Research article
Effects of habitat fragmentation on frugivorous birds and on seed removal from Pistacia lentiscus in two contrasting fruiting seasons

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2020.125541Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Greater abundance of seed dispersers in connected forest fragments in the mast season.

  • Increased isolation had negative effects on the abundance of medium-sized birds.

  • Seed removal rates were similar between landscape configurations and in different fruiting seasons.

  • Seed rain destination was consistent between seasons and landscape configurations.

Abstract

Successful animal seed dispersal is the result of the interaction between frugivore behavior and the distribution of food resources, which can vary over space and time. We evaluated the interaction between avian frugivores and the masting shrub Pistacia lentiscus in both connected and isolated forest fragments along the Guadalquivir valley (south Iberian Peninsula) in two contrasting fruiting seasons (mast and non-mast). We compared the abundance and composition of avian dispersers and seed predators, recorded fruit removal rates by dispersers and predators, and investigated potential changes in the arrival of seeds to forest fragments. Our results showed that there was a greater abundance of dispersers in connected than in isolated fragments in the mast season (i.e. high fruit availability) but the opposite pattern in the non-mast season (i.e. low fruit availability). The effects of habitat fragmentation were more noticeable on medium-sized than small bird dispersers. Medium-sized birds were more abundant in isolated forest fragments but their abundance was highly dependent on the season, while small bird dispersers were apparently unaffected by fragmentation. Seed removal rates were higher in isolated than in connected fragments in the mast season but not in the non-mast season; predation rates were negligible in both seasons. Seed arrival was consistent between seasons and microhabitat where the dispersed seeds were deposited, most seeds being dispersed under the canopy of female Pistacia plants. We highlight the influence of the interplay between seasonality and landscape configuration on patterns of frugivore-mediated seed dispersal. Thus, despite its direct link to plant–frugivore interaction, the effects of habitat fragmentation on frugivores and plants were decoupled in our study system. These decoupled responses seemed to be chiefly due to the high feeding dependence of dispersers on P. lentiscus fruits.

Introduction

Seed dispersal is a key step in the life cycle of plants as it provides an independent dispersal phase for a new and genetically distinctive individual that can potentially colonize and establish itself in novel environments (Jordano, 2017). Consequently, seed dispersal is a determinant factor in the structure and dynamics of plant populations and communities (Janzen, 1970). In animal seed-dispersed plants, frugivores either regurgitate or defecate undamaged seeds away from parent plants (Jordano, 2000). The probability of seed removal and the patterns of seed dispersal are thus strongly influenced by spatial environmental factors affecting frugivore abundance and behavior such as food availability, the heterogeneity of microhabitat in terms of shelter and breeding sites, and the functional connectivity between habitats (Corrêa Côrtes and Uriarte, 2012). However, current changes in landscape configuration due to human activities leading to forest loss and fragmentation may alter the abundance of both fruiting plants and frugivores (Stiles, 1980; Restrepo and Gomez, 1998; Restrepo et al., 1999).

Habitat loss and fragmentation change the original spatial structure of the landscape by reducing the size and connectivity of remaining habitat fragments, which will probably affect the mutualistic interactions of animal seed dispersal (Emer et al., 2018). One key aspect to consider when assessing the effects of fragmentation on plant–animal seed dispersal is the relative mobility of the seed disperser. For example, habitat fragmentation can alter the distribution of certain frugivorous species with low mobility that are restricted to specific environments, while other frugivores with greater mobility may be capable of using a non-forested matrix and thus be able to increase their abundance in moderately marginalized fragmented habitats (Farwig et al., 2006). Furthermore, habitat fragmentation may change the composition of the disperser guild by reducing the abundance of large-bodied avian dispersers, thereby decreasing the probability that long-distance dispersal events from small habitat fragments will take place (Uriarte et al., 2011). Generally, large frugivores will have stricter feeding and habitat requirements than smaller ones, which are able to live in small and low-quality forest fragments (Uriarte et al., 2011).

