Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T15:37:04.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antarctic sea anemone distribution, abundance and relationships with habitat composition, community structure and anthropogenic disturbance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2020

Leslie A. Watson Open the ORCID record for Leslie A. Watson [Opens in a new window] ,
Jonathan S. Stark Open the ORCID record for Jonathan S. Stark [Opens in a new window] ,
Glenn Johnstone ,
Erik Wapstra Open the ORCID record for Erik Wapstra [Opens in a new window]  and
Karen Miller
Leslie A. Watson*
Affiliation:
School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS7001, Australia
Jonathan S. Stark
Affiliation:
Australian Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Hwy, Kingston, TAS7050, Australia
Glenn Johnstone
Affiliation:
Australian Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Hwy, Kingston, TAS7050, Australia
Erik Wapstra
Affiliation:
School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS7001, Australia
Karen Miller
Affiliation:
School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS7001, Australia Australian Institute of Marine Science, 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA6009, Australia
*
leslie.watson@utas.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding the distribution, abundance and habitat preferences of species in the Southern Ocean provides a foundation for assessing the impacts of environmental change and anthropogenic disturbance on Antarctic ecosystems. In near-shore waters at Casey and Davis Stations, photoquadrat surveys were used to determine sea anemone distribution and abundance, habitat preferences, associations with other species and the impact of human disturbance on sea anemone distribution. Two distinct sea anemone morphotypes were found in this study: large sea anemones that require hard substrate for attachment and small, burrowing sea anemones found in muddy sediment. The large sea anemones were found in rocky habitats, with the exception of some sedimentary habitats where other biota were used as substrate. The large sea anemones were associated with a diverse community of epibenthic species found in rocky habitats. The burrowing sea anemones were associated with a less diverse assemblage of sediment-dwelling epibenthos. At Casey Station, sea anemones were more abundant in habitats adjacent to a former waste disposal site than at control sites. The reason for this is not yet known, but may be due to high organic matter inputs or, alternatively, a longer sea ice duration providing protection from ice scour.

