Skip to main content
Log in

Multiplicity of singularities is not a bi-Lipschitz invariant

  • Published:
Mathematische Annalen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It was conjectured that multiplicity of a singularity is bi-Lipschitz invariant. We disprove this conjecture constructing examples of bi-Lipschitz equivalent complex algebraic singularities with different values of multiplicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birbrair, L., Fernandes, A., Lê, D.T., Sampaio, J.E.: Lipschitz regular complex algebraic sets are smooth. Proc Am Math Soc 144(3), 983–987 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Birbrair, Lev, Gabrielov, Andrei: Ambient Lipschitz equivalence of real surface singularities (2017). arXiv:1707.04951v2 [math.AG], to appear in IMRN

  3. Barden, D.: Simply connected five-manifolds. Ann. Math. 82(2), 365–385 (1965)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernández de Bobodilla, J., Fernandes, A., Sampaio, E.: Multiplicity and degree as bi-Lipschitz invariants for complex sets. J Topol 11(4), 958–966 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chirka, E.M.: Complex analytic sets. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Crowley, D.: 5-manifolds: 1-connected. Bull. Manifold Atlas 49–55 (2011)

  7. Comte, G.: Multiplicity of complex analytic sets and bi-Lipschitz maps. Real analytic and algebraic singularities (Nagoya/Sapporo/Hachioji, 1996) Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser., 381, pp. 182–188 (1998)

  8. Fernandes, A.: Topological equivalence of complex curves and bi-Lipschitz maps. Michigan Math. J. 51, 593–606 (2003)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandes, A., Sampaio, J.Edson: Multiplicity of analytic hypersurface singularities under bi-Lipschitz homeomorphisms. J. Topol. 9, 927–933 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirszbraun, M.: \(\ddot{U}\)ber die zusammenziehende und Lipschitzsche Transformationen. Fund. Math. 22(1), 77–108 (1934)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kollár, J.: Seifert Gm-bundles (2004). arXiv:math/0404386v2 [math.AG]

  12. Kollár, J.: Circle actions on simply connected 5-manifolds. Topology 45(3), 643–671 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Mcshane, E.J.: Extension of range of functions. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 40, 837–842 (1934)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Milnor, J. W., Stasheff, J. D.: Characteristics Classes. In: Annals of mathematics studies, vol. 76. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1974)

  15. Neumann, W., Pichon, A.: Lipschitz geometry of complex surfaces: analytic invariants and equisingularity (2016). arXiv:1211.4897v3 [math.AG]

  16. Sampaio, J.Edson: Bi-Lipschitz homeomorphic subanalytic sets have bi-Lipschitz homeomorphic tangent cones. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 22(2), 553–559 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Smale, S.: On the structure of 5-manifolds. Ann. Math. 75(2), 38–46 (1962)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Pham, F., Teissier, B.: Fractions lipschitziennes d’une algébre analytique complexe et saturation de Zariski. Centre de Mathématiques de l’Ecole Polytechnique (Paris) (1969)

  19. Whitney, H.: Analytic extensions of functions defined in closed sets. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 36, 63–89 (1934)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Zariski, O.: On the topology of algebroid singularities. Am. J. Math. 54, 453–465 (1932)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Zariski, O.: Some open questions in the theory of singularities. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 77(4), 481–491 (1971)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lev Birbrair.

Additional information

Communicated by Jean-Yves Welschinger.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Lev Birbrair: Partially supported by CNPq grant 302655/2014-0. Alexandre Fernandes: Partially supported by CNPq grant grant304221/2017-9 and by CAPES-BRASIL Finance Code 001. J. Edson Sampaio: Partially supported by CNPq-Brazil grant 303811/2018-8, by the ERCEA 615655 NMST Consolidator Grant and also by the Basque Government through the BERC 2018-2021 program and Gobierno Vasco Grant IT1094-16, by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities: BCAM Severo Ochoa accreditation SEV-2017-0718. Misha Verbitsky: Partially supported by the Russian Academic Excellence Project ‘5-100’, FAPERJ E-26/202.912/2018 and CNPq - Process 313608/2017-2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Birbrair, L., Fernandes, A., Sampaio, J.E. et al. Multiplicity of singularities is not a bi-Lipschitz invariant. Math. Ann. 377, 115–121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-020-01958-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-020-01958-x

Navigation