Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neurocognitive Correlates of Statistical Learning of Orthographic–Semantic Connections in Chinese Adult Learners

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neuroscience Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the neural correlates of the statistical learning of orthographic–semantic connections in Chinese adult learners. Visual event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants were exposed to a sequence of artificial logographic characters containing semantic radicals carrying low, moderate, or high levels of semantic consistency. The behavioral results showed that the mean accuracy of participants’ recognition of previously exposed characters was 63.1% that was significantly above chance level (50%), indicating the statistical learning of the regularities of semantic radicals. The ERP data revealed a temporal sequence of the neural process of statistical learning of orthographic-semantic connections, and different brain indexes were found to be associated with this processing, i.e., a clear N170–P200–N400 pattern. For N170, the larger negative amplitudes were evoked by the high and moderate consistency than the low consistency. For P200, the mean amplitudes elicited by the moderate and low consistency were larger than the high consistency. In contrast, a larger N400 amplitude was observed in the low than moderate and high consistency; and more negative amplitude was elicited by the moderate than high consistency. We propose that the initial potential shifts (N170 and P200) may reflect orthographic or graphic form identification, while the later component (N400) may be associated with semantic information analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meltzoff AN, Kuhl PK, Movellan J, Sejnowski TJ. Foundations for a new science of learning. Science 2009, 325: 284–288.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Arciuli J, Simpson IC. Statistical learning in typically developing children: The role of age and speed of stimulus presentation. Dev Sci 2011, 14: 464–473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Turk-Browne NB, Scholl BJ, Chun MM, Johnson MK. Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness. J Cogn Neurosci 2009, 21: 1934–1945.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Brady TF, Oliva A. Statistical learning using real-world scenes: Extracting categorical regularities without conscious intent. Psychol Sci 2008, 19: 678–685.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nissen MJ, Bullemer P. Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cogn Psychol 1987, 19: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chater N, Manning CD. Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10: 335–344.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuhl PK. Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004, 5: 831–843.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Erickson LC, Thiessen ED. Statistical learning of language: Theory, validity, and predictions of a statistical learning account of language acquisition. Dev Rev 2015, 37: 66–108.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Share DL. Orthographic learning at a glance: On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. J Exp Child Psychol 2004, 87: 267–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. He X, Tong X. Statistical learning as a key to cracking Chinese orthographic codes. Sci Stud Read 2017, 21: 60–75.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yang J, McCandliss BD, Shu H, Zevin JD. Simulating language-specific and language-general effects in a statistical learning model of Chinese reading. J Mem Lang 2009, 61: 238–257.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shu H, Chen X, Anderson RC, Wu N, Xuan Y. Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Dev 2003, 74: 27–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tong X, McBride C. Chinese children’s statistical learning of orthographic regularities: Positional constraints and character structure. Sci Stud Read 2014, 18: 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Perfetti CA, Liu Y, Tan LH. The lexical constituency model: some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychol Rev 2005, 112: 43–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Taft M, Zhu X, Peng D. Positional specificity of radicals in Chinese character recognition. J Mem Lang 1999, 40: 498–519.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou X, Marslen-Wilson W. The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1999, 25: 819–837.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen MJ, Weekes BS. Effects of semantic radicals on Chinese character categorization and character decision. Chin J Psychol 2004, 46: 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams C, Bever T. Chinese character decoding: a semantic bias? Read Writ 2010, 23: 589–605.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ho CS, Ng TT, Ng WK. A “radical” approach to reading development in Chinese: The role of semantic radicals and phonetic radicals. J Lit Res 2003, 35: 849–878.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tong X, Tong X, McBride C. Radical sensitivity is the key to understanding Chinese character acquisition in children. Read Writ 2017, 30: 1251–1265.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang M, Liu Y, Perfetti CA. The implicit and explicit learning of orthographic structure and function of a new writing system. Sci Stud Read 2004, 8: 357–379.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yin L, McBride C. Chinese kindergartners learn to read characters analytically. Psychol Sci 2015, 26: 424–432.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Molfese DL, Molfese VJ, Espy KA. The predictive use of event-related potentials in language development and the treatment of language disorders. Dev Neuropsychol 1999, 16: 373–377.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Howard-Jones PA, Varma S, Ansari D, Butterworth B, De Smedt B, Goswami U, et al. The principles and practices of educational neuroscience: comment on bowers. Psychol Rev 2016, 123: 620–627.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maurer U, Zevin JD, McCandliss BD. Left-lateralized N170 effects of visual expertise in reading: evidence from Japanese syllabic and logographic scripts. J Cogn Neurosci 2008, 20: 1878–1891.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bentin S, Mouchetant-Rostaing YO, Giard MH, Echallier JF, Pernier J. ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution. J Cogn Neurosci 1999, 11: 235–260.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin SE, Chen HC, Zhao J, Li S, He S, Weng XC. Left-lateralized N170 response to unpronounceable pseudo but not false Chinese characters—the key role of orthography. Neuroscience 2011, 190: 200–206.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong AC, Gauthier I, Woroch B, Debuse C, Curran T. An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2005, 5: 306–318.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hsiao JH, Shillcock R, Lee CY. Neural correlates of foveal splitting in reading: Evidence from an ERP study of Chinese character recognition. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45: 1280–1292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hsu CH, Tsai JL, Lee CY, Tzeng OJ. Orthographic combinability and phonological consistency effects in reading Chinese phonograms: an event-related potential study. Brain Lang 2009, 108: 56–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee CY, Tsai JL, Huang HW, Hung DL, Tzeng OJ. The temporal signatures of semantic and phonological activations for Chinese sublexical processing: An event-related potential study. Brain Res 2006, 1121: 150–159.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu Y, Perfetti CA, Hart L. ERP evidence for the time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic information in Chinese meaning and pronunciation decisions. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2003, 29: 1231–1247.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kong L, Zhang B, Zhang JX, Kang C. P200 can be modulated by orthography alone in reading Chinese words. Neurosci Lett 2012, 529: 161–165.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Perfetti CA, Liu Y. Orthography to phonology and meaning: Comparisons across and within writing systems. Read Writ 2005, 18: 193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kutas M, Hillyard SA. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 1980, 207: 203–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Daltrozzo J, Conway CM. Neurocognitive mechanisms of statistical-sequential learning: what do event-related potentials tell us? Front Hum Neurosci 2014, 8: 437.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kooijman V, Hagoort P, Cutler A. Electrophysiological evidence for prelinguistic infants’ word recognition in continuous speech. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005, 24: 109–116.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Teinonen T, Fellman V, Näätänen R, Alku P, Huotilainen M. Statistical language learning in neonates revealed by event-related brain potentials. BMC Neurosci 2009, 10: 21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Sanders LD, Newport EL, Neville HJ. Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5: 700–703.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Holcomb PJ, Neville HJ. Auditory and visual semantic priming in lexical decision: A comparison using event-related brain potentials. Lang Cogn Process 1990, 5: 281–312.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Li X. Study on He Hong’s dongba manuscripts collected by American Harvard-Yenching Library. Adv in Anth 2014, 4: 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004, 134: 9–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Luck SJ. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. 2nd ed. MIT Press, 2014.

