Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation Between Maximum Trunk Daily Shrinkage, Soil Matric Potential and Weather Variables for Mature Plum Trees in Medium-textured Soils and Temperate Climate

Korrelation zwischen maximaler täglicher Verringerung des Stammdurchmessers, Matrixpotential im Boden und Wettervariablen bei ausgewachsenen Pflaumenbäumen auf mittelschweren Böden und bei gemäßigtem Klima

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Erwerbs-Obstbau Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this work is to test the strength of relationships between maximum trunk daily shrinkage (MDS), soil matric potential (SMP) for various soil depths, and some weather variables in grown plum trees and medium-textured soils under continental-temperate climate conditions. The obtained relationships might be used in identification of water stress for irrigation scheduling. The study was carried out in a 7–9-year-old plum tree orchard plot with the ‘Stanley’ cultivar grafted on Saint Julien A semi-dwarf rootstock. Micrometric trunk diameter fluctuations of three trees were automatically measured by phytomonitors, and SMP was monitored continuously with resistance blocks installed in three profiles at four depths: 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 m during many wetting-drying cycles during two growing seasons. Strong and highly significant regression equations were obtained between MDS and air temperature (T) and daily vapor pressure deficit (VPD) for three growing seasons of observations. There were also weaker but significant relationships between MDS and SMP for all the four depths studied. Multiple linear regression equations between MDS, SMP for all the four depths, and either maximum T or VPD generally improved R2 from the simple regression equations obtained with each of the same variables. The MDS threshold of 0.08–0.12 mm approximately corresponds to a SMP range of about −60 to −40 kPa; however, due to the high MDS variability in time and the weight of the weather variables in the relationships between MDS, SMP and weather variables like T or VPD, the usefulness of these relationships is limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelfatah A, Aranda X, Save R, de Herralde F, Biel C (2013) Evaluation of the response of maximum daily shrinkage in young cherry trees submitted to water stress cycles in a greenhouse. Agric Water Manag 118:150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RW, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper, vol 56

    Google Scholar 

  • Aïvazian S (1970) Étude statistique des dépendances. Edition Mir, Moscou, p 236

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonany J, Camps F, Salvia J, Cohen M (2000) Relationship between trunk diameter fluctuations, stem water potential and fruit growth rate in potted adult apple trees. Acta Hortic (511):43–49. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.511.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conejero W, Alarcon JJ, Garcia-Orellana Y, Abrisqueta JM, Torrecillas A (2007) Daily sap flow and maximum daily trunk shrinkage measurements for diagnosing water stress in early maturing peach trees during the post-harvest period. Tree Physiol 27(1):81–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conejero W, Mellisho CD, Ortuno MF, Galindo A, Perez-Sarmiento F, Torrecillas A (2011) Establishing maximum daily trunk shrinkage and midday stem water potential reference equations for irrigation scheduling of early maturing peach trees. Irrig Sci 29(4):299–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0238-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conejero W, Ortuno MF, Mellisho CD, Torrecillas A (2010) Influence of crop load on maximum daily trunk shrinkage reference equations for irrigation scheduling of early maturing peach trees. Agric Water Manag 97(2):333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuevas MV, Torres-Ruiz JM, Alvarez R, Jimenez MD, Cuerva J, Fernandez JE (2010) Assessment of trunk diameter variation derived indices as water stress indicators in mature olive trees. Agric Water Manag 97(9):1293–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.03.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doltra J, Oncins JA, Bonany J, Cohen M (2007) Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions. Irrig Sci 25(4):351–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-006-0051-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egea G, Pagan E, Baille A, Domingo R, Nortes PA, Perez-Pastor A (2009) Usefulness of establishing trunk diameter based reference lines for irrigation scheduling in almond trees. Irrig Sci 27(6):431–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0157-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereres E, Goldhamer DA (2003) Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 78:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez JE, Cuevas MV (2010) Irrigation scheduling from stem diameter variations: a review. Agric For Meteorol 150(2):135–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florea N, Munteanu I (2012) Romanian Soil Taxonomy System—SRTS. Editura Sitech, Craiova

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer DA, Fereres E (2004) Irrigation scheduling of almond trees with trunk diameter sensors. Irrig Sci 23(1):11–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-003-0088-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer DA, Fereres E, Mata M, Girona J, Cohen M (1999) Sensitivity of continuous and discrete plant and soil water status monitoring in peach trees subjected to deficit irrigation. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 124(4):437–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson RB, Orloff S, Peters D (2000a) Monitoring soil moisture helps refine irrigation management. Calif Agric 54:38–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson RB, Orloff S, Peters D (2000b) Effectiveness of tensiometers and electrical resistance sensors varies with soil condition. Calif Agric 54:47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2004) Continuous measurement of plant and soil water status for irrigation scheduling in plum. Irrig Sci 23(2):93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-004-0097-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2005) Usefulness of diurnal trunk shrinkage as a water stress indicator in plum trees. Tree Physiol 26:303–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2006) Performance of various water stress indicators for prediction of fruit size response to deficit irrigation in plum. Agric Water Manag 83(1):173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2007) Crop load affects maximum daily trunk shrinkage of plum trees. Tree Physiol 27(1):89–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2008) Trunk diameter variations as water stress indicator in plum and grapevine. Acta Hortic 792:363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine J, Grace J (1997) Continuous measurement of water tensions in the xylem of trees based on the elastic properties of wood. Planta 202:455–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaj YR, Geyer M, Herppich WB, Zude-Sasse M (2017) Interaction of maximum daily trunk shrinkage and fruit quality in European plum. Erwerbs-Obstbau. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-017-0341-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CW, Kang SZ, Li FS, Li SE, Du TS, Tong L (2011) Relationship between environmental factor and maximum daily stem shrinkage in apple tree in arid region of northwest China. Sci Hortic 130(1):118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malazian A, Hartsough P, Kamai I, Campbell GS, Cobos DR, Hopmans JW (2011) Evaluation of the MPS‑1 soil water potential sensor. J Hydrol 402:126–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miras-Avalos JM, Perez-Sarmiento F, Alcobendas R, Alarcon JJ, Mounzer O, Nicolas E (2016) Reference values of maximum daily trunk shrinkage for irrigation scheduling in mid-late maturing peach trees. Agric Water Manag 171:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miras-Avalos JM, Perez-Sarmiento F, Alcobendas R, Alarcon JJ, Mounzer O, Nicolas E (2017) Maximum daily trunk shrinkage for estimating water needs and scheduling regulated deficit irrigation in peach trees. Irrig Sci 35(1):69–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-016-0523-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltineanu C, Calciu I, Vizitiu O, Chitu E, Tanasescu N (2015) Investigating spatial distribution of the soil-water characteristic curves and consequences in irrigation application within a sandy-loam soil in an intensive plum tree orchard. Fruit Grow Res 31:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltineanu C, Chitu E, Mateescu E (2011) Changes in crop evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. Int Agrophys 25(4):369–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltineanu C, Nicolae S, Tanasescu N, Chitu E, Ancu S (2016c) Investigating root density of plum and apple trees grafted on low-vigor rootstocks to improve orchard management. Erwerbs-Obstbau 59:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-016-0293-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltineanu C, Septar L, Chitu E (2016a) Temperature profile in apricot tree canopies under the soil and climate conditions of the Romanian black sea coast. Int J Biometeorol 60(3):401–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-1037-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paltineanu C, Septar L, Moale C (2013a) Dynamics of soil water content during depletion cycles in peach orchards in a semiarid region. Chil J Agric Res 73(4):399–405. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392013000400011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltineanu C, Septar L, Moale C (2013b) Crop water stress in peach orchards and relationships with soil moisture content in a chernozem of Dobrogea. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(1):20–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paltineanu C, Tanasescu N, Chitu E (2016b) Pattern of soil physical properties in intensive plum and apple orchards on medium and course textured soils. Soil Tillage Res 163(C):80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parlange JY, Turner NC, Waggoner PE (1975) Water uptake, diameter change and non-linear diffusion in tree stems. Plant Physiol 55:247–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de la Rosa JM, Conesa MR, Domingo R, Torres R, Perez-Pastor A (2013) Feasibility of using trunk diameter fluctuation and stem water potential reference lines for irrigation scheduling of early nectarine trees. Agric Water Manag 126:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr JL, Paltineanu IC (1998) Real-time soil water dynamics over large areas using multisensor capacitance probes and monitoring system. Soil Tillage Res 47(1–2):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Swaef T, Steppe K, Lemeur R (2009) Determining reference values for stem water potential and maximum daily trunk shrinkage in young apple trees based on plant responses to water deficit. Agric Water Manag 96(4):541–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalley WR, Ober ES, Jenkins M (2013) Measurement of the matric potential of soil water in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot 64(13):3951–3963

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support received from the Romanian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development for Project ADER 3.3.12 and partly form the Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation for Project PN-III-P1-1.2-PCCDI-2017-0721 – INTER-ASPA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristian Paltineanu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

C. Paltineanu, E. Chitu, D. Sumedrea and A. Florea declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paltineanu, C., Chitu, E., Sumedrea, D. et al. Correlation Between Maximum Trunk Daily Shrinkage, Soil Matric Potential and Weather Variables for Mature Plum Trees in Medium-textured Soils and Temperate Climate. Erwerbs-Obstbau 62, 201–211 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-020-00472-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-020-00472-3

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation