Impact of time after fire on post-fire seismic behavior of RC columns
Introduction
Reinforced concrete (RC) columns are known to lose a fair amount of compressive strength and stiffness after being exposed to fire [1]. However, the loss of residual mechanical properties of concrete due to fire exposure is largely recoverable in the long-term [2]. Therefore, autogenous recovery of concrete as a function of time after cooling is of paramount interest. Post-cooling behavior of concrete can be separated into two stages [3]. At the first stage, after cooling to ambient temperatures, it is observed that the compressive strength and elastic modulus of concrete may be further reduced from its original strength under high temperatures until a period of time because of continuing disintegration of the microstructure in concrete. This first stage of post-fire cooling period is reported to be approximately 30 days from the beginning of the cooling [4], [5]. Because of the reaction between the concrete and moisture in the air (needed for re-hydration of cement), after around 30 days, recovery in compressive strength begins referring to the second stage of cooling period and concrete can recover up to 90% of its original strength in one year after being subjected to temperatures of 500 °C [4], [6]. This is attributed to the fact that capillaries initially filled by C-S-H gels are opened during fire exposure and refilled by rehydration products due to the moisture in air owing to the carbonation process [2]. Hence, this rehydration process reduces the porosity of concrete and results in strength recovery. However, there is not a consensus between the reduction ratios in compressive strength depending on the time after fire due to the fact that residual compressive strength after fire may be affected by various parameters such as concrete composition, heating and cooling scenario, specimen size, axial restraint. For instance, Harada et al. [4] indicated that residual compressive strength decreases up to 50% of the initial value 30 days after fire, and this reduction ratio does not further vary until 60 days after fire exposure. On the other hand, Papayianni and Valiasis [5] mentioned that the compressive strength would reduce to about 41% of the original value 30 days after being subjected to fire and then around 15% enhancement on compressive strength is expected for the next 30 days (at the age of 60 days after fire, residual compressive strength ratio is about 48% of the original value). Residual mechanical properties of reinforcement are also effective on the behavior after fire. Cooling would often restore the material to its original state for temperatures up to 450 °C for cold work and 600 °C for hot rolled steel reinforcement [6], [7] irrespective of time after fire. As can be drawn from the findings of the literature review, the load-bearing capacity of a structure tends to decrease after the maximum temperature is achieved, then reaches to a minimum value, and finally recovers partially or completely after cooling [8]. These variations in load-bearing capacity due to the thermal inertia and additional loss of material mechanical properties during cooling stage, may result in structural failure during the cooling phase of a fire rather than under elevated temperatures [9], [10], [11]. This phenomenon is one of the major reasons that formed a motivation for the present study.
In other respects, performance of any building subjected to fire should be inspected considering probable future earthquakes in earthquake prone areas. Weaknesses in RC structures arising from insufficient lateral load capacity and stiffness due to low concrete compressive strength and substandard detailing of reinforcing bars, result with vulnerable buildings during earthquakes [12]. Fire damage may also cause inadequate concrete compressive strength even for well-engineered structures, and can lead to vulnerable building classes as commonly exist in developing countries. Keeping this issue in mind, post-fire seismic behavior of RC structural elements designed according to current guidelines is simply unknown up to date. Majority of the existing studies considered the behavior after cooling under only service loads combined with uniaxial/biaxial bending [13], [14], [15], and the studies investigating fire-damaged RC columns under seismic loading have not been extensive. Studies conducted by Yaqub and Bailey [16] and Bailey and Yaqub [17] included seismic retrofitting of shear-critical RC columns after fire exposure while Mostafaei [18] pointed out hybrid fire testing principles on a single high strength concrete column under monotonic lateral loading. None of these studies considered the post-fire seismic behavior of conventional flexure-controlled RC columns. Furthermore, impact of autogenous recovery in concrete after fire on the post-fire seismic behavior of RC columns has not been investigated yet neither for shear nor flexure-controlled columns. As mentioned above, structural performance assessment of a fire-damaged structure may lead to misleading results due to the reduction in compressive strength of concrete particularly in the initial days after fire exposure. Therefore, this study presents the experimental findings on the effect of fire damage on seismic behavior of RC columns for the first time with a particular focus on the impact of autogenous recovery of concrete with time after cooling. In the scope of this study, uniaxial compression tests were carried out on cylinder and cube specimens in order to determine the variation of compressive strength depending on the time after fire. Also, four full-scale RC columns were designed and constructed complying with the major design codes (e.g. [19]). The columns except the reference one, were exposed to ISO-834 standard fire [20] for 90 minutes, and then kept in ambient conditions for 30, 60 or 360 days until the test day. The columns were then subjected to constant axial loads combined with reversed cyclic lateral displacements simulating seismic loading. The responses of the columns were analyzed in terms of lateral load-displacement relationships, ductility and stiffness. However, the column tested 360 days after fire experienced premature buckling of longitudinal bars due to concrete settling problems during casting process and therefore, only the hysteretic response of this column was given in the study, and it was excluded from further discussion. As aforementioned, there is an obvious inconsistency in the literature in terms of the recovery of concrete with time after fire, which is particularly encountered during the two months after fire exposure. After this period of time, it is generally accepted that the recovery rate of concrete almost proportionally increases with time after fire, and concrete after fire is expected to reinstate its original strength after one year [4], [6]. Therefore, it should be noted that the column tested 360 days after fire can be deemed to be a less critical specimen in the test matrix. A combined thermal and structural analysis was also conducted to predict the post-fire seismic response of the columns considering the variations in mechanical properties of concrete by time after fire. The results of the analytical work demonstrate that the generated algorithm within the current study is in good agreement with the test results. Demonstrated applicability of the given algorithm within the manuscript in terms of prediction of post-fire seismic response considering the compressive strength variation with time, may serve to the prediction of the response of the column tested 360 days after fire as well.
