Skip to main content
Log in

On the use of nestedness-based similarity functions (NBSF) to classify and/or order operational geographic units (OGUs)

  • Published:
Community Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we want to support the idea of using a family of indices of similarity, that we call the Simpson’s family indices or nestedness-based similarity functions (NBSF) for comparing operational geographic units (OGUs) (phytosociological relevés, animal traps, watersheds, administrative units, industrial areas, islands etc.). In these cases, similarity-dissimilarity depends, in addition to factors that induce replacement, also on factors that produce reduction or increment in the number of features within the same typology of OGUs (e.g., extent, reduction of fertility, anthropogenic pressure etc.). To keep into consideration this aspect, the indices are defined to be equal to 1 when the OGUs are completely nested. The results of the application to four simulated data sets prove that, when the data set does not show clear nested pattern, the use of NBSF produces results similar to the nestedness-free similarity functions, however since NBSF clearly detect nested situations, we should prefer their use in the circumstances where we think important to put in evidence nestedness. In conclusion, we support the idea of using both types of indices in order to improve the knowledge about the structure of any data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NBSF:

Nestedness-Based Similarity Functions

NFSF:

Nestedness-Free Similarity Functions

OGU:

Operational Geographic Unit

References

  • Atmar, W. and B.D. Patterson. 1993. The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96:373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atmar, W. and B.D. Patterson. 1995. The nestedness temperature calculator: a visual basic program, including 294 presence-absence matrices. AICS Research Inc, University Park, New Mexico, USA and the Field Museum, Chicago, IL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baselga, A. 2010. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19:134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baselga, A. and F. Leprieur. 2015. Comparing methods to separate components of beta diversity. Meth. Ecol. Evol. 6(9):1069–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bustos, S., C. Gomez, R. Hausmann and C.A. Hidalgo. 2012. The dynamics of nestedness predicts the evolution of industrial ecosystems. PLoS One 7(11): e49393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, J.C., P. Cardoso, P.A.V. Borges, D. Schmera and J. Podani. 2013. Measuring fractions of beta diversity and their relationships to nestedness: a theoretical and empirical comparison of novel approaches. Oikos 122(6):825–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crovello, T.J. 1981. Quantitative biogeography: an overview. Taxon 30:563–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feoli, E. and V. Zuccarello. 1996. Spatial pattern of ecological processes: the role of similarity in GIS applications for landscape analysis. In: M. Fisher, H. Scholten and D. Unwin (eds), Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS. Taylor and Francis, London. pp. 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feoli, E., R. Pérez-Gómez, C. Oyonarte and J.J. Ibáñez. 2017. Using spatial data mining to analyze area-diversity patterns among soil, vegetation, and climate: A case study from Almería, Spain. Geoderma 287:164–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, J.J., R. Pérez-Gómez, P. Ganis and E. Feoli. 2016. The use of vegetation series to assess α and β vegetation diversity and their relationships with geodiversity in the province of Almeria (Spain) with watersheds as operational geographic units. Plant Biosystems 150(6):1395–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. 2014. Interpreting the replacement and richness difference components of beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23:1324–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podani, J. 2000. Introduction to the Exploration of Multivariate Biological Data. Backhuys, Leiden, NL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podani, J. and D. Schmera. 2011. A new conceptual and methodological framework for exploring and explaining pattern in presence-absence data. Oikos 120:1625–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podani, J. and D. Schmera. 2012. A comparative evaluation of pairwise nestedness measures. Ecography 35:889–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podani, J. and D. Schmera. 2016. Once again on the components of pairwise beta diversity. Ecol. Informatics 32:63–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1978. Multivariate Analysis in Vegetation Research. 2nd edition. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G. 1943. Mammals and the nature of continents. Amer. J. Sci. 241:1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G. 1960. Notes on the measurement of faunal resemblance. Amer. J. Sci. 258(2):300–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W and M. Almeida-Neto. 2012. On the meanings of nestedness: back to the basics. Ecography 35:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W., M. Almeida-Neto and N. Gotelli. 2009. A consumer’s guide to nestedness analysis. Oikos 118:3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inform. Control 8:338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Feoli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feoli, E., Ganis, P., Ibáñez, J.J. et al. On the use of nestedness-based similarity functions (NBSF) to classify and/or order operational geographic units (OGUs). COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 20, 223–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2019.20.3.2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/168.2019.20.3.2

Keywords

Navigation