Abstract
This paper introduces correlation of the small-signal modulation characteristics with those of digital modulation of high-speed multiple-quantum-well semiconductor laser. The accuracy of applying the common small-signal approximation to calculate the modulation bandwidth is evaluated by comparing the obtained values with those calculated by the reliable technique of time-integration of the rate equations. Also, we present correlation between the maximum bit rate and the small-signal bandwidth at given bias current and modulation index. We show that the bandwidth frequencies predicted by the small-signal approximation are higher than those calculated by the time integration. The difference increases with the increase of the bias current reaching 8 GHz when the current exceeds 3.5 times the threshold current. We predict also the modulation conditions required to achieve modulation speed as high as 40 Gbps. The ratio of the maximum bit rate to the small-signal bandwidth exceeds unity and reaches 1.6 under deep modulation with modulation index equal to 0.5.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
H. Dalir and F. Koyama, “Bandwidth enhancement of single-mode VCSEL with lateral optical feedback of slow light,” IEICE Electron. Expr.8 (13), 1075 (2011).
K. Petermann, Laser Diode Modulation and Noise (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988).
K. Sato, S. Kuwahar, and Y. Miyamoto, “Chirp characteristics of 40-Gb/s directly modulated distributed-feedback laser diodes,” J. Lightwave Technol.23 (11), 3790 (2005).
M. Ahmed, M. Yamada, and S. W. Z. Mahmoud, “Analysis of semiconductor laser dynamics under gigabit rate modulation,” J. Appl. Phys.101 (3), 33119 (2007).
M. Ahmed, S. W. Mahmoud, and A. A. Mahmoud, “Comparative study on modulation dynamic characteristics of laser diodes using RZ and NRZ bit formats,” Int. J. Numer. Model.27 (1), 138 (2014).
J. S. Gustavsson, A. Haglund, L. Bengtsson, and A. Lasrsson, “High-speed digital modulation characteristics of oxide-confined vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers-numerical simulations consistent with experimental results,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.38 (8), 1089 (2002).
M. Ahmed, S. W. Mahmoud, and A. A. Mahmoud, “Influence of Pseudorandom bit format on the direct modulation performance of semiconductor lasers,” Pramana J. Phys.79 (6), 1443 (2012).
G. P. Agrawal, Fiber-Optic Communication Systems (Wiley, N.Y., 2002).
S. W. Mahmoud, M. F. Ahmed, K. Abdelhady, and A. Mahmoud, “Estimation of parameters controlling direct modulation of semiconductor lasers,” in Proceedings of the National Radio Science Conference (March 17–19,2009, Cairo, Egypt), p. 318.
M. Ahmed and A. El-Lafi, “Analysis of small-signal intensity modulation of semiconductor lasers taking account of gain suppression,” Pramana J. Phys.71 (1), 99 (2008).
G. P. Agrawal and N. K. Dutta, Semiconductor Lasers (Van Nostrand Reinhold, N.Y., 1993).
M. Ahmed, M. Yamada, and M. Saito, “Numerical modeling of intensity and phase noise in semiconductor lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron.37 (12), 1600 (2001).
J. C. Cartledge and G. S. Burley, “The effect of laser chirping on lightwave system performance,” J. Lightwave Technol.7 (3), 568 (1989).
R. L. Burden, J. D. Faires, and A. C. Reynolds, Numerical Analysis, 2nd ed. (Prindle, Weber and Schmidt, Boston, 1981).
D. Derickson and M. Müller, Digital Communications Test and Measurement: High-Speed Physical Layer Characterization (Pearson Education Inc., 2007).
Understanding Eye Pattern Measurements. Application Note No. 11410-00533, Anritsu.
M. Ahmed, A. Bakry, and S. W. Z. Mahmoud, “Influence of chirp of high-speed laser diodes and fiber dispersion on performance of non-amplified 40-Gbps optical fiber links,” Int. J. Phys. Math. Sci.9 (1), 12 (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The text was submitted by the authors in English.
About this article
Cite this article
Rizk, T., Mahmoud, A., Abdel-Rahman, M. et al. Correlation of Small-Signal Modulation with Digital Modulation Characteristics of High-Speed Semiconductor Lasers. Phys. Wave Phen. 28, 49–54 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1541308X20010070
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1541308X20010070