Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Response of a flat plate laminar separation bubble to Reynolds number, free-stream turbulence and adverse pressure gradient variation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An extensive data set describing separated flows with different Reynolds numbers (Re), free-stream turbulence intensities (Tu) and adverse pressure gradients (APG) is used for the statistical characterization of laminar separation bubbles (LSBs). Measurements were performed by means of time-resolved particle image velocimetry along a flat plate installed between two adjustable endwalls, providing a test matrix of 3 Re, 4 Tu levels and 4 APGs. In this paper, 22 flow conditions are considered, which are related to the occurrence of boundary layer separation for each combination of the flow parameters. Boundary layer integral parameters, the root mean square of velocity fluctuations and the intermittency function distributions were computed for each condition. The connections between the main quantities that are commonly adopted for the statistical characterization of separated flows are clearly highlighted, thus providing the description of a LSB by means of a reduced set of these parameters. Empirical correlations predicting the transition onset location as well as the main dimensions (i.e., length and height) describing the geometry of a LSB are included in this work. Proper orthogonal decomposition is also adopted for the statistical characterization of the shedding process developing as a consequence of the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. The frequency, wavelength and propagation velocity of the large-scale structures shed near the bubble maximum displacement are computed for each condition, showing the relation between the dominant shedding frequency and the average flow field at the separation position, and how these quantities are affected by Re, Tu and APG.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam M, Sandham N (2000) Direct numerical simulation of ’short’ laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment. J Fluid Mech 410:1–28

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Alessandri A, Bagnerini P, Gaggero M, Lengani D, Simoni D (2019) Dynamic mode decomposition for the inspection of three-regime separated transitional boundary layers using a least squares method. Phys Fluids 31(4):044103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutilier MS, Yarusevych S (2012) Parametric study of separation and transition characteristics over an airfoil at low reynolds numbers. Exp Fluids 52(6):1491–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgmann S, Schröder W (2008) Investigation of the vortex induced unsteadiness of a separation bubble via time-resolved and scanning PIV measurements. Exp Fluids 45:675–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgmann S, Brücker C, Schröder W (2006) Scanning PIV measurements of a laminar separation bubble. Exp Fluids 41:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellacasagrande M, Guida R, Lengani D, Simoni D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P (2019) Correlations for the prediction of intermittency and turbulent spot production rate in separated flows. J Turbomach 141(3):031003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diwan SS, Ramesh ON (2009) On the origin of the inflectional instability of a laminar separation bubble. J Fluid Mech 629:263–298

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fransson JH, Matsubara M, Alfredsson PH (2005) Transition induced by free-stream turbulence. J Fluid Mech 527:1–25

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gaster M (1967) The structure and behaviour of laminar separation bubbles. In: Technical report. Aeronautical Research Council

  • Hain R, Kähler CJ, Radespiel R (2009) Dynamics of laminar separation bubbles at low-Reynolds-number aerofoils. J Fluid Mech 630:129–153

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinverdi S, Fasel HF (2018) Role of klebanoff modes in active flow control of separation: direct numerical simulations. J Fluid Mech 850:954–983

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Istvan MS, Yarusevych S (2018) Effects of free-stream turbulence intensity on transition in a laminar separation bubble formed over an airfoil. Exp Fluids 59(3):52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istvan MS, Kurelek JW, Yarusevych S (2018) Turbulence intensity effects on laminar separation bubbles formed over an airfoil. AIAA J 56(4):1335–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob RG, Durbin PA (2001) Simulations of bypass transition. J Fluid Mech 428:185–212

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jones L, Sandberg R, Sandham N (2008) Direct numerical simulations of forced and unforced separation bubbles on an airfoil at incidence. J Fluid Mech 602:175–207

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jones L, Sandberg R, Sandham N (2010) Stability and receptivity characteristics of a laminar separation bubble on an aerofoil. J Fluid Mech 648:257–296

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Keane RD, Adrian RJ (1992) Theory of cross-correlation analysis of piv images. Appl Sci Res 49(3):191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lardeau S, Leschziner M, Zaki T (2012) Large eddy simulation of transitional separated flow over a flat plate and a compressor blade. Flow Turbul Combust 88:919–944

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lengani D, Simoni D (2015) Recognition of coherent structures in the boundary layer of a low-pressure-turbine blade for different free-stream turbulence intensity levels. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 54:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lengani D, Simoni D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P (2014) POD analysis of the unsteady behavior of a laminar separation bubble. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 58:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou W, Hourmouziadis J (2000) Separation bubbles under steady and periodic-unsteady main flow conditions. ASME J Turbomach 122:634–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marxen O, Lang M, Rist U, Wagner S (2003) A combined experimental/numerical study of unsteady phenomena in a laminar separation bubble. Flow Turbul Combust 71:133–146

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marxen O, Rist U, Henningson D (2006) Steady three-dimensional streaks and their optimal growth in a laminar separation bubble. In: New results in numerical and experimental fluid mechanics V. Springer, pp 233–240

  • Marxen O, Lang M, Rist U (2013) Vortex formation and vortex breakup in a laminar separation bubble. J Fluid Mech 728:58–90

