Abstract
Traditional slice methods for slope stability analysis must introduce some assumptions regarding the inter-slice forces and hence lack a rigorous theoretical basis. In this study, a new block method for slope stability analysis is proposed based on Pan’s maximum principle. In this method, the slope is cut into a block system, and the search for the maximum factor of safety is accomplished by a nonlinear mathematical programming method. During the searching process, the magnitude, direction and action point of the inter-block forces are taken as a variable system. The static equilibrium and yield criterion that satisfy the requirement of the statically admissible field of Pan’s maximum principle are used as constraints, and the maximum factor of safety is regarded as the optimization objective. Therefore, the problem of slope stability analysis is transformed into an optimization problem. This method does not introduce any other assumptions except for block rigidity. This approach can compensate for not only the lack of theoretical rigour in the traditional limit equilibrium theory but also the low computing efficiency and the optimization difficulty of the limit analysis finite element method. In this new method, a block system is used to simulate the structural characteristics of a toppling slope and the transfer of the toppling load and moment through the balance of the force and moment. The proposed block method is verified by one case with an analytical solution and two ACDAS test questions; additionally, the proposed method offers a satisfactory result for complex engineering slopes. In addition, both slope sliding and toppling failure can be analysed, and the results determined with the proposed method are close to those determined with the Goodman-Bray method. Because the computing precision of this method is comparable with the limit analysis finite element and its computation cost is as low as that of the limit equilibrium method (LEM), this method demonstrates robust slope stability analysis and has great potential in engineering practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bishop AW (1955) The use of the slip circle in stability analysis of slope. Geotechnique 5:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1955.5.1.7
Chen WF (1975) Limit analysis and soil plasticity. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, New York
Chen Z (1998) On Pan’s principles of soil and rock stability analysis. J Tsinghua Univ Sci Technol 38:1–4
Chen Z, Wang J, Wang Y, Yin J-H, Haberfield C (2001) A three-dimensional slope stability analysis method using the upper bound theorem part II: numerical approaches, applications and extensions. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:379–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00013-2
Chen J, Yin J-H, Lee CF (2003) Upper bound limit analysis of slope stability using rigid finite elements and nonlinear programming. Can Geotech J 40:742–752. https://doi.org/10.1139/t03-032
Da Silva MV, Antão AN (2007) A non-linear programming method approach for upper bound limit analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72:1192–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2061
Donald IB, Giam P (1992) The ACADS slope stability programs review. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on landslides. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1665–1670
Goodman RE (1976) Methods of geological engineering in discontinuous rocks. West Publishing Co., St. Paul
Goodman RE, Bray JW (1976) Toppling of rock slopes. In: Proceedings of the specialty conference on rock engineering for foundations and slopes. ASCE, Boulder, pp 201–234
Hoek E, Bray JW (1977) Rock slope engineering. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, London
Janbu N (1954) Application of composite slip surface for stability analysis. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Stability of Earth Slopes, Stockholm, pp 43–49
Kim J, Salgado R, Yu HS (1999) Limit analysis of soil slopes subjected to pore-water pressures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125:49–58. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:1(49)
Krabbenhoft K, Damkilde L (2003) A general non-linear optimization algorithm for lower bound limit analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 56:165–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.551
Le Canh V, Nguyen-Xuan H, Nguyen-Dang H (2010) Upper and lower bound limit analysis of plates using FEM and second-order cone programming. Comput Struct 88:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.08.011
Liu F, Zhao J (2013) Upper bound limit analysis using radial point interpolation meshless method and nonlinear programming. Int J Mech Sci 70:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.017
Lyamin AV, Sloan SW (2002a) Lower bound limit analysis using non-linear programming. Int J Numer Methods Eng 55:573–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.511
Lyamin AV, Sloan SW (2002b) Upper bound limit analysis using linear finite elements and nonlinear programming. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 26:181–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.198
Makrodimopoulos A, Martin CM (2007) Upper bound limit analysis using simplex strain elements and second-order cone programming. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 31:835–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.567
Morgenstern NR, Price VE (1965) The analysis of the stability of general slip surfaces. Geotechnique 15:79–93. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1965.15.1.79
Pan J (1980a) Analysis of stability and landslide for structures. China Water Power Press, Beijing
Pan J (1980b) Analysis of stability and landslide for structures. China Water Power Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Sarma KS (1979) Stability analysis of embankments and slopes. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 105:1511–1524
Sloan SW (1988) Lower bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 12:61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610120105
Sloan SW (1989) Upper bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 13:263–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610130304
Sloan SW, Kleeman PW (1995) Upper bound limit analysis using discontinuous velocity fields. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 127:293–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(95)00868-1
Spencer E (1967) A method of analysis of the stability of embankments assuming parallel inter-slice forces. Geotechnique 17:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1967.17.1.11
Sutcliffe DJ, Yu HS, Page AW (2001) Lower bound limit analysis of unreinforced masonry shear walls. Comput Struct 79:1295–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00024-4
Wang X-T, Wang X-G (2004) Lower bound limit analysis of slope stability using finite element method. Rock Soil Mech 25:134–138
Yin J, Chen J, Lee CF (2004) Upper limit analysis of stability of rock and soil slopes using rigid finite elements. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23:898–905
Yu S, Zhang X, Sloan SW (2016) A 3D upper bound limit analysis using radial point interpolation meshless method and second-order cone programming. Int J Numer Methods Eng 108:1686–1704. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5273
Yuan S, Du J (2018) Effective stress-based upper bound limit analysis of unsaturated soils using the weak form quadrature element method. Comput Geotech 98:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.02.008
Zhou J, Chen Q, Wang J (2017) Rigid block based lower bound limit analysis method for stability analysis of fractured rock mass considering rock bridge effects. Comput Geotech 86:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.01.016
Funding
This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFC0407000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51809289) and the IWHR Research & Development Support Program (Nos. GE0145B462017 and GE0145B692017).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Methodology, formal analysis and investigation: [Xiao Gang WANG]; formal analysis and investigation, writing—original draft preparation: [Xing Chao LIN]; writing—review and editing: [Ping Sun], [Xu LI], [Yu Jie WANG] and [Yong Yu LING].
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 24 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, X.G., Lin, X.C., Sun, P. et al. 2D slope stability analysis based on Pan’s maximum principle. Bull Eng Geol Environ 79, 4093–4105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01840-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-020-01840-9