Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quartzite–Schist Sequences of the Aktau–Mointy Massif (Central Kazakhstan): Structural Position, Provenance, and Formation Stages of the Earth Crust in the Precambrian

  • Published:
Geotectonics Aims and scope

Abstract—

Detrital zircons from quartzite–schist sequences of the Aktau–Mointy Massif (Central Kazakhstan), which occur in various structural positions relative to the Early Neoproterozoic felsic volcanics, were studied. The obtained U–Pb zircon dating results suggest similarity of detrital zircon age populations with a lower limiting depositional age of 1220 Ma in all quartzite–schist sequences. The different positions of quartzite–schist sequences relative to the felsic volcanics are due to subsequent deformations. The ages of detrital zircons studied fall mostly within the intervals of 1149–2105 and 2354–3159 Ma with major peaks at 1218, 1338, 1468, 1581, 1628, 1743, 1851, and 2520 Ma and minor peaks at 2016, 2619, 2696, 2791, 2823, and 3114 Ma. The structural features of quartzite–schist sequences and the presence of heavy minerals that are unstable during long-term transport indicate the predominance of local source areas, which either form the buried part of the basement of the Aktau–Mointy Massif or have been eroded completely. Within the Aktau–Mointy Massif, it enables us to use the U–Pb ages and Lu–Hf isotope compositions of detrital zircons from quartzite–schist sequences to reconstruct the history of Precambrian continental crust formation. Results suggest that the production of juvenile continental crust prevailed only during Middle Mesoproterozoic, while formation during the Mesoarchean–Neoproterozoic time accompanied magmatic reworking of the older crustal complexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. V. Avdeev, “The age of porphyroids from the Atasu–Mointy watershed,” in Stratigraphy of the Lower Paleozoic and Silurian Deposits of Central Kazakhstan, Ed. by L. I. Borovikov (Nedra, Leningrad, 1965), pp. 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Avdeev, K. A. Azbel’, and M. R. Borukaeva, “The key marker of the Late Precambrian of Kazakhstan and North Kyrgyzstan,” in Precambrian in Phanerozoic Fold Zones, Ed. by V. M. Shemyakin (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 1992), pp. 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. V. Avdeev, E. V. Al’perovich, V. D. Voznesenskii, and B. G. Koren’kov, “Precambrian deposits of the Akt-au–Mointy watershed,” in Pre-Paleozoic and Paleozoic of Kazakhstan, Ed. by A. A. Abdulin (Nauka, Alma-Ata, 1974), Vol. 1, pp. 53–57.

  4. N. I. Gvozdik, “Some results of lithologic study of Proterozoic shale-quartzite sequences of the Aktau–Mointy anticlinorium,” in Geological Problems of Central Kazakhstan, Ed. by Yu. A. Zaitsev (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1980), Vol. 1, pp. 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. I. Gvozdik, “Upper Proterozoic quartzite strata of the Aktau–Mointy watershed,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Ser. 4: Geol., No. 3, 18–22 (1978).

  6. Geology of Northern Kazakhstan: Stratigraphy (Nauka, Alma-Ata, 1987) [in Russian].

  7. K. E. Degtyarev, V. P. Kovach, A. A. Tret’yakov, A. B. Kotov, and Kuo-Lun Wang, “Age and sources of Precambrian zircon–rutile deposits in the Kokchetav sialic massif (northern Kazakhstan),” Dokl. Earth Sci. 464, 1005–1009 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. E. Degtyarev, “Position of the Aqtau–Dzungar microcontinent in the structural framework of the Paleozoides of Central Kazakhstan,” Geotectonics 37, 271–288 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. E. Degtyarev, A. A. Tret’yakov, A. V. Ryazantsev, A. B. Kotov, E. B. Sal’nikova, P. A. Aleksandrov, and I. V. Anisimova, “Stenian granitoids of the west Kyrgyz Ridge (North Tien Shan): Position, structure, and age determination,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 441, 1484–1488 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. E. Degtyarev, K. N. Shatagin, A. B. Kotov, E.  B. Sal’nikova, M. V. Luchitskaya, A. A. Tret’yakov, and S. Z. Yakovlev, “Late Precambrian volcanoplutonic association of the Aktau-Dzhungar massif, Central Kazakhstan: Structural position and age,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 421, 879–883 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. K. E. Degtyarev, K. N. Shatagin, N. B. Kuznetsov, and O. V. Astrakhantsev, “The platform stage in the Precambrian history of Kazakhstan: Paleotectonic, paleogeographic, and geochronological aspects,” in Paleogeography of the Late Precambrian–Early Paleozoic of North Eurasia, Ed. by V. A. Koroteev and A. V. Maslov, (Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Yekaterinburg, 1998), pp. 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu. A. Zaitsev, “Distinguishing Middle Riphean Issedonian orogeny in Kazakhstan,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Ser. 4: Geol., No. 3, 32–52 (1974).