  44. Lau EF, Phillips C, Poeppel D. A cortical network for semantics:(de) constructing the N400. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008, 9: 920–933.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee CY, Tsai JL, Chan WH, Hsu CH, Hung DL, Tzeng OJ. Temporal dynamics of the consistency effect in reading Chinese: an event-related potentials study. Neuroreport 2007, 18: 147–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Maurer U, Brandeis D, McCandliss BD. Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response. Behavl Brain Funct 2005, 1:13.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hackley SA, Woldorff M, Hillyard SA. Cross-modal selective attention effects on retinal, myogenic, brainstem, and cerebral evoked potentials. Psychophysiology 1990, 27: 195–208.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Cunillera T, Toro JM, Sebastián-Gallés N, Rodríguez-Fornells A. The effects of stress and statistical cues on continuous speech segmentation: an event-related brain potential study. Brain Res 2006, 1123: 168–178.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Abla D, Katahira K, Okanoya K. On-line assessment of statistical learning by event-related potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 2008, 20: 952–964.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported, in part, by the General Research Fund of the Hong Kong Government Research Grant Council (17609518), the Early Career Scheme of the Hong Kong Grants Council (28606419), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600903).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Xiuhong Tong

  2. Institute of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 310000, China

    Yi Wang

  3. Human Communication, Development, and Information Sciences, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Shelley Xiuli Tong

Authors
  1. Xiuhong Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shelley Xiuli Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shelley Xiuli Tong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors claim that there are no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tong, X., Wang, Y. & Tong, S.X. Neurocognitive Correlates of Statistical Learning of Orthographic–Semantic Connections in Chinese Adult Learners. Neurosci. Bull. 36, 895–906 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-020-00500-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-020-00500-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation