Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Between fascination and concern: an exploratory study of senior citizens’ attitudes towards synthetic biology and agricultural biotechnology

  • Long Paper
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present exploratory study describes senior citizens’ attitudes relating to biotechnologies, which were compared with a younger sample. Using an anonymised voluntary paper-and-pencil survey, data were collected from a total of 86 senior Swiss adults attending the Seniors' University in Zurich, Switzerland. Unlike previous studies, our data suggest that senior citizens value the utility of biotechnologies. In particular, a high level of fascination was directed towards the prospects of medical biotechnological applications. Consistent with prior studies, our data reveal that senior citizens also express reservations in the face of potential risks. Therefore, an often-alleged conservative response behaviour of this group only relates to the supposed harm of these technologies. To explore the response behaviour of this cohort across technologies, we found a lesser degree of differentiation compared to university students. Consistent with this reduced level of differentiation, senior citizens assessed agricultural biotechnology similarly positively compared to nanotechnology and synthetic biology, in contrast to university students who made a clear distinction between positively evaluated emerging technologies and the more sceptically assessed agricultural biotechnology. Differences of gender were revealed to be more pronounced in the case of senior citizens compared to students, indicating that a comparison between different societal subgroups can contribute to a wider understanding of factors influencing public technology assessment without introducing a rigid separation of these groups. We close by discussing consequences for public-policy making and science and technology communication, such as the need to emphasise the characteristics that demarcate technologies against each other in public communication for this and comparable groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdullah, F., Ward, R., Ahmed, E.: Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ perceived ease of use (PEOU) and perceived usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 75–90 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amin, L., Azad, M.A.K., Gausmian, M.H.: Zulkifli F (2014) Determinants of public attitudes to genetically modified salmon. PloS one 9(1), e86174 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Auer, C.: Ecological risk assessment and regulation for genetically-modified ornamental plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 27(4), 255–271 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barbosa Neves, B., Franz, R., Judges, R., Beermann, C., Baecker, R.: Can digital technology enhance social connectedness among older adults? A feasibility study. J. Appl. Gerontol. 38(1), 49–72 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bearth, A., Siegrist, M.: Psychological factors that determine people's willingness-to-share genetic data for research. Clin. Genet. 97, 483–491 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. BFS: https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/bevoelkerung/alterung.assetdetail.9486012.html

  7. Bourdieu, P.: Sociology in Question. SAGE, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brewer, M.B., Dull, V., Lui, L.: Perceptions of the elderly: stereotypes as prototypes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 41(4), 656 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, K., Chan, A.H.S.: A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology 10, 1–12 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2011.10.01.006.00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Czaja, S.J., Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Rogers, W.A.: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dziuba, S., Cierniak-Emerych, A., Michalski, G., Poulová, P., Mohelská, H., Klímová, B.: The use of the internet by older adults in Poland. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 117, 1–8 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Einsiedel, E.F., Medlock, J.: A public consultation on plant molecular farming. AgBioForum 8, 26–32 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eurobarometer: Social values, science and technology. Eurobarometer Special Report 225 (2005)

  15. Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., Combs, B.: How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci. 9(2), 127–152 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frewer, L., Lassen, J., Kettlitz, B., Scholderer, J., Beekman, V., Berdal, K.G.: Societal aspects of genetically modified foods. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42(7), 1181–1193 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaskell, G., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N., Castro, P., Esmer, Y., Fischler, C., et al.: The 2010 Eurobarometer on the life sciences. Nat. Biotechnol. 29(2), 113 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gaskell, G., Allum, N., Wagner, W., Kronberger, N., Torgersen, H., Hampel, J., et al.: GM foods and the misperception of risk perception. Risk Anal. Int. J. 24(1), 185–194 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. George, S., Kaptan, G., Lee, J., Frewer, L.: Awareness on adverse effects of nanotechnology increases negative perception among public: survey study from Singapore. J. Nanopart. Res. 16(12), 2751 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guner, H., Acarturk, C.: The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: a comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0642-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Holzinger, A., Searle, G., Wernbacher, M.: The effect of previous exposure to technology (PET) on acceptance and its importance in usability engineering. Springer Univ. Access Inf. Soc. Int. J. 10(3), 245–260 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-010-0212-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ineichen, C., Biller-Andorno, N., Deplazes-Zemp, A.: Image of synthetic biology and nanotechnology: a survey among university students. Front. Genet. 8, 122 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Klingeman, W.E., Hall, C.R.: Risk, trust, and consumer acceptance of plant biotechnology: implications for genetically modified ornamental plants. J. Crop Improv. 18(1-2), 451–486 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mählmann, L., Röcke, C., Brand, A., Hafen, E., Vayena, E.: Attitudes towards personal genomics among older Swiss adults: an exploratory study. Appl. Transl. Genom. 8, 9–15 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Marris, C.: Public views on GMOs: deconstructing the myths: stakeholders in the GMO debate often describe public opinion as irrational. But do they really understand the public? EMBO Rep. 2(7), 545–548 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Neves, B.B., Vetere, F. (eds.): Ageing and Digital Technology: Designing and Evaluating Emerging Technologies for Older Adults. Springer, Berlin (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Olson, K.E., O’Brien, M.A., Rogers, W.A., Charness, N.: Diffusion of technology: frequency of use for younger and older adults. Ageing Int. 36(1), 123–145 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pardo, R., Engelhard, M., Hagen, K., Jørgensen, R.B., Rehbinder, E., Schnieke, A., et al.: The role of means and goals in technology acceptance: a differentiated landscape of public perceptions of pharming. EMBO Rep. 10(10), 1069–1075 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pillai, R.G., Bezbaruah, A.N.: Perceptions and attitude effects on nanotechnology acceptance: an exploratory framework. J. Nanopart. Res. 19(2), 41 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ronteltap, A., Fischer, A.R., Tobi, H.: Societal response to nanotechnology: converging technologies–converging societal response research? J. Nanopart. Res. 13(10), 4399 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rousselière, D., Rousselière, S.: Decomposing the effects of time on the social acceptability of biotechnology using age-period-cohort-country models. Public Underst. Sci. 26(6), 650–670 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sayago, S. (ed.): Perspectives on Human–Computer Interaction Research with Older People. Springer Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Berlin (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schutz, H., Wiedemann, P.M.: Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology. Public Underst. Sci. 17(3), 369–379 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Siegrist, M.: Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 19(11), 603–608 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Siegrist, M., Cousin, M.E., Kastenholz, H., Wiek, A.: Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust. Appetite 49(2), 459–466 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Simon, R.M.: Gender differences in knowledge and attitude towards biotechnology. Public Underst. Sci. 19(6), 642–653 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sjöberg, L.: Principles of risk perception applied to gene technology: to overcome the resistance to applications of biotechnology, research on risk perception must take a closer look at the public's reasons for rejecting this technology. EMBO Rep. 5(1S), S47–S51 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, Z.: Media, biotechnology, and trust: what drives citizens to support biotechnology. Stud. Media Communi. 5(2), 157–165 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, Q., Sun, X.: Investigating gameplay intention of the elderly using an extended technology acceptance model (ETAM). Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 107, 59–68 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.10.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zepeda, L., Douthitt, R., You, S.Y.: Consumer risk perceptions toward agricultural biotechnology, self-protection, and food demand: the case of milk in the United States. Risk Anal. Int. J. 23(5), 973–984 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhou, G., Wuyang, Hu: Public acceptance of and willingness-to-pay for nanofoods in the US. Food Control 89, 219–226 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Seniorenuniversität Zurich for the possibility to conduct this study and its members for participation. This publication is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation as part of the NCCR Molecular Systems Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 30, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland

    Christian Ineichen, Nikola Biller-Andorno & Anna Deplazes-Zemp

Authors
  1. Christian Ineichen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nikola Biller-Andorno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anna Deplazes-Zemp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Ineichen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Research involving Human Participants

The study was exempt from ethics review by national regulation.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained by participants prior to study start.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 685 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ineichen, C., Biller-Andorno, N. & Deplazes-Zemp, A. Between fascination and concern: an exploratory study of senior citizens’ attitudes towards synthetic biology and agricultural biotechnology. Univ Access Inf Soc 20, 391–404 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00719-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00719-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation