
Kämäräinen, J., Huokko, T., Kreula, S., Jones, P.R., Aro, E.-M., and Kallio, P., Pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase PntAB is essential for optimal growth and photosynthetic integrity under low-light mixotrophic conditions in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, New Phytol., 2017, vol. 214, p. 194. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14353
Ferroni, L., Suorsa, M., Aro, E., Baldisserotto, C., and Pancaldi, S., Light acclimation in the lycophyte Selaginella martensii depends on changes in the amount of photosystems and on the flexibility of the light-harvesting complex II antenna association with both photosystems, New Phytol., 2016, vol. 211, p. 554. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13939
Humplík, J.F., Lazár, D., Fürst, T., Husičková, A., Hýbl, M., and Spíchal, L., Automated integrative high-throughput phenotyping of plant shoots: a case study of the cold-tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.), Plant Methods, 2015, vol. 11: 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-015-0063-9
Straka, L. and Rittmann, B.E., Growth kinetics and mathematical modeling of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 under flashing light, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2018, vol. 116, p. 469. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26862
Belgio, E., Trsková, E., Kotabová, E., Ewe, D., Prášil, O., and Kaňa, R., High light acclimation of Chromera velia points to photoprotective NPQ, Photosy-nth. Res., 2018, vol. 135, p. 263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-017-0385-8
Skirycz, A., Vandenbroucke, K., Clauw, P., Maleux, K., de Meyer, B., Dhondt, S., Pucci, A., Gonzalez, N., Hoeberichts, F., Tognetti, V.B., Galbiati, M., Tonelli, C., van Breusegem, F., Vuylsteke, M., and Inzé, D., Survival and growth of Arabidopsis plants given limited water are not equal, Nat. Biotechnol., 2011, vol. 29, p. 212. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1800
Clauw, P., Coppens, F., de Beuf, K., Dhondt, S., van Daele, T., Maleux, K., Storme, V., Clement, L., Gonzalez, N., and Inzé, D., Leaf responses to mild drought stress in natural variants of Arabidopsis, Plant Physiol., 2015, vol. 167, p. 800. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.254284
Tisné, S., Serrand, Y., Bach, L., Gilbault, E., Ben Ameur, R., Balasse, H., Voisin, R., Bouchez, D., Durand-Tardif, M., Guerche, P., Chareyron, G., da Rugna, J., Camilleri, C., and Loudet, O., Phenoscope: an automated large-scale phenotyping platform offering high spatial homogeneity, Plant J., 2013, vol. 74, p. 534. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12131
Manay, S., Cremers, D., Byung-Woo, Hong, Yezzi, A.J., and Soatto, S., Integral invariants for shape matching, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2006, vol. 28, p. 1602. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2006.208
Bau, J. and Cardé, R.T., Simulation modeling to interpret the captures of moths in pheromone-baited traps used for surveillance of invasive species: the gypsy moth as a model case, J. Chem. Ecol., 2016, vol. 42, p. 877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0765-0
Chu, K.W., Lee, W.S., Cheng, C.Y., Huang, C.F., Zhao, F., Lee, L.S., Chen, Y.S., Lee, C.Y., and Tsai, M.J., Demonstration of lateral IGBTs in 4H-SiC, IEEE Electron Device Lett., 2013, vol. 34, p. 286. https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2012.2230240
Mirowski, P.W., LeCun, Y., Madhavan, D., and Kuzniecky, R., Comparing SVM and convolutional networks for epileptic seizure prediction from intracranial EEG, IEEE Int. Workshop Mach. Learn. Signal Process., 2008, p. 244.
Wiederschain, G.Y., Data mining techniques for the life sciences, Biochemistry, 2011, vol. 76, p. 494. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297911040158
Yip, K.Y., Cheng, C., and Gerstein, M., Machine learning and genome annotation: a match meant to be? Genome Biol., 2013, vol. 14: 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-205
Sommer, C. and Gerlich, D.W., Machine learning in cell biology—teaching computers to recognize phenotypes, J. Cell Sci., 2013, vol. 126, p. 5529. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.123604
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., and Vapnik, V., Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines, Mach. Learn., 2002, vol. 46, p. 389. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012487302797
Zacharaki, E.I., Wang, S., Chawla, S., Soo Yoo, D., Wolf, R., Melhem, E.R., and Davatzikos, C., Classification of brain tumor type and grade using MRI texture and shape in a machine learning scheme, Magn. Reson. Med., 2009, vol. 62, p. 1609. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22147
Gehan, M.A., Fahlgren, N., Abbasi, A., Berry, J.C., Callen, S.T., Chavez, L., Doust, A.N., Feldman, M.J., Gilbert, K.B., Hodge, J.G., Hoyer, J.S., Lin, A., Liu, S., Lizárraga, C., Lorence, A., et al., PlantCV v2: image analysis software for high-throughput plant phenotyping, PeerJ., 2017, vol. 5: e4088. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4088
Gutiérrez, S., Fernández-Novales, J., Diago, M.P., and Tardaguila, J., On-the-go hyperspectral imaging under field conditions and machine learning for the classification of grapevine varieties, Front. Plant Sci., 2018, vol. 9: 1102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01102
Cai, Z., Fan, Q., Feris, R.S., and Vasconcelos, N., A unified multi-scale deep convolutional neural network for fast object detection, Lecture Notes in Computer Scien-ce, 2016, p. 354.
El-Bendary, N., El Hariri, E., Hassanien, A.E., and Badr, A., Using machine learning techniques for evaluating tomato ripeness, Expert Syst. Appl., 2015, vol. 42, p. 1892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.057
Ubbens, J., Cieslak, M., Prusinkiewicz, P., and Stavness, I., The use of plant models in deep learning: an application to leaf counting in rosette plants, Plant Methods, 2018, vol. 14: 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0273-z
Taghavi Namin, S., Esmaeilzadeh, M., Najafi, M., Brown, T.B., and Borevitz, J.O., Deep phenotyping: deep learning for temporal phenotype/genotype classification, Plant Methods, 2018, vol. 14: 66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-018-0333-4
De Chant, C., Wiesner-Hanks, T., Chen, S., Stewart, E.L., Yosinski, J., Gore, M.A., Nelson, R.J., and Lipson, H., Automated identification of northern leaf blight-infected maize plants from field imagery using deep learning, Phytopathology, 2017, vol. 107, p. 1426. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-11-16-0417-R
Xiong, X., Duan, L., Liu, L., Tu, H., Yang, P., Wu, D., Chen, G., Xiong, L., Yang, W., and Liu, Q., Panicle-SEG: a robust image segmentation method for rice panicles in the field based on deep learning and superpixel optimization, Plant Methods, 2017, vol. 13: 104. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13007-017-0254-7
Jin, S., Su, Y., Gao, S., Wu, F., Hu, T., Liu, J., Li, W., Wang, D., Chen, S., Jiang, Y., Pang, S., and Guo, Q., Deep learning: individual maize segmentation from terrestrial Lidar data using faster R-CNN and regional growth algorithms, Front. Plant Sci., 2018, vol. 9: 866. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00866
Bai, G., Jenkins, S., Yuan, W., Graef, G.L., and Ge, Y., Field-based scoring of soybean iron deficiency chlorosis using RGB imaging and statistical learning, Front. Plant Sci., 2018, vol. 9: 1002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01002
Xu, R., Li, C., Paterson, A.H., Jiang, Y., Sun, S., and Robertson, J.S., Aerial images and convolutional neural network for cotton bloom detection, Front. Plant Sci., 2018, vol. 8: 2235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02235
Grift, T.E., Novais, J., and Bohn, M., High-throughput phenotyping technology for maize roots, Biosyst. Eng., 2011, vol. 110, p. 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.06.004
Schnaubelt, D., Schulz, P., Hannah, M.A., Yocgo, R.E., and Foyer, C.H., A phenomics approach to the analysis of the influence of glutathione on leaf area and abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana,Front. Plant Sci., 2013, vol. 4: 416. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00416
Weraduwage, S.M., Chen, J., Anozie, F.C., Morales, A., Weise, S.E., and Sharkey, T.D., The relationship between leaf area growth and biomass accumulation in Arabi-dopsis thaliana,Front. Plant Sci., 2015, vol. 6: 167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00167
Chopin, J., Laga, H., Huang, C.Y., Heuer, S., and Miklavcic, S.J., RootAnalyzer: a cross-section image analysis tool for automated characterization of root cells and tissues, PLoS One, 2015, vol. 10: e0137655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137655
Montenegro-Johnson, T.D., Stamm, P., Strauss, S., Topham, A.T., Tsagris, M., Wood, A.T.A., Smith, R.S., and Bassel, G.W., Digital single-cell analysis of plant organ development using 3DCellAtlas, Plant Cell, 2015, vol. 27, p. 1018. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.15.00175
Duan, L., Yang, W., Huang, C., and Liu, Q., A novel machine-vision-based facility for the automatic evaluation of yield-related traits in rice, Plant Methods, 2011, vol. 7: 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-44
Aquino, A., Millan, B., Gaston, D., Diago, M.-P., and Tardaguila, J., vitisFlower®: development and testing of a novel android-smartphone application for assessing the number of grapevine flowers per inflorescence using artificial vision techniques, Sensors (Basel), 2015, vol. 15, p. 21204. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150921204
Virlet, N., Costes, E., Martinez, S., Kelner, J.-J., and Regnard, J.-L., Multispectral airborne imagery in the field reveals genetic determinisms of morphological and transpiration traits of an apple tree hybrid population in response to water deficit, J. Exp. Bot., 2015, vol. 66, p. 5453. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv355
Golzarian, M.R., Frick, R.A., Rajendran, K., Berger, B., Roy, S., Tester, M., and Lun, D.S., Accurate inference of shoot biomass from high-throughput images of cereal plants, Plant Methods, 2011, vol. 7: 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-7-2
Fujita, S., Matsuo, T., Ishiura, M., and Kikkawa, M., High-throughput phenotyping of chlamydomonas swimming mutants based on nanoscale video analysis, Biophys. J., 2014, vol. 107, p. 336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2014.05.033
Funding
This work was funded by the State Committee on Science and Technology of Belarus under the State Program “High Technologies and Technics” as well as joint projects with the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (project no. CB02-07), the Department of Science and Technology of Gaundong Province (project no. 2018YFD0201203), and the International Base Guangdong Science and Technology (project no. 163-2018-XMZC-0001-05-0049).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS
This article does not contain any research involving humans and animals as research objects.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Translated by M. Shulskaya
Abbreviations: ERT—Electrical Resistance Tomography; ESMI, EMI—Electromagnetic Soil Inductance; GPR—Ground Penetrating Radar; PSI—Photon Systems Instruments; RGB-sensors—Red, Green, Blue-sensors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demidchik, V.V., Shashko, A.Y., Bandarenka, U.Y. et al. Plant Phenomics: Fundamental Bases, Software and Hardware Platforms, and Machine Learning. Russ J Plant Physiol 67, 397–412 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443720030061
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443720030061