Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Raw material consumption or total material consumption? Which indicator is better for evaluating material resource consumption and environmental pressure?

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article presents a time series of raw material consumption (RMC) and total material consumption (TMC) indicators for the Czech Republic for 1990–2017 calculated with the use of hybrid input-output life cycle assessment approach (hybrid IO-LCA). While the RMC indicator has already been calculated with the use of various alternatives of input-output or hybrid approaches for some other countries, we are not aware of any published TMC time series calculated with the use of these methods. We briefly discuss the time development of the indicators’ material components. The core of the article lies in the assessment of the suitability of RMC and TMC indicators for (1) Quantification of material resource consumption of nations or groups of nations and (2) Evaluation of environmental pressure related to material resource consumption. We concluded that RMC is more appropriate for quantification of material resource consumption, as unused flows included in TMC are not consumed, but only displaced. Regarding the second purpose of the indicators, we found that trends of environmental pressure expressed by RMC and TMC are similar for the Czech Republic. We showed that RMC significantly underestimates total environmental pressure related to material resource consumption, which is particularly relevant for international comparison. Finally, we revealed that the material structure of the indicators differ and referring to an example of coal and construction and industrial minerals we argued that TMC is more appropriate for the evaluation of environmental pressure attributable to particular resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adriaanse, A., Bringezu, S., Hammond, A., Moriguchi, Y., Rodenburg, E., Rogich, D., & Schütz, H. (1997). Resource flows: the material basis of industrial economies. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu, S., & Bleischwitz, R. (2009). Sustainable resource management: global trends, visions and policies. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu, S., & Schutz, H. (2001). Total material requirements of the European Union. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu, S., Schütz, H., & Moll, S. (2003). Rationale for and interpretation of economy-wide material flow analysis and derived indicators. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 7, 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanale, R. M., & Femia, A. (2013). An environmentally ineffective way to increase resource productivity: evidence from the Italian case on transferring the burden abroad. Resources, 2013, 608–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2011a). Analysis associated with the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe: Part II. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2011b). A resource-efficient Europe – flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2015). Closing the loop - an EU action plan for the Circular Economy. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech Geological Survey, various years. Balances and inventory of deposits of raw materials. Czech Geological Survey, Prague.

  • Czech Statistical Office, various years-a. Annual national accounts database. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/hdp_narodni_ucty. Accessed January 2019. Czech Statistical Office, Prague.

  • Czech Statistical Office, various years-b. Food consumption. Czech Statistical Office, Prague.

  • Czech Statistical Office, various years-c. Generation, recovery and disposal of waste. Czech Statistical Office, Prague.

  • Czech Statistical Office, various years-d. Livestock survey. Czech Statistical Office, Prague.

  • Czech Statistical Office, various years-e. Material flows accounts, (selected indicators). Czech Statistical Office, Prague.

  • European Commission. (2016). EU resource efficiency scoreboard 2015. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2001). Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators: a methodological guide. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2016). Handbook for estimating raw material equivalents (RME) of imports and exports and RME based indicators for countries– based on Eurostat’s EU RME model. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2018). Sustainable development in the European Union: monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in en EU context. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giljum, S., Hak, T., Hinterberger, F., & Kovanda, J. (2005). Environmental governance in the European Union: strategies and instruments for absolute decoupling. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8, 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giljum, S., Bruckner, M., & Martinez, A. (2014). Material footprint assessment in a global input-output framework. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19, 792–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich, E. G., Van der Voet, E., Suh, S., Tukker, A., Huijbregts, M., Kazmierczyk, P., Lenzen, M., McNeely, J., & Moriguchi, Y. (2010). Assessing the environmental impacts of consumption and production: priority products and materials. Geneva: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency, various years. IEA country statistics. http://www.iea.org/statistics/statisticssearch/. Accessed May 2017. International Energy Agency, Paris.

  • Jolli, D., Giljum, S., 2004. Unused biomass extraction in agriculture, forestry and fishery. Report on the project “Modelling opportunities and limits for restructuring Europe towards sustainability (MOSUS)”. Unpublished.

  • Kovanda, J., & Hak, T. (2008). Changes in materials use in transition economies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12, 721–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovanda, J., & Weinzettel, J. (2013). The importance of raw material equivalents in economy-wide material flow accounting and its policy dimension. Environmental Science & Policy, 29, 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovanda, J., Hak, T., & Janacek, J. (2008). Economy-wide material flow indicators in the Czech Republic: trends, decoupling analysis and uncertainties. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 35, 25–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kovanda, J., Weinzettel, J., & Hak, T. (2010). Material flow indicators in the Czech Republic in light of the accession to the European Union. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14, 650–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovanda, J., Weinzettel, J., & Schoer, K. (2018). What makes the difference in raw material equivalents calculation through environmentally extended input-output analysis? Ecological Economics, 2018, 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausman, F., Lauk, C., Haas, V., & Wiedenhofer, D. (2018). From resource extraction to outflows of wastes and emissions: the socioeconomic metabolism of the global economy, 1900–2015. Global Environmental Change, 2018, 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann, F., Gingrich, S., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K. H., Haberl, H., & Fischer-Kowalski, M. (2009). Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century. Ecological Economics, 68, 2696–2705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutter, S., Giljum, S., & Bruckner, M. (2016). A review and comparative assessment of existing approaches to calculate material footprints. Ecological Economics, 127, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, E. (2000). The weight of nations: material outflows from industrial economies. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of the Environment. (2001). Report on the environment in the Czech Republic in 2000. Prague: Ministry of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of the Environment. (2018). Statistical environmental yearbook of the Czech Republic. Prague: Ministry of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mostert, C., & Bringezu, S. (2019). Measuring product material footprint as new life cycle impact assessment method: indicators and abiotic characterization factors. Resources, 8, 61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudgal, S., Tan, A., Lockwood, S., Eisenmenger, N., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Giljum, S., & Bruckner, M. (2012). Assessment of resource efficiency indicators and targets. Final report prepared for the European Commission. Luxembourg: DG Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Measuring material flows and resource productivity. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., et al. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffartzik, A., Eisenmenger, N., Krausmann, F., & Weisz, H. (2014). Consumption-based material flow accounting austrian trade and consumption in raw material equivalents 1995-2007. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18, 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoer, K., Weinzettel, J., Kovanda, J., Giegrich, J., & Lauwigi, C. (2012). Raw material consumption of the European Union - concept, calculation method, and results. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 8903–8909.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, H., & Bringezu, S. (2008). Final report: resource consumption of Germany - indicators and definitions. Dessau: Federal Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, 2019a. The Sustainable Development Goals report. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2018. Accessed March 2019. United Nations, New York.

  • United Nations, 2019b. Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed March 2019. United Nations, New York.

  • Van der Voet, E., van Oers, L., & Nikolic, I. (2004). Dematerialization: not just a matter of weight. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8, 121–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vienna University of Economics and Business 2016. Factors for unused domestic extraction. Unpublished. Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna.

  • Weinzettel, J., & Kovanda, J. (2009). Assessing socioeconomic metabolism through hybrid life cycle assessment: the case of the Czech Republic. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13, 607–621.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, H., 2006. Accounting for raw material equivalents of traded goods: a comparison of input–output approaches in physical, monetary, and mixed units. Social ecology working paper. Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies of Austrian Universities (IFF), Vienna.

  • Weizsäcker, E.U., Hargroves, K., Smith, M.H., Desha, C., Stasinopoulos, P., 2009. Factor five. Transforming the global economy through 80% improvements in resource productivity: a report to the Club of Rome. Earthscan/The Natural Edge Project, London; Sterling, VA.

  • Wiedmann, T. O., Schandl, H., Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Suh, S., West, J., & Kanemoto, K. (2015). The material footprint of nations. P Natl Acad Sci USA, 112, 6271–6276.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wuppertal Institute for Climate Environment and Energy, 2019. Material intensity factors. https://wupperinst.org/fa/redaktion/downloads/misc/MIT_2014.pdf. Accessed March 2019. Wuppertal Institute for Climate Environment and Energy, Wuppertal.

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Czech Science Foundation [Grant No. 19-01280S “Material system analysis of the Czech Republic: A tool for increasing analytical potential of the economy-wide material flow analysis”]. This support is gratefully appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Charles University Environment Centre, J. Martiho 2/407, 162 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic

    Jan Kovanda

Authors
  1. Jan Kovanda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Kovanda.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kovanda, J. Raw material consumption or total material consumption? Which indicator is better for evaluating material resource consumption and environmental pressure?. Environ Monit Assess 192, 362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08343-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08343-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation