Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of North-Eastern Thailand

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Northeast of Thailand is defined as a low seismic hazard region. However, earthquakes were reported and felt by local people around 25 years ago. Using probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), this research evaluates the seismic hazard in the Northeast region of Thailand to be the database for seismic design. The seismic hazard is expressed in the term of peak ground acceleration (PGA) at base rock level. The crustal faults and earthquake events are considered as the seismic source in this evaluation. Two crustal faults are evaluated in Thakhaek fault and Phetchabun fault, which have not been considered before in PSHA. Earthquake events are classified into two types: background seismicity zones and subduction zones. The results reveal that the highest peak ground acceleration at base rock level is in Bueng Kan province and Nakhon Phanom province. The evaluated seismic hazard in the Northeast region is approximately 30% g and 12% g with a return period of 2,475 years and 475 years, respectively. Results obtained from this study are about two times higher than the Earthquake Resistant Design code 1302 of Thailand. The evaluated seismic hazard is higher than the peak ground accelerations that can cause damage to building structures (>3.9% g).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2003) Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 93(4):1703–1729, DOI: 10.1785/0120020156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2008) Erratum to empirical ground-motion relations for subduction zone earthquakesand their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 98(5):2567–2569, DOI: 10.1785/0120080108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellier O, Sébrier M (1995) Is the slip rate variation on the great sumatran fault accommodated by fore-arc stretching? Geophysical Research Letters 22(15):1969–1972, DOI: 10.1029/95GL01793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW (1985) Strong motion attenuation relations: A ten-year perspective. Earthquake Spectra 1(4):759–804, DOI: 10.1193/1.1585292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) Ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10.0s. Earthquake Spectra 24(1):1390171, DOI: 10.1193/1.2857546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chintanapakdee C, Naguit ME, Charoenyuth M (2008) Suitable attenuationmodel for Thailand. Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, October 12–17, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 58(5):1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  • Das R, Wason HR, Sharma ML (2011) Global regression relations for conversion of surface wave and body wave magnitudes to moment magnitude. Natural Hazards 59(2):801–810, DOI: 10.1007/s11069-011-9796-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DPT (2009) Earthquake resistant design code 1302. Earthquake Resistant Design code, Department of Public Works and Town & Country Planning, Bangkok, Thailand, 1–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel A (1995) Mapping seismic hazard in the central and eastern United States. Seismological Research Letters 66(4):8–21, DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.66.4.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 64(5):1363–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutenberg B, Richter CF (1954) Seismicity of the earth and associated phenomena. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen S (2007) USGS software for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) draft document. United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA, 1–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton TH, Tajima F, Mori AW (1986) Estimating ground motions using recorded accelerograms. Surveys in Geophysics 8(1):25–83, DOI: 10.1007/BF01904051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann RB (1977) Recurrence relations. Earthquake Notes 88:47–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM (1993) Procedures for selecting earthquake ground motions at rock sites. Report No. NIST GDR 93-625, US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Janpila A, Foytong P, Ruangrassamee A, Areemit N (2016a) Deterministic seismic hazard assessment of KORAT plateau. Proceedings of 21th national convention on civil engineering, June 28–30, Songkhla, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Janpila A, Foytong P, Ruangrassamee A, Areemit N (2016b) Deterministicseismic hazard analysis in Thailand using active fault data. International Journal of Technology 7(7):1196–1204, DOI: 10.14716/ijtech.v7i7.4664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshimura S, Takashima M (2005) Remote sensing GIS and modeling technologies enhance the synergic capability to comprehend the impact of great tsunami disaster. Proceedings of 3rd international workshop on remote sensing for post-disaster response, September 12–13, Chiba, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire RK, Arabasz WJ (1990) An introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. In: Ward SH (ed) Geotechnical and environmental geophysics. Wiley Publishing, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 333–352

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe I (2000) The Bentong-Raub suture zone. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 18(6): 91–712, DOI: 10.1016/S1367-9120(00)00043-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller C, Hopper M, Frankel A (1977) Preparation of earthquake catalogs for the national seismic-hazard maps contiguous 48 states. Open-File Report 97-464, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA, DOI: 10.3133/ofr97464

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornthammarath T, Warnitchai P, Worakanchana K, Zaman S, Ragnar S, Lai CG (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Thailand. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9(2):367–394, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-010-9197-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pailoplee S, Sugiyama Y, Charusiri P (2008) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis in Thailand and adjacent areas by using regional seismic source zones. Proceedings of the international symposia on geoscience resources and environments of Asian terrenes (GREAT 2008), 4th IGCP 516, and 5th APSEG, November 24–26, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Pailoplee S, Sugiyama Y, Charusiri P (2009) Deterministic and probabilisticseismic hazard analyses in Thailand and adjacent areas using active fault data. Earth Planets Space 61(12):1313–1325, DOI: 10.1186/BF03352984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palasri C (2006) Probabilistic seismic hazard map of Thailand. MSc Thesis, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadigh K, Chang C, Egan J, Makdisi F, Youngs R (1997) Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismological Research Letters 68(1):180–189, DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.68.1.180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scordilis EM (2006) Empirical global relations converting MS and mb to moment magnitude. Journal of Seismology 10(2):225–236, DOI: 10.1007/s10950-006-9012-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sipkin SA (2003) A correction to body-wave magnitude m based on moment magnitude Mw. Seismological Research Letters 74(6):739–742, DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.74.6.739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepp JC (1972) Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the puget sound area and its effect on statistical estimates of earthquake hazard. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Microzonazion 2:897–910

    Google Scholar 

  • TMD (2014) Chiang Rai earthquake report May 5, 2014 at 18.08 LST. Seismological Bureau Thailand, Thai Meteorological Department, Bangkok, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanitchai P, Lisantono A (1996) Probabilistic seismic risk mapping for Thailand. Proceedings of 11th world conference on earthquake engineering, June 23–28, Acapulco, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs RR, Chiou SJ, Silva WJ, Humphrey JR (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters 68(1):58–73, DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.68.1.58

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding support from the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) and the Thailand Research Fund and Office of the Higher Education Commission under contract No. MRG6080179.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piyawat Foytong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foytong, P., Ornthammarath, T., Arjwech, R. et al. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of North-Eastern Thailand. KSCE J Civ Eng 24, 1845–1857 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1313-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1313-6

Keywords

Navigation