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mayle RE (1991) The role of laminar-turbulent transition in gas turbine engines. J Turbomach 113:509–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuliffe BR, Yaras MI (2010) Transition mechanisms in separation bubbles under low- and elevated-freestream turbulence. J Turbomach 132:011004–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelis T, Kotsonis M, Yarusevych S (2018) Spanwise flow development within a laminar separation bubble under natural and forced transition. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 96:169–179

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ol MV, McAuliffe BR, Hanff ES, Scholz U (2005) Kähler C (2005) Comparison of laminar separation bubble measurements on a low Reynolds number airfoil in three facilities. AIAA Paper 5149(1)

  • Olson DA, Katz AW, Naguib AM, Koochesfahani MM, Rizzetta DP, Visbal MR (2013) On the challenges in experimental characterization of flow separation over airfoils at low Reynolds number. Exp Fluids 54(2):1470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts S, Yaras M (2003) Effects of periodic unsteadiness, free-stream turbulence, and flow reynolds number on separation-bubble transition. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2003, collocated with the 2003 international joint power generation conference.American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 745–759

  • Roberts SK, Yaras MI (2006) Large-eddy simulation of transition in a separation bubble. J Fluids Eng 128(2):232–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson A, Sarkar S (2016) Effects of free-stream turbulence on transition of a separated boundary layer over the leading-edge of a constant thickness airfoil. J Fluids Eng 138(2):021202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandham N (2008) Transitional separation bubbles and unsteady aspects of aerofoil stall. Aeronaut J 112(1133):395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sciacchitano A, Neal DR, Smith BL, Warner SO, Vlachos PP, Wieneke B, Scarano F (2015) Collaborative framework for PIV uncertainty quantification: comparative assessment of methods. Meas Sci Technol 26(7):074004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoni D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P, Lengani D, Bertini F (2012) An experimental investigation of the separated-flow transition under high-lift turbine blade pressure gradients. Flow Turbul Combust 88:45–62

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Simoni D, Lengani D, Guida R (2016a) A wavelet-based intermittency detection technique from PIV investigations in transitional boundary layers. Exp Fluids 57(9):145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoni D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P (2016b) A simplified model predicting the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability frequency for laminar separated flows. J Turbomach 138(4):044501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoni D, Lengani D, Ubaldi M, Zunino P, Dellacasagrande M (2017) Inspection of the dynamic properties of laminar separation bubbles: free-stream turbulence intensity effects for different Reynolds numbers. Exp Fluids 58(6):66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoni D, Lengani D, Dellacasagrande M, Kubacki S, Dick E (2019) An accurate data base on laminar-to-turbulent transition in variable pressure gradient flows. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 77:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirovich L (1987) Turbulence and the dynamics of coherent structures. Part I–III. Q Appl Math 45:561–590

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Suzen YB, Huang P, Hultgren LS, Ashpis DE (2003) Predictions of separated and transitional boundary layers under low-pressure turbine airfoil conditions using an intermittency transport equation. J Turbomach 125(3):455–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tani I (1964) Low-speed flows involving bubble separations. Progress Aerosp Sci 5:70–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volino RJ (2002a) Separated flow transition under simulated low-pressure turbine airfoil conditions: Part 1—mean flow and turbulence statistics. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2002: power for land, sea, and air.American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 691–702

  • Volino RJ (2002b) Separated flow transition under simulated low-pressure turbine airfoil conditions: Part 2—turbulence spectra. In: ASME Turbo Expo 2002: power for land, sea, and air.American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 703–712

  • Volino RJ, Hultgren LS (2000) Measurements in separated and transitional boundary layers under low-pressure turbine airfoil conditions. In: ASME, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2000-GT-0260. p V003T01A065

  • Watmuff JH (1999) Evolution of a wave packet into vortex loops in a laminar separation bubble. J Fluid Mech 397:119–169

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Westerweel J (2008) On velocity gradients in PIV interrogation. Exp Fluids 44(5):831–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieneke B (2015) PIV uncertainty quantification from correlation statistics. Meas Sci Technol 26(7):074002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z, Voke PR (2001) Large-eddy simulation of boundary-layer separation and transition at a change of surface curvature. J Fluid Mech 439:305–333

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yarusevych S, Kotsonis M (2017) Effect of local dbd plasma actuation on transition in a laminar separation bubble. Flow Turbul Combust 98(1):195–216

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yarusevych S, Kawall JG, Sullivan PE (2008) Separated-shear-layer development on an airfoil at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J 46:3060–3069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarusevych S, Sullivan PE, Kawall JG (2009) On vortex shedding from an airfoil in low-Reynolds-number flows. J Fluid Mech 632:245–271

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zaki T (2013) From streaks to spots and on to turbulence: exploring the dynamics of boundary layer transition. Flow Turbul Combust 91:451–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DIME - Università di Genova, Via Montallegro 1, 16145, Genoa, Italy

    Matteo Dellacasagrande, Dario Barsi, Davide Lengani, Daniele Simoni & Jacopo Verdoya

Authors
  1. Matteo Dellacasagrande
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dario Barsi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Davide Lengani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniele Simoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jacopo Verdoya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Dellacasagrande.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dellacasagrande, M., Barsi, D., Lengani, D. et al. Response of a flat plate laminar separation bubble to Reynolds number, free-stream turbulence and adverse pressure gradient variation. Exp Fluids 61, 128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-02958-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-020-02958-y

Search

Navigation