  13. Yu. A. Zaitsev, S. B. Rozanov, and L. I. Filatova, “Geology of Precambrian metamorphic sequences of the Aktau–Mointy anticlinorium,” in Geological Problems of Central Kazakhstan, Ed. by Yu. A. Zaitsev (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1980), Vol. 1, pp. 22–40.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu. A. Zaitsev and T. N. Kheraskova, Vendian of Central Kazakhstan, Vol. 14 of Mater. Geol. Tsentr. Kaz. (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1979) [in Russian].

  15. V. P. Kovach, A. V. Ryazantsev, A. A. Tret’yakov, K. E. Degtyarev, E. V. Tolmacheva, Kuo-Lun Wang, A. B. Kotov, Sun-Lin Chun, and Bor-Min Jahn, “U‒Pb age of detrital zircons from neoproterozoic placers of the Erementau-Niyaz massif as a reflection of stages of Precambrian tectono-magmatic evolution of northern Kazakhstan,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 455, 254–258 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A. B. Kotov, V. P. Kovach, E. B. Salnikova, V. A. Glebovitskii, S. Z. Yakovleva, N. G. Berezhnaya, and T. A. Myskova, “Continental crust age and formation stages in the Central Aldan granulite-gneiss terrain: U‒Pb and Sm–Nd isotopic data for granitoids,” Petrology 3, 87–97 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Lydka and L. I. Filatova, “Main lithostratigraphic features of the Kokchetav Series (Proterozoic of the Kokchetav massif),” Litol. Polezn. Iskop., No. 4, 130–136 (1982).

  18. E. M. Spiridonov, “Middle and Upper Riphean sequences of North Kazakhstan,” Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol. 62 (2), 71–77 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. A. Tret’yakov, K. E. Degtyarev, E. B. Sal’nikova, K.  N. Shatagin, A. B. Kotov, A. V. Ryazantsev, A. V. Pilitsyna, S. Z. Yakovleva, E. V. Tolmacheva, and Yu. V. Plotkina, “Paleoproterozoic anorogenic granitoids of the Zheltav sialic massif (Southern Kazakhstan): Structural position and geochronology,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 466, 14–19 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A. A. Tret’yakov, K. E. Degtyarev, K. N. Shatagin, A. B. Kotov, E. B. Sal’nikova, and and I. V. Anisimova, “Neoproterozic anorogenic rhyolite-granite volcanoplutonic association of the Aktau-Mointy sialic massif (Central Kazakhstan): Age, source, and paleotectonic position,” Petrology 23, 22–44 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. A. Tretyakov, A. B. Kotov, K. E. Degtyarev, E. B. Sal’nikova, K. N. Shatagin, S. Z. Yakovleva, and I. V. Anisimova, “The Middle Riphean volcanogenic complex of Kokchetav massif (Northern Kazakhstan): Structural position and age substantiation,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 438, 739–743 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. A. Tret’yakov, K. E. Degtyarev, A. B. Kotov, E.  B.  Sal’nikova, K. N. Shatagin, S. Z. Yakovleva, I. V. Anisimova, and Yu. V. Plotkina, “Middle Riphean gneiss granites of the Kokchetav Massif (Northern Kazakhstan): Structural position and age substantiation,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 440, 1367–1371 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. O. M. Turkina, F. A. Letnikov, and A. V. Levin, “Mesoproterozoic granitoids of the Kokchetav microcontinent basement,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 436, 176–180 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. L. I. Filatova, “Upper Precambrian stratigraphy of the southeastern Central Kazakhstan,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ. Ser. 4: Geol., No. 1, 3–16 (1990).

  25. L. I. Filatova, Stratigraphy and Historical-Geological Analysis of Precambrian Metamorphic Sequences of Central Kazakhstan (Nedra, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. I. Filatova, N. I. Gvozdik, and G. M. Zubatkina, “Proterozoic stratigraphy of Central Kazakhstan,” in Geology and Mineral Resources of Central Kazakhstan, Ed. by E. E. Milanovskii (Nauka, Moscow, 1988), pp. 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. I. Filatova, G. M. Zubatkina, and Yu. B. Stepanov, “Stratigraphy of the Upper Proterozoic–Lower Cambrian sequences in the southeastern Central Kazakhstan,” in Stratigraphy, Lithology, Geochemistry, and Ore-Bearing Potential of the Upper Riphean–Vendian of Central Asia, Kazakhstan, and Siberia, Ed. by A. B. Bakirov and R. A. Maksumova (Ilim, Bishkek, 1992), pp. 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chu–Ili Ore Belt: Geology of the Chu–Ili Region, Ed. by A. A. Abdulin (Nauka, Alma-Ata, 1980) [in Russian].

  29. J. Blichert-Toft and F. Albaride, “The Lu–Hf isotope geochemistry of chondrites and the evolution of the mantle–crust system,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 148, 243–258 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. H.-Y. Chiu, S.-L. Chung, F.-Y. Wu, D. Liu, Y.-H. Liang, I.-J. Lin, Y. Iizuka, L.-W. Xie, Y. Wang, and M.-F. Chu, “Zircon U–Pb and Hf isotopic constraints from eastern Transhimalayan batholiths on the precollisional magmatic and tectonic evolution in southern Tibet,” Tectonophysics 477, 3–19 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. K. Degtyarev, A. Yakubchuk, A. Tretyakov, A. Kotov, and V. Kovach, “Precambrian geology of the Kazakh Uplands and Tien Shan: An overview,” Gondwana Res. 47, 44–75 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. G. E. Gehrels, “Detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology: Current methods and new opportunities,” in Tectonics of Sedimentary Basins: Recent Advances, Ed. by C. Busby and A. Azor (Chichester, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), pp. 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. Glorie, F. I. Zhimulev, M. M. Buslov, T. Andersen, D. Plavsa, A. Izmer, F. Vanhaecke, and J. De Grave, “Formation of the Kokchetav subduction-collision zone (Northern Kazakhstan): Insights from zircon U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotope systematics,” Gondwana Res. 27, 424–438 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. W. L. Griffin, X. Wang., S. E. Jackson, N. J. Pearson, S. Y. O’Reilly, X. Xu, and X. Zhou, “Zircon chemistry and magma mixing, SE China: In-situ analysis of Hf isotopes, Tonglu and Pingtan igneous complexes,” Lithos 61, 237–269 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J. W. He, W. B. Zhu, R. F. Ge, B. H. Zheng, and H. L. Wu, “Detrital zircon U–Pb ages and Hf isotopes of Neoproterozoic strata in the Aksu area, northwestern Tarim Craton: Implications for supercontinent reconstruction and crustal evolution,” Precambrian Res. 254, 194–209 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Z. Y. He, R. Klemd, Z. M. Zhang, K. Q. Zong, L.  X.  Sun, Z. L. Tian, and B. T. Huang, “Mesoproterozoic continental arc magmatism and crustal growth in the eastern Central Tianshan Arc Terrane of the southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt: Geochronological and geochemical evidence,” Lithos 236–237, 74–89 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. P. W. O. Hoskin and U. Schaltegger, “The composition of zircon and igneous and metamorphic petrogenesis,” Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 53, 27–62 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S. E. Jackson, N. J. Pearson, W. L. Griffin, and E.  A. Belousova, “The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U-Pb zircon geochronology,” Chem. Geol. 211, 47–69 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. A. K. Khudoley, R. H. Rainbird, R. A. Stern, A.  P.   Kropachev, L. M. Heaman, A. M. Zanin, and V.  N. Podkovyrov, V. N. Belova, and V. I. Sukhorukov, “Sedimentary evolution of the Riphean–Vendian basin of southeastern Siberia,” Precambrian Res. 111, 129–163 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. V. Kovach, K. Degtyarev, A. Tretyakov, A. Kotov, E.  Tolmacheva, K.-L. Wang, S.-L. Chung, H.-Y. Lee, B.-M. Jahn, “Sources and provenance of the Neoproterozoic placer deposits of the northern Kazakhstan: Implication for continental growth of the western Central Asian Orogenic Belt,” Gondwana Res. 47, 28–43 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. A. Kröner, D. V. Alexeiev, V. P. Kovach, Y. Rojas-Agramonte, A. A. Tretyakov, A. V. Mikolaichuk, H. Xie., and E. R. Sobel, “Zircon ages, geochemistry and Nd isotopic systematics for the Palaeoproterozoic 2.3 to 1.8 Ga Kuilyu complex, East Kyrgyzstan – The oldest continental basement fragment in the Tianshan orogenic belt,” J. Asian Earth Sci. 135, 122–135 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. A. Kröner, D. V. Alexeiev, Y. Rojas-Agramonte, E. Hegner, J. Wong, X. Xia, E. Belousova, A. V. Mikolaichuk, R. Seltmann, D. Liu, and V. V. Kiselev, “Mesoproterozoic (Grenville-age) terranes in the Kyrgyz North Tianshan: Zircon ages and Nd-Hf isotopic constraints on the origin and evolution of basement blocks in the southern Central Asian Orogen,” Gondwana Res. 23, 272–295 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. A. Kröner, B. F. Windley, G. Badarch, O. Tomurtogoo, E. Hegner, B. M. Jahn, S. Gruschka, E. V. Khain, A. Demoux, and M. T. D. Wingate, “Accretionary growth and crust formation in the Central Asia Orogenic Belt and comparison with the Arabian-Nubian shield,” in 4-D Framework of Continental Crust, Vol. 200. Geol. Soc. Am., Mem., Ed. by R. D. Hatcher, Jr., M.  P. Carlson, J. H. McBride, and J. R. Martínez Catalán (2007), pp. 1–29.

