Skip to main content
Log in

Consistent Production of Mice with Conditional Knockout Alleles by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing Using Two Guides/Two Oligos Approach

  • Published:
Cytology and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gene targeting is extensively used to generate designer mouse mutants and to study gene function in vivo. Knockout mice that harbor a null allele in their germline provide appropriate genetic models of inherited diseases and often exhibit embryonic or early postnatal lethality. To study gene function in adult mice and in selected cell types, a refined strategy for conditional gene inactivation has been developed that relies on the DNA recombinase Cre and its recognition (loxP) sites. This process has traditionally relied on the complex process involving genome editing in embryonic stem (ES) cells despite its limitations, including incorrect targeting or cassette structure, and difficulties with germline transmission of the allele from chimeric mice. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology has considerably facilitated the generation of mouse knockout alleles, relieving many of the cumbersome and time-consuming steps of traditional mouse ES cell technology. However, the generation of conditional knockout alleles remains an important challenge. An earlier study reported up to 16% efficiency in generating conditional knockout alleles in mice using 2 single guide RNAs (sgRNA) and 2 single-stranded oligonucleotides (ssODN), which has been questioned by another report combining data from multiple transgenic cores. With the advent of CRISPR/Cas9 as a mouse genome modification tool, we assessed the efficiency of using this method in creating conditional targeted alleles in three genes, phosphatase and actin regulator 1 (Phactr1), apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA1), and actin-related protein T2 (Actrt2). Even though overall success rate was low—about 2.5%—we show that it’s possible to reliably generate conditional knockout alleles using CRISPR/Cas9 on a consistent basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Gu, H., Marth, J.D., Orban, P.C., Mossmann, H., and Rajewsky, K., Deletion of a DNA polymerase beta gene segment in T cells using cell type-specific gene targeting, Science, 1994, vol. 265, pp. 103–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rajewsky, K., Gu, H., Kuhn, R., Betz, U.A., Muller, W., Roes, J., and Schwenk, F., Conditional gene targeting, J. Clin. Invest., 1996, vol. 98, pp. 600–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sauer, B. and Henderson, N., Site-specific DNA recombination in mammalian cells by the Cre recombinase of bacteriophage P, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1988, vol. 85, pp. 5166–5170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoess, R.H. and Abremski, K., Interaction of the bacteriophage P1 recombinase Cre with the recombining site loxP, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1984, vol. 81, pp. 1026–1029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brand,a, C.S. and Dymecki, S.M., Talking about a revolution: the impact of site-specific recombinases on genetic analyses in mice, Dev. Cell, 2004, vol. 6, pp. 7–28.

  6. Jinek, M., et al., A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity, Science, 2012, vol. 337, pp. 816–821.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, S.W., Kim, S., Kim, J.M., and Kim, J.S., Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease, Nat. Biotechnol., 2013, vol. 31, pp. 230–232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cong, L., et al., Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems, Science, 2013, vol. 339, pp. 819–823.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jinek, M., et al., RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells, Elife, 2013, vol. 2. e00471. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9, Science, 2013, vol. 339, pp. 823–826.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mashiko, D. et al. Generation of mutant mice by pronuclear injection of circular plasmid expressing Cas9 and single guided RNA, Sci. Rep., 2013, vol. 3355, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03355

  12. Shen, B. et al. Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting, Cell Res., 2013, vol. 23, pp. 720–723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering, Cell, 2013, vol. 153, pp. 910–918.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, H., et al. One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering, Cell, 2013, vol. 154, no. 6, pp. 1370–1379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gurumurthy, C., et al. Re-evaluating one-step generation of mice carrying conditional alleles by CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing technology, bioRxiv, 2018, vol. 393231. https://doi.org/10.1101/393231

  16. Behringer R., et al., Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Horii, T., et al., Efficient generation of conditional knockout mice via sequential introduction of lox sites, Sci Rep., 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 7891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bishop, K.A., et al., CRISPR/Cas9-mediated insertion of loxP sites in the mouse dock7 gene provides an effective alternative to use of targeted embryonic stem cells, G3 (Bethesda), 2016, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 2051–2061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kueh, A.J., et al., An update on using CRISPR/Cas9 in the one-cell stage mouse embryo for generating complex mutant alleles, Cell Death Differ., 2017, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1821–1822.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lanza, D.G., et al., Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles, BMC Biol., 2018, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pritchard, C.E.J., Kroese, L.J., and Huijbers, I.J., Direct Generation of Conditional Alleles Using CRISPR/ Cas9 in Mouse Zygotes. Methods Mol Biol., 2017, vol. 1642, pp. 21–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Miyasaka, Y., et al., CLICK: one-step generation of conditional knockout mice, BMC Genomics, 2018, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Dr. Christopher Lemke and Dr. Nicola van der Walt of CRISPR Core Partnership Program (Sigma Millipore/Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) for help with design and validation of CRISPR/cas9 materials.

Funding

This work was supported by Texas AgriLife Research (SS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Golovko.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare no conflict of interest or financial disclosure statements. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golovko, A., Adams, J., Guo, H. et al. Consistent Production of Mice with Conditional Knockout Alleles by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing Using Two Guides/Two Oligos Approach. Cytol. Genet. 54, 63–70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452720010065

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0095452720010065

Keywords:

Navigation