However, not all frugivorous birds establish mutualistic interactions and disperse seeds. Some species act as antagonists since they eat the seeds (e.g. granivorous birds) and kill the embryo, thereby reducing female plant fitness (Verdú and García-Fayos, 2001). Habitat fragmentation may also affect seed removal by modifying the behavior of animal dispersers (Herrera, 1995), thereby altering the balance between mutualistic and antagonistic interactions (Jules and Rathcke, 1999; Herrera et al., 2011). A shift toward more antagonistic interactions (e.g. seed predation) and less seed removal will harm forest regeneration dynamics (Neuschulz et al., 2016). At the end of the fruiting period the plant will have interacted with both dispersers and predators and the relative balance between them will determine the net amount of seed dispersal. In the long term, habitat fragmentation may change the regenerative potential of plant species by affecting the recruitment and regeneration of plant populations (García et al., 2012; Rey and Alcántara, 2013).

Additionally, seed dispersal mediated by animal vectors is strongly influenced by seasonal variation in fruit production. This is the case of masting behavior (i.e. the annual variation in fruit production) in certain plant species that represent key fruit resources for frugivorous birds. Similarly, masting can reduce seed predation by satiating predators through an abundance of available fruit and, consequently, may improve plant fitness (Mezquida and Olano, 2013). Masting can affect the presence and abundance of frugivorous birds in forests and therefore plant–frugivore interactions (Jordano, 1985). Movements by frugivorous animals may in fact reflect the underlying seasonal variability in the availability of fruit resources rather than the nature of the habitat cover itself (Lehouck et al., 2009; Herrera and García, 2010; Herrera et al., 2011). Despite the importance of seasonal variation imposed by masting, to date only a few studies spanning a temporal window of more than a single season have ever been published (e.g. Jordano, 1987; Alcántara et al., 1997; Herrera and García, 2009; Herrera et al., 2011).

Seed removal by animals is also affected by spatial variation in microhabitat heterogeneity. This process frequently exhibits non-random patterns biased toward certain microhabitats within the landscape (Schupp et al., 2002). Consequently, frugivores may disperse seeds unevenly by occupying preferred microhabitats, which will create contagious spatial distributions of dispersed seeds (Schupp et al., 2002). Ultimately, a nucleation process of this nature affects seed survival and seedling establishment, as well, subsequently, as the structure and dynamics of plant populations and communities (Howe and Smallwood, 1982; Wang and Smith, 2002; Nathan, 2006; Clark et al., 2007; González-Castro et al., 2015).

In this study, we evaluated the effects of habitat fragmentation on the seed dispersers and seed predators of the Mediterranean masting species Pistacia lentiscus L. (Anacardiaceae) in two contrasting fruiting seasons (high and low production). More specifically, we (i) compared the abundance and composition of the avian frugivores, (ii) recorded fruit-removal rates by fruit dispersers and predators, and (iii) investigated potential changes in the final destination of seeds. We expected to find greater frugivore richness and abundance in connected than in physically isolated forest fragments. In addition, we expected small-sized frugivorous bird species to dominate in the frugivore guild in connected forest fragments, but that medium-sized birds would occur in both isolated and connected forest fragments (Uriarte et al., 2011). Furthermore, since P. lentiscus is a masting species, we hypothesized that there would be greater dispersal and predation rates during a high fruit production season (the mast season, hereafter), and that interactions would be similar in both connected and isolated forest fragments during the mast season. Finally, because frugivorous birds visit female plants for longer and regurgitate or defecate the seeds in the same place as they ingest them, we expected higher levels of seed dispersal under female Pistacia plants than in other microhabitat types (Verdú and García-Fayos, 2002; González-Varo et al., 2018).

Section snippets

Study species

Pistacia lentiscus is a common evergreen sclerophyllous shrub of up to 3–5 m in height, widely distributed throughout the Mediterranean region. It is dioecious and wind-pollinated; its fruit consist of one-seeded drupes that ripen in September–March (Verdú and García-Fayos, 1998). Fruit ripening is associated with a change of color from white to red and then to black. Black fruits are most likely to bear a viable seed, while red and white fruits are either deceptive fruits of parthenocarpic

Results

As expected, initial fruit availability differed between seasons (Tables 1 and S2, Fig. 2a). During the mast season P. lentiscus yielded a large crop and was basically the only species with fleshy fruit in the study fragments. The estimated mean (± SD) fruit production of P. lentiscus plants during the mast season was 62,150 fruit per individual (51,650 and 72,650 in connected and isolated fragments, respectively). By contrast, during the non-mast season fruit production dropped dramatically to

Discussion

In this study we found a greater abundance of seed dispersers in connected than in isolated forest fragments during the mast season but the opposite pattern in the non-mast season. However, small seed dispersers, which are responsible for most dispersal events, showed no differences in abundance. We detected a higher abundance of seed predators in isolated fragments and thus we would have expected to find lower rates of seed removal by legitimate seed dispersers in isolated fragmented forests

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the local landowners for permission to work at the study sites, Lorena Ashworth, Ana Calviño and Pedro Jordano for valuable comments, Encarnación Rubio-Perez for field and laboratory assistance, and Michael Lockwood for the linguistic correction. This study was supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CGL2011- 23721). CPF is supported by a predoctoral fellowship from Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (BES-2012-055103), research

References (61)

  • J.S. Clark et al.

    Resolving the biodiversity paradox

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2007)
  • M.C. Corrêa Côrtes et al.

    Integrating frugivory and animal movement: a review of the evidence and implications for scaling seed dispersal

    Biol. Rev.

    (2012)
  • C. Emer et al.

    Seed-dispersal interactions in fragmented landscapes - a metanetwork approach

    Ecol. Lett.

    (2018)
  • N. Farwig et al.

    Enhanced seed dispersal of Prunus africana in fragmented and disturbed forests?

    Oecologia

    (2006)
  • N. Farwig et al.

    Trait-associated loss of frugivores in fragmented forest does not affect seed removal rates

    J. Ecol.

    (2017)
  • D. García et al.

    Functional heterogeneity in a plant–frugivore assemblage enhances seed dispersal resilience to habitat loss

    Ecography

    (2012)
  • A. González-Castro et al.

    Comparing seed dispersal effectiveness by frugivores at the community level

    Ecology

    (2015)
  • J.P. González-Varo

    Fragmentation, habitat composition and the dispersal/predation balance in interactions between the Mediterranean myrtle and avian frugivores

    Ecography

    (2010)
  • J.P. González-Varo et al.

    Mating patterns and spatial distribution of conspecific neighbours in the Mediterranean shrub Myrtus communis (Myrtaceae)

    Pl. Ecol.

    (2008)
  • J.P. González-Varo et al.

    Who dispersed the seeds? The use of DNA barcoding in frugivory and seed dispersal studies

    Methods Ecol. Evol.

    (2014)
  • J.P. González-Varo et al.

    The timing of frugivore-mediated seed dispersal effectiveness

    Mol. Ecol.

    (2018)
  • C.M. Herrera

    A study of avian frugivores, bird-dispersed plants, and their interaction in Mediterranean scrublands

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (1984)
  • C.M. Herrera

    Determinants of plant–animal coevolution: the case of mutualistic dispersal of seeds by vertebrates

    Oikos

    (1985)
  • C.M. Herrera

    Plant-vertebrate seed dispersal systems in the Mediterranean: ecological, evolutionary, and historical determinants

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.

    (1995)
  • J.M. Herrera et al.

    Effects of forest fragmentation on seed dispersal and seedling establishment in ornithochorous trees

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2010)
  • C.M. Herrera et al.

    Annual variability in seed production by woody plants and the masting concept

    Am. Nat.

    (1998)
  • J.M. Herrera et al.

    Differential effects of fruit availability and habitat cover for frugivore-mediated seed dispersal in a heterogeneous landscape

    J. Ecol.

    (2011)
  • H.F. Howe et al.

    Ecology of seed dispersal

    Annu. Rev. Ecol. Sys.

    (1982)
  • D. Janzen

    Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests

    Am. Nat.

    (1970)
  • P. Jordano

    El ciclo anual de los paseriformes frugívoros en el matorral mediterráneo del sur de España: importancia de su invernada y variaciones interanuales

    Ardeola

    (1985)
  • Cited by (4)

    1

    Current address: Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development (MED), University of Évora, Casa Cordovil 7000–651, Évora, Portugal.

    View full text