Skip to main content
Log in

Arsenic release in contaminated soil amended with unmodified and modified biochars derived from sawdust and rice husk

  • Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Biochar, due to its heterogeneity, may not be equally effective for cationic and anionic metals/metalloid immobilization in soil. Biochar modification could facilitate the immobilization of specific metals/metalloids in soil.

Materials and methods

This study explored the potential of unmodified and modified (with KMnO4) biochars derived from sawdust and rice husk at two different temperatures (300 and 700 °C) on the mobility of arsenic (As) in contaminated soil. Soil column leaching experiments were performed with two application rates (2% and 5%; w/w) of different biochars, and the pore waters at different time intervals were analyzed for As and other cations and anion concentrations.

Results and discussion

In general, all the biochars increased As mobility in soil. The biochars produced at 300 °C significantly and highly increased As concentrations (up to 341%) in pore waters, as compared with the unamended soil. However, the modified biochars showed As immobilization in soil as compared with their unmodified counterparts. The mechanisms of biochar interaction with As in soil were investigated by developing correlations of As with various chemical constituents. It was inferred that As mobilization was increased due to competition between As and PO43−. Contrarily, immobilization of As in soil by modified biochars was related to sorption onto Fe- and Mn-oxides.

Conclusions

Pristine biochar may not be an efficient remediation measure for As-contaminated soil. There could be a risk of As leaching into groundwater from soils amended with biochar. However, it is recommended that modification of biochar may assist the immobilization of As in soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad M, Lee SS, Dou X, Mohan D, Sung JK, Yang JE, Ok YS (2012) Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soybean stover- and peanut shell-derived biochar properties and TCE adsorption in water. Bioresour Technol 118:536–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Ok YS, Kim BY, Ahn JH, Lee YH, Zhang M, Moon DH, Al-Wabel MI (2016) Impact of soybean stover- and pine needle-derived biochars on Pb and As mobility, microbial community, and carbon stability in a contaminated agricultural soil. J Environ Manage 166:131–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Lee SS, Lee SE, Al-Wabel MI, Tsang DCW, Ok YS (2017) Biochar-induced changes in soil properties affected immobilization/mobilization of metals/metalloids in contaminated soils. J Soils Sediments 17:717–730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Angin D, Sensoz S (2014) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on chemical and surface properties of biochar of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Int J Phytoremed 16:84–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Asadullah M, Jahan I, Ahmed MB, Adawiyah P, Malek NH, Rahman MS (2014) Preparation of microporous activated carbon and its modification for arsenic removal from water. J Ind Eng Chem 20:887–896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bang S, Meng X (2004) A review of arsenic interactions with anions and iron hydroxides. Environ Eng Res 9:184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agron J 54:464–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao X, Ma LQ, Shiralipour A (2003) Effects of compost and phosphate amendments on arsenic mobility in soils and arsenic uptake by the hyperaccumulator, Pteris vittata L. Environ Pollut 126:157–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castaldi P, Mele E, Silvetti M, Garau G, Dieana S (2014) Water treatment residues as accumulators of oxoanions in soil. Sorption of arsenate and phosphate anions from an aqueous solution. J Hazard Mater 264:144–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborti D, Rahman MM, Das B, Murrill M, Dey S, Mukherjee SC, Dhar RK, Biswas BK, Chowdhury UK, Roy S, Sorif S, Selim M, Rahman M, Quamruzzaman Q (2010) Status of groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh: a 14-year study report. Water Res 44:5789–5802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Zhou D, Zhu L (2008) Transitional adsorption and partition of nonpolar and polar aromatic contaminants by biochars of pine needles with different pyrolytic temperatures. Environ Sci Technol 42:5137–5143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conz RF, Abbruzzini TF, de Andrade CA, Milori DMBP, Cerri CEP (2017) Effect of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type on agricultural properties and stability of biochars. Agr Sci 8:914–933

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domingues RR, Trugilho PF, Silva CA, de Melo ICNA, Melo LCA, Magriotis ZM, Sanchez-Monedero MA (2017) Properties of biochar derived from wood and high-nutrient biomasses with the aim of agronomic and environmental benefits. PLoS ONE 12(5):e0176884. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farooqi A, Masuda H, Firdous N (2007) Toxic fluoride and arsenic contaminated groundwater in the Lahore and Kasur districts, Punjab, Pakistan and possible contaminant sources. Environ Pollut 145:839–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grathwohl P, Susset B (2009) Comparison of percolation to batch and sequential leaching tests: theory and data. Waste Manage 29:2681–2688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hilber I, Bastos AC, Loureiro S, Soja G, Marsz A, Cornelissen G, Bucheli TD (2017) The different faces of biochar: contamination risk versus remediation tool. J Environ Eng Landsc Manage 25:86–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICARDA (2013) ICARDA Annual Report 2013. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. Beirut, Lebanon 68 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam FS, Pederick RL, Gault AG, Adams LK, Polya DA, Charnock JM, Lloyd JR (2005) Interactions between the Fe(III)-reducing bacterium Geobacter sulfurreducens and arsenate, and capture of the metalloid by biogenic Fe(II). Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8642–8648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kar S, Maity JP, Jean JS, Liu CC, Nath B, Lee YC, Bundschuh J, Chen CY, Li Z (2011) Role of organic matter and humic substances in the binding and mobility of arsenic in a Gangetic aquifer. J Environ Sci Health, A 46:1231–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazi TG, Arain MB, Baig JA, Jamali MK, Afridi HI, Jalbani N, Sarfraz RA, Shah AQ, Niaz A (2009) The correlation of arsenic levels in drinking water with the biological samples of skin disorders. Sci Total Environ 407:1019–1026

