Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:45:38.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Roles of regional production in a global food system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2019

Christian J. Peters*
Affiliation:
Division of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
Miguel I. Gómez
Affiliation:
Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Timothy Griffin
Affiliation:
Division of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Christian J. Peters, E-mail: christian.peters@tufts.edu

Abstract

What is the role of Northeastern agricultural products in the US food system? This paper presents a typology that categorizes where agricultural production and distribution of a specific geographic area, in this case a multi-state region, fits within the US food system. The place of each food is defined based on its production volume, scope of distribution, market timing and agro-ecological niche. Six distinct roles that a region might play in supplying food are identified: (a) the region is a national production center, (b) the region is a seasonally important supplier, (c) regional production and distribution is the primary scale for supplying a food, (d) the product occupies an agro-ecological niche, (e) a product is a co-product of another industry in the region, and (f) the product is marketed explicitly for its geographic provenance as a local or regional product. Illustrative examples of each role are provided from the research of the Enhancing Food Security in the Northeast (EFSNE) regional food systems project. The examples draw from a variety of methodological approaches including regional self-reliance analysis, product case studies, supply chain models, and examination of spatial and temporal patterns in crop and livestock production and marketing. While presented in the context of the Northeast, the typology would likely be valuable for characterizing other regions of the country. We need such a typology to better understand and communicate the value of geographically dispersed agricultural production to creating a resilient food system, thereby improving our decisions of how to respond to future agricultural challenges

Type
Themed Content: Enhancing Food Security in the US Northeast: Interdisciplinary Insights: Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alkhannan, F, Lee, J, Gómez, MI and Gao, H (2017) A systems approach to carbon policy for fruit supply chains: carbon-tax, innovation in storage technologies or land-sparing? Dyson School Working Paper No. 17-04, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Bergmann, L and Holmberg, M (2016) Land in motion. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 106, 932956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunke, H and Chan, M (2015) Peaches. Agricultural Marketing Resource Center. Available at https://www.agmrc.org/commodities-products/fruits/peaches (verified 14 August 2018).Google Scholar
Clancy, K and Ruhf, K (2010) Is local enough? Some arguments for regional food systems. Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues 25, 1–5. Available at http://www.choicesmagazine.org/magazine/article.php?article=114 (verified 17 August 2017).Google Scholar
Clancy, K, Bonanno, A, Canning, P, Cleary, R, Conrad, Z, Fleisher, D, Gómez, M, Griffin, T, Lee, R, Kane, D and Palmer, A (2017) Using a market basket to explore regional food systems. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 7, 163178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conrad, Z, Tichenor, N, Peters, C and Griffin, T (2016) Regional self-reliance for livestock feed, meat, dairy, and eggs in the Northeast U.S. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 32, 145156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorward, C, Smukler, SM and Mullinix, K (2016) A novel methodology to assess land-based food self-reliance in the Southwest British Columbia bioregion. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 32, 112130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2015) The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets: trade and food security: achieving a better balance between national priorities and the collective good. Rome.Google Scholar
Freedgood, J, Pierce-Quiñonez, M, Meter, KA (2011) Emerging assessment tools to inform food system planning. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems and Community Development 2, 83104. http://dx.doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2011.021.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, T, Conrad, Z, Peters, C, Ridberg, R and Tyler, EP (2015) Regional self-reliance of the Northeast food system. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 30, 349363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, T, Peters, C, Fleisher, D, Conard, M, Conrad, Z, Tichenor, N, McCarthy, A, Piltch, E, Resop, J and Saberi, H (2018) Baselines, trajectories, and scenarios: exploring agricultural production in the Northeast U.S. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 8, 2337. https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2018.082.015.Google Scholar
Heimlich, R (2000) Farm resource regions. Agricultural Information Bulletin No. (AIB-760) USDA Economic Research Service. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/42298/32489_aib-760_002.pdf?v=42487 (verified 11 April 2018).Google Scholar
Henderson, J and Foster, K (2000) Characteristics of U.S. veal consumers. Staff paper 00-2, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, Indiana.Google Scholar
Horst, M and Gaolach, B (2014) The potential of local food systems in North America: a review of foodshed analyses. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 30, 399407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerardo, A (2003) Import share of U.S. food consumption stable at 11%. U.S. Agricultural Trade Update No. (FAU-79-01), USDA Economic Research Service. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=36444 (verified 17 August 2017).Google Scholar
Johnson, R (2016) The US trade situation for fruit and vegetable products. Congressional Research Service, pp. 119.Google Scholar
Lin, X, Quin, D and Konar, M (2014) A network analysis of food flows within the United States of America. Environmental Science & Technology 48, 54395447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLaughlin, EW and Gómez, MI (2014) Chapter 14: Food Distribution. In Neff, R (ed.), Introduction to the US Food System: Public Health, Environment, and Equity. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 345–370.Google Scholar
Nicholson, CF, Gómez, MI and Gao, H (2011) The cost of increased localization for a multiple-product food supply chain: dairy in the United States. Food Policy 36, 300310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, CF, Gómez, MI, Gao, H and Hill, E (2015) Environmental and economic impacts of localizing food systems: the case of dairy supply chains in the northeastern United States. Environmental Science & Technology 49, 1200512014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, A, Bonanno, A, Clancy, K, Cho, C, Cleary, R and Lee, R (2019) Enhancing understanding of food purchasing patterns in the Northeast US using multiple datasets. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170519000371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, KS, Gómez, MI and Clancy, K (2018) Case studies of supermarkets and food supply chains in low-income areas of the Northeast: a cross case comparison of 11 case studies. Extension Bulletin 2018–02, Charles H. Dyson School and Applied Economics and Management, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Porkka, M, Kummu, M, Siebert, S and Varis, O (2013) From food insufficiency towards trade dependency: a historical analysis of global food availability. PLoS ONE 8: e82714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratt, JE, Bishop, PM, Erba, EM, Novakovic, AM and Stephenson, MW (1997) A description of the methods and data employed in the U.S. Dairy Sector Simulator, Version 97.3. Department of Agricultural, Resource and Managerial Economics, Cornell University, July, 1997.Google Scholar
Robinson, C, Shirazi, A, Liu, M and Dilkina, B (2016) Network optimization of food flows in the U.S. 4 th IEEE International Conference on Big Data, p. 21902198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Marketing Service (1999) Total arrivals in 19 cities, 12 February 1999. Fruit and vegetable market news. Available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/wa_fv070.txt (verified 11 January 2019).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service (2010) Fresh fruit and vegetable shipments: by commodities, states, and months. Available at https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/Annual%20Fresh%20Fruit%20and%20Vegetable%20Shipments%202010.pdf (verified 17 Aug 2017).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS) (2017) Import share of consumption. Available at http://usda.proworks.com/topics/international-markets-trade/us-agricultural-trade/import-share-of-consumption/ (verified 16 August 2017).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (2017) Desktop Data Query tool 2.0 [Electronic resource]. Available at https://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Online_Resources/Desktop_Application/ (verified 20 June 2018).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (2018) Quick Stats Database. Available at https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/ (verified 25 June 2018).Google Scholar
Waisanen, PL and Bliss, NB (2002) Changes in population and agricultural land in conterminous United States counties, 1790 to 1997. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16, 1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeh, D, Nishi, I and Gómez, MI (2017) A supply chain impacts of vegetable demand growth: the case of cabbage in the US. Dyson School Working Paper No. 17-04, Cornell University.Google Scholar