  44. S. Liu, Z. Guo, Z. Zhang, Q. Li, and H. Zheng, “Nature of the Precambrian metamorphic blocks in the eastern segment of Central Tianshan: Constraint from geochronology and Nd isotopic geochemistry,” Sci. China. Ser. D: Earth Sci. 47, 1085–1094 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. K. R. Ludwig, Isoplot V. 4.15. Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel, No. 4 of Berkeley Geochron. Center, Spec. Publ. (2008).

  46. A. C. Morton, “Heavy minerals in provenance studies,” in Provenance of Arenites, Vol. 148 of NATO ASI Ser., Ser. C, Ed. by G. G. Zuffa (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985), pp. 249–277.

  47. U. Söderlund, P. J. Patchett, J. D. Vervoort, and C. E. Isachsen, “The 176Lu decay constant determined by Lu–Hf and U–Pb isotope systematics of Precambrian mafic intrusions,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 219, 311–324 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. E. Van Achterbergh, C. G. Ryan, S. E. Jackson, and W. L. Griffin, “Data reduction software for LA-ICP-MS,” in Laser Ablaion ICP-MS in the Earth Sciences, Vol. 29 of Short Course Ser.–Mineral. Assoc. Can., Ed. by P. J. Sylvester (2001), pp. 239–243.

  49. Y. S. Wan, B. Song, D. Y. Liu, S. A. Wilde, J. S. Wu, Y. R. Shi, X. Y. Yin, and H. Y. Zhou, “SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology of Palaeoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks in the North China Craton: Evidence for a major Late Palaeoproterozoic tectonothermal event,” Precambrian Res. 149, 249–271 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Y. B. Wu and Y. F. Zheng, “Genesis of zircon and its constraints on interpretation of U–Pb age,” Chin. Sci. Bull. 49, 1554–1569 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Y. Yuan, K. Zong, Z. He, R. Klemd, Y. Liu, Z. Hu, J. Guo, and Z. Zhang, “Geochemical and geochronological evidence for a former early Neoproterozoic microcontinent in the South Beishan Orogenic Belt, southernmost Central Asian Orogenic Belt,” Precambrian Res. 266, 409–424 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 19-55-52 001 and 17-05-00357), and the analytical work by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 14-27-00058) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan (project no. 108-2923-M-001-005-MY3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119017, Moscow, Russia

    N. A. Kanygina, A. A. Tretyakov & K. E. Degtyarev

  2. Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034, St. Petersburg, Russia

    V. P. Kovach & J. V. Plotkina

  3. Institute of Earth Sciences, Academica Sinica, 115, Taipei, Taiwan

    K.-N. Pang, K.-L. Wang & H.-Y. Lee

Authors
  1. N. A. Kanygina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. A. Tretyakov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. E. Degtyarev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V. P. Kovach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. V. Plotkina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. K.-N. Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. K.-L. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. H.-Y. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. A. Kanygina.

Additional information

Reviewer: T.N. Kheraskova

Translated by E. Murashova

The article contains additional materials available for authorized users on doi: 10.1134/S0016852120020065.

Supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanygina, N.A., Tretyakov, A.A., Degtyarev, K.E. et al. Quartzite–Schist Sequences of the Aktau–Mointy Massif (Central Kazakhstan): Structural Position, Provenance, and Formation Stages of the Earth Crust in the Precambrian. Geotecton. 54, 212–228 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852120020065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852120020065

Keywords:

Search

Navigation