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lou J, Meng X, Crittenden J, Qu J, Hu C, Liu H, Peng P (2018) Arsenic adsorption on α-MnO2 nanofibers and the significance of (1 0 0) facet as compared with (1 1 0). Chem Eng J 331:492–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning BA, Fendorf SE, Bostick B, Suarez DL (2002) Arsenic(III) oxidation and arsenic(V) adsorption reactions on synthetic birnessite. Environ Sci Technol 36:976–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Min Z, Bohan L, Ming L, Yong Z, Qingru Z, Bin O (2008) Arsenic removal from contaminated soil using phosphoric acid and phosphate. J Environ Sci 20:75–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muehe EM, Morin G, Scheer L, Pape PL, Esteve I, Daus B, Kappler A (2016) Arsenic(V) incorporation in vivianite during microbial reduction of arsenic(V)-bearing biogenic Fe(III) (oxyhydr)oxides. Environ Sci Technol 50(2281):2291

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajapaksha AU, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Zhang M, Vithanage M, Mandal S, Gao B, Bolan NS, Ok YS (2016) Engineered/designer biochar for contaminant removal/immobilization from soil and water: potential and implication of biochar modification. Chemosphere 148:276–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith E, Naidu R, Alston AM (1998) Arsenic in the soil environment: a review. Adv Agron 64:149–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AH, Lingas EO, Rahman M (2000) Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency. Bull World Health Organ 78:1093–1103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedy RK, Goel PK, Trisal CL (1987) Practical methods in ecology and environmental science. Enviro Media Publications, 340 pp

  • Tyrovola K, Nikolaidis NP, Veranis N, Kallithrakas-Kontos N, Koulouridakis PE (2006) Arsenic removal from geothermal waters with zero-valent iron-Effect of temperature, phosphate and nitrate. Water Res 40:2375–2386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Geen A, Farooqi A, Kumar A, Khattak JA, Mushtaq N, Hussain I, Ellis T, Singh CK (2019) Field testing of over 30,000 wells for arsenic across 400 villages of the Punjab plains of Pakistan and India: implications for prioritizing mitigation. Sci Total Environ 654:1358–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A (1947) A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils–effects of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci 63:251–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2011) Arsenic in drinking water. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Cui MQ, Xue SG, Li WC, Huang L, Jiang XX, Qian ZY (2018) Remediation of arsenic-contaminated paddy soil by iron-modified biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:20792–20801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie X, Wang Y, Duan M, Xie Z (2009) Geochemical and environmental magnetic characteristics of high arsenic aquifer sediments from Datong Basin, northern China. Environ Geol 58:45–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Hofmann T, Pies C, Grathwohl P (2008) Sorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to carbonaceous materials in a river floodplain soil. Environ Pollut 156:1357–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Zhou L, Huang Y, Song Z, Qiu W (2015) Effects of a manganese oxide-modified biochar composite on adsorption of arsenic in red soil. J Environ Manage 163:155–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G, Liu F, Liu H, Qu J, Liu R (2014) Respective role of Fe and Mn oxide contents for arsenic sorption in iron and manganese binary oxide: an X-ray absorption spectroscopy investigation. Environ Sci Technol 48:10316–10322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng RL, Cai C, Liang JH, Huang Q, Chen Z, Huang YZ, Arp HPH, Sun GX (2012) The effects of biochars from rice residue on the formation of iron plaque and the accumulation of Cd, Zn, Pb, As in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Chemosphere 89:856–862

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The present work was partially supported by the “University Research Fund” program of the Quaid-i-Azam University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahtab Ahmad.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Ravi Naidu

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Memuna Amin and Mahtab Ahmad share co-first authorship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amin, M., Ahmad, M., Farooqi, A. et al. Arsenic release in contaminated soil amended with unmodified and modified biochars derived from sawdust and rice husk. J Soils Sediments 20, 3358–3367 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02661-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02661-9

Keywords

Navigation