Keywords

Actinariabenthic communitybiodiversityhuman impactmarine benthosphotoquadrat
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 186 - 198
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammons, A.W. & Daly, M. 2008. Distribution, habitat use and ecology of deepwater anemones (Actiniaria) in the Gulf of Mexico. Deep-sea Research II, 55, 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.07.015.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J. 2001. Permutation tests for univariate or multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58, 10.1139/f01-004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. & Braak, C.T. 2003. Permutation tests for multi-factorial analysis of variance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 73, 10.1080/00949650215733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, H.P. & Stark, J.S. 2013. Population dynamics of the ubiquitous Antarctic benthic amphipod Orchomenella franklini and its vulnerability to environmental change. Polar Biology, 36, 10.1007/s00300-012-1246-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, H.P. & Stark, J.S. 2014. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the distribution of an Antarctic amphipod and relationship with the sediment. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 502, 10.3354/meps10715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, H.P., Miller, K.J. & Stark, J.S. 2012. Genetic population structure in the Antarctic benthos: insights from the widespread amphipod, Orchomenella franklini. PLoS ONE, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0034363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brueggeman, P. 1998. Cnidaria–Anthozoa: anemones, soft coral: underwater field guide to Ross Island & McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation, 84 pp.Google Scholar
Casares, B.M. & Cantero, Á.L.P. 2018. Bathymetric distribution pattern in Antarctic benthic hydroids. Polar Biology, 41, 10.1007/s00300-018-2281-x.Google Scholar
Chiantore, M., Cattaneo-Vietti, R., Berkman, P.A., Nigro, M., Vacchi, M., Schiaparelli, S. & Albertelli, G. 2001. Antarctic scallop (Adamussium colbecki) spatial population variability along the Victoria Land Coast, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 24, 10.1007/s003000000191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, O., Douek, J., Chadwick, N.E., Dubinsky, Z. & Rinkevich, B. 2009. Biological and population–genetic aspects of the sea anemone Actinia equina (Cnidaria: Anthozoa) along the Mediterranean coast of Israel. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 375, 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.04.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.F., Raymond, B., Riddle, M.J., Stark, J.S. & Johnston, E.L. 2015. Vulnerability of Antarctic shallow invertebrate-dominated ecosystems. Austral Ecology, 40, 10.1111/aec.12237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G.F., Stark, J.S., Palmer, A.S., Riddle, M.J. & Johnston, E.L. 2017. The roles of sea-ice, light and sedimentation in structuring shallow Antarctic benthic communities. PLoS ONE, 12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0168391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, G.F., Stark, J.S., Johnston, E.L., Runcie, J.W., Goldsworthy, P.M., Raymond, B. & Riddle, M.J. 2013. Light-driven tipping points in polar ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 19, 10.1111/gcb.12337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, K.R. & Gorley, R.N. 2015. PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E, 190 pp.Google Scholar
Dunn, D.F. 1983. Some Antarctic and sub-Antarctic sea anemones (Coelenterata–Ptychodactiaria and Actiniaria). Antarctic Research Series, 39, 10.1029/AR039p0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durden, J.M., Bett, B.J. & Ruhl, H.A. 2015. The hemisessile lifestyle and feeding strategies of Iosactis vagabunda (Actiniaria, Iosactiidae), a dominant megafaunal species of the Porcupine Abyssal Plain. Deep-Sea Research I, 102, 10.1016/j.dsr.2015.04.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elran, R., Raam, M., Kraus, R., Brekhman, V., Sher, N., Plaschkes, I., et al. 2014. Early and late response of Nematostella vectensis transcriptome to heavy metals. Molecular Ecology, 23, 10.1111/mec.12891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fautin, D.G. 1986. More Antarctic and Subantarctic sea anemones (Coelenterata: Corallimorpharia and Actiniaria). Antarctic Research Series, 41, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fautin, D.G. 1988. Anthozoan dominated benthic environments. Proceedings of the 6th International Coral Reef Symposium, 3, 231–236.Google Scholar
Hattori, A. & Kobayashi, M. 2009. Incorporating fine-scale seascape composition in an assessment of habitat quality for the giant sea anemone Stichodactyla gigantea in a coral reef shore zone. Ecological Research, 24, 10.1007/s11284-008-0518-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanova, N.Y. & Grebelnyi, S.D. 2017. On the food of the Antarctic sea anemone Urticinopsis antarctica Carlgren, 1927 (Actiniidae, Actiniaria, Anthozoa). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 97, 10.1017/s0025315415002131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S.L., Thurber, A., Hammerstrom, K. & Conlan, K. 2007. Seastar response to organic enrichment in an oligotrophic polar habitat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 346, 10.1016/j.jembe.2007.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K.M., Xie, J.Y., Sun, Y.A., Kei, K. & Qiu, J.W. 2015. Four dense assemblages of the bulb-tentacle sea anemone Entacmaea quadricolor and associated clownfish in Hong Kong. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 95, 10.1017/s0025315414001192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchelmore, C.L., Verde, E.A., Ringwood, A.H. & Weis, V.M. 2003. Differential accumulation of heavy metals in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima as a function of symbiotic state. Aquatic Toxicology, 64, 10.1016/s0166-445x(03)00055-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ormond, R.F.G. & Caldwell, S. 1982. The effect of oil pollution on the reproduction and feeding-behaviour of the sea anemone Actinia equina. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 13, 10.1016/0025-326x(82)90367-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimondino, C., Torre, L., Sahade, R. & Tatian, M. 2015. Sessile macro-epibiotic community of solitary ascidians, ecosystem engineers in soft substrates of Potter Cove, Antarctica. Polar Research, 34, 10.3402/polar.v34.24338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, E., Lopez-Gonzalez, P.J. & Gilib, J.M. 2007. Biogeography of Antarctic sea anemones (Anthozoa, Actiniaria): what do they tell us about the origin of the Antarctic benthic fauna? Deep-Sea Research II, 54, 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.07.013.Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, S. & Linse, K. 2006. A reassessment of the distribution of the common Antarctic scallop Adamussium colbecki (Smith, 1902). Deep-Sea Research II, 53, 10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.02.004.Google Scholar
Schories, D., Reise, K., Sanamyan, K., Sanamyan, N., Clasing, E. & Reise, A. 2011. Actinian dominated intertidal mudflats: a new case of an extraordinary rare phenomenon from Southern Chile. Journal of Sea Research, 65, 10.1016/j.seares.2011.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J., O'Brien, P.E., Stark, J.S., Johnstone, G.J. & Riddle, M.J. 2015. Integrating multibeam sonar and underwater video data to map benthic habitats in an East Antarctic nearshore environment. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 164, 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.07.036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.E., Aronson, R.B., Steffel, B.V., Amsler, M.O., Thatje, S., Singh, H., et al. 2017. Climate change and the threat of novel marine predators in Antarctica. Ecosphere, 8, 10.1002/ecs2.2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, J.S., Kim, S.L. & Oliver, J.S. 2014. Anthropogenic disturbance and biodiversity of marine benthic communities in Antarctica: a regional comparison. PLoS ONE, 9, 10.1371/journal.pone.0098802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, J.S., Riddle, M.J. & Simpson, R.D. 2003a. Human impacts in soft-sediment assemblages at Casey Station, East Antarctica: spatial variation, taxonomic resolution and data transformation. Austral Ecology, 28, 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01289.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, J.S., Snape, I. & Riddle, M.J. 2003b. The effects of petroleum hydrocarbon and heavy metal contamination of marine sediments on recruitment of Antarctic soft-sediment assemblages: a field experimental investigation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 283, 10.1016/s0022-0981(02)00449-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, J.S., Riddle, M.J. & Smith, S.D.A. 2004. Influence of an Antarctic waste dump on recruitment to nearshore marine soft-sediment assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 276, 10.3354/meps276053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, J.S., Snape, I., Riddle, M.J. & Stark, S.C. 2005. Constraints on spatial variability in soft-sediment communities affected by contamination from an Antarctic waste disposal site. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 50, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.10.015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, J.S., Bridgen, P., Dunshea, G., Galton-Fenzi, B., Hunter, J., Johnstone, G., et al. 2016a. Dispersal and dilution of wastewater from an ocean outfall at Davis Station, Antarctica, and resulting environmental contamination. Chemosphere, 152, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, J.S., Corbett, P.A., Dunshea, G., Johnstone, G., King, C., Mondon, J.A., et al. 2016b. The environmental impact of sewage and wastewater outfalls in Antarctica: an example from Davis station, East Antarctica. Water Research, 105, 10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumida, P.Y.G., Smith, C.R., Bernardino, A.F., Polito, P.S. & Vieira, D.R. 2014. Seasonal dynamics of megafauna on the deep West Antarctic Peninsula shelf in response to variable phytodetrital influx. Royal Society Open Science, 1, 10.1098/rsos.140294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarrant, A.M., Reitzel, A.M., Kwok, C.K. & Jenny, M.J. 2014. Activation of the cnidarian oxidative stress response by ultraviolet radiation, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and crude oil. Journal of Experimental Biology, 217, 10.1242/jeb.093690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, B.A.W., Goldsworthy, P.M., Riddle, M.J., Snape, I. & Stark, J.S. 2007. Contamination effects by a ‘conventional’ and a ‘biodegradable’ lubricant oil on infaunal recruitment to Antarctic sediments: a field experiment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 340, 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, L.A., Stark, J.S., Johnstone, G.J., Wapstra, E. & Miller, K. 2018. Patterns in the distribution and abundance of sea anemones off Dumont d'Urville Station, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 41, 10.1007/s00300-018-2332-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Watson et al. supplementary material

Watson et al. supplementary material

Download Watson et al. supplementary material(File)
File 485.9 KB