Section snippets
Materials
The calcareous aggregate concrete mix-proportions of the specimens are presented in Table 1. Three cylinder specimens of 150 × 300 mm size were also reserved for each column to monitor the compressive strength of the columns at the time of seismic tests. The mean unfired concrete compressive strength, obtained based on these cylinder tests at around the age of 16 months corresponding to around 60 days after the fire tests was around 36 MPa. The stress–strain relationships of the unfired
Prediction of post-fire seismic response
Seismic responses of the columns are estimated through a combined thermal and structural modelling as summarized in Fig. 7. As abovementioned, thermal analysis is conducted using SAFIR software in order to obtain the temperature gradients at various depths in the heated column sections. SAFIR is capable of sequential modelling of the thermal and structural behavior for RC structural members. However, in the presented study, only the thermal behavior (i.e. temperature gradients during the
Experimental results
The seismic responses of the columns are analyzed in terms of their hysteretic behavior. The test data for the hysteretic responses and their envelopes on lateral load versus lateral displacement of the columns are plotted in Fig. 11, Fig. 12a, respectively. Envelopes of the numerical work is shown in Fig. 12b. Only the first cycle of each lateral load–displacement relationship was considered while developing the envelope curves of the hysteretic response. Important stages such as cracking,
Conclusions
This paper investigates the impact of time after fire exposure on seismic behavior of full-scale RC columns. The following conclusions can be drawn from the experimental and analytical campaign.
- •
Average concrete compressive strength of the heated columns was reduced to around half of the original strength (lower in the surface, higher towards center). This significant loss in concrete compressive strength caused considerable reduction (up to 20%) in lateral load capacities of the fire exposed
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by ITU Scientific Research Department (Project No: 39548) and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) under grant number 216M535. The authors are thankful to the Yapı Merkezi Prefabrication Inc., Allianz Insurance Inc., Turk YTONG Inc., Fibrobeton Inc. for the financial supports as well as staff of ITU Structural and Earthquake Engineering, ITU Infrastructure Materials Laboratories, and Fire Laboratory at Turkish Standard Institute for
References (40)
- et al.
Strength and stiffness of post-heated columns repaired with ferrocement and fibre reinforced polymer jackets
Compos B Eng
(2013) - et al.
Strength and durability recovery of fire-damaged concrete after post-fire-curing
Cem Concr Res
(2001) - et al.
A performance indicator for structures under natural fire
Eng Struct
(2015) - et al.
Experimental research on post-fire behaviour of reinforced concrete columns
Fire Saf J
(2009) - et al.
A study of reinforced concrete corner columns after fire
Cem Concr Compos
(2008) - et al.
Seismic performance of shear critical post-heated reinforced concrete square columns wrapped with FRP composites
Constr Build Mater
(2012) - et al.
Seismic strengthening of shear critical post-heated circular concrete columns wrapped with FRP composite jackets
Compos Struct
(2012) - et al.
Residual stress–strain relationship for concrete after exposure to high temperatures
Cem Concr Res
(2006) - et al.
Post-fire seismic behavior of reinforced concrete structural walls
Eng Struct
(2018) - et al.
Strengthening fire-damaged concrete by confinement with fibre-reinforced polymer wraps
Eng Struct
(2011)
Factors affecting seismic behavior of reinforced concrete structures after fire exposure
NED Univ J Res
Strength, elasticity and thermal properties of concrete subjected to elevated temperatures
ACI Spec Publ
Residual mechanical properties of heated concrete incorporating different pozzolanic materials
Mater. Struct.
Structural fire protection. ASCE committee on fire protection
Structural Division
On the interaction between span length and opening ratio of RC frames under natural fires
Proc Inst Civ Eng Struct Build
Structural behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) columns under fire
IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng
Earthquakes, existing building and seismic design codes in Turkey
Arab J Sci Eng
Residual strength of fire exposed RC columns. Evaluation and repair of fire damage to concrete
ACI Special Publ
Cited by (12)
Experimental study on the effect of fireproof coating and cooling methods on the mechanical properties of concrete exposed to high temperature
2023, Construction and Building MaterialsCyclic behaviour of as-built and strengthened existing reinforced concrete columns previously damaged by fire
2022, Engineering StructuresCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, they observed that a larger concrete cover depth has an adverse effect on the stiffness (and subsequently, the yield displacement and ductility) of the column, whereas it does not have a significant impact on the lateral load and energy dissipation capacity [21]. In [34], Demir et al. also considered the effect of ageing after fire exposure on the cyclic performance of columns to investigate the influence of the known long-term (partial) strength recovery of concrete [35]; however, they did not observe any significant differences between columns tested at 30 and 60 days after fire exposure, whereas no conclusions could be drawn from testing at 360 days of ageing due to experimental problems. Nonetheless, as Mostafaei et al. [24] point out, despite the fact that concrete exposed to 500 °C may gain up to 90% of its original compressive strength one year after fire, the risk of an earthquake occurring soon after the column has been exposed to fire cannot be neglected and this strength recovery cannot be relied upon.
Mechanical performance of bonded prestressed concrete beam with steel corrosion under partial heating condition
2024, Journal of Railway Science and EngineeringProvision the Plastic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns Under Fire Action
2023, AIP Conference ProceedingsExperimental study on bearing performance of concrete beams with circular openings after high temperature
2023, Jianzhu Jiegou Xuebao/Journal of Building Structures