Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Effective Stochastic Approach for Optimal Energy Resource Management in Hybrid AC–DC Microgrids

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a new management framework for optimal operation of the hybrid AC–DC microgrids incorporating renewable energy sources and storages. Hybrid microgrid consists of two parts of AC and DC to supply the AC and DC loads, respectively. The power exchange capability of hybrid microgrids between the AC and DC parts makes it possible to reduce the total microgrid costs, effectively. To make it a realistic analysis, a stochastic method based on cloud theory is proposed to model the uncertainty effects of wind turbine power, photovoltaic power, load demand and market price sufficiently. The proposed framework makes use of a new optimization algorithm based on flower pollination mechanism to minimize the total network costs through the optimal dispatch of the units. Also, a three-stage modification method is proposed to improve the population diversity and avoid the premature convergence. The performance of the proposed method is examined on the IEEE test system through two different operation scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

He :

Hyper entropy

Iter :

Iteration number in algorithm

Ex :

Standard deviation

En :

Entropy

\(C_{{{\text{G}}i}}^{t}\) and \(C_{{{\text{s}}j}}^{t}\) :

Cost of the ith RES and jth storage device at hour t

\(C_{\text{Grid}}^{t}\) :

Price of utility at hour t

d :

Length of the control vector

f :

Cost objective function

N T :

Number of scheduling time intervals in the study (in this paper 24)

N s :

Number of storage devices

N g :

Number of power units

N Load :

Number of load levels

n :

Total number of energy generation sources in MG

\(p_{\text{Grid}}^{t}\) :

Active power bought/sold from/to the utility at time t

\(p_{{{\text{G}}i}}^{t}\) and \(p_{{{\text{s}}j}}^{t}\) :

Active power output of the ith generator and jth storage device at time t

\(P_{{{\text{Load}},k}}^{t}\) :

Load value in kth level of tth hour

\(P_{m}^{{{\text{Inj}},t}}\)/\(Q_{m}^{{{\text{Inj}},t}}\) :

Active and reactive power injection in bus m at time t

\(p_{{{\text{G}}i,\hbox{min} }}^{t}\) and \(p_{{{\text{G}}i,\hbox{max} }}^{t}\) :

Minimum and maximum active power production of ith RES at hour t

\(p_{{{\text{s}}j,{ \hbox{min} }}}^{t} \,{\text{and}}\,p_{{{\text{s}}j , {\text{max}}}}^{t}\) :

Minimum and maximum active power production of jth storage device at hour t

\(p_{{{\text{grid}},{ \hbox{min} }}}^{t} \,{\text{and}}\,p_{{{\text{grid}},{ \hbox{max} }}}^{t}\) :

Minimum and maximum active power production of the utility at hour t

Pcharge (Pdischarge):

Permitted rate of charge (discharge) through a definite period of time Δt

Pcharge,max (Pdischarge,max):

Maximum rate of charge (discharge) during definite period of time Δt

\(P_{i}^{{{\text{Line}},t}}\) :

Amount of active power flow in line i at time t

\(P_{i,\hbox{max} }^{\text{Line}}\) :

Allowed maximum power flow at line i

pro :

Switching probability parameter

Rest :

Scheduled spinning reserve at time t

r i :

Random number with uniform distribution between 0 and 1

\(S_{{{\text{G}}i}}^{\text{on}}\) and \(S_{{{\text{G}}i}}^{\text{off}}\) :

Start-up/shutdown costs for the ith RES unit

\(S_{{{\text{s}}j}}^{\text{on}}\) and \(S_{{{\text{s}}j}}^{\text{off}}\) :

Start-up/shutdown costs for the jth storage device

z t i :

Status of the ith unit at hour t

Z g :

ON/OFF status of RESs

V min /V max :

Minimum and maximum values of voltage

V/δ :

Voltage magnitude/phase

Wess,min (Wess,max):

Lower (upper) bounds on the battery energy storage

W tess :

Battery energy storage at time t

u :

Membership cloud of L

X :

Control variable (or solution vector in CSA)

X best :

Best solution in the algorithm

x i,j :

jth element of the ith control vector Xi

Y/θ :

Magnitude/phase of line admittance

Ψ :

Levy movement

M pop :

Mean value of the population

r k :

Random number in the range of [0,1]

ηcharge (ηdischarge):

Charge (discharge) efficiency of the battery

References

  • Avatefipour O, Nafisian A (2018) A novel electric load consumption prediction and feature selection model based on modified clonal selection algorithm. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 34(4):2261–2272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baziar A, Kavousi-Fard A (2013) Considering uncertainty in the optimal energy management of renewable micro-grids including storage devices. Renew Energy 59:158–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eghtedarpour N, Farjah E (2014) Power control and management in a hybrid AC/DC microgrid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 5(3):1494–1505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han X, Zhang H, Yu X, Wang L (2016) Economic evaluation of grid-connected micro-grid system with photovoltaic and energy storage under different investment and financing models. Appl Energy 184:103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu MC, Lu SY, Chen YH (2016) Stochastic programming and market equilibrium analysis of microgrids energy management systems. Energy 113:662–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamankesh H, Agelidis VG, Kavousi-Fard A (2016) Optimal scheduling of renewable micro-grids considering plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging demand. Energy 100:285–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamel RM, Nagasaka K (2015) Effect of load type on standalone micro grid fault performance. Appl Energy 160:532–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavousi-Fard A (2017) Modeling uncertainty in tidal current forecast using prediction interval-based SVR. IEEE Trans Geo Sci Remote Sens 99:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavousi-Fard A, Khodaei A (2016) Efficient integration of plug-in electric vehicles via reconfigurable microgrids. Energy 111:653–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavousi-Fard A, Abunasri A, Zare A, Hoseinzadeh R (2014) Impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles charging demand on the optimal energy management of renewable micro-grids. Energy 78:904–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavousi-Fard A, Abbasi A, Rostami MA, Khosravi A (2015a) Optimal distribution feeder reconfiguration for increasing the penetration of plug-in electric vehicles and minimizing network costs. Energy 93:1693–1703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavousi-Fard A, Niknam T, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2015b) Stochastic reconfiguration and optimal coordination of V2G plug-in electric vehicles considering correlated wind power generation. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 6(3):822–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavousi-Fard A, Niknam T, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M (2016) A novel stochastic framework based on cloud theory and θ-modified bat algorithm to solve the distribution feeder reconfiguration. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 7:120–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeini-Aghtaie M, Abbaspour A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Hajipour E (2014) Multiagent genetic algorithm: an online probabilistic view on economic dispatch of energy hubs constrained by wind availability. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 5(2):699–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papari Behnaz, Edrington Chris S, Bhattacharya Indranil, Radman Ghadir (2017a) Effective energy management of hybrid AC–DC microgrids with storage devices. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 10(1):193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papari B, Edrington CS, Kavousi-Fard F (2017b) An effective fuzzy feature selection and prediction method for modeling tidal current: a case of Persian Gulf. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 55(9):4956–4961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papari Behnaz, Edrington Chris S, Gonsoulin David (2019) Optimal energy-emission management in hybrid AC–DC microgrids with vehicle-2-grid technology. J Renew Sustain Energy 11:134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saravanan S, Ramesh Babu N (2017) Analysis and implementation of high step-up DC–DC converter for PV based grid application. Appl Energy 190:64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahcheraghi A, Piltan F, Mokhtar M, Avatefipour O, Khalilian A (2014) Design a novel SISO off-line tuning of modified PID fuzzy sliding mode controller. Int J Inf Technol Comput Sci (IJITCS) 6(2):72

    Google Scholar 

  • Taherpoor H, Niknam T, Kavousi-Fard A (2015) A novel stochastic framework for energy management in renewable micro-grids considering uncertainty of measurement and forecasting. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28(3):999–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teimourzadeh Baboli P, Shahparasti M, Parsa Moghaddam M, Haghifam MR, Mohamadian M (2014) Energy management and operation modelling of hybrid AC–DC microgrid. IET Gen Trans Distrib 8(10):1700–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS (2012) Flower pollination algorithm for global optimization. In: Durand-Lose J, Jonoska N (eds) Unconventional computation and natural computation: 7445. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taher Niknam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Askari, M., Niknam, T. An Effective Stochastic Approach for Optimal Energy Resource Management in Hybrid AC–DC Microgrids. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng 44, 835–848 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-019-00266-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-019-00266-8

Keywords

Navigation