Uniquely separable extensions

In memory of my father
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exmath.2020.01.003Get rights and content

Abstract

The separability tensor element of a separable extension of noncommutative rings is an idempotent when viewed in the correct endomorphism ring; so one speaks of a separability idempotent, as one usually does for separable algebras. It is proven that this idempotent is full if and only if the H-depth is 1 (H-separable extension). Similarly, a split extension has a bimodule projection; this idempotent is full if and only if the ring extension has depth 1 (centrally projective extension). Separable and split extensions have separability idempotents and bimodule projections in 1–1 correspondence via an endomorphism ring theorem in Section 3. If the separable idempotent is unique, then the separable extension is called uniquely separable. A Frobenius extension with invertible E-index is uniquely separable if the centralizer equals the center of the over-ring. It is also shown that a uniquely separable extension of semisimple complex algebras with invertible E-index has depth 1. Earlier group-theoretic results are recovered and related to depth 1. The dual notion, uniquely split extension, only occurs trivially for finite group algebra extensions over complex numbers.

Section snippets

Introduction and preliminaries

The classical notion of separable algebra is one of a semisimple algebra that remains semisimple under every base field extension. The approach of Hochschild to Wedderburn’s theory of associative algebras in the Annals was cohomological, and characterized a separable k-algebra A by having a separability idempotent in Ae=AkAop. A separable extension of noncommutative rings is characterized similarly by possessing separability elements in [13]: separable extensions are shown to be left and right

Full idempotent characterizations of H-separable and centrally projective ring extensions

In this section, we give characterizations of H-depth 1 and depth 1 ring extension in terms of well-known idempotents being full idempotents. Recall the equivalent form of Morita theory, which states that for a ring A with idempotent eA, eAe is Morita equivalent to A so long as e is a full idempotent, i.e. AeA=A: the Morita context bimodules are eA and Ae [1]. Recall from the previous section the ring structure on T=(ABA)B of a ring extension AB.

Proposition 2.1

A separable extension RS is H-separable if

Endomorphism ring theorem for uniquely separable extension

A uniquely separable extension is a ring extension A|B, which is a separable extension having a unique separability idempotent. In this section we prove an endomorphism ring theorem for separable extensions A|B showing that separability idempotents are in one-to-one correspondence with bimodule projections from EndAB onto A (embedded as left multiplication endomorphisms). For this reason, we define a uniquely split extension A|B as a ring extension possessing a unique bimodule projection (or

Uniquely separable frobenius extensions

Recall that a Frobenius (ring) extension AB is characterized by having a (Frobenius) homomorphism E:AB in Hom(BAB,BBB) with elements (dual bases) xi,yiA (i=1,,n) such that idA=i=1nE(xi)yi=i=1mxiE(yi). Equivalently, AB is finite projective and AHom(AB,BB) as natural B-A-bimodules: see [15] for more details. For example, given a group G and subgroup H of finite index n with right coset representatives g1,,gn, K an arbitrary commutative ring, the group algebra A=KG is a Frobenius

Group algebra extensions

Let A=kG where G is a finite group with subgroup H<G, and let B=kHA where k is a field containing the inverse of |G:H|1. Then AB is a split, separable Frobenius extension. If g1,,gnG is a right transversal of H in G, then e=1|G:H|i=1ngi1Bgi is a separability element. The next theorem is a consequence of a theorem by Singh–Hanna in [32], which we show is also a consequence of Theorem 4.1.

Theorem 5.1

[32]

A separable finite group algebra extension AB has unique separability element eABA if and only if

References (33)

  • BurciuS. et al.

    Subgroups of depth three

    Surv. Differ. Geom.

    (2011)
  • BurciuS. et al.

    On subgroup depth

    I.E.J.A.

    (2011)
  • CaenepeelS. et al.

    Are biseparable extensions Frobenius?

    K-Theory

    (2001)
  • FritzscheT.

    The depth of subgroups of PSL(2,q)

    J. Algebra

    (2011)
  • GoodmanF.M. et al.
  • HirataK.

    Some types of separable extensions of rings

    Nagoya Math. J.

